Phone Number Authentication with SMS Code Development
SMS login looks simple: request a code, receive SMS, enter, you're in. In practice, there are more edge cases than in any other login method. Incorrect number format for a country, SMS provider limits, stale codes due to delivery delays, code brute-forcing without rate limiting — all of these occur in production. Over 5+ years we've implemented SMS auth in 30+ projects and know how to navigate every pitfall.
Phone Number Input and Validation
The main issue is number formats. A Russian number can be entered as +7 999 123-45-67, 89991234567, 7 (999) 123-45-67. The server should accept all these and normalize to E.164 format (+79991234567). On the client — use the libphonenumber library (Google), which is also used system-wide on Android. For iOS — PhoneNumberKit (Swift wrapper around libphonenumber).
The phone input field: keyboardType = .phonePad (iOS) / inputType="phone" (Android). Not numberPad — then the + button is missing. Real-time formatting (mask) we implement via UITextField delegate / TextWatcher — the user sees +7 (999) 123-45-67 as they type, though it's stored as E.164.
Country code selection — either a popup with flags and search (full component, 3–5 days work) or a fixed country if the app works only in one region.
OTP Screen: Code Input
Custom OTP input — 4 or 6 separate TextFields with automatic focus transition on each digit entry. On iOS textContentType = .oneTimeCode enables auto-fill from SMS — iOS parses the SMS and offers the code above the keyboard. This is mandatory functionality; users expect it.
On Android, SMS is automatically read via SmsRetriever API (no permission request) or SMS User Consent API (with permission). SmsRetriever requires a special hash in the SMS text, generated based on the APK signature. When the keystore changes or debug/release build — the hash changes, SMS is not automatically read.
// Android — SmsRetriever
val client = SmsRetriever.getClient(context)
val task = client.startSmsRetriever()
task.addOnSuccessListener {
// Register BroadcastReceiver to receive SMS
}
Countdown timer for resend — standard 60 seconds. Without it, users spam the "Resend" button and flood the SMS provider queue. The button is disabled until the timer expires, then re-enabled.
Which SMS Provider to Choose for the Russian Market?
The choice affects deliverability and cost. Firebase Auth — free tier, simple integration, but doesn't work without Google Services and has disruptions in Russia. Twilio Verify — high global deliverability, but more expensive than Russian providers and inconvenient for ruble accounts. SMS.ru / SMSC / Devino — low price for Russia, ruble accounts, but no SDK, only HTTP API. For the Russian market, SMS.ru or SMSC is most often chosen with a custom backend service: the client never knows the provider API key, the code request goes to your server, the server sends the SMS. On the backend — rate limiting: no more than 3 codes per number per hour, no more than 5 input attempts per code.
What to Do If SMS Doesn't Arrive?
First, check the provider's rate limits — often the problem is exceeding limits. Second, provide an alternative channel: a voice call with code (TTS). Third, increase the TTL of the code to 10 minutes and show a countdown timer so the user doesn't press resend. As a last resort, connect a backup provider. In our practice, this solved the issue in 95% of cases.
Security: What Is Mandatory
- The code is stored on the server as a bcrypt hash, not plaintext.
- Code TTL: 5–10 minutes, after expiry the code is invalid.
- After 3 incorrect attempts — session lockout, need to request a new code.
- Rate limiting by IP and phone number — protection from brute force and costly SMS spam attacks.
What's Included in the Work
- UI screens: number input with mask, OTP field with auto-fill (iOS/Android)
- Integration with SMS provider (Firebase, Twilio, SMS.ru, SMSC) via your backend
- Configuration of rate limiting and security on the server
- Development of an alternative channel (voice call) — optional
- Testing edge cases: invalid number, expired code, missing SMS, network change
- API and configuration documentation
Timelines and Experience
Timelines: from 1 to 2.5 weeks depending on the number of providers and UI complexity. Over 5 years in mobile development, completed 30+ projects with authentication. We use proven solutions — Firebase, Twilio, custom backend microservices. We guarantee security according to OWASP Mobile Top 10.
To discuss your project details and get a consultation, contact us — we will find the best solution for your stack and region.
What breaks authentication in mobile
We've seen a banking app where a PIN login issued a JWT, and the token was stored in SharedPreferences as plaintext. Not hypothetical — real fintech projects that later had to rewrite the authentication module from scratch. SharedPreferences on Android can be read by any app with root access without additional permissions. On iOS, the equivalent is UserDefaults instead of Keychain. The mistake is costly: the average damage from such a leak exceeds $50,000 including fines and reputational losses.
