Chain Abstraction System Development

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1306 services
Chain Abstraction System Development
Complex
from 2 weeks to 3 months
FAQ
Blockchain Development Services
Blockchain Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1214
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    852
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    823

Chain Abstraction System Development

Multi-chain reality creates UX nightmare: user has ETH on Ethereum, wants to pay on Base, app deployed on Arbitrum. Three steps: bridge ETH to Base, swap for needed token, bridge to Arbitrum. Each step — separate wait, separate gas, separate risk.

Chain abstraction — user and app stop thinking about chains. User sees unified balance, signs one operation, system handles routing, bridging, execution. Near Protocol pushes this term, but implementations appear everywhere: NEAR Chain Signatures, Socket Protocol, Particle Network, Agoric Orchestration.

Components

1. Unified Account Layer

User has one identifier working on all chains. Options:

ERC-4337 Smart Account + cross-chain ownership. Same address on each chain (CREATE2 with identical salt), one owner.

NEAR Chain Signatures (MPC). NEAR account signs transactions for any external chain. MPC nodes generate signature for target.

Particle Network. Combines AA and MPC: master account through MPC, deployable on any EVM via universal AA.

2. Intent Layer

Instead of explicit transactions, user expresses intent:

interface CrossChainIntent {
    from: { chain: 'ethereum', asset: 'ETH', amount: '1.5' }
    to: { chain: 'arbitrum', asset: 'USDC', minAmount: '5000' }
    deadline: number
}

Intent routing engine finds optimal path and executes.

3. Solver / Filler Network

Solvers compete for execution. Solver takes intent, provides tokens immediately from own balance, later reconciles through bridge. User gets tokens in seconds, not 15 minutes.

4. Cross-Chain Messaging for Proof

Solver needs proof of fill on source chain to get reimbursement. Requires messaging: Wormhole, LayerZero, Hyperlane.

SDKs and Solutions

Socket Protocol / Bungee — meta-router aggregating 10+ bridges and DEX protocols.

Li.Fi SDK — aggregates bridges/DEX with ERC-4337 support.

Hyperlane — build custom messaging with own ISM configuration.

Unified Balance View

Frontend aggregates balances from all chains:

async function getUnifiedBalance(address: string, asset: string): Promise<UnifiedBalance> {
    const chains = [1, 42161, 8453, 10, 137]
    const balances = await Promise.all(
        chains.map(chainId => fetchBalance(address, asset, chainId))
    )
    return {
        asset,
        totalBalance: balances.reduce((sum, b) => sum + b.balance, 0n),
        chains: chains.map((chainId, i) => ({...}))
    }
}

Gas Abstraction

User doesn't need nativetoken on target chain. Options:

Paymaster sponsorship — Paymaster covers gas.

Gas in bridge — small native token airdrop on bridge.

ERC-20 gas payment — user pays in USDC even without ETH.

Monitoring and UX

Cross-chain operations take seconds to hours. User needs clear status: Initiating → Source TX confirmed → Bridge in progress → Destination TX confirmed.

Stack: Li.Fi/Socket SDK for routing, Hyperlane/Wormhole for messaging, ERC-4337 for accounts, Paymaster for gas, wagmi v2 + viem for frontend.

Timelines: Li.Fi/Socket SDK without custom contracts — 4-6 weeks. Full custom solver — 3-5 months.