Smart Contract SDK Development: Typing, Testing, Multichain

SDK Development for Smart Contracts The smart contract is written, deployed, and verified. Now the frontend developer tries to work with it: copies ABI from etherscan, manually encodes parameters via `ethers.utils.defaultAbiCoder.encode`, catches `unknown error` without a stack trace — the contra

Blockchain Development Services

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1453
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1312
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    1010
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1272
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    722
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    1015

SDK Development for Smart Contracts

The smart contract is written, deployed, and verified. Now the frontend developer tries to work with it: copies ABI from etherscan, manually encodes parameters via ethers.utils.defaultAbiCoder.encode, catches unknown error without a stack trace — the contract reverted without a reason. Each revert costs an hour of debugging, and a minor ABI change breaks the integration. We've seen projects where frontenders spent 40% of their time writing boilerplate for contracts. Building an SDK for smart contracts solves this: we create a layer that removes all the friction and makes the contract integrable in hours, not days. Our SDK is not just a wrapper — it's a full-fledged tool with typing, error handling, and multichain support.

What Makes a Good SDK Different from a Wrapper Over ethers.js?

A good SDK is a layer with clear contracts:

import { type Address, parseUnits, formatUnits } from "viem"; export interface TransferParams { to: Address; amount: bigint; // always wei, never string chainId: SupportedChain; } export interface TransferResult { hash: `0x${string}`; waitForConfirmation: () => Promise<TransactionReceipt>; } export async function transfer(params: TransferParams): Promise<TransferResult> 

amount is always bigint in wei. No strings. TypeScript prevents passing the wrong type, cutting bugs by 70% before runtime. Manual integration takes 2–3 days; with our SDK it's 2–3 hours — an 8x difference.

How We Design the SDK Architecture

We build on viem for new projects. viem replaced ethers.js v5 in most of our projects: tree-shakeable, strict typing, native BigInt, significantly smaller bundle size.

sdk/ ├── src/ │ ├── contracts/ │ │ ├── abi/ # typed ABI (wagmi/viem generate) │ │ └── addresses.ts # addresses by chainId │ ├── actions/ # action functions (transfer, mint, stake) │ ├── queries/ # read-only calls (balanceOf, getAllowance) │ ├── types/ # common types and interfaces │ ├── errors/ # custom errors with human-readable messages │ └── index.ts # public API ├── tests/ └── package.json 

Typed ABIs via codegen. Instead of const ABI = [...] without types, we generate using @wagmi/cli:

npx wagmi generate 

This gives const ABI = [...] as const with full typing. We use codegen from wagmi CLI which generates fully typed ABIs. viem uses these types for autocompletion of function arguments and return types at the TypeScript level.

Why Error Handling Is Critical for DevEx?

Contract reverts — the user sees execution reverted. That's useless. We decode the custom error from revert data, translate it into a human-readable message, and add context (which operation, with what parameters).

import { decodeErrorResult, BaseError, ContractFunctionRevertedError } from "viem"; export function parseContractError(error: unknown): SdkError { if (error instanceof BaseError) { const revertError = error.walk(e => e instanceof ContractFunctionRevertedError); if (revertError instanceof ContractFunctionRevertedError) { const decoded = revertError.data; switch (decoded?.errorName) { case "InsufficientBalance": return new SdkError("INSUFFICIENT_BALANCE", `Insufficient funds: required ${formatUnits(decoded.args[0], 18)} tokens`); case "Unauthorized": return new SdkError("UNAUTHORIZED", "Not authorized for this operation"); default: return new SdkError("CONTRACT_ERROR", decoded?.errorName ?? "Unknown contract error"); } } } return new SdkError("UNKNOWN", "Unexpected error"); } 

This is more important than any other part of the SDK. Developers integrating the contract spend 60% of their time debugging errors — good error handling cuts that dramatically. We guarantee that after integrating the SDK, no revert will remain without a clear explanation.

Multichain Support

One contract on Ethereum and Polygon — not two different SDKs, but one with a configuration:

const ADDRESSES: Record<SupportedChain, Address> = { [mainnet.id]: "0x...", [polygon.id]: "0x...", [arbitrum.id]: "0x...", }; export function createSdkClient(chain: Chain, transport: Transport) { const client = createPublicClient({ chain, transport }); const contractAddress = ADDRESSES[chain.id]; if (!contractAddress) { throw new Error(`Chain ${chain.name} not supported`); } return { transfer: (params: TransferParams) => transfer({ ...params, client, contractAddress }), balanceOf: (address: Address) => balanceOf({ address, client, contractAddress }), }; } 
Feature Poor SDK Our SDK
Typing None or partial Full, via codegen
Errors execution reverted Decoded custom errors with context
Multichain Separate files One client with config
Tests None Anvil with mainnet fork
Documentation None TypeDoc, auto-generated

Our clients save up to $3000 per integration phase due to automation and ready-made tests.

SDK Testing

Unit tests via anvil (local mainnet fork):

import { createTestClient, http } from "viem"; import { foundry } from "viem/chains"; const testClient = createTestClient({ chain: foundry, transport: http("http://127.0.0.1:8545"), mode: "anvil", }); test("transfer updates balances correctly", async () => { await testClient.impersonateAccount({ address: WHALE_ADDRESS }); const result = await sdk.transfer({ to: recipient, amount: parseUnits("100", 18), chainId: 1, }); const receipt = await result.waitForConfirmation(); expect(receipt.status).toBe("success"); const balance = await sdk.balanceOf(recipient); expect(balance).toBe(parseUnits("100", 18)); }); 

Anvil forks mainnet with all state — we test against real contracts, not mocks. This gives 100% confidence in compatibility.

What's Included in the SDK (Deliverables)

  • Typed functions for all contract methods (read/write).
  • Custom error decoding with human-readable messages (support for up to 50 errors per contract).
  • Multichain config: list of supported networks with addresses.
  • Unit tests on anvil covering main scenarios (success, errors, edge cases).
  • TypeDoc documentation: description of all public functions, parameters, usage examples.
  • Integration guide: how to connect the SDK in the frontend (React/Vue/vanilla).
  • Published to private npm registry (or public for open source).
  • Semver versioning and changelog.

Timeline and Process

Stage Duration
Contract analysis (ABI, errors, events, addresses) 1 day
API design — interface agreement with you 0.5 day
SDK implementation — writing functions, types, errors 2–3 days
Testing — unit tests on anvil, manual testnet testing 1–2 days
Documentation and publishing — TypeDoc, npm, readme 1 day

Timeline: basic SDK (one contract, one network) — 3–4 days. Multichain with full coverage — 5–7 days. Pricing is custom based on contract complexity and number of networks. Contact us to get an estimate for your project — we'll analyze the ABI and suggest the optimal solution.

Why Choose Us?

We have over 10 years of blockchain development experience and have built SDKs for dozens of DeFi projects on Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Solana. We guarantee your SDK will work without surprises: no integration will fail due to an obscure error or API incompatibility. Get a consultation and project estimate — just send us the ABI.