AI Workforce Performance Monitoring System Development

We design and deploy artificial intelligence systems: from prototype to production-ready solutions. Our team combines expertise in machine learning, data engineering and MLOps to make AI work not in the lab, but in real business.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1566 services
AI Workforce Performance Monitoring System Development
Medium
from 1 week to 3 months
FAQ
AI Development Areas
AI Solution Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1212
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    852
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    822

Development of an AI system for monitoring the performance of AI agents

AI agent performance monitoring is the systematic monitoring of the quality, speed, and reliability of AI workers in production. It differs from monitoring regular services: quality metrics (accuracy, relevance) are more important than latency metrics.

AI agent performance metrics

Three groups of metrics:

Technical metrics: latency (p50/p95/p99), throughput (tasks/hour), error rate, availability, cost per task (tokens × price).

Qualitative metrics: task completion rate (the proportion of tasks successfully completed), accuracy (the correctness of the result), hallucination rate, human override rate (how often a human corrects the agent).

Business metrics: ROI (hours saved x rate), customer satisfaction (if agent interacts with clients), SLA compliance.

Metrics collection system

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime
import uuid

@dataclass
class AgentTaskMetrics:
    task_id: str = field(default_factory=lambda: str(uuid.uuid4()))
    agent_id: str = ""
    task_type: str = ""
    started_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow)
    completed_at: datetime | None = None

    # Технические
    latency_ms: float | None = None
    input_tokens: int = 0
    output_tokens: int = 0
    cost_usd: float = 0.0
    retries: int = 0

    # Качественные (заполняются post-hoc или авто-eval)
    task_completed: bool | None = None
    quality_score: float | None = None      # 0-1, авто-eval или human
    human_override: bool = False
    error_type: str | None = None

class AgentMonitor:
    def __init__(self, metrics_backend: MetricsBackend):
        self.backend = metrics_backend

    def track_task(self, agent_id: str, task_type: str):
        """Context manager для трекинга задачи."""
        return AgentTaskTracker(agent_id, task_type, self.backend)

class AgentTaskTracker:
    def __enter__(self) -> AgentTaskMetrics:
        self.metrics = AgentTaskMetrics(agent_id=self.agent_id, task_type=self.task_type)
        return self.metrics

    def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb):
        self.metrics.completed_at = datetime.utcnow()
        self.metrics.latency_ms = (
            self.metrics.completed_at - self.metrics.started_at
        ).total_seconds() * 1000
        if exc_type:
            self.metrics.error_type = exc_type.__name__
        self.backend.record(self.metrics)

Automatic quality assessment

For most agent tasks, human verification of each result is impossible. Auto-eval:

def auto_evaluate_task(task: AgentTask, result: AgentResult) -> float:
    """Оценка качества результата через LLM-судью."""
    eval_prompt = f"""Оцени качество выполнения задачи агентом.

Задача: {task.description}
Ожидаемый результат: {task.expected_outcome}
Фактический результат: {result.output}

Оцени от 0 до 1, где:
1.0 — задача выполнена полностью и корректно
0.5 — частичное выполнение или незначительные ошибки
0.0 — задача не выполнена или критические ошибки

Ответь только числом."""

    score = float(eval_llm.generate(eval_prompt, max_tokens=10).strip())
    return min(max(score, 0.0), 1.0)

Agent Monitoring Dashboard

Key panels: SLA compliance (% of tasks within the SLA), quality by task type, cost dynamics (price increase = token increase or increase in errors with retry), human override rate (trend: if it increases, the agent is degrading), error taxonomy.

Degradation alerts

class DegradationDetector:
    def check(self, metrics: AgentMetricsSummary) -> list[Alert]:
        alerts = []

        if metrics.error_rate_7d > metrics.error_rate_30d * 1.5:
            alerts.append(Alert(
                severity="warning",
                message=f"Error rate grew by {metrics.error_rate_7d/metrics.error_rate_30d:.1f}x over 7 days"
            ))

        if metrics.avg_quality_score_7d < metrics.avg_quality_score_30d - 0.1:
            alerts.append(Alert(
                severity="warning",
                message=f"Quality score dropped from {metrics.avg_quality_score_30d:.2f} to {metrics.avg_quality_score_7d:.2f}"
            ))

        if metrics.human_override_rate_7d > 0.15:  # > 15% задач переделываются
            alerts.append(Alert(
                severity="critical",
                message=f"Human override rate too high: {metrics.human_override_rate_7d:.1%}"
            ))

        return alerts