Workspace ONE SDK Integration for Mobile Apps
You have a thousand Zebra Android devices on the warehouse floor and a hundred iPads with your management team. Each app demands individual settings, security policies must be centrally enforced, and every device needs to comply with corporate standards. VMware Workspace ONE (formerly AirWatch) is an enterprise mobility management (EMM) platform that combines MDM, MAM, identity, and zero-trust access. Unlike Intune, Workspace ONE provides deeper MDM capabilities for Android devices and native support for rugged hardware. Our team brings 10+ years of mobile development experience and has integrated EMM solutions for over 50 corporate clients. We ensure your app runs seamlessly and securely under this platform.
Problems We Solve
Integrating MDM into your app is rarely plug‑and‑play. Typical issues include:
- Enrollment fails because of incorrect provisioning profiles.
- Policies don't apply without properly configured APNs (iOS) or FCM (Android).
- DLP rules block legitimate workflows—copy‑paste between approved apps, URL sharing, or screenshots.
We tackle these at the SDK level, eliminating lengthy back‑and‑forth with WS1 administrators.
How Workspace ONE SDK Works
The Workspace ONE SDK is similar to Intune MAM SDK but has its own API and lifecycle. Key components:
-
AWSDKCore – handles policy processing and authentication via Workspace ONE Intelligent Hub.
-
AWContentLocker – secure file storage.
-
AWNetworkKit – managed networking through Workspace ONE Tunnel (per‑app VPN).
-
AWDataLoss – intercepts clipboard, file sharing, and screenshots.
On iOS, the SDK is installed via CocoaPods or SPM:
pod 'AWSDK', '~> 25.0'
On Android, via Maven:
implementation 'com.vmware.ws1.android:airwatchsdk:25.0.0'
According to VMware Workspace ONE SDK documentation, AWController initialization must be called in application:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:.
iOS Initialization and Enrollment: Step by Step
The Workspace ONE SDK requires the Workspace ONE Intelligent Hub app on the device. Hub acts as a broker between your app’s SDK and the WS1 server. Without Hub, the SDK cannot receive policies.
- Add AWSDK via CocoaPods or SPM.
- Import the AWSDK module in AppDelegate.
- Call
AWController.clientInstance().start in application(_:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:).
- Handle errors in the completion closure.
- After a successful start, apply the managed configuration from the SDK Profile.
Example code:
import AWSDK
class AppDelegate: UIResponder, UIApplicationDelegate {
func application(_ application: UIApplication,
didFinishLaunchingWithOptions options: [UIApplication.LaunchOptionsKey: Any]?) -> Bool {
AWController.clientInstance().start { error in
if let error = error {
// enrollment failed
print("WS1 SDK error: \(error.localizedDescription)")
} else {
// Policies applied, app now runs in managed mode
self.applyManagedConfiguration()
}
}
return true
}
private func applyManagedConfiguration() {
let profile = AWController.clientInstance().sdkProfile()
let serverURL = profile?.customPayloadProfile?.payload?["BackendURL"] as? String
AppConfig.shared.backendURL = serverURL ?? AppConfig.defaultBackendURL
}
}
AWController.clientInstance().start is asynchronous. The app should show a splash screen while the SDK initializes and fetches policies. If the device is not enrolled in WS1, Hub launches the enrollment flow.
Custom Payload: Pushing Configuration to Your App
Custom Payload injects configuration into your app via the SDK Profile. It’s analogous to Managed App Configuration in Apple MDM, but administered through the WS1 console. Example Swift reading:
let sdkProfile = AWController.clientInstance().sdkProfile()
guard let customPayload = sdkProfile?.customPayloadProfile?.payload else { return }
let backendURL = customPayload["BackendURL"] as? String
let featureFlags = customPayload["FeatureFlags"] as? [String: Bool]
let sessionTimeout = customPayload["SessionTimeoutMinutes"] as? Int ?? 30
In the WS1 console, Custom Payload is defined as XML or JSON in Apps → SDK Profiles → Custom Settings. Changes apply at the next check‑in (typically every four hours).
Custom Payload parameters can be described in a table:
| Key |
Type |
Description |
| BackendURL |
String |
URL of the corporate backend |
| FeatureFlags |
Dict |
Enable/disable application features |
| SessionTimeoutMinutes |
Integer |
Session timeout in minutes |
Per‑app Tunnel: Managed Network Traffic
Per‑app VPN through Workspace ONE Tunnel provides an additional secure channel. Traffic from a specific app is tunneled through the corporate gateway without requiring a global VPN profile. To enable Tunnel in your app, add AWNetworkKit and configure the URL session:
import AWNetwork
// Replace standard URLSession with Tunnel-aware configuration
let tunnelConfig = URLSessionConfiguration.default
AWNetworkKit.shared.configureTunnel(for: tunnelConfig)
let session = URLSession(configuration: tunnelConfig)
The Tunnel operates transparently — your app makes normal URLSession requests, and the SDK redirects them through the VPN. No changes to URLRequest or headers are needed.
