Automated Wallet Management for Airdrop Farming

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 1 of 1All 1305 services
Automated Wallet Management for Airdrop Farming
Complex
~1-2 weeks
Frequently Asked Questions

Blockchain Development Services

Blockchain Development Stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1357
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_logo-advance_0.webp
    B2B Advance company logo design
    646
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929

Automated Wallet Management for Airdrop Farming

Airdrop farming requires managing hundreds of wallets, executing systematic on-chain transactions, and interacting with dozens of protocols simultaneously. Manual management of hundreds of wallets takes hundreds of hours per month and inevitably leads to errors: missed transactions, suboptimal gas, and pattern correlation that triggers sybil bans. Our team has over 5 years of experience in DeFi automation and has successfully completed more than 50 projects in this space. An automation system is a must-have tool for any serious farmer. Contact us to discuss your tasks and get a custom automation project.

What Professional Airdrop Farming Entails

Analysis of major airdrop campaigns (Arbitrum, Optimism, ZkSync, LayerZero, EigenLayer) reveals the patterns that were rewarded: regular activity over many months, diverse protocol usage, native transactions (not just bridging), token holding, and governance participation. The system must automate precisely these patterns while maintaining organic-looking activity.

System Architecture

Wallet Hierarchy

A professional farmer works with multiple key levels:

  • Master wallet — cold wallet (Ledger/Trezor or air-gapped machine). Holds the main capital. Never used directly in protocols.
  • Fund wallets (2-5) — intermediate wallets for fund distribution. Receive ETH/USDC from master, distribute to farming wallets.
  • Farming wallets (50-500) — working wallets that directly interact with protocols. Each generated as a separate HD path from one or more seed phrases.
Master Wallet
    ↓ (manual transfers)
Fund Wallets [1-5]
    ↓ (automated distribution)
Worker Wallets [50-500]
    ↓ (automated interactions)
DeFi Protocols

Important: farming wallets must not have direct on-chain links to the master wallet. The chain fund wallet → worker wallet with varying time intervals reduces correlation.

Key Generation and Storage

All worker wallets are generated deterministically from mnemonic phrases according to BIP44:

import { HDNodeWallet, Mnemonic } from "ethers";

function generateFarmingWallets(
  mnemonic: string,
  count: number,
  startIndex: number = 0
): WalletInfo[] {
  const masterNode = HDNodeWallet.fromMnemonic(
    Mnemonic.fromPhrase(mnemonic)
  ).derivePath("m/44'/60'/0'/0");
  
  return Array.from({ length: count }, (_, i) => {
    const wallet = masterNode.deriveChild(startIndex + i);
    return {
      index: startIndex + i,
      address: wallet.address,
      privateKey: wallet.privateKey,
      derivationPath: `m/44'/60'/0'/0/${startIndex + i}`,
    };
  });
}

Key storage: never store private keys in plaintext. Options include AES-256-GCM encryption with a password (KDF: Argon2id), storing only the seed phrase + on-demand derivation, or using HashiCorp Vault for team use.

Wallet and Activity Database

CREATE TABLE wallets (
    id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    address VARCHAR(42) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
    derivation_path VARCHAR(64),
    wallet_group VARCHAR(64),
    created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(),
    last_active_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
    total_gas_spent NUMERIC(30, 18) DEFAULT 0,
    notes TEXT,
    tags TEXT[]
);

CREATE TABLE protocol_interactions (
    id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    wallet_id INTEGER REFERENCES wallets(id),
    protocol VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL,
    chain_id INTEGER NOT NULL,
    tx_hash VARCHAR(66),
    action_type VARCHAR(64),
    amount NUMERIC(30, 18),
    gas_used NUMERIC(30, 18),
    executed_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(),
    status VARCHAR(16) DEFAULT 'pending',
    metadata JSONB
);

CREATE TABLE farming_tasks (
    id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    wallet_id INTEGER REFERENCES wallets(id),
    task_type VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL,
    protocol VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL,
    chain_id INTEGER NOT NULL,
    parameters JSONB NOT NULL,
    scheduled_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
    executed_at TIMESTAMPTZ,
    status VARCHAR(16) DEFAULT 'pending',
    retry_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,
    error_message TEXT
);

