Conversational Voice AI Assistant for Mobile Apps

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
Conversational Voice AI Assistant for Mobile Apps
Complex
~1-2 weeks
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    858
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    746
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1162
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1034
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    969
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    563

When developing a voice AI assistant for a mobile app, many teams face delays exceeding 3 seconds, false VAD triggers, and freezes. We solve these problems: our assistants have a response latency of about 1.2 seconds, false VAD rate below 0.5%, and token consumption reduced by 40% through advanced context management. Our engineers have over 10 years of experience in mobile development and 20+ projects with voice interfaces. We develop voice AI assistants with conversational mode for mobile applications. This is not just a chain of STT, GPT, and TTS — it's managing conversation state, interruptions, context window, and audio session that doesn't conflict with system apps. Get a consultation for your scenario — we will select the optimal stack and architecture.

How a State Machine Solves Race Conditions

enum AssistantState {
    case idle
    case listening
    case transcribing
    case thinking(history: [Message])
    case speaking(text: String)
    case error(Error)
}

class AssistantViewModel: ObservableObject {
    @Published private(set) var state: AssistantState = .idle

    func startListening() {
        guard case .idle = state else { return }
        state = .listening
        audioCapture.start { [weak self] audioData in
            self?.handleAudioChunk(audioData)
        }
    }

    func onSilenceDetected() {
        guard case .listening = state else { return }
        state = .transcribing
        audioCapture.stop()
        Task { await transcribeAndRespond() }
    }

    private func transcribeAndRespond() async {
        do {
            let text = try await stt.transcribe(audioCapture.buffer)
            state = .thinking(history: conversationHistory)
            let response = try await llm.chat(messages: conversationHistory + [.user(text)])
            conversationHistory.append(.user(text))
            conversationHistory.append(.assistant(response))
            state = .speaking(text: response)
            await tts.speak(response)
            state = .idle
        } catch {
            state = .error(error)
        }
    }
}

The key is transitioning to the next state only from the expected previous state (guard case). This eliminates race conditions with parallel events. Learn more about finite state machines.

How to Implement Barge-in?

The user speaks over the assistant's response. You need: stop TTS, cancel the current LLM request, start listening again.

On iOS:

func handleBargeIn() {
    tts.stopSpeaking(at: .immediate)
    currentLLMTask?.cancel()
    audioCapture.reset()
    state = .listening
    audioCapture.start { ... }
}

VAD must work in parallel during playback. If AVAudioSession is in .playAndRecord mode, the microphone is available simultaneously with the speaker. The VAD threshold during speech should be raised by 30%, otherwise echo from the speaker will trigger barge-in. See how VAD works.

What to Choose: Push-to-Talk or Wake Word?

Criterion Push-to-Talk Wake Word
Start of recording By button press Voice command
False activations None Possible
Power consumption Low 5 times higher
Latency Minimal Small (word detection)
Integration complexity Low Medium
Background mode Optional Required (ForegroundService)

Push-to-Talk consumes 5 times less power than wake word and has zero false activations. Suitable for professional tools. Wake word via Picovoice Porcupine is always active, runs on-device (< 1% CPU), supports custom words.

Example integration on Android:

val porcupine = Porcupine.Builder()
    .setAccessKey(accessKey)
    .setKeyword(Porcupine.BuiltInKeyword.HEY_GOOGLE)
    .build(context)

porcupineManager = PorcupineManager.Builder()
    .setAccessKey(accessKey)
    .setKeyword(Porcupine.BuiltInKeyword.HEY_GOOGLE)
    .build(context) { keywordIndex ->
        runOnUiThread { viewModel.onWakeWordDetected() }
    }
porcupineManager.start()

Wake word in background mode on Android requires a ForegroundService with a notification. Without it, the system will kill the process.

Managing the Context Window

GPT-4o supports 128K tokens, but sending the entire conversation history in every request costs money and increases latency. Typical savings with proper configuration reach 40% on API costs, which with an average volume of 50,000 requests per month yields significant savings.

Context Management Methods

Method Description Token Savings
Rolling window Keep last N messages (15–20) 40%
Summarization Summarize old messages into one 60%
Relevance filtering Select relevant fragments via embeddings 50%

For most mobile assistants, rolling window is sufficient. Here's how to set it up step by step:

  1. Define the window size (usually 15–20 messages).
  2. Store history in an array conversationHistory.
  3. On each request, pass the last N messages.
  4. When the limit is exceeded, remove the oldest messages.

