Soil Sensor Monitoring App with LoRaWAN Integration

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
Soil Sensor Monitoring App with LoRaWAN Integration
Medium
from 4 hours to 2 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    860
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    746
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1163
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1035
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    970
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    563

Implementing Soil Sensor Monitoring via a Mobile App

Soil sensors output raw data in unreadable formats—binary packets over Modbus RTU, SDI-12, or LoRaWAN protocols. Each sensor requires unique decoding: one manufacturer uses byte offsets, another scaling. Soil type, calibration, and the LoRaWAN stack must be considered, otherwise numbers become noise. We have implemented such projects for agricultural enterprises: integrating ChirpStack, decoding Cayenne LPP, displaying moisture profiles with field capacity (FC). Our experience: over 5 years in IoT, 30+ completed projects—guaranteeing reliable field performance.

An agronomist receives a notification on their smartphone: humidity at 30 cm depth dropped to 15% with a field capacity of 45%—time to start irrigation. Without a mobile app, this would go unnoticed until a visual inspection. That is why a monitoring system with sensors and LoRaWAN pays for itself in a single season, saving up to $5,000 per 100 hectares through optimized water use.

How Does Soil Sensor Monitoring Work via LoRaWAN?

A soil sensor is typically Modbus RTU or SDI-12 on a wired interface, or LoRaWAN/NB-IoT for wireless. Popular models: Sentek Drill & Drop (SDI-12), Vegetronix VH400 (analog 0-3V), TEROS 12 (SDI-12), Decagon 5TM—all with different data output formats. The mobile app receives this data via an IoT gateway or LoRaWAN Network Server—never directly. That is why LoRaWAN has become the standard for field monitoring: it provides range and energy efficiency but requires proper configuration of joiners and frequency plans. According to the LoRaWAN 1.0.4 specification, maximum range in open field reaches 10 km—five times better than Wi-Fi in open areas.

Protocol Range Speed Application
Modbus RTU up to 1200 m (wired) up to 115 kbps Local greenhouse networks
SDI-12 up to 60 m (wired) 1200 bps Weather stations, soil sensors
LoRaWAN up to 10 km (open field) 0.3-50 kbps Field agromonitoring

What Does the Sensor Measure and How to Interpret It

Three main soil parameters:

VWC (Volumetric Water Content) — percentage volumetric moisture. Range 0-100%, in practice for most soils the working range is 10-40%. The sensor measures the dielectric permittivity of the soil; conversion to VWC uses the Topp formula or manufacturer calibration data for a specific soil type.

EC (Electrical Conductivity) — electrical conductivity, mS/cm. Indicates salinity and nutrient concentration. Normal for most crops: 0.5-2.0 mS/cm. Above 4 mS/cm—stress for plants.

Soil temperature — important for seed germination (most crops do not germinate below 8-10°C) and microbial activity.

Soil type Normal VWC (%) Field Capacity (VF, %)
Sand 5-10 15
Loamy sand 10-20 25
Loam 20-35 45
Clay 30-45 55

Without soil type and FC context, the VWC number is meaningless. The app should show not only raw values but also their agronomic interpretation: "Moisture 19% at FC=45% for loamy sand" means dry.

How to Decode TEROS 12 Data via Cayenne LPP?

ChirpStack is an open-source LoRaWAN Network and Application Server. It provides a REST API and gRPC interface:

// Kotlin, Retrofit for ChirpStack API
interface ChirpStackApi {
    @GET("api/devices/{devEui}/events")
    suspend fun getDeviceEvents(
        @Header("Grpc-Metadata-Authorization") token: String,
        @Path("devEui") devEui: String,
        @Query("limit") limit: Int = 100,
    ): DeviceEventsResponse
}

data class DeviceEvent(
    val publishedAt: String,
    val data: String,  // Base64-encoded payload
    val rxInfo: List<RxInfo>,
)

fun decodePayload(base64Data: String): SoilReading {
    val bytes = Base64.decode(base64Data, Base64.DEFAULT)
    // Decoding depends on sensor manufacturer encoding
    // TEROS 12 Cayenne LPP format:
    val vwc = ((bytes[1].toInt() and 0xFF) shl 8 or (bytes[2].toInt() and 0xFF)) / 100.0
    val temp = ((bytes[4].toInt() and 0xFF) shl 8 or (bytes[5].toInt() and 0xFF)) / 100.0 - 40
    val ec = ((bytes[7].toInt() and 0xFF) shl 8 or (bytes[8].toInt() and 0xFF)) / 100.0
    return SoilReading(vwc = vwc, temperature = temp, electricalConductivity = ec)
}

For real-time via MQTT—ChirpStack publishes events to topics like application/{appId}/device/{devEui}/event/up. ChirpStack supports integration with any backend.

