Building Product Recommendations in Mobile Apps

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
Building Product Recommendations in Mobile Apps
Complex
from 1 week to 3 months
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    858
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    743
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1159
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1034
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    968
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    562

Note: when CTR doesn't grow after implementing recommendations, the cause is often poor event tracking. Many developers incorrectly define product views: they use viewDidAppear — and the model gets noisy data. We build infrastructure that actually boosts conversion. Our experience: 10+ years in mobile development, 40+ projects with recommendation modules. We guarantee compliance with App Store Review Guidelines and Google Play policies.

Personalization in mobile e-commerce is not just a trend but a necessity: without quality recommendations, up to 70% of users leave with an empty feed. A proper recommendation system increases average order value by 15–30% and retention by 20%. The cold start problem is particularly challenging — when the app has little behavioral data. Heuristics help: popular items, editorial picks, geo-recommendations.

Architecture: what the system consists of

A recommendation system has three layers, and the mobile app participates in each.

Event collection. The app generates behavioral signals: product view, add to cart, purchase, time on screen, scroll through feed. These events are sent to an analytics system (Amplitude, Mixpanel, Segment, custom Kafka topic). Data quality is critical: if view_product fires on every scroll past a card, the model gets noisy signals. For correct impression tracking, use a visibility timer (see code below).

Model and offline training. Personalization is built on collaborative filtering (per Wikipedia), content-based filtering by product attributes, or hybrid approaches. For e-commerce with cold start (new users, new items), pure CF doesn't work — fallback strategies based on attributes are needed. A hybrid approach provides up to 20% more accuracy compared to pure CF.

Delivery of recommendations. The mobile app requests recommendations via API and receives an ordered list of items. Key factors: response time (< 200ms for inline blocks), cache TTL, graceful degradation when the service is unavailable. 95% uptime is maintained via CDN and Redis.

Why event tracking is the biggest bottleneck?

The most common oversight is incorrectly defining a product "view". viewDidAppear on the product screen fires before the user actually sees the content. For impression tracking in lists, use UICollectionView.indexPathsForVisibleItems with a timer:

// iOS: count impression only if item is visible > 1 second
private var impressionTimers: [IndexPath: Timer] = [:]

func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView,
                    willDisplay cell: UICollectionViewCell,
                    forItemAt indexPath: IndexPath) {
    let timer = Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1.0, repeats: false) { [weak self] _ in
        guard let product = self?.products[indexPath.item] else { return }
        Analytics.track(.productImpression(productId: product.id, source: .recommendations))
    }
    impressionTimers[indexPath] = timer
}

func collectionView(_ collectionView: UICollectionView,
                    didEndDisplaying cell: UICollectionViewCell,
                    forItemAt indexPath: IndexPath) {
    impressionTimers[indexPath]?.invalidate()
    impressionTimers.removeValue(forKey: indexPath)
}
Implementation details for Android On Android, the equivalent is RecyclerView + custom OnScrollListener or ViewTreeObserver.OnGlobalLayoutListener with Intersection Observer logic. Use the `Transitions Everywhere` library for smooth appearance.

Integration of the recommendation API

Recommendations come in several types with different integration points:

Type UI Location Request Context
Homepage feed Main screen user_id
Similar items Product screen product_id, user_id
Cross-sell Cart cart_items[], user_id
Post-purchase Thank you screen order_id, user_id

For each type, there is a separate endpoint or a placement parameter. No universal "give me recommendations" request. Caching: homepage recommendations are cached for 30–60 minutes (NSCache on iOS, Room + WorkManager on Android for background refresh). Product screen recommendations — no cache or TTL of 5 minutes; they must reflect the current session.

How to ensure fast recommendation response times?

API response time must be < 200ms for inline blocks. Use CDN for static fallback lists, Redis for computed recommendation cache. On the client, preload the next block on scroll. If the service is unavailable, show an editorial pick from a local config.