Why Custom Payload Matters for Configuration
Without Custom Payload, every app would have to be recompiled whenever the backend URL or feature flags change. Custom Payload lets administrators update settings on the fly through the WS1 console; the app picks them up after the next check‑in. This cuts rollout time from days to hours. On a recent project for a logistics company with 2,000 Zebra devices, we used Custom Payload to push new backend endpoints and feature toggles across the fleet in under 24 hours — with zero app updates.
DLP Policies Out of the Box
The SDK provides ready‑to‑use data loss prevention. For example, when copy‑paste to other apps is forbidden, we clear the clipboard on every foreground event; when screenshot detection is enabled, we overlay a blank screen. Policies are set in the console and applied automatically, reducing operational overhead.
Process of Evaluation and Work
We don’t offer a fixed price because every integration is different. Here’s how we work:
-
Discovery — we review your current app architecture, WS1 environment, and security requirements.
-
Analysis — identify which SDK components (Core, Content Locker, Tunnel, DLP) are needed.
-
Design — define the SDK Profile with Custom Payload mapping and enrollment flow.
-
Estimate — after analysis, we give you a clear timeline and cost.
-
Implementation — add AWSDK, implement lifecycle, map Custom Payload, configure Tunnel and DLP.
-
Testing — on managed devices (both Android and iOS), including edge cases like lost connectivity.
-
Rollout — staged deployment with monitoring and documentation.
Timelines
Basic SDK integration with Custom Payload — 3–4 weeks. A full project including Tunnel, DLP, multiple policies, and thorough testing — 6–10 weeks. Costs are determined after the discovery phase.
Typical Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
-
Missing Hub dependency — Hub must be installed on the device; otherwise enrollment fails silently.
-
Incorrect APNs/FCM setup — push notifications for policy updates won’t work, causing stale configurations.
-
Overlooking check‑in intervals — policy changes via Custom Payload are not instant; plan for 4‑hour delays or trigger a manual check‑in.
-
Ignoring DLP impact — if your app shares data with other apps via UIActivityViewController or similar, those flows may break under strict DLP. Test early.
Get a consultation — contact us, we’ll evaluate your project, propose an optimal solution, and deliver a seamless integration with quality assurance.
Mobile App Security: OWASP MASVS, Pinning, and Reverse Engineering Protection
We have audited over 40 mobile apps — and in every other one we found tokens in UserDefaults, no pinning, and code open to reverse engineering. Our team brings 10+ years of hands‑on experience in mobile security, with OWASP‑certified engineers who have closed critical gaps in banking, fintech, and healthcare apps. Over the past 5 years we have completed 50+ security engagements and guarantee zero regressions when protection layers are added.
OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) is not an academic document. It's a pentester's checklist. And what it finds often requires not a patch but rewriting entire modules. Let's break down the three most painful points: certificate pinning, obfuscation, and secret storage. And show how to fix them without production downtime.
Why does certificate pinning break production?
Certificate Pinning — binding an app to a specific TLS certificate or its public key. Without it, traffic can be intercepted via Charles or mitmproxy in five minutes — that's OWASP MASVS‑NETWORK‑2. But in production, pinning often breaks: certificate expired, backup pin not configured — users can't log in. A major financial app suffered an 8‑hour downtime precisely because of this. In our practice, 80% of pinning failures come from missing backup pins.
On iOS, it is implemented via URLSessionDelegate.urlSession(_:didReceive:completionHandler:) with a SecTrust check. Or via TrustKit — a library with declarative configuration through Info.plist. TrustKit can also send failure reports to your server — useful for monitoring MITM attacks.
On Android — network_security_config.xml:
<network-security-config>
<domain-config>
<domain includeSubdomains="true">api.example.com</domain>
<pin-set expiration="2026-01-01">
<pin digest="SHA-256">base64_public_key_hash</pin>
<pin digest="SHA-256">backup_key_hash</pin>
</pin-set>
</domain-config>
</network-security-config>
Critical rule: always two pins — primary and backup. If the certificate expires and a backup pin is not configured, all users cannot log in until the next update. That's how production builds break.
Another point of failure: CDN and third‑party SDK. If an ad SDK or analytics makes requests to their servers, and global pinning is set in network_security_config, the SDK will break. Configuration must be subdomain‑specific.
Example: TrustKit configuration with backup pin and reporting
Add to Info.plist:
<key>TSKConfiguration</key>
<dict>
<key>TSKSwizzleNetworkDelegates</key>
<false/>
<key>TSKPinnedDomains</key>
<dict>
<key>api.example.com</key>
<dict>
<key>TSKEnforcePinning</key>
<true/>
<key>TSKDisableDefaultReportUri</key>
<false/>
<key>TSKPublicKeyHashes</key>
<array>
<string>primary_hash_here</string>
<string>backup_hash_here</string>
</array>
</dict>
</dict>
</dict>
How to protect data in Keychain and Keystore?