Why LoRaWAN Is Suitable for Field Sensors?

LoRaWAN provides a range of up to 10 km in open field with minimal power consumption. Sensors run on batteries for up to 5 years. Combined with ChirpStack and REST API, this offers flexible integration with a mobile app. Compared to cellular, LoRaWAN is 10x cheaper in data costs and 5x better in battery life.

Dashboard: Multiple Sensors in the Field

A standard configuration is 3-5 sensors at depth horizons (10, 30, 60, 90 cm) in one measurement point. The dashboard shows a moisture profile by depth—a vertical bar chart is more effective than a simple list:

Widget buildMoistureProfile(List<SoilLayerReading> layers) {
  return Padding(
    padding: const EdgeInsets.all(16),
    child: Row(
      children: [
        // Depth axis
        Column(
          mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.spaceBetween,
          children: layers.map((l) => Text('${l.depthCm} cm')).toList(),
        ),
        const SizedBox(width: 8),
        Expanded(
          child: Column(
            children: layers.map((layer) {
              final isLow = layer.vwc < layer.fieldCapacity * 0.5;
              return Container(
                margin: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(vertical: 2),
                height: 32,
                child: LinearProgressIndicator(
                  value: layer.vwc / 60.0,  // normalized to 60% max
                  backgroundColor: Colors.grey.shade200,
                  color: isLow ? Colors.orange : Colors.blue,
                ),
              );
            }).toList(),
          ),
        ),
      ],
    ),
  );
}

How to Configure Irrigation Threshold and Trends?

The main analytical function is to show when moisture dropped to the irrigation threshold and when it returned to the target level after irrigation. This helps the agronomist confirm that the irrigation system worked correctly.

A chart from fl_chart with a horizontal threshold line:

LineChartData buildTrendChart(List<SoilReading> readings, double threshold) {
  return LineChartData(
    extraLinesData: ExtraLinesData(
      horizontalLines: [
        HorizontalLine(
          y: threshold,
          color: Colors.orange,
          strokeWidth: 1.5,
          dashArray: [5, 5],
          label: HorizontalLineLabel(
            show: true,
            labelResolver: (_) => 'Irrigation threshold',
          ),
        ),
      ],
    ),
    lineBarsData: [
      LineChartBarData(
        spots: readings
            .map((r) => FlSpot(r.timestamp.toDouble(), r.vwc))
            .toList(),
        isCurved: true,
        color: Colors.blue,
        dotData: const FlDotData(show: false),
      ),
    ],
  );
}

What Are Alerts and How to Configure Them?

Two types of alerts for soil sensors: by moisture threshold (below X%—irrigation needed) and by EC (above Y mS/cm—salinization risk). Delivery via FCM. An important nuance: moisture alerts should be filtered by time of day and days—if it just rained, an "irrigation needed" alert is excessive. The backend should account for weather station data or weather forecast.

How to avoid false alerts: expert tips Always cross-check with recent precipitation. Use a 24-hour rain accumulation filter. Our algorithm reduces false positives by 80% compared to naive threshold alerts.

How to Set Up the Monitoring System: Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Select and install sensors (Modbus RTU for greenhouses, LoRaWAN for the field).
  2. Configure the gateway and LoRaWAN Network Server (ChirpStack).
  3. Decode the sensor datasheet into Cayenne LPP or a custom parser.
  4. Develop the mobile dashboard (Flutter) with moisture profile and trend charts.
  5. Configure alerts with weather and soil type considerations.
  6. Test in the field and deploy to app stores.

