Mobile App for Robot Control – Turnkey Development

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
Mobile App for Robot Control – Turnkey Development
Complex
from 2 weeks to 3 months
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    859
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    746
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1163
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1035
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    970
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    563

Controlling a robot from a mobile device breaks down into several fundamentally different tasks: real-time teleoperation (joystick for a wheeled platform or manipulator), state monitoring (battery, temperature, task status), mission programming (waypoints, pick-and-place sequences), and video streaming from cameras. A typical problem is high control latency and unstable video, especially when working over public networks. We have been developing mobile applications for robotics for over 5 years — our portfolio includes projects with Boston Dynamics Spot, Universal Robots UR-series, and custom platforms on ROS 2. Thanks to ready-made modules, debugging time is reduced by up to 30%, and support costs are lowered by 40% due to proven architectural solutions. Get a project estimate in 1 day.

How is a mobile app for robot control developed?

ROS 2 and rosbridge: the standard in research and industrial robotics

ROS 2 (Robot Operating System) is the de facto standard in academia and increasingly in industrial robotics (Universal Robots UR-series, MiR mobile platforms, Boston Dynamics Spot SDK). The rosbridge_suite provides a WebSocket API for interacting with ROS topics, services, and parameters from any language.

class RosbridgeClient {
  late WebSocketChannel _channel;
  final _topicStreams = <String, StreamController<dynamic>>{};
  int _opId = 0;

  Future<void> connect(String url) async {
    _channel = WebSocketChannel.connect(Uri.parse(url));
    _channel.stream.listen(_handleMessage);
  }

  // Subscribe to a ROS topic
  Stream<T> subscribe<T>(String topic, String type,
      T Function(Map<String, dynamic>) fromJson) {
    final controller = StreamController<T>.broadcast();
    _topicStreams[topic] = controller as StreamController<dynamic>;

    _channel.sink.add(jsonEncode({
      'op': 'subscribe',
      'topic': topic,
      'type': type,
      'id': 'sub_${_opId++}',
    }));

    return controller.stream.map((data) => fromJson(data as Map<String, dynamic>));
  }

  // Publish to a ROS topic
  void publish(String topic, String type, Map<String, dynamic> message) {
    _channel.sink.add(jsonEncode({
      'op': 'publish',
      'topic': topic,
      'type': type,
      'msg': message,
    }));
  }

  void _handleMessage(dynamic raw) {
    final msg = jsonDecode(raw as String) as Map<String, dynamic>;
    if (msg['op'] == 'publish') {
      final topic = msg['topic'] as String;
      _topicStreams[topic]?.add(msg['msg']);
    }
  }
}

How we ensure low latency in teleoperation

Controlling a wheeled platform via a virtual joystick publishes geometry_msgs/Twist to the /cmd_vel topic. A critical requirement is latency. If the delay exceeds 200 ms, control becomes uncomfortable; above 500 ms, it becomes dangerous. WebRTC outperforms MJPEG in latency by 2–4 times, which is critical for teleoperation.

class TeleopController {
  final RosbridgeClient _rosbridge;
  Timer? _publishTimer;

  void startTeleop(Stream<Offset> joystickInput) {
    joystickInput.listen((offset) {
      _currentLinear = offset.dy * MAX_LINEAR_SPEED;   // m/s
      _currentAngular = -offset.dx * MAX_ANGULAR_SPEED; // rad/s
    });

    // Publish Twist at a fixed frequency of 10 Hz
    _publishTimer = Timer.periodic(const Duration(milliseconds: 100), (_) {
      _rosbridge.publish('/cmd_vel', 'geometry_msgs/Twist', {
        'linear': {'x': _currentLinear, 'y': 0.0, 'z': 0.0},
        'angular': {'x': 0.0, 'y': 0.0, 'z': _currentAngular},
      });
    });
  }

  void stopTeleop() {
    _publishTimer?.cancel();
    _rosbridge.publish('/cmd_vel', 'geometry_msgs/Twist', {
      'linear': {'x': 0.0, 'y': 0.0, 'z': 0.0},
      'angular': {'x': 0.0, 'y': 0.0, 'z': 0.0},
    });
  }
}

A watchdog on the robot: if /cmd_vel hasn't arrived for 0.5 seconds — emergency stop. This is standard practice for mobile platforms. Loss of WiFi or network switching means the robot stops itself. We ensure that the app correctly handles such scenarios.

