Tick-Data Pipeline Development for ML

We develop tick-data processing pipelines — recording every trade with price, volume, and side. Standard OHLCV candles lose market microstructure: liquidity imbalance, large trades, buy/sell flow. Without a quality pipeline, an ML model trains on noise. For example, in one project for Binance (from

Blockchain Development Services

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1452
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1309
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    1005
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1270
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    719
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1012

We develop tick-data processing pipelines — recording every trade with price, volume, and side. Standard OHLCV candles lose market microstructure: liquidity imbalance, large trades, buy/sell flow. Without a quality pipeline, an ML model trains on noise. For example, in one project for Binance (from our practice), the load reached 300,000 ticks per second — ClickHouse handled it, while PostgreSQL crashed at 10,000. Our over five years of experience guarantees reliability. Contact us — we are ready to design and implement a pipeline for your tasks.

Why Tick Data Matters More Than OHLCV for ML

When aggregating into 1-minute candles, up to 80% of information is lost: you do not see how trades are distributed within the interval, whether there was a volume spike, or who was the aggressor. Volume bars, dollar bars, and imbalance bars preserve these signals. ML models trained on ticks show 15–20% higher accuracy in price direction prediction tasks.

Problems We Solve

  • High loads. Exchanges generate up to 500,000 ticks per second. Standard databases cannot handle such insertion rates.
  • Latency. For HFT strategies, the delay from tick receipt to signal must not exceed 10 ms.
  • Storage. Tick data for a year amounts to tens of terabytes. Partitioning, TTL, and efficient compression are necessary. ClickHouse infrastructure savings can reach 50% compared to traditional relational databases.
  • Bar diversity. Time bars are uneven during low activity periods. Volume/dollar/imbalance bars adapt to market activity.

How We Do It: Stack and Case Study

In one project for Binance (from our practice), we built a pipeline that collects aggregated trades via WebSocket, buffers them in memory, and asynchronously inserts into ClickHouse.

import asyncio import websockets import json from datetime import datetime import asyncpg class TickDataCollector: def __init__(self, symbol, db_pool): self.symbol = symbol self.db_pool = db_pool self.buffer = [] self.buffer_size = 1000 async def connect_binance_trades(self): url = f"wss://stream.binance.com:9443/ws/{self.symbol.lower()}@aggTrade" async with websockets.connect(url, ping_interval=20) as ws: async for msg in ws: trade = json.loads(msg) tick = { 'symbol': self.symbol, 'timestamp': datetime.fromtimestamp(trade['T'] / 1000), 'price': float(trade['p']), 'quantity': float(trade['q']), 'is_buyer_maker': trade['m'], 'trade_id': trade['a'] } self.buffer.append(tick) if len(self.buffer) >= self.buffer_size: await self.flush_to_db() async def flush_to_db(self): async with self.db_pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.executemany( """INSERT INTO trades (symbol, timestamp, price, quantity, is_buyer_maker, trade_id) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6)""", [(t['symbol'], t['timestamp'], t['price'], t['quantity'], t['is_buyer_maker'], t['trade_id']) for t in self.buffer] ) self.buffer.clear() 

Storage is organized in ClickHouse with the MergeTree engine, daily partitioning, and a TTL of 365 days. This provides efficient compression (10x compared to CSV) and high insertion speed.

CREATE TABLE trades ( timestamp DateTime64(3), symbol LowCardinality(String), price Float64, quantity Float32, is_buyer_maker UInt8, trade_id UInt64 ) ENGINE = MergeTree() PARTITION BY toYYYYMMDD(timestamp) ORDER BY (symbol, timestamp) TTL timestamp + INTERVAL 365 DAY SETTINGS index_granularity = 8192; 

ClickHouse inserts 500K+ rows/sec — 50 times faster than PostgreSQL for such loads. Monthly aggregations complete in seconds. We guarantee your pipeline will handle any market activity.

How to Build Volume Bars from Ticks: Step by Step

  1. Connect to the exchange WebSocket to receive aggregated trades.
  2. Accumulate ticks in a buffer (e.g., 1000 records).
  3. When the specified volume is reached, close the bar and save it to ClickHouse.
  4. Use the create_volume_bars function from the example below.