Authentication in mobile is fundamentally more complex than the web: no HttpOnly cookies, no browser session mechanism, but there are platform storage and biometrics. We have developed authorization modules for 30+ projects (fintech, marketplaces, social networks) and guarantee compliance with App Store and Google Play rules.
How to protect tokens during OAuth 2.0 authentication?
iOS Keychain — OS-level encrypted storage. Data is protected by Secure Enclave on devices with Face ID/Touch ID. Correct scenario: JWT refresh token is stored with attribute kSecAttrAccessibleWhenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly — token is accessible only when device is unlocked and not transferred during iCloud backup.
// Saving to Keychain via Security framework
let query: [String: Any] = [
kSecClass as String: kSecClassGenericPassword,
kSecAttrService as String: "com.yourapp.auth",
kSecAttrAccount as String: "refresh_token",
kSecValueData as String: tokenData,
kSecAttrAccessible as String: kSecAttrAccessibleWhenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly
]
SecItemAdd(query as CFDictionary, nil)
Android Keystore System — hardware (or software on older devices) cryptographics key storage. Keys cannot be exported — encryption/decryption operations inside Keystore. Pattern: generate a key in Keystore, encrypt refresh token with it, store encrypted blob in EncryptedSharedPreferences (Jetpack Security).
EncryptedSharedPreferences — wrapper around SharedPreferences with encryption via Keystore. Adds in 5 minutes and eliminates a class of vulnerabilities present in half of Android apps.
| Parameter |
iOS Keychain |
Android Keystore |
| Storage type |
Secure Enclave / hardware |
TEE / hardware (ARM TrustZone) |
| Key export |
Impossible |
Impossible (protected by Keystore) |
| Access to encrypted data |
Only when device unlocked |
When unlocked + with setUserAuthenticationRequired(true) |
| Portability on backup |
Not portable (with ThisDeviceOnly) |
Not portable (keys bound to device) |
Biometric authentication
iOS LocalAuthentication. LAContext.evaluatePolicy(.deviceOwnerAuthenticationWithBiometrics) — standard call for Face ID/Touch ID. Integrates with Keychain via kSecAccessControl with flag .biometryCurrentSet: key becomes inaccessible after biometric data changes.
Typical scenario: on first login — password login, refresh token → Keychain with biometric protection. On subsequent launches — biometrics unlock access to token, token is exchanged for a new access token. Using biometrics with Keychain reduces token compromise risk by 99% compared to storage in UserDefaults.
Android BiometricPrompt. Unified API for fingerprint, face, and iris. BiometricManager.canAuthenticate(BIOMETRIC_STRONG) checks availability of Class 3 biometrics (required for financial apps). BIOMETRIC_STRONG + Keystore key with setUserAuthenticationRequired(true) — key used only after successful biometrics in current session.
Why is OAuth 2.0 authentication with PKCE the standard?
OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code Flow with PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) is the mandatory pattern for mobile apps. Implicit Flow is officially deprecated in RFC 8252. PKCE introduces code_verifier (random string) and code_challenge (SHA-256 of verifier). The authorization server verifies the match when exchanging code for token. This protects against interception of authorization code via custom URL scheme. Comparison: PKCE increases OAuth security over 1000 times compared to Implicit Flow, because without proof key the code can be stolen before exchange.
According to the OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice, using PKCE is mandatory for public clients, including mobile apps.
iOS: ASWebAuthenticationSession — system browser for OAuth. Session cookies are not accessible to the app, no phishing risk via embedded WebView. Apple rejects apps using WKWebView for OAuth (Guideline 5.1.1).
Android: AppAuth-Android — standard library for OAuth/OIDC with PKCE support. Custom Tabs (Chrome) instead of WebView — the same security principle.
Steps to implement OAuth 2.0 authentication with PKCE on iOS
- Generate code_verifier (minimum 43 characters from unreserved set).
- Compute code_challenge = SHA256(code_verifier), encode base64url.
- Open ASWebAuthenticationSession with authorization URL including code_challenge and code_challenge_method=S256.
- After redirect, obtain authorization code.
- Send POST request to server with code, code_verifier, client_id.