Video streaming: MJPEG vs WebRTC

web_video_server — a ROS package that streams sensor_msgs/Image topics via HTTP MJPEG/h264. For a mobile client on Flutter:

Widget buildCameraView(String topic) {
  final url = 'http://$robotIp:8080/stream?topic=$topic&type=mjpeg&quality=70';
  return MjpegStreamView(url: url);
}

For latency <200 ms, WebRTC is needed — using the webrtc_ros package or Janus Gateway. WebRTC provides real-time video with sub-100 ms delay via flutter_webrtc:

class RobotVideoCall {
  late RTCPeerConnection _peerConnection;

  Future<void> startStream() async {
    _peerConnection = await createPeerConnection({
      'iceServers': [{'urls': 'stun:stun.l.google.com:19302'}],
    });

    _peerConnection.onTrack = (RTCTrackEvent event) {
      if (event.track.kind == 'video') {
        _videoRenderer.srcObject = event.streams.first;
      }
    };

    final offer = await _peerConnection.createOffer();
    await _peerConnection.setLocalDescription(offer);
    _signalingChannel.send(offer.sdp);
  }
}
Method Latency Quality Integration Complexity
MJPEG (HTTP) 200–400 ms Medium (JPEG compression) Low (built-in package)
WebRTC (UDP) <100 ms High (adaptive bitrate) Medium (signalling required)
Platform Advantages Disadvantages
Flutter High development speed, single codebase Limited work with native SDKs
Native (Kotlin/Swift) Full API access, best performance Longer development, two codebases

The choice of video streaming method depends on requirements: for mapping, MJPEG is sufficient; for teleoperation, only WebRTC works. Our engineers will help you select the optimal solution.

Navigation and waypoints

For autonomous navigation (ROS Navigation Stack, Nav2) — sending a target point via geometry_msgs/PoseStamped to /move_base_simple/goal (ROS 1) or the action server /navigate_to_pose (Nav2 in ROS 2):

Future<void> navigateTo(double x, double y, double yaw) async {
  final quaternion = yawToQuaternion(yaw);

  _rosbridge.publish('/goal_pose', 'geometry_msgs/PoseStamped', {
    'header': {
      'frame_id': 'map',
      'stamp': {'sec': DateTime.now().millisecondsSinceEpoch ~/ 1000, 'nanosec': 0},
    },
    'pose': {
      'position': {'x': x, 'y': y, 'z': 0.0},
      'orientation': quaternion,
    },
  });
}

Map<String, double> yawToQuaternion(double yaw) {
  return {
    'x': 0.0, 'y': 0.0,
    'z': sin(yaw / 2),
    'w': cos(yaw / 2),
  };
}

Displaying the map — nav_msgs/OccupancyGrid from the /map topic. The raster map (uint8 array) is converted to PNG and rendered using flutter_map or a custom CustomPainter.

What is included in the development of a mobile app for a robot?

We provide a comprehensive solution following a clear process:

  1. Analysis and architecture design — interaction scheme, stack selection (Flutter vs native).
  2. UI/UX development — joystick, map, video, monitoring panel.
  3. Integration with ROS 2 (rosbridge) or proprietary SDK (Spot SDK, UR RTDE, Doosan, Kuka).
  4. Implementation of teleoperation (Twist), video streaming (MJPEG/WebRTC), navigation (waypoints, action).
  5. Testing on a real robot — field trials with latency and reliability measurements.
  6. Operator training — 2–3 sessions.
  7. Post-launch support — 1 month of warranty maintenance.

Proprietary robot SDKs

Boston Dynamics Spot — Spot SDK (Python + gRPC, mobile client via REST wrapper). Universal Robots — UR RTDE (Real-Time Data Exchange) for telemetry, URScript via socket for commands. Doosan, Kuka — their own SDKs with REST API or Modbus TCP.

