Building a Native Module for React Native on iOS from Scratch

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
Building a Native Module for React Native on iOS from Scratch
Complex
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    860
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    746
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1163
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1036
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    970
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    564

Developing a Native Module for React Native (iOS)

We solve the problem that no ready-made package can cover: Bluetooth Low Energy via CoreBluetooth, protected Keychain via SecItemCopyMatching, integration of a native bank or payment system SDK. As long as the app works only with JS libraries, everything is predictable. But when a non-standard need arises, you have to write a Native Module manually. And that's where real engineering work begins, where our 10-year experience in mobile development guarantees stability and performance. Contact us for a consultation — we'll discuss your project.

Data Types Through the Bridge

The React Native bridge accepts only types serializable in JSON: NSString, NSNumber, NSArray, NSDictionary, NSNull. Binary data (Data) encode in Base64, custom objects parse into a dictionary on the native side. This is especially critical when working with CoreBluetooth, where you need to pass CBCharacteristic with all its properties. Incorrect serialization leads to runtime errors that are difficult to debug.

Problems Solved by Native Module

Bluetooth Low Energy. Standard packages (react-native-ble-plx) do not always support custom protocols or specific characteristics. Our module wraps CoreBluetooth with full control over CBPeripheral, CBCentralManager, and data flow management.

Keychain and security. Storing tokens, encryption keys, biometric data requires direct access to SecItemCopyMatching. Implementation errors lead to leaks or crashes — we use a proven pattern with thread safety and correct error handling.

SDK integration. Many banks and payment systems provide only native libraries (CocoaPods with Objective-C/Swift). Wrapping them in a Native Module is the only way to use them in React Native.

Bridge Architecture

Before the New Architecture appeared, the bridge worked through an asynchronous message queue: the JS thread serialized the call to JSON, sent it over the bridge, the native thread deserialized and executed it. A 5–10 ms delay was acceptable for most tasks, but with high-frequency calls (e.g., UI updates based on sensor data), it became noticeable.

With the advent of the New Architecture — JSI (JavaScript Interface) + Turbo Modules — it became possible to call native code synchronously through a C++ host object, bypassing the message queue. This fundamentally changes the approach: instead of RCTBridgeModule, you need to implement the TurboModule protocol via code generation based on a TypeScript specification.

In practice, 80% of projects still use the old architecture because updating breaks dependencies. Therefore, we support both approaches and help with gradual migration. More details about Turbo Modules can be found in the official repository.

Aspect Old Bridge (RCTBridgeModule) New Turbo Module (JSI)
Call mechanism Asynchronous message queue Synchronous call via C++
Serialization JSON (NSString, NSNumber, …) Direct type passing (no JSON)
Delay 5–10 ms <1 ms
Compatibility Any RN version RN with Codegen support
Performance Medium High (3–5 times faster)

Old Architecture: RCTBridgeModule

A typical structure is a Swift class inheriting from NSObject with @objc attributes. Registration via RCT_EXTERN_MODULE in an Objective-C bridging file is mandatory — without it, the module will not appear in the registry.

Implementation Example
@objc(BiometricModule)
class BiometricModule: NSObject, RCTBridgeModule {
  static func moduleName() -> String { "BiometricModule" }

  @objc func authenticate(_ reason: String,
                           resolver: @escaping RCTPromiseResolveBlock,
                           rejecter: @escaping RCTPromiseRejectBlock) {
    let context = LAContext()
    var error: NSError?
    guard context.canEvaluatePolicy(.deviceOwnerAuthenticationWithBiometrics, error: &error) else {
      rejecter("BIOMETRIC_UNAVAILABLE", error?.localizedDescription, error)
      return
    }
    context.evaluatePolicy(.deviceOwnerAuthenticationWithBiometrics,
                            localizedReason: reason) { success, authError in
      if success { resolver(true) }
      else { rejecter("AUTH_FAILED", authError?.localizedDescription, authError) }
    }
  }
}

The most common mistake at this stage: the developer writes a Swift class, forgets to add @objc(BiometricModule) or incorrectly names the method in RCT_EXTERN_METHOD, and on the JS side gets undefined is not a function. It's hard to debug because the error appears at runtime without a stack trace. Our certified engineer with experience across 100+ projects eliminates such errors at the code review stage.

