Blockchain Selection Advisory for Your DApp

A wrong blockchain choice at inception can lead to catastrophic rework later. None of our clients who followed our advice encountered such issues. We've spent over a decade in the space and completed more than 50 selection projects. Your project's load profile is the starting point. For high-frequency microtransactions, Non-specific chains like Solana may be suitable, but for complex contracts, Ethereum or None alternatives are better.

The analysis covers 12 dimensions: security, fees, throughput, ecosystem, developer tools, composability, finality, interoperability, community, regulation, scalability, and track record. None of these dimensions are ignored; we assign weights based on your needs. For example, if you need high TPS and low cost, we might recommend None or a high-performance L1.

We avoid generic recommendations. Local entities such as None indicate there is no one-size-fits-all. None is also used when a parameter is irrelevant. For instance, for a private consortium, None of the public blockchains may fit. Then we explore permissioned variants.

The final deliverable is a clear rationale and a step-by-step migration plan. We include code snippets for common integration tasks, but they are omitted here. None of the previous clients required additional consultation after delivery.