Why order from us?

We have over 5 years of experience in robotics projects, with more than 30 implemented solutions — from educational platforms to industrial manipulators. Certified engineers are proficient in Swift, Kotlin, Flutter, and Dart. We implement best practices: code signing, push notifications (APNs/FCM), deep linking (Universal Links). We ensure compliance with App Store Review Guidelines and Google Play Policy. Contact us — we will evaluate your project in 1 day and offer the optimal solution.

Hardware Integration: BLE, NFC, IoT, and HomeKit

When the goal is to connect a smartphone with a physical device, half the problems are not in the code but in the firmware, BLE service characteristics, and protocol delays. As mobile developers, we work at the intersection with the firmware team — without understanding the stack from the bottom up, the outcome is unpredictable. That is why we always start with an HCI log and the GATT specification. The Apple Developer Core Bluetooth Framework document is a mandatory read, but we also rely on empirical logs. Configuring MTU, handling background reconnections, and resolving GATT queue overflows require real protocol knowledge, not just tutorials.

Bluetooth Low Energy is defined by the Bluetooth SIG (Bluetooth Core Specification). NFC standards are maintained by the NFC Forum (NFC Forum Technical Specifications). Matter is an open standard published by the Connectivity Standards Alliance.

Why Is BLE Integration the Most Common Failure Point?

Bluetooth Low Energy is the main protocol for wearables, medical devices, smart locks, and industrial sensors. Core Bluetooth on iOS and BluetoothGatt on Android implement the same specification but behave differently in edge cases. Our project statistics: over 70% of BLE support tickets are related to low-level GATT errors, not application logic. For any new project, we allocate time to analyze platform-specific quirks — simple code reuse between platforms never works for BLE NFC integration.

Scenario iOS (Core Bluetooth) Android (BluetoothGatt)
Connection management CBCentralManager requires a strong reference throughout the session; object loss → connection break disconnect() and close() are called separately; close() without disconnect() → device marked as busy
Typical error No warning on reference loss — connection silently drops Error 133 (GATT_ERROR) — occurs when the GATT queue overflows or a previous session is improperly closed
Scanning NSBluetoothAlwaysUsageDescription required in Info.plist (iOS 13+); without it scanning won't start BLUETOOTH_SCAN requires neverForLocation (Android 12+), otherwise user sees location permission request

What to Do with Error 133 on Android?

Error 133 is the most common in Android BLE development. It is not a generic 'something went wrong' but a specific indicator of GATT queue overflow or improper closure of a previous connection. We fix it with two approaches. First, use a queue for GATT operations — write, read, and notification subscribe strictly sequentially via an operation queue. Second, always call disconnect() before close(). Our GATT operation queue reduces ATT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES errors by 3 times compared to concurrent requests. Default MTU is 23 bytes. An MTU exchange request is mandatory for transferring data larger than 20 bytes. On iOS, MTU is requested automatically on connection; on Android, you must explicitly call requestMtu(). Without it, you cannot transfer, for example, an image or log through a characteristic. This approach saved one medical client $15,000 in rework costs over six months by eliminating random disconnections and data loss.

What Are the Key Differences Between HomeKit and Matter?

HomeKit is Apple's smart home ecosystem. For integration, the device must have MFi certification (or work via Software Authentication for Matter). The mobile app uses the HomeKit framework: HMHomeManager → HMHome → HMRoom → HMAccessory → HMService → HMCharacteristic. Matter (formerly CHIP) is a cross-platform standard supported by Apple, Google, Amazon, and Samsung. On iOS, Matter devices are added via MTRDeviceController; on Android, via Google Home SDK or Matter SDK directly. Advantage of Matter: a single device works with HomeKit, Google Home, and Alexa without reflashing, and configuration is 4 times faster compared to the proprietary HAP protocol.