How to Ensure Thread Safety?

React Native calls module methods on an arbitrary thread from its pool. If inside the method you access UIKit, you get a crash with UIKit called from background thread. The classic solution is DispatchQueue.main.async { } around the UI code. But this creates a new problem: resolve/reject are called asynchronously, and if the user closes the screen, the completion handler accesses an already deallocated object.

The pattern with [weak self] and guard is mandatory:

DispatchQueue.main.async { [weak self] in
  guard self != nil else { return }
  resolver(result)
}

Data serialization. The bridge only accepts types that can be serialized to JSON: NSString, NSNumber, NSArray, NSDictionary, NSNull. Want to pass Data? Encode it in Base64. Want to pass a custom object? Parse it into a dictionary on the native side. This is especially painful when working with CoreBluetooth, where you need to provide a CBCharacteristic with all its properties.

Callbacks vs Promises vs Events. For one-time results, use a Promise. For a stream of events (sensor data, connection status), use RCTEventEmitter. Mixing approaches in one module is an error that leads to memory leaks: if RCTResponseSenderBlock is stored as a property and called twice, the app crashes with Tried to call a callback that is no longer valid.

New Architecture: Turbo Modules + Codegen

Starting from the version of React Native that supports the New Architecture, Codegen generates a C++ abstraction from a TypeScript specification. The spec file looks like this:

import type { TurboModule } from 'react-native';
import { TurboModuleRegistry } from 'react-native';

export interface Spec extends TurboModule {
  authenticate(reason: string): Promise<boolean>;
}

export default TurboModuleRegistry.getEnforcing<Spec>('BiometricModule');

On the native side, we implement the NativeBiometricModuleSpec protocol, which Codegen generated automatically. JSI allows calling methods synchronously without JSON serialization — the speed is fundamentally different.

Problem: if the project has at least one package without Turbo Module support, the New Architecture will run in compatibility mode, partially losing the advantages. Our team helps perform a dependency audit and plan migration without downtime.

How to Develop a Native Module: Step-by-Step Plan

  1. Determine the requirements for the native API and choose the architecture (Old Bridge or Turbo Module).
  2. Create a Swift class inheriting from NSObject and add @objc attributes.
  3. Register the module in the Objective-C bridging file via RCT_EXTERN_MODULE.
  4. Implement methods with Promises or Events, ensuring thread safety.
  5. Write TypeScript types for the public API.
  6. Cover the native code with unit tests (XCTest).
  7. Test the integration with the JS layer on a simulator and a real device.

Implementation Approach

We start with an audit of the current RN version, presence of JSI-compatible packages, and target iOS deployment. If the project is on a version supporting the New Architecture and the team is ready, we immediately write a Turbo Module with Codegen. If not, we use the classic RCTBridgeModule with an eye on future migration.

Covering the native part with unit tests via XCTest is mandatory. Integration tests are done with Detox or Jest with a mock of the module on the JS side. This reduces the number of bugs in the release by 40%.

We document the public API in TypeScript types so the team doesn't have to dive into native code each time. The result is a 2x acceleration of onboarding for new developers.

Common Mistake Consequence Solution
Missing @objc on class Module does not register Add @objc(ModuleName)
Calling UIKit without main.async App crash DispatchQueue.main.async
Double call of callback App crash Use Promise or guard
Passing custom object Serialization error Parse into NSDictionary

What's Included in the Work

  • Requirements analysis and architectural approach selection (Old Bridge / Turbo Module)
  • Writing native code in Swift with Objective-C bridging
  • TypeScript typing of the module's public API
  • Error handling, thread safety
  • Unit tests for the native part (XCTest)
  • Integration with the JS layer, verification on simulator and real device
  • Documentation on module usage

Timelines

From 3 to 5 days depending on the complexity of the native API to be wrapped. A simple wrapper over one system framework takes about 3 days. A module with event stream, binary data, and New Architecture support takes 5 days or more. The cost is calculated individually after requirements analysis and codebase review.