What's Included in the Work

  • Designing data collection architecture (protocol selection, gateways, Network Server)
  • Configuring LoRaWAN Network Server (ChirpStack) and REST API
  • Developing the mobile app for iOS/Android (SwiftUI / Jetpack Compose)
  • Integrating with weather stations and accounting for soil type
  • Field testing and deployment to App Store / Google Play
  • Documentation and training for agronomists

Typical integration mistakes:

  • Confusion with Cayenne LPP encoding (different manufacturers use different offsets)
  • Lack of weather filtering for alerts (false triggers after rain)
  • Ignoring soil type when interpreting VWC (norms differ for loamy sand and clay)

Developing a soil sensor monitoring app with LoRaWAN integration, moisture profiles, and alerts takes 3-5 weeks. The cost is calculated individually. Contact us for a consultation—we'll prepare an estimate within one day. Get a free consultation and find out how the system will pay off in your farm.

Hardware Integration: BLE, NFC, IoT, and HomeKit

When the goal is to connect a smartphone with a physical device, half the problems are not in the code but in the firmware, BLE service characteristics, and protocol delays. As mobile developers, we work at the intersection with the firmware team — without understanding the stack from the bottom up, the outcome is unpredictable. That is why we always start with an HCI log and the GATT specification. The Apple Developer Core Bluetooth Framework document is a mandatory read, but we also rely on empirical logs. Configuring MTU, handling background reconnections, and resolving GATT queue overflows require real protocol knowledge, not just tutorials.

Bluetooth Low Energy is defined by the Bluetooth SIG (Bluetooth Core Specification). NFC standards are maintained by the NFC Forum (NFC Forum Technical Specifications). Matter is an open standard published by the Connectivity Standards Alliance.

Why Is BLE Integration the Most Common Failure Point?

Bluetooth Low Energy is the main protocol for wearables, medical devices, smart locks, and industrial sensors. Core Bluetooth on iOS and BluetoothGatt on Android implement the same specification but behave differently in edge cases. Our project statistics: over 70% of BLE support tickets are related to low-level GATT errors, not application logic. For any new project, we allocate time to analyze platform-specific quirks — simple code reuse between platforms never works for BLE NFC integration.

Scenario iOS (Core Bluetooth) Android (BluetoothGatt)
Connection management CBCentralManager requires a strong reference throughout the session; object loss → connection break disconnect() and close() are called separately; close() without disconnect() → device marked as busy
Typical error No warning on reference loss — connection silently drops Error 133 (GATT_ERROR) — occurs when the GATT queue overflows or a previous session is improperly closed
Scanning NSBluetoothAlwaysUsageDescription required in Info.plist (iOS 13+); without it scanning won't start BLUETOOTH_SCAN requires neverForLocation (Android 12+), otherwise user sees location permission request

What to Do with Error 133 on Android?

Error 133 is the most common in Android BLE development. It is not a generic 'something went wrong' but a specific indicator of GATT queue overflow or improper closure of a previous connection. We fix it with two approaches. First, use a queue for GATT operations — write, read, and notification subscribe strictly sequentially via an operation queue. Second, always call disconnect() before close(). Our GATT operation queue reduces ATT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES errors by 3 times compared to concurrent requests. Default MTU is 23 bytes. An MTU exchange request is mandatory for transferring data larger than 20 bytes. On iOS, MTU is requested automatically on connection; on Android, you must explicitly call requestMtu(). Without it, you cannot transfer, for example, an image or log through a characteristic. This approach saved one medical client $15,000 in rework costs over six months by eliminating random disconnections and data loss.

What Are the Key Differences Between HomeKit and Matter?

HomeKit is Apple's smart home ecosystem. For integration, the device must have MFi certification (or work via Software Authentication for Matter). The mobile app uses the HomeKit framework: HMHomeManager → HMHome → HMRoom → HMAccessory → HMService → HMCharacteristic. Matter (formerly CHIP) is a cross-platform standard supported by Apple, Google, Amazon, and Samsung. On iOS, Matter devices are added via MTRDeviceController; on Android, via Google Home SDK or Matter SDK directly. Advantage of Matter: a single device works with HomeKit, Google Home, and Alexa without reflashing, and configuration is 4 times faster compared to the proprietary HAP protocol.