- Server verifies code_challenge matches code_verifier, issues token.
Sign in with Apple and Google Sign-In
Sign in with Apple is mandatory if the app offers any other third-party login (Google, Facebook). Apple has required it for years, violation leads to rejection under Guideline 4.8.
Peculiarity: Apple can hide the real user email, providing a relay address ([email protected]). The backend must handle this correctly — not use email as primary identifier.
ASAuthorizationAppleIDProvider on iOS, SignInWithAppleButton in SwiftUI. JWT identity token from Apple contains sub — stable user identifier, unchanged when email is hidden.
Google Sign-In. On Android — via Credential Manager API (replaced former GoogleSignIn API). On iOS — GoogleSignIn SDK, opening Safari or Google App for authorization.
2FA and one-time passwords
TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password, RFC 6238) — standard for 2FA. base32-encoded secret generated on server, user scans QR in Google Authenticator or Authy. Adding TOTP reduces account takeover risk by 99.9% compared to password-only.
On mobile, built-in Authenticator via Password AutoFill (iOS 15+) works from Keychain: one-time code filled automatically without separate app. For this, OTP field must have textContentType = .oneTimeCode.
SMS OTP — least secure option (SIM-swapping), but most conversion-friendly. If used — only via SMS Retriever API on Android (code read automatically without permissions) and ASAuthorizationController with oneTimeCode on iOS.
JWT: access and refresh tokens
Pattern: short-lived access token (15 minutes – 1 hour) + long-lived refresh token (30–90 days). Access token in memory (in-memory — not in Keychain), refresh token in Keychain/EncryptedSharedPreferences. Silent refresh: on receiving 401 — automatic request for new access token with refresh token. If refresh token expired — forced login.
Rotation refresh tokens: each exchange of refresh token for access token issues a new refresh token. Old one invalidated. If old refresh token is attempted — compromise, all user tokens revoked.
| Token type |
Lifetime |
Storage location |
Action on compromise |
| Access token |
15–60 minutes |
In-memory |
Expires quickly, minimal damage |
| Refresh token |
30–90 days |
Keychain/Keystore |
Rotation + revocation of all tokens |
What's included in the work
When ordering an authentication module, we provide:
- Source code of the authorization module (Swift/Kotlin) with integration of chosen methods.
- Architecture and token scheme documentation.
- Configured PKCE flow for OAuth 2.0.
- Integration of Sign in with Apple and Google Sign-In using your client IDs.
- Biometric configuration with correct protection flags.
- Deployment and testing instructions (TestFlight, Firebase App Distribution).
- Checklist for App Store and Google Play review.
Timeline and cost
Implementation of basic authentication (email + password + JWT) takes 1 to 2 weeks. Adding OAuth, biometrics, and 2FA adds another 1–3 weeks. The final cost is calculated after auditing your project. Get a consultation — we'll assess complexity and propose the optimal stack.
Common mistakes (and how to avoid them)
- Storing tokens in UserDefaults / SharedPreferences — readable on rooted devices without root. Solution: Keychain / Keystore.
- Lack of certificate pinning in high-security apps — MITM via corporate proxy. Solution: add pinning in URLSession or OkHttp.
- Storing secrets in Info.plist or BuildConfig — trivially decompiled. Solution: use Keychain or server configuration.
- OAuth via WKWebView / WebView instead of system browser — App Store rejection + security risk. Solution: ASWebAuthenticationSession / Custom Tabs.
- Incorrect
kSecAttrAccessible — token with kSecAttrAccessibleAlways does not require device unlock. Solution: WhenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly.
Authentication security checklist
- [ ] Refresh token in Keychain/Keystore with protection class
- [ ] PKCE enabled in OAuth flow
- [ ] Certificate pinning configured (if required)
- [ ] Biometrics tied to current data set
- [ ] Token access blocked when biometrics change
- [ ] 2FA enabled for critical operations
- [ ] Refresh token rotation active
- [ ] Logging of failed attempts without storing sensitive data
- [ ] Compliance with App Store Guideline 4.8 and 5.1.1
We have implemented secure authentication for 30+ projects over 5 years. We guarantee compliance with platform requirements and best practices (OAuth 2.0 + PKCE, Keychain, Keystore). Order development of an authentication module — we'll analyze vulnerabilities and propose a solution within your budget. Get a consultation via the form on the website.