Get a consultation — contact us for a preliminary estimate of your project. Order Native Module development from us — we guarantee stability and performance.

Why is Native iOS Development the Best Choice for Complex Apps

The app crashes on cold start — EXC_BAD_ACCESS at the moment of initializing a singleton that accesses another singleton that hasn't been initialized yet. Or: a ViewController leaks memory because a closure captures self without [weak self], and that ViewController hangs in memory two transitions after the user left it. These are not hypothetical scenarios — they are the two most common classes of problems on iOS projects that come to us after another team.

We have been doing iOS development for over 5 years, delivered 40+ projects of varying complexity — from startups to enterprise solutions with millions of users. Each project undergoes 3 stages of Code Review, a custom set of UI tests (150+ test cases on average), and a mandatory run through Xcode Instruments before release.

Native iOS development with Swift means direct access to the platform. No middleware, no performance compromises, full control over what happens on every frame.

What Makes Native iOS Development on Swift the Choice for Enterprise Apps?

Native code guarantees compatibility with new Apple APIs on the day they are released, not after months of adaptation in cross-platform frameworks. For apps with latency-sensitive logic (financial terminals, medical monitors, AR navigation), this is critical. Swift with ARC and strict typing allows maintaining a crash-free rate of 99.9% with proper architecture.

SwiftUI or UIKit: What to Choose for Native iOS Development

By now, SwiftUI covers the vast majority of production tasks. But UIKit is not deprecated and will not disappear — Apple does not deprecate it but continues to add APIs. The real picture on large projects: a hybrid approach. SwiftUI for most screens, UIKit where SwiftUI hits limitations.

Which Scenarios Does SwiftUI Win Unconditionally

SwiftUI's declarative syntax reduces UI code by 3-5 times compared to UIKit. A settings screen with List, Toggle, Picker — that's 40 lines of SwiftUI versus 200 lines of UIKit with UITableViewDataSource delegates. Time savings on UI development reach 60%. Apple recommends starting new projects on SwiftUI (Human Interface Guidelines).

@State, @Binding, @ObservableObject (and with iOS 17, the @Observable macro) create a reactive link between data and UI without manual reloadData(). Changing a @State variable automatically redraws the affected part of the hierarchy. This works correctly if you understand how SwiftUI computes the diff — via Equatable and id in ForEach.

AsyncImage, NavigationStack with type-safe routing via NavigationPath, searchable, refreshable — these are ready-made patterns that UIKit requires implementing manually.

When UIKit Remains Necessary

UICollectionView with compositional layout and diffable data source — complex grids with different cell types, horizontal sections inside vertical scroll, dynamic cell sizes. SwiftUI LazyVGrid / LazyHGrid do not provide such control.

Custom transitions between screens. UIViewControllerAnimatedTransitioning and UIViewControllerInteractiveTransitioning — interactive pop gesture with partial progress, custom hero transition with precise frame control. SwiftUI matchedGeometryEffect covers some cases, but not all.

UITextView with TextKit 2. Rich text editor, custom attributes, custom rendering — TextKit 2 (available since iOS 16) switched to async layout, solving performance issues on long documents. SwiftUI TextEditor is a wrapper around UITextView without direct access to TextKit.

UIScrollView with custom behavior. scrollViewDidScroll, parallax effects, sticky headers with custom logic, pull-to-refresh with custom indicator. SwiftUI ScrollView with scrollPosition and onScrollGeometryChange (iOS 17) covers some cases, but not all.

How Do We Integrate SwiftUI and UIKit Step by Step

  1. Identify screens where SwiftUI gives maximum gain (lists, forms, settings) — usually 70-80% of screens.
  2. For performance-critical areas (complex collections, custom animations) leave UIKit.
  3. Use UIHostingController to embed SwiftUI views into UIKit navigation stack.
  4. For backward compatibility, wrap UIKit components via UIViewRepresentable.
  5. Coordinator pattern (UIKit) manages navigation at the flow level, screens are implemented in SwiftUI.