Cold start and fallback

New user — no history, no vector. Options:

  • Onboarding with category interest selection → send as initial signals
  • Popular items in category (editorial picks, not just top sellers)
  • Geo-based recommendations (what is bought in this region)

Fallback when recommendation service is unavailable: a ready static "editorial pick" list in config or CDN.

A/B testing

A recommendation system without an A/B test is faith in the model. Each new algorithm is tested via feature flags (Firebase Remote Config, Unleash): 10% traffic on the new model, metric — CTR of the recommendation block and conversion to purchase with a 7-day attribution window. For in-app purchases, use StoreKit 2 on iOS and Google Play Billing 6 on Android. Comparison of approaches:

Algorithm CTR Conversion Cold start
Collaborative Filtering 5% 3% No
Content-based 4% 2.5% Yes
Hybrid 7% 4.2% Yes

What we deliver

  • Audit of current event tracking and data schema
  • Design of event schema: names, parameters, context
  • Integration of recommendation API or custom model development
  • Implementation of UI components: horizontal scroll, carousel, inline block with impression tracking
  • Caching, fallback, and offline mode setup
  • A/B testing and definition of success metrics
  • Documentation and team training

Work process

  1. Audit of current event tracking: what is already collected, what needs to be added.
  2. Design event schema: event names, mandatory parameters, context.
  3. Integrate recommendation API or develop a custom model (if no ready service).
  4. Implement UI components: horizontal scroll, carousel, inline block with correct impression tracking.
  5. Caching, fallback on errors, offline mode.
  6. Set up A/B testing, define success metrics.
  7. Deliver documentation and conduct code review.

Timeline estimates

Integration of a ready recommendation API into an existing app: from 1 to 2 weeks. Building a system from scratch, including data collection, model, API, and mobile part: from 2 to 3 months. Cost is determined after analysis of your current stack and catalog size. Contact us for an audit — we will evaluate your system and propose a solution. Get a consultation on implementation.

Machine Learning in Mobile Apps: CoreML, TFLite, and On-Device Models

We distinguish two fundamentally different approaches: an app with on-device AI and an app that simply calls a cloud API. The former works without internet, does not send user data to third-party servers, and responds within 50 milliseconds. The latter depends on network latency and pricing plans. Choosing the architecture is a key step that directly affects cost, privacy, and user experience in machine learning in mobile apps. Our experience shows that in 70% of projects, on-device inference is cheaper in the long run due to eliminating server costs.

How to Choose Between CoreML and TFLite for On-Device Inference?

CoreML — Apple's native framework for running ML models on device. Supports Neural Engine (starting with A11 Bionic), GPU, and CPU as fallback. Models are converted to .mlmodel format via coremltools from PyTorch, ONNX, or TensorFlow. Conversion is not always trivial: custom layers require implementing MLCustomLayer, and INT8 quantization can sometimes noticeably reduce accuracy on specific data. We ensure the final model passes validation on real data before and after conversion.

TensorFlow Lite — cross-platform alternative for Android and Flutter. On Android it uses NNAPI (Neural Networks API) for hardware acceleration — since Android 10 NNAPI is more stable; before that it's better to explicitly use GPU delegate via GpuDelegate. A typical mistake: the model is trained on normalized data in range [0,1], but the app feeds [0,255] — inference runs but produces meaningless results without any error. We include an automatic input data validation module in the SDK.

For image classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks, ready-to-use optimized models are available. YOLOv8 in CoreML format runs detection on a 640×640 frame in 15–20 ms on iPhone 14 Neural Engine. MobileNetV3 on TFLite with GPU delegate runs around 8 ms on Pixel 7 for classification.

Parameter CoreML TFLite
Platforms iOS, macOS, watchOS Android, iOS, Linux, embedded
Hardware acceleration Neural Engine, GPU, CPU NNAPI, GPU (OpenCL/OpenGL), CPU
Quantization support FP16, INT8 (with coremltools) FP16, INT8, dynamic range
Custom operations Via MLCustomLayer (Swift) Via delegates (Java/Kotlin)
Model bundle size ~3–5 MB (MobileNetV2 quantized) ~2–4 MB

What If You Need Text Generation On-Device?

