AI Solution Migration Between Cloud Providers

We design and deploy artificial intelligence systems: from prototype to production-ready solutions. Our team combines expertise in machine learning, data engineering and MLOps to make AI work not in the lab, but in real business.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1566 services
AI Solution Migration Between Cloud Providers
Medium
~1-2 weeks
FAQ
AI Development Areas
AI Solution Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1212
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    852
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    822

Migrating an AI solution between cloud providers

Migrating an AI workload between AWS, GCP, and Azure is a complex task: it requires transferring not only code and models, but also data, training infrastructure, inference services, and integrated managed services. Minimizing downtime and avoiding model quality degradation is crucial.

Typical reasons for migration

  • Cost optimization: the difference in the cost of GPU spot instances reaches 30-40%
  • Vendor lock-in reduction: reducing dependence on proprietary services
  • Compliance: data residency requirements
  • Performance: a specific cloud offers the best GPU (H100 is available from different providers at different times)

Pre-migration audit

Cloud-specific dependencies checklist:
□ Managed ML services (SageMaker / Vertex AI / Azure ML)
□ Data storage (S3 / GCS / Azure Blob)
□ Container registry (ECR / GCR / ACR)
□ Message queues (SQS+SNS / Pub/Sub / Event Hub)
□ Database services (RDS / Cloud SQL / Azure Database)
□ Secrets management (Secrets Manager / Secret Manager / Key Vault)
□ Monitoring (CloudWatch / Cloud Monitoring / Azure Monitor)
□ Networking (VPC, security groups, DNS)

Migration Strategy

Strangler Fig pattern - gradual replacement, not a big bang:

  1. Raise parallel infrastructure in a new cloud
  2. Transfer non-critical workload (batch training)
  3. Configure shadow deployment: inference in both clouds
  4. Gradually switch traffic (canary migration)
  5. Remove old infrastructure

Abstraction from cloud-specific API

# Cloud-agnostic storage abstraction
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod

class ObjectStorage(ABC):
    @abstractmethod
    def upload(self, local_path: str, remote_path: str): ...

    @abstractmethod
    def download(self, remote_path: str, local_path: str): ...

class S3Storage(ObjectStorage):
    def __init__(self, bucket: str, region: str = "us-east-1"):
        self.client = boto3.client('s3', region_name=region)
        self.bucket = bucket

    def upload(self, local_path: str, remote_path: str):
        self.client.upload_file(local_path, self.bucket, remote_path)

class GCSStorage(ObjectStorage):
    def __init__(self, bucket: str):
        self.client = storage.Client()
        self.bucket = self.client.bucket(bucket)

    def upload(self, local_path: str, remote_path: str):
        blob = self.bucket.blob(remote_path)
        blob.upload_from_filename(local_path)

# Переключение через конфиг
storage = S3Storage("my-bucket") if CLOUD == "aws" else GCSStorage("my-bucket")

Data transfer

# AWS S3 → GCS через Storage Transfer Service (Google)
gcloud transfer jobs create \
  --source-agent-pool=aws-pool \
  --aws-source-bucket=my-aws-bucket \
  --destination-bucket=my-gcs-bucket \
  --do-not-delete-from-source

# Для больших датасетов (>TB): gsutil -m rsync -r
gsutil -m rsync -r s3://source-bucket gs://dest-bucket

Post-migration testing

Mandatory check: reproducibility of model predictions—the same input data should produce identical results (taking stochasticity into account). A difference in the distribution of predictions between the old and new environments indicates reproducibility issues. Comparison of metrics on the holdout dataset should show a discrepancy of <0.1%.

Typical timeframe: 4-8 weeks for a full-scale AI platform with ML pipelines, Feature Store, and inference services.