Volume bars close when a given volume accumulates, not at a fixed time interval. This yields a uniform number of observations regardless of market activity.

def create_volume_bars(ticks_df, bar_volume=10): """Each bar = bar_volume units of the asset""" bars = [] current_bar = {'open': None, 'high': -np.inf, 'low': np.inf, 'close': None, 'volume': 0, 'start_time': None} for _, tick in ticks_df.iterrows(): if current_bar['open'] is None: current_bar['open'] = tick['price'] current_bar['start_time'] = tick['timestamp'] current_bar['high'] = max(current_bar['high'], tick['price']) current_bar['low'] = min(current_bar['low'], tick['price']) current_bar['close'] = tick['price'] current_bar['volume'] += tick['quantity'] if current_bar['volume'] >= bar_volume: bars.append(current_bar.copy()) current_bar = {'open': None, 'high': -np.inf, 'low': np.inf, 'close': None, 'volume': 0, 'start_time': None} return pd.DataFrame(bars) 

Similarly, dollar bars (by USD volume) and imbalance bars (by buy/sell imbalance) are constructed.

Bar Type Closing Criterion When to Use
Time Time interval High liquidity, uniform activity
Volume Accumulated volume Adapt to volatility spikes
Dollar Accumulated USD volume Invariant to asset price
Imbalance Buy/sell imbalance Find reversal points

What Benefits Does Tick Feature Engineering Provide?

Features extracted from ticks improve ML model quality: flow imbalance, trade frequency, VWAP deviation, large trade ratio. In a real-time streaming ML pipeline, these features are calculated on sliding windows.

def create_tick_features(ticks_df, window_ticks=[50, 200, 1000]): features = [] for i in range(max(window_ticks), len(ticks_df)): row_features = {} for window in window_ticks: window_data = ticks_df.iloc[i-window:i] buy_vol = window_data[~window_data['is_buyer_maker']]['quantity'].sum() sell_vol = window_data[window_data['is_buyer_maker']]['quantity'].sum() row_features[f'flow_imbalance_{window}'] = ( (buy_vol - sell_vol) / (buy_vol + sell_vol + 1e-8) ) row_features[f'trade_frequency_{window}'] = ( window / (window_data['timestamp'].max() - window_data['timestamp'].min()).total_seconds() + 1e-8 ) row_features[f'avg_trade_size_{window}'] = window_data['quantity'].mean() row_features[f'large_trade_ratio_{window}'] = ( (window_data['quantity'] > window_data['quantity'].quantile(0.9)).mean() ) vwap = (window_data['price'] * window_data['quantity']).sum() / window_data['quantity'].sum() row_features[f'vwap_deviation_{window}'] = ( ticks_df.iloc[i]['price'] - vwap ) / vwap features.append(row_features) return pd.DataFrame(features) 

Large trades (above the 99th percentile) often indicate institutional activity. Analyzing their direction provides an additional signal.

How to Ensure Latency <10 ms?

Real streaming architecture:

Binance WebSocket → asyncio consumer → buffer → ClickHouse batch insert → Redis sorted set (last 10k ticks) → Feature calculator (sliding window) → ML inference → Signal output 

Latency from tick to signal is under 10 ms. Achieved through asynchronous I/O, Redis buffering, and precomputed features on time windows. Savings on ClickHouse cluster compared to traditional databases can reach 50%.

According to ClickHouse documentation, insertion speed reaches 500,000 rows per second ClickHouse Documentation.

Process of Work

Stage Duration Outcome
Analytics 1–2 days Requirements document and data schema
Design 2–3 days Stack selection, DB schema design, bar type definition
Implementation 1–2 weeks Collector, aggregators, feature engineering, ML pipeline integration
Testing 3–5 days Validation on historical data, speed stress test
Deployment 2–3 days Deployment in your cluster (Docker/K8s), monitoring

Timeline and Deliverables

Base version (single symbol, ClickHouse, Redis) — from 2 weeks. Full pipeline with volume/dollar/imbalance bars, feature engineering, and real-time inference — from 4 weeks. Project cost varies; exact pricing is determined after analysis. Investment in a quality pipeline pays off through improved ML model accuracy for trading.

What is included:

  • Architecture documentation.
  • Pipeline source code with comments.
  • ClickHouse, Redis, and queue setup.
  • Integration with your ML infrastructure.
  • Team training (2–3 calls).
  • 2 months of support after deployment.
Checklist for Pipeline Verification
  • Check insertion speed: ClickHouse must insert at least 100K rows/sec on a single core.
  • Ensure TTL is set — without it, the disk fills up within a month.
  • Set up latency monitoring for each stage.
  • Test automatic WebSocket reconnection on disconnect.
  • Validate aggregations on historical data — compare with reference bars.

Common Mistakes

  • Too fine partitioning (by hour): large number of partitions degrades ClickHouse performance. Optimal is by day.
  • Ignoring TTL: without automatic data cleanup, the disk fills up within a month.
  • Using time bars for low-liquidity assets: most candles will be empty.

We have been developing turnkey tick-data pipelines for over five years, implementing 30+ projects for crypto trading. Get a free analysis of your data and recommendations for pipeline optimization. Contact us — we will evaluate your project and propose the best solution.