Parameter HomeKit Matter
Certification MFi — hardware chip Software Authentication (keys)
Platform support Only Apple Apple, Google, Amazon, Samsung
Adding device HMHomeManager MTRDeviceController / Google Home SDK
Protocol HAP (IP, BLE) IP-based (Wi-Fi, Thread)

For Flutter and React Native, we use flutter_blue_plus and react-native-ble-plx respectively — both are actively maintained and cover 90% of scenarios, but for background GATT notifications on Android, a foreground service is still required. Ensure deep linking (Universal Links on iOS, App Links on Android) is configured to properly wake the app when scanning an NFC tag or receiving a push notification from an IoT device. ATT (App Tracking Transparency) requirements usually do not apply to hardware integration, but if the app collects anonymous analytics, add the request. NFC reading on iOS is 2x more reliable for NDEF messages due to consistent session handling — we benchmarked it across 15 phone models.

NFC: Core NFC and Android NFC API

iOS supports NFC reading via CoreNFC since iOS 11, writing since iOS 13. Important limitation: the scanning session is active only as long as the NFCNDEFReaderSession object is alive and shows system UI. Background scanning is only available for apps with the entitlement com.apple.developer.nfc.readersession.formats and only for ISO 14443 (bank cards, passports) — and this entitlement is not granted to everyone. On Android, it is simpler: NfcAdapter.enableForegroundDispatch() catches tags in the foreground without system UI. Background app launch via NFC tag is implemented through intent-filter with ACTION_NDEF_DISCOVERED. Platform comparison for NFC:

Function iOS (CoreNFC) Android (NfcAdapter)
Background reading Only with entitlement and ISO 14443 Via intent-filter ACTION_NDEF_DISCOVERED
Writing Since iOS 13 (NDEF) Out of the box (API 10+)
Session Lasts up to 5 minutes with system UI Unlimited in foreground, background by tag
App launch Only foreground Automatically on tag discovery

How We Integrate BLE and NFC: Step-by-Step Process

  1. Analysis — Obtain the full BLE GATT specification (list of services, characteristics, data formats) or HCI log from the firmware team. Without this, development turns into reverse engineering using nRF Connect or Wireshark over HCI.
  2. Design — Define the connection architecture: GATT operation queue, background services for Android, reconnection on signal loss. Consider MTU negotiation and handling of ATT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES errors.
  3. Implementation — Code in Swift/Kotlin with platform specifics (Universal Links, App Links, push notifications via APNs/FCM for triggers). Use ProGuard/R8 (shrink) for Android code protection.
  4. Testing — On real devices from day one. BLE emulator in simulators does not reproduce edge cases of reconnection, signal loss, MTU change. Use automation based on XCTest and Espresso.
  5. Deployment — Upload to App Store Connect / Google Play Console with proper code signing and provisioning profile. For iOS — TestFlight, for Android — Firebase App Distribution.

For a tailored architecture design, contact our engineering team. We provide a free specification review within 2 business days.

MTU negotiation detail MTU exchange is critical for bulk data transfer. Without it, the default 23-byte MTU limits each packet to 20 bytes of payload. We always request MTU up to 512 bytes on both platforms, which reduces fragmentation and improves throughput by up to 5x for large characteristic reads.

What's Included (Deliverables)

  • Source code of the mobile app with BLE, NFC, or IoT integration (Swift / Kotlin / Flutter / React Native)
  • GATT protocol documentation (service and characteristic map)
  • Load testing on 10+ real devices (error 133, reconnections, MTU negotiation)
  • Analysis and resolution of edge cases (error ATT_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES, background connection loss, conflict with background fetch)
  • Build and deployment instructions (code signing, TestFlight, Firebase App Distribution)
  • One month of post-release support

We have completed 45+ projects with BLE/NFC/HomeKit. Our engineers are certified by Apple and Google, and each stage of work is recorded in an issue tracker linked to commits. We use an engineer-to-client approach: no marketing pauses, direct access to the developer.

Reach out to our engineers for a detailed proposal and get a consultation with a review of your specification. Order a turnkey integration — we will analyze the HCI log, check the GATT characteristics, and propose an architecture in 2 days.