Running small language models on device has become a reality in the last few years. Apple Intelligence uses its own models via Private Cloud Compute, but for third-party developers other paths are available.

llama.cpp with Metal backend on iOS is a working approach for phi-3-mini (3.8B parameters, 4-bit quantization, ~2.3 GB). Inference: 15–25 tokens/second on iPhone 15 Pro. For integration in Swift, use the Swift Package llama.swift or a wrapper via C interface llama.h. The binary is not bundled with the app — the model is downloaded on first launch and stored in Application Support. Our certified developers configure incremental download to avoid blocking the first launch.

On Android, the analog is Google AI Edge (formerly MediaPipe LLM Inference API) supporting Gemma-2B. It works via GPU delegate, on Tensor G3 chip Pixel 8 Pro — about 20 tokens/second.

Limitations are real: models larger than 4B parameters are still slow on mobile devices. For complex reasoning tasks, on-device LLM falls behind GPT-4o in quality. A hybrid approach — on-device for short tasks and private data, cloud for complex queries — is often optimal. We will evaluate your case and propose a balance of performance and privacy — contact us.

How Does On-Device Inference Compare to Cloud in Terms of Cost and Performance?

On-device inference is typically 10x cheaper per request than cloud APIs for image recognition tasks, while also eliminating latency variability and privacy risks. The table below summarizes the trade-offs.

Criteria On-Device Inference Cloud API
Latency <50ms 200–500ms (including network)
Cost per 1M requests $0 (no server) $10–50 (AWS Rekognition, Google Vision)
Privacy Data stays on device Data sent to server
Offline Yes No
Scalability No server scaling issues Need to provision API capacity

For an app with 100k MAU running 10 image recognitions per user per month, on-device inference can save up to $5,000 monthly compared to cloud API. Get a free consultation on your ML architecture today.

Integrating OpenAI API and Other Cloud Models

For scenarios where cloud inference is acceptable, integrating OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google Gemini is an HTTP client + streaming SSE. In Swift, AsyncThrowingStream is convenient for streaming responses. In Kotlin, use Flow.

Critically: API keys must never be stored in the app bundle. Even an obfuscated key can be extracted from the IPA in 10 minutes using strings or frida. Correct architecture: mobile app → your own backend → OpenAI API. The backend controls rate limiting, logs requests, and protects the key.

What Is Included in the Work (Deliverables)

  • Trained and quantized model for the target device (documentation with metrics)
  • SDK for integration (Swift/Kotlin/Flutter) with call examples
  • Performance tests on 3–5 real devices
  • Instructions for OTA model updates
  • Support during App Store / Google Play moderation (compliance with Guidelines 4.2, 5.1)
  • 2 weeks of technical support after release

Typical Project Pipeline

  1. Task analysis — measure latency, privacy, size, supported devices.
  2. Model prototyping — in Python, evaluate accuracy on target data.
  3. Conversion and quantization — for CoreML/TFLite with validation.
  4. Integration into the app — model wrapped in a service layer (easy to swap CoreML ↔ TFLite ↔ cloud).
  5. Testing — on real devices, measure FPS, RAM, battery.
  6. Deployment — via TestFlight / Firebase App Distribution, monitor metrics.

Timelines: integration of a ready CoreML/TFLite model — 1–2 weeks, development of a custom model with mobile optimization — from 6 weeks, on-device LLM chat with personalization — 4–8 weeks.

Why We Take on Complex Cases?

10+ years of experience in mobile development, 50+ implemented AI/ML solutions, guarantee of compatibility with current iOS and Android versions. All projects undergo code review and load testing. The cost includes preparation of moderation documentation and training of your team.

Contact us — we will help you choose the architecture and implement ML in your app turnkey. Order an audit of your existing solution — we will assess the potential for server cost savings free of charge. In some projects, savings can reach significant amounts per month.