How We Automate Interactions

Task Runner

The task execution system mimics human behavior: random delays between transactions, varying times of day, different gas prices.

class FarmingTaskRunner {
  async executeTask(task: FarmingTask): Promise<TxReceipt> {
    const wallet = await this.walletManager.getWallet(task.walletId);
    const provider = this.getProvider(task.chainId);
    
    // Случайная задержка 30с - 5 мин перед транзакцией
    const delay = randomBetween(30_000, 300_000);
    await sleep(delay);
    
    // Случайное изменение gas price в пределах ±10%
    const gasPrice = await this.getGasWithVariance(provider, 0.1);
    
    const handler = this.handlers.get(task.taskType);
    if (!handler) throw new Error(`Unknown task type: ${task.taskType}`);
    
    return handler.execute(wallet, task.parameters, { gasPrice });
  }
  
  private async getGasWithVariance(provider: Provider, variance: number) {
    const feeData = await provider.getFeeData();
    const base = feeData.maxFeePerGas!;
    const multiplier = 1 + (Math.random() * 2 - 1) * variance;
    return base * BigInt(Math.round(multiplier * 100)) / 100n;
  }
}

Protocol Handlers

Each protocol has its own handler. Example for Uniswap V3:

class UniswapV3SwapHandler implements ProtocolHandler {
  async execute(
    wallet: Wallet,
    params: SwapParams,
    options: ExecutionOptions
  ): Promise<TxReceipt> {
    const router = new Contract(UNISWAP_V3_ROUTER, ROUTER_ABI, wallet);
    
    const deadline = Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 1800; // 30 мин
    
    const tx = await router.exactInputSingle({
      tokenIn: params.tokenIn,
      tokenOut: params.tokenOut,
      fee: params.fee,
      recipient: wallet.address,
      deadline,
      amountIn: params.amountIn,
      amountOutMinimum: params.minAmountOut,
      sqrtPriceLimitX96: 0,
    }, {
      maxFeePerGas: options.gasPrice,
      maxPriorityFeePerGas: options.maxPriorityFeePerGas,
    });
    
    return tx.wait();
  }
}

Similar handlers are created for Curve, AAVE, GMX, Stargate, Wormhole/LayerZero bridge, Pendle, and other protocols.

How We Protect Against Sybil Detection

Modern airdrop systems actively combat sybil attacks. We account for several factors:

  • Activity uniqueness. Patterns are not copied between wallets: different amounts, different protocols, different timing patterns.
  • IP rotation: each wallet operates through a separate proxy/VPN. A shared IP is a strong sybil signal.
  • Source of funds: the funding chain should not be traceable to a single source. CEX withdrawals to different wallets are good; direct transfers are bad.
  • Wallet age: older wallets are valued more. The system creates wallets ahead of time and gives them a history before the target deadline.

According to Nansen analytics, IP address correlation is one of the main factors in sybil detection in major airdrop campaigns.

Monitoring and Analytics

For each wallet, the system shows: on-chain activity by protocol (with dates), gas spent (in USD), current positions, score based on known metrics (volume, transaction count, unique protocols, days active), and current balance across chains. The system automatically calculates an estimated airdrop score for each tracked project and provides recommendations.

Example of airdrop score calculation Score may include weighted metrics: volume (35%), transaction count (25%), unique protocols (20%), days active (20%). Weights are customizable per project.

Why Gas Optimization Is Critical

With 200 wallets making 3–5 transactions per day each, gas optimization is vital. Transactions on L2 (Arbitrum, Base, Optimism) are 10–50 times cheaper than mainnet: average gas cost on L2 is $0.02–0.05 per transaction versus $2–5 on L1. We use batching where multicall is supported, monitor gas prices to pick low periods, and automatically calculate the minimum ETH balance needed on each wallet.

Parameter Ethereum L1 Arbitrum L2 Optimism L2 Base L2
Average transaction cost $2–5 $0.02–0.05 $0.01–0.03 $0.02–0.04
Transactions per 1 ETH 200–500 10 000–25 000 15 000–30 000 12 000–20 000

Development Process

  1. Analysis — gather requirements: number of wallets, protocols, budgets, RPC.
  2. Design — architecture, database schema, stack selection.
  3. Implementation — wallet generation, handler development, scheduler, dashboard.
  4. Testing — simulation on testnet, anti-sybil metric verification.
  5. Deployment and launch — deployment, monitoring setup, documentation.