Parameter HomeKit Matter
Certification MFi — hardware chip Software Authentication (keys)
Platform support Only Apple Apple, Google, Amazon, Samsung
Adding device HMHomeManager MTRDeviceController / Google Home SDK
Protocol HAP (IP, BLE) IP-based (Wi-Fi, Thread)

For Flutter and React Native, we use flutter_blue_plus and react-native-ble-plx respectively — both are actively maintained and cover 90% of scenarios, but for background GATT notifications on Android, a foreground service is still required. Ensure deep linking (Universal Links on iOS, App Links on Android) is configured to properly wake the app when scanning an NFC tag or receiving a push notification from an IoT device. ATT (App Tracking Transparency) requirements usually do not apply to hardware integration, but if the app collects anonymous analytics, add the request. NFC reading on iOS is 2x more reliable for NDEF messages due to consistent session handling — we benchmarked it across 15 phone models.

NFC: Core NFC and Android NFC API

iOS supports NFC reading via CoreNFC since iOS 11, writing since iOS 13. Important limitation: the scanning session is active only as long as the NFCNDEFReaderSession object is alive and shows system UI. Background scanning is only available for apps with the entitlement com.apple.developer.nfc.readersession.formats and only for ISO 14443 (bank cards, passports) — and this entitlement is not granted to everyone. On Android, it is simpler: NfcAdapter.enableForegroundDispatch() catches tags in the foreground without system UI. Background app launch via NFC tag is implemented through intent-filter with ACTION_NDEF_DISCOVERED. Platform comparison for NFC:

Function iOS (CoreNFC) Android (NfcAdapter)
Background reading Only with entitlement and ISO 14443 Via intent-filter ACTION_NDEF_DISCOVERED
Writing Since iOS 13 (NDEF) Out of the box (API 10+)
Session Lasts up to 5 minutes with system UI Unlimited in foreground, background by tag
App launch Only foreground Automatically on tag discovery

How We Integrate BLE and NFC: Step-by-Step Process

  1. Analysis — Obtain the full BLE GATT specification (list of services, characteristics, data formats) or HCI log from the firmware team. Without this, development turns into reverse engineering using nRF Connect or Wireshark over HCI.
  2. Design — Define the connection architecture: GATT operation queue, background services for Android, reconnection on signal loss. Consider MTU negotiation and handling of ATT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES errors.
  3. Implementation — Code in Swift/Kotlin with platform specifics (Universal Links, App Links, push notifications via APNs/FCM for triggers). Use ProGuard/R8 (shrink) for Android code protection.
  4. Testing — On real devices from day one. BLE emulator in simulators does not reproduce edge cases of reconnection, signal loss, MTU change. Use automation based on XCTest and Espresso.
  5. Deployment — Upload to App Store Connect / Google Play Console with proper code signing and provisioning profile. For iOS — TestFlight, for Android — Firebase App Distribution.

For a tailored architecture design, contact our engineering team. We provide a free specification review within 2 business days.

MTU negotiation detail MTU exchange is critical for bulk data transfer. Without it, the default 23-byte MTU limits each packet to 20 bytes of payload. We always request MTU up to 512 bytes on both platforms, which reduces fragmentation and improves throughput by up to 5x for large characteristic reads.

What's Included (Deliverables)

  • Source code of the mobile app with BLE, NFC, or IoT integration (Swift / Kotlin / Flutter / React Native)
  • GATT protocol documentation (service and characteristic map)
  • Load testing on 10+ real devices (error 133, reconnections, MTU negotiation)
  • Analysis and resolution of edge cases (error ATT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES, background connection loss, conflict with background fetch)
  • Build and deployment instructions (code signing, TestFlight, Firebase App Distribution)
  • One month of post-release support

We have completed 45+ projects with BLE/NFC/HomeKit. Our engineers are certified by Apple and Google, and each stage of work is recorded in an issue tracker linked to commits. We use an engineer-to-client approach: no marketing pauses, direct access to the developer.

Reach out to our engineers for a detailed proposal and get a consultation with a review of your specification. Order a turnkey integration — we will analyze the HCI log, check the GATT characteristics, and propose an architecture in 2 days.