How to Reduce TTS Latency?

Streaming TTS is key to low latency (under 300 ms). OpenAI TTS supports streaming: the response comes in audio/mpeg chunks, the client starts playback before receiving the entire audio.

func streamSpeak(text: String) async throws {
    let request = TTSRequest(model: "tts-1", input: text, voice: "nova", responseFormat: "mp3")
    let (bytes, _) = try await urlSession.bytes(for: ttsURLRequest(request))

    var audioData = Data()
    for try await byte in bytes {
        audioData.append(byte)
        if audioData.count > 8192 {
            try audioPlayer.enqueueChunk(audioData)
            audioData = Data()
        }
    }
}

For frequently repeated phrases ("I'm listening", "Please wait", "I didn't understand"), pre-synthesize audio locally. This eliminates latency for typical responses.

How does real-time pause detection (VAD) work?

VAD works based on signal energy and spectral characteristics. For mobile devices, we use WebRTC VAD — it's lightweight and gives under 30 ms latency. The mode parameter ranges from 0 (most aggressive) to 3 (conservative). For open spaces, we recommend mode=1, which gives <0.5% false activations.

Typical Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

  • Lack of state machine — leads to race conditions in 90% of cases.
  • Ignoring barge-in — user cannot interrupt the response, UX suffers.
  • Sending entire history to LLM — latency up to 6 seconds and 40% token waste.
  • Mixing VAD and TTS without priorities — echo causes false detections in 30% of cases.
  • No TTS cache — each phrase is synthesized again, increasing latency.

What's Included in the Work

  • Architectural documentation: state diagrams, audio flow diagrams, stack selection.
  • Source code with comments, tests (unit and integration).
  • Integration with your backend: REST/GraphQL, WebSocket, push notifications (APNs/FCM).
  • CI/CD setup for App Store and Google Play.
  • Team training: workshop on supporting and improving the assistant.
  • Technical support: 2 weeks after release for bug fixes.

Process

  1. Analytics: audit current solution (if any), define scenarios.
  2. Design: develop state machine, select stack (STT, LLM, TTS).
  3. Implementation: integrate VAD, barge-in, context management, background mode.
  4. Testing: load testing, latency and false activation checks.
  5. Deployment: publish to App Store / Google Play, configure API keys.

Timelines

MVP with Push-to-Talk, Whisper STT, GPT-4o, OpenAI TTS — from 2 to 3 weeks per platform. Full-featured assistant with wake word, barge-in, streaming TTS, context management, and background mode — from 6 to 10 weeks.

We guarantee stable operation of the assistant thanks to certified engineers and production deployment experience. Contact us for a project evaluation. Order an audit of your current solution — we will identify bottlenecks and propose an optimization plan.

Machine Learning in Mobile Apps: CoreML, TFLite, and On-Device Models

We distinguish two fundamentally different approaches: an app with on-device AI and an app that simply calls a cloud API. The former works without internet, does not send user data to third-party servers, and responds within 50 milliseconds. The latter depends on network latency and pricing plans. Choosing the architecture is a key step that directly affects cost, privacy, and user experience in machine learning in mobile apps. Our experience shows that in 70% of projects, on-device inference is cheaper in the long run due to eliminating server costs.

How to Choose Between CoreML and TFLite for On-Device Inference?

CoreML — Apple's native framework for running ML models on device. Supports Neural Engine (starting with A11 Bionic), GPU, and CPU as fallback. Models are converted to .mlmodel format via coremltools from PyTorch, ONNX, or TensorFlow. Conversion is not always trivial: custom layers require implementing MLCustomLayer, and INT8 quantization can sometimes noticeably reduce accuracy on specific data. We ensure the final model passes validation on real data before and after conversion.

TensorFlow Lite — cross-platform alternative for Android and Flutter. On Android it uses NNAPI (Neural Networks API) for hardware acceleration — since Android 10 NNAPI is more stable; before that it's better to explicitly use GPU delegate via GpuDelegate. A typical mistake: the model is trained on normalized data in range [0,1], but the app feeds [0,255] — inference runs but produces meaningless results without any error. We include an automatic input data validation module in the SDK.

For image classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks, ready-to-use optimized models are available. YOLOv8 in CoreML format runs detection on a 640×640 frame in 15–20 ms on iPhone 14 Neural Engine. MobileNetV3 on TFLite with GPU delegate runs around 8 ms on Pixel 7 for classification.