Our team brings 5+ years of experience in DeFi and automation, having completed numerous projects. Get a consultation — we'll design the optimal architecture and stack.

What's Included

  • Full documentation set (architecture, operations manual).
  • Source code access with a usage license.
  • Operator training.
  • Support during launch phase (up to 2 weeks).
  • Guarantee of no backdoors in code (audit of key parts).

Tech Stack

Our engineers have years of experience in DeFi and automation. The system is built on a production-ready stack with fault tolerance and monitoring.

Component Technology
Backend Node.js + TypeScript, Fastify
Task queue Bull + Redis
Database PostgreSQL + TimescaleDB
Blockchain ethers.js v6, viem
RPC Alchemy, Infura (with failover)
Proxy SOCKS5 rotation (Bright Data, Oxylabs)
Frontend React + TanStack Query
Monitoring Grafana + Prometheus

If you need airdrop farming automation, contact us for a consultation and project assessment.

We develop crypto wallets turnkey — from custodial solutions for fintech to smart contract accounts on EIP-4337. 5+ years in blockchain development, 40+ projects implemented. Let's examine which architecture to choose for your task and why MPC or Account Abstraction solve the private key problem that MetaMask and classic HD wallets could not close.

Why are classic wallets dangerous for business?

A seed phrase in a browser extension is the only way to restore access. For retail users, this is a barrier to entry (lost phrase = lost money). For corporate treasuries, it is incompatible with compliance (KYC/AML, role model, multisignature). Any single key leak compromises all funds. These risks are built into the architecture, not poor UX.

We eliminate them at the protocol level: MPC wallets (key never fully assembled), smart contract wallets (authorization logic in code), hardware HSM for institutional storage. Details below.

What is the real difference between custodial and non-custodial?

Custodial — the provider stores the private key. User authenticates via email/password/OAuth. Recovery is trivial, KYC/AML built-in. For centralized financial applications, often the only regulatory acceptable option. Risk: single point of failure (e.g., Bitfinex hack — $72M, FTX — $600M+ client funds).

Non-custodial — keys are with the user. Provider has no access to funds. Storage responsibility falls on the user. For 99% of people, this model is unworkable without additional protection — hence MPC.

MPC wallets: the key that doesn't exist

Multi-Party Computation (MPC) is a cryptographic protocol that allows multiple parties to jointly sign a transaction without revealing their partial secrets. The private key never exists in its assembled form.

Standard scheme: 2-of-3 MPC between user (share on device), provider server, and backup cloud storage. Transaction is signed by any two of three parties. Lost phone — recovery via server + cloud. Server compromised — attacker holds only one share, signing impossible.

TSS (Threshold Signature Scheme) is a concrete implementation of MPC for ECDSA/EdDSA. Algorithms: GG18, GG20, CGGMP21 (the latter is faster and has better security proofs). Libraries: tss-lib (Go, from Binance), multi-party-sig (Go, from Coinbase), ZenGo-X/multi-party-ecdsa (Rust).

MPC requires no on-chain changes — to the blockchain, the signature looks like a normal single-key signature. This saves gas and keeps the key management scheme confidential (not published in chain) — unlike multisig.

Account Abstraction (EIP-4337): smart contract as wallet

EIP-4337 completely changes the model: instead of EOA (Externally Owned Account), a smart contract Account is used. Authorization logic is in contract code, not in protocol cryptography. This opens up arbitrary signing logic, social recovery, session keys, sponsored transactions, and batch operations.

How the EIP-4337 stack works:

User → UserOperation → Bundler → EntryPoint contract → Account contract
                                          ↑
                                    Paymaster (optional, pays gas)

UserOperation — a new type of object (not an L1 transaction). Bundler collects UserOps from an alternative mempool, packs them into one transaction, and sends to EntryPoint. EntryPoint calls validateUserOp on the Account contract — Account decides if the signature is valid.

Practical capabilities:

Social recovery. The contract stores a list of guardians (other addresses or a service). Lost key — guardians vote for replacement. Argent has used this scheme since 2020.