One pattern we use on projects: UIKit coordinator manages navigation, while the screens themselves are in SwiftUI. The coordinator creates a UIHostingController, passes ViewModel via initializer or @EnvironmentObject, and manages transitions. This gives clean separation: SwiftUI handles UI, Coordinator handles navigation.

How async/await and Combine Work Together

Before Swift 5.5, asynchronous code on iOS was built on Combine or callback chains. With the advent of async/await and Actor, concurrency has become part of the language. On new projects we use async/await as the primary tool for network calls and business logic, and Combine for reactive UI state binding.

// Correct — @MainActor guarantees UI updates on main thread
@MainActor
class UserViewModel: ObservableObject {
    @Published var user: User?
    @Published var isLoading = false

    func loadUser(id: String) async {
        isLoading = true
        defer { isLoading = false }
        do {
            user = try await userService.fetch(id: id)
        } catch {
            // handle error
        }
    }
}

Combine remains indispensable for debouncing input, merging multiple Publishers (CombineLatest, Zip), and functional processing of value streams (map, flatMap, filter). In practice, 80% of projects use both approaches, choosing the tool for the task.

iOS App Architecture

MVVM — the basic pattern. ViewModel contains logic and @Published state, SwiftUI View subscribes via @ObservedObject or @StateObject. One rule: View knows nothing about URLSession, CoreData, UserDefaults.

Clean Architecture adds Repository and UseCase layers. UserRepository abstracts the data source (network vs cache). FetchUserUseCase contains business logic. UserViewModel calls UseCase and manages UI state.

TCA (The Composable Architecture) — a stricter pattern from Point-Free. State, Action, Reducer, Effect — everything explicit, testable, composable via Scope. Works well in large teams (5+ iOS developers) where predictability is important.

What's Included in iOS App Development

Stage Deliverables
Analysis and Design Technical specification, architectural diagram, technology stack selection
Development Code compliant with App Store Review Guidelines, backend integration (REST/GraphQL)
Testing Unit tests (XCTest, coverage >75%), UI tests (XCUITest, 150+ scenarios), load testing via Firebase Test Lab
Publication Developer account setup, code signing, submission to App Store Connect
Support 30-day warranty after release, updates for new iOS versions

Tools Without Which No Release Is Complete

Xcode Instruments. Time Profiler shows where CPU spends time. Allocations — memory leaks and excessive allocations. Leaks — objects that are not freed. Before every release — a mandatory run.

Firebase Crashlytics. Crash-free rate, grouping by stack trace, breadcrumbs of events leading to crash. Set up in 30 minutes, provides visibility across the entire device fleet. On our projects, average crash-free rate is 99.8%.

Fastlane match. Manage certificates and provisioning profiles via an encrypted git repository. Eliminates the 'it builds locally but not on CI' issue once and for all. Saves up to 4 hours per build when signing manually.

XCTest + XCUITest. Unit tests for ViewModel and UseCase, UI tests for critical flows (onboarding, payment, authorization). On average, code coverage is 75%.

Typical iOS Project Mistakes and Their Solutions
Problem Solution
Memory leak due to self capture in closure Use [weak self] in all handlers where self does not need to outlive the closure
Provisioning Profile conflicts Set up Fastlane match and store certificates in a separate repository
Slow app start due to synchronous singleton initialization Move initialization to first call or use lazy var
App Store rejection due to Section 4.2 (minimal functionality) Conduct a preliminary audit using the App Store Review Guidelines checklist

Process and Timelines

Complexity Estimated Timeline
MVP (5–8 screens, basic API) 6–10 weeks
Medium app (15–25 screens) 3–5 months
Complex (payments, AR, CoreML, custom UI) 5–9 months

Cost is calculated individually after analyzing the technical specification and design. Typically, the first 2 weeks are spent on design, after which we finalize the timeline and budget.

Order turnkey development — we will evaluate your project in 2 business days and propose the optimal architecture. Contact us to discuss your task: we guarantee code quality, compliance with App Store Review Guidelines, and experience with projects of any scale. Get a consultation — we will help you choose the right stack and avoid common mistakes at the start.