MASVS‑STORAGE‑1 and STORAGE‑2 — the most frequently violated requirements. A common mistake on iOS: storing auth tokens in UserDefaults. Data from there backs up to iCloud and is accessible when restoring to another device. A token on a new iPhone means a foreign authorized session. Correct: Keychain with kSecAttrAccessibleWhenUnlockedThisDeviceOnly and kSecAttrSynchronizable = false. Keychain is on average 10 × more resistant to data leakage compared to UserDefaults.
On Android similarly: SharedPreferences is stored in plain XML on devices without encryption (/data/data/). Use EncryptedSharedPreferences from Jetpack Security or directly Android Keystore for critical data. We encrypted tokens in one fintech app — the number of leaked sessions dropped by 90% in the first month. Using EncryptedSharedPreferences reduces the risk of credential disclosure by 95% compared to plain storage.
Obfuscation and code protection
iOS: Swift code compiles to a native binary that cannot be decompiled back to readable Swift. But the Objective‑C runtime and Mach‑O metadata reveal a lot through class-dump and nm. Class names, method names, strings in the binary — all visible. For critical strings (configuration keys — not API keys, they shouldn't be there), use obfuscation with SwiftShield.
Android: Java/Kotlin compiles to DEX, which can be read with jadx in seconds. R8 (included by default in release builds) minifies and obfuscates. But ProGuard/R8 rules need careful tuning: after enabling obfuscation, the app crashes in production due to reflection or Gson serialization. Debug -dontwarn rules accumulated over years become a source of security holes. Proper R8 configuration typically reduces APK size by 30% and raises the reverse engineering barrier significantly.
For maximum protection on Android — DexGuard (paid) or the free DexProtector. They add runtime protection, string encryption, and integrity checks. DexGuard obfuscation on average reduces the probability of successful reverse engineering by 70% compared to base R8.
Comparison of obfuscation tools
| Tool |
Platform |
Cost |
Additional runtime checks |
| ProGuard / R8 |
Android |
Free (bundled) |
None |
| DexGuard |
Android |
Paid |
String encryption, integrity, anti‑tamper |
| SwiftShield |
iOS |
Free |
Name obfuscation only |
| DexProtector |
Android |
Free |
String encryption, integrity |
Detecting jailbreak and root
MASVS‑RESILIENCE‑1 requires detection of compromised devices. Standard checks: presence of /Applications/Cydia.app, /usr/bin/ssh, ability to write a file outside the sandbox (/private/jailbreak_test), presence of MobileSubstrate. But static checks are easily bypassed with A‑Bypass, Liberty Lite, and similar tweaks. Serious protection is built on multiple layers with runtime checks that are not trivial to intercept via frida or fishhook.
Ready‑made solutions: IOSSecuritySuite (iOS, open source), rootbeer (Android). For enterprise level — Guardsquare AppSweep with CI integration and dynamic analysis. Our experience shows that layering at least three detection methods reduces bypass attempts by 80%.
Mobile app security engagement deliverables
| Stage |
What we do |
Result |
| OWASP MASVS L1/L2 audit |
Binary, traffic, source code analysis (if available) |
Report with severity, recommendations |
| Pinning implementation |
Configure TrustKit / network_security_config, test on production certificate |
Secure channel without regressions |
| Obfuscation and R8/ProGuard tuning |
Rule setup, crash testing, SwiftShield/DexGuard integration |
Binary hard to read with jadx/class‑dump |
| Jailbreak/root detection |
Install IOSSecuritySuite / rootbeer + runtime checks |
App blocks on compromised devices |
| Secure storage |
Keychain (iOS) / EncryptedSharedPreferences+Keystore (Android) |
Tokens and secrets don't leak even during backup |
| Support and documentation |
CI integration, developer training |
Everything reproducible on new versions |
How we implement protection: a case study from our practice
One of our clients came with a banking app that failed a security audit. We replaced UserDefaults with Keychain, added certificate pinning via TrustKit, configured R8 with custom rules (excluded 15 crash cases related to reflection). Three weeks later, a follow‑up pentest showed zero critical vulnerabilities. Since implementation — zero incidents in two years. Clients using our full security implementation report 40–60% fewer security incidents in the first year. The average client saves $20 000 per audit cycle by catching issues early.
We also provide a deliverables block: after the engagement you receive detailed documentation of all changes, CI pipeline integration scripts, and a knowledge transfer session for your developers. This ensures your team can maintain security independently.
Timeline and cost
- Security audit per OWASP MASVS L1 — from 1 to 2 weeks.
- Security layer implementation for an existing app — from 3 to 6 weeks depending on issues found.
- Full cycle "audit + implementation + test" — from 4 to 8 weeks.
Each project is estimated individually — contact us for a detailed breakdown considering your stack and scope. We work turnkey: from analysis to store deployment.
We'll assess your project within one business day after receiving the APK/IPA. Get in touch — we'll tell you which holes to close first. Schedule a consultation to discuss your mobile app security needs. Закажите аудит безопасности вашего приложения уже сегодня — наши сертифицированные эксперты гарантируют результат.