Session keys. A temporary key with limited rights: interaction only with a specific contract, until a certain date, up to a certain amount. For GameFi and dApps — user does not sign every micro-transaction.

Paymaster. A third-party contract pays gas for the user. Onboarding pattern: user does not hold ETH, gas is sponsored by dApp or taken from ERC-20 tokens.

Implementations: Safe{Core} Protocol, Biconomy SDK (Stackup), ZeroDev (Kernel), Alchemy (Rundler bundler). EntryPoint v0.6/v0.7 is deployed and active on Ethereum mainnet, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism. We guarantee compatibility with the latest contract versions.

What is a Hardware Security Module for corporate wallets?

For treasuries and institutional storage: HSM (Hardware Security Module). The key is generated and never leaves the secure chip. Signing happens inside the HSM. Hardware attestation is supported. Solutions used: AWS CloudHSM, Azure Dedicated HSM, Thales Luna, YubiHSM 2 (for small volumes). Integration via PKCS#11 or cloud-specific API.

A combination of HSM + MPC is optimal for institutional use: key shares are stored in HSMs on different servers/jurisdictions, signing via TSS. This ensures compliance with regulatory requirements (e.g., for crypto custodians).

Integration with dApps: WalletConnect and standards

Any wallet must be able to interact with dApps. Standard: WalletConnect v2 (Sign API): QR code or deep link, peer-to-peer encrypted channel via relay server. For browser extensions: EIP-1193 (Ethereum Provider API).

On the frontend, we use wagmi + viem — one interface for MetaMask, WalletConnect, Coinbase Wallet, injected providers. For Account Abstraction: EIP-5792 (wallet capabilities) and EIP-7677 (paymaster service).

Development process

  1. Threat model — who is the user (B2C, B2B, institutional), what operations, what is the acceptable risk model. Architecture depends on this.
  2. Selection and design of key storage scheme — MPC, HSM, multisig, or a combination.
  3. Development of Account contract (if EIP-4337) or integration of MPC library.
  4. Backend — MPC coordination, session management, paymaster service (if needed).
  5. Mobile/browser application — UI with WalletConnect integration, biometrics, QR.
  6. Integration with dApps — EIP-1193, WalletConnect v2.
  7. Audit of contracts and cryptographic implementations — mandatory step. MPC libraries have known vulnerabilities (GG18 susceptible to attack with malicious participant without abort protocol). We use libraries with up-to-date security reviews (CGGMP21). Experience passing audits with Certik, Hacken, Trail of Bits — we have certificates.

What is included in the work (deliverables)

  • Source code of smart contracts (Solidity/Rust) with documentation
  • Backend MPC coordination service (Go or Rust) with API
  • Mobile application (iOS/Android) or browser extension
  • Integration with WalletConnect, Ledger/Trezor (if required)
  • Preparation for security audit (vulnerability report)
  • Administrator and user documentation
  • Access to repository, CI/CD, monitoring (Tenderly, Etherscan API)
  • Training of your team (2-3 sessions)
  • Post-launch support — 1 month

Timeline and cost

Solution type Timeline (working weeks)
Custodial with basic UI 4–8
Non-custodial with MPC integration 8–16
EIP-4337 Account with paymaster 6–12
Institutional (HSM + MPC + compliance) from 16

Cost is calculated individually for your project. We will estimate within one day — contact us by email or Telegram. We provide a guarantee on code and timeline.

Typical mistakes in crypto wallet development (and how to avoid them)

  • Using outdated MPC libraries — GG18 without abort protocol. Choose CGGMP21 or tss-lib with up-to-date audit reports.
  • Tight coupling to a single blockchain — not abstracting for L2/sidechains. Use viem/wagmi for cross-chain.
  • Ignoring MEV attacks — when using multisig without timelocks. Add tx simulation (Tenderly) and sandwiching protection.
  • Lack of fallback recovery mechanism — for Account Abstraction, not setting up social recovery. Include from the first release.

We eliminate these pitfalls at the design stage — for each project, we create a threat model and security checklist.

Need a reliable wallet with no compromises? Get a consultation from our architect — we will analyze your task and propose an architecture with a precise estimate. Leave a request — we will respond within a day.