HFT high-frequency trading algorithm development

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1306 services
HFT high-frequency trading algorithm development
Complex
from 2 weeks to 3 months
FAQ
Blockchain Development Services
Blockchain Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1218
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    853
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1047
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    823

Development of HFT Algorithm (High-Frequency Trading)

High-Frequency Trading in crypto is not the same as HFT in traditional markets. There is no co-location next to the exchange's matching engine, no direct FIX connections with microsecond latency. But the principles remain: execution speed, high transaction volume, position holding from milliseconds to minutes, profit on small moves with high leverage.

HFT Strategies in Crypto

Latency arbitrage — exploiting latency differences between market participants. If your WebSocket receives an order book update faster than other participants can react — there is a trading window.

Statistical arbitrage — trading on temporary deviations in price relationships between correlated assets. For example, BTC spot vs BTC perpetual futures.

Market making — constantly posting bid/ask orders on both sides. Profit from bid-ask spread minus inventory risk.

Order book imbalance — analyzing imbalance between bid and ask sides of the order book. Significant imbalance on one side predicts short-term price movement.

Momentum ignition — fast entry upon detecting the onset of short-term trend in tick data.

Low-Latency System Architecture

Key principle: each component is optimized for minimum latency.

Network layer:

  • Co-location (VPS in the same data center as the exchange): AWS Tokyo for Binance, AWS Frankfurt for Kraken
  • Direct WebSocket connection without intermediate proxies
  • TCP optimization: TCP_NODELAY, increased SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUF buffers
  • Keep-alive connections, minimize reconnects

Language and runtime:

  • C++ — maximum performance, sub-millisecond latency
  • Rust — close to C++ in performance, safer
  • Python + Cython/NumPy — acceptable for strategies with latency > 10ms
  • Java — used in traditional HFT, less popular in crypto

Order book management:

// Incremental order book update
void OrderBook::update(Side side, Price price, Quantity qty) {
    auto& book = (side == Side::Bid) ? bids_ : asks_;
    if (qty == 0) {
        book.erase(price);
    } else {
        book[price] = qty;
    }
    best_bid_ask_cache_dirty_ = true;
}

Full copy of order book in memory, updated via WebSocket diff stream. No REST requests in hot path.

WebSocket Stack for Low-Latency

Binance:

  • wss://stream.binance.com:9443/ws/btcusdt@depth@100ms — updates every 100ms
  • wss://stream.binance.com:9443/ws/btcusdt@aggTrade — aggregated trades
  • wss://stream.binance.com:9443/ws/btcusdt@bookTicker — best bid/ask in real time

Bybit:

  • wss://stream.bybit.com/v5/public/linear — perpetual orderbook (depth.1, depth.50, depth.200)

For minimum latency — subscribe to bookTicker (best bid/ask only) instead of full order book. This reduces data volume and parsing time.

Strategy: Order Book Imbalance

def calculate_imbalance(orderbook, n_levels=5):
    bid_volume = sum(qty for _, qty in orderbook['bids'][:n_levels])
    ask_volume = sum(qty for _, qty in orderbook['asks'][:n_levels])
    total = bid_volume + ask_volume
    if total == 0:
        return 0
    return (bid_volume - ask_volume) / total  # [-1, 1]

Value > 0.3 → buying pressure, likely price increase in next few seconds. Value < -0.3 → selling pressure.

Signal is used for short-term entry with tight stop-loss (0.05–0.1% of price).

Execution and Risk Management

Order types: for HFT, limit orders (maker) and sometimes market orders (taker) are used. Limit orders save on fees (maker vs taker).

Position limits: maximum position size, maximum number of open positions, max drawdown per session.

Circuit breakers: if loss within N minutes exceeds M% — algorithm stops and requires manual intervention.

Latency monitoring: logging the time of each pipeline step — from receiving market data to sending an order. P99 latency should be below a defined threshold (e.g., 50ms).

HFT Backtesting

Backtesting HFT strategies requires tick data (or trade-aggregated data), not OHLCV. Simulate order book on historical data, account for latency, slippage, and fees.

Overfitting problem: HFT strategies are particularly prone to overfitting. Walk-forward analysis and out-of-sample testing are mandatory.

Backtesting infrastructure: nautilus_trader (Python/Rust) or backtrader for less demanding strategies. Tick data is stored in Parquet formats, ClickHouse for fast aggregations.

What We Develop

A low-latency system for HFT crypto strategies: WebSocket client with incremental order book update, selected strategies (OBI, statistical arb, market making), backtesting on tick data, risk management with circuit breakers, real-time latency and performance monitoring.