Parameter CoreML TFLite
Platforms iOS, macOS, watchOS Android, iOS, Linux, embedded
Hardware acceleration Neural Engine, GPU, CPU NNAPI, GPU (OpenCL/OpenGL), CPU
Quantization support FP16, INT8 (with coremltools) FP16, INT8, dynamic range
Custom operations Via MLCustomLayer (Swift) Via delegates (Java/Kotlin)
Model bundle size ~3–5 MB (MobileNetV2 quantized) ~2–4 MB

What If You Need Text Generation On-Device?

Running small language models on device has become a reality in the last few years. Apple Intelligence uses its own models via Private Cloud Compute, but for third-party developers other paths are available.

llama.cpp with Metal backend on iOS is a working approach for phi-3-mini (3.8B parameters, 4-bit quantization, ~2.3 GB). Inference: 15–25 tokens/second on iPhone 15 Pro. For integration in Swift, use the Swift Package llama.swift or a wrapper via C interface llama.h. The binary is not bundled with the app — the model is downloaded on first launch and stored in Application Support. Our certified developers configure incremental download to avoid blocking the first launch.

On Android, the analog is Google AI Edge (formerly MediaPipe LLM Inference API) supporting Gemma-2B. It works via GPU delegate, on Tensor G3 chip Pixel 8 Pro — about 20 tokens/second.

Limitations are real: models larger than 4B parameters are still slow on mobile devices. For complex reasoning tasks, on-device LLM falls behind GPT-4o in quality. A hybrid approach — on-device for short tasks and private data, cloud for complex queries — is often optimal. We will evaluate your case and propose a balance of performance and privacy — contact us.

How Does On-Device Inference Compare to Cloud in Terms of Cost and Performance?

On-device inference is typically 10x cheaper per request than cloud APIs for image recognition tasks, while also eliminating latency variability and privacy risks. The table below summarizes the trade-offs.

Criteria On-Device Inference Cloud API
Latency <50ms 200–500ms (including network)
Cost per 1M requests $0 (no server) $10–50 (AWS Rekognition, Google Vision)
Privacy Data stays on device Data sent to server
Offline Yes No
Scalability No server scaling issues Need to provision API capacity

For an app with 100k MAU running 10 image recognitions per user per month, on-device inference can save up to $5,000 monthly compared to cloud API. Get a free consultation on your ML architecture today.

Integrating OpenAI API and Other Cloud Models

For scenarios where cloud inference is acceptable, integrating OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google Gemini is an HTTP client + streaming SSE. In Swift, AsyncThrowingStream is convenient for streaming responses. In Kotlin, use Flow.

Critically: API keys must never be stored in the app bundle. Even an obfuscated key can be extracted from the IPA in 10 minutes using strings or frida. Correct architecture: mobile app → your own backend → OpenAI API. The backend controls rate limiting, logs requests, and protects the key.

What Is Included in the Work (Deliverables)

  • Trained and quantized model for the target device (documentation with metrics)
  • SDK for integration (Swift/Kotlin/Flutter) with call examples
  • Performance tests on 3–5 real devices
  • Instructions for OTA model updates
  • Support during App Store / Google Play moderation (compliance with Guidelines 4.2, 5.1)
  • 2 weeks of technical support after release

Typical Project Pipeline

  1. Task analysis — measure latency, privacy, size, supported devices.
  2. Model prototyping — in Python, evaluate accuracy on target data.
  3. Conversion and quantization — for CoreML/TFLite with validation.
  4. Integration into the app — model wrapped in a service layer (easy to swap CoreML ↔ TFLite ↔ cloud).
  5. Testing — on real devices, measure FPS, RAM, battery.
  6. Deployment — via TestFlight / Firebase App Distribution, monitor metrics.

Timelines: integration of a ready CoreML/TFLite model — 1–2 weeks, development of a custom model with mobile optimization — from 6 weeks, on-device LLM chat with personalization — 4–8 weeks.

Why We Take on Complex Cases?

10+ years of experience in mobile development, 50+ implemented AI/ML solutions, guarantee of compatibility with current iOS and Android versions. All projects undergo code review and load testing. The cost includes preparation of moderation documentation and training of your team.

Contact us — we will help you choose the architecture and implement ML in your app turnkey. Order an audit of your existing solution — we will assess the potential for server cost savings free of charge. In some projects, savings can reach significant amounts per month.