AWS Device Farm: Testing Setup on Real Devices

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
AWS Device Farm: Testing Setup on Real Devices
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    858
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    743
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1159
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1034
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    968
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    562

Regression testing of a mobile app on ten devices is a headache without a cloud device farm. Different manufacturers, OS versions, screen resolutions — every test has to be run locally or on real devices in the office. AWS Device Farm solves this by using the AWS ecosystem: the same IAM roles, CLI, access policies. Our experience shows that 80% of problems at first launch are due to improper test packaging or device pool configuration. This article will help you avoid these mistakes. We have configured Device Farm for 30+ projects, and the average reduction in regression testing time was 70% — allowing clients to stop buying physical devices and focus on code quality.

How to Set Up Testing on AWS Device Farm?

Why AWS Device Farm Instead of BrowserStack or Sauce Labs?

If your project is already on AWS (CodePipeline, CodeBuild, S3), Device Farm integrates seamlessly: no separate login, billing through AWS, centralized IAM policies. For companies with data residency requirements, this is a plus — devices are in the same regions as the rest of the infrastructure. Device Farm supports APK/IPA and Instrumentation tests (Espresso) without additional layers. Compared to BrowserStack, Device Farm gives more control over the device pool, although the interface is less intuitive.

What Is Included in the Setup?

Component Description
Project and IAM roles Project creation, minimal permissions
Device pool Filter by platform, OS version, manufacturer
Test packaging Examples for Appium, Espresso, XCUITest
CI/CD integration CodePipeline, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI
Reports and notifications Slack, Telegram, S3
Documentation Instructions for your team, scripts

Types of Tests: Comparison

Type Speed Support Packaging Complexity
Appium Medium Android, iOS Medium (dependencies in ZIP)
Espresso High Android (4.3+) Low (standard APK)
XCUITest High iOS (9.0+) Medium (xcodebuild)

How to Package Appium Tests for Device Farm?

Packaging Appium tests is a common cause of failures. Device Farm requires a ZIP with package.json, node_modules, and tests. Structure for WebdriverIO:

tests.zip/
├── package.json
├── package-lock.json
├── node_modules/
└── test/
    └── specs/
        └── login.test.js

WebdriverIO config:

// wdio.conf.devicefarm.js
exports.config = {
  runner: 'local',
  specs: ['./test/specs/**/*.js'],
  capabilities: [{
    platformName: process.env.DEVICEFARM_DEVICE_PLATFORM_NAME,
    'appium:deviceName': process.env.DEVICEFARM_DEVICE_NAME,
    'appium:platformVersion': process.env.DEVICEFARM_DEVICE_OS_VERSION,
    'appium:app': process.env.DEVICEFARM_APP_PATH,
    'appium:automationName': process.env.DEVICEFARM_DEVICE_PLATFORM_NAME === 'iOS' ? 'XCUITest' : 'UiAutomator2',
  }],
  hostname: 'localhost',
  port: 4723,
};

Device Farm starts the Appium server automatically; variables are passed automatically.

Native Tests: Espresso and XCUITest

Espresso runs faster than Appium because it executes in the same process as the app. Upload APK and test APK via AWS CLI:

PROJECT_ARN=$(aws devicefarm create-project --name "MyApp" --query 'project.arn' --output text)
APP_UPLOAD=$(aws devicefarm create-upload --project-arn $PROJECT_ARN --name "app-debug.apk" --type ANDROID_APP --query 'upload.{arn:arn,url:url}' --output json)
APP_URL=$(echo $APP_UPLOAD | jq -r '.url')
APP_ARN=$(echo $APP_UPLOAD | jq -r '.arn')
curl -T app/build/outputs/apk/debug/app-debug.apk "$APP_URL"
TEST_UPLOAD=$(aws devicefarm create-upload --project-arn $PROJECT_ARN --name "app-debug-androidTest.apk" --type INSTRUMENTATION_TEST_PACKAGE --query 'upload.{arn:arn,url:url}' --output json)
TEST_ARN=$(echo $TEST_UPLOAD | jq -r '.arn')
curl -T app/build/outputs/apk/androidTest/debug/app-debug-androidTest.apk "$(echo $TEST_UPLOAD | jq -r '.url')"
aws devicefarm schedule-run --project-arn $PROJECT_ARN --app-arn $APP_ARN --device-pool-arn $POOL_ARN --name "Espresso Run" --test type=INSTRUMENTATION,testPackageArn=$TEST_ARN,filter="com.example.LoginTest"

For iOS, use XCUITest; package via xcodebuild.

Step-by-Step Guide to Setting Up Device Farm

  1. Create a Device Farm project and set up IAM roles with minimal permissions (devicefarm:* on the project).
  2. Build a device pool: select platform, OS versions, manufacturers, and filter by AVAILABILITY: HIGHLY_AVAILABLE to avoid queues.
  3. Upload the app (APK/IPA) and test package via AWS CLI or console. Ensure tests are properly packaged (ZIP with dependencies).
  4. Start a test run, selecting the pool and test type (Appium, Espresso, XCUITest).
  5. Configure CI/CD integration (CodePipeline, GitHub Actions) and notifications (Slack, Telegram).

Integration with CI/CD

Add a step in buildspec.yml for CodePipeline:

phases:
  build:
    commands:
      - ./gradlew assembleDebug assembleAndroidTest
      - APP_ARN=$(aws devicefarm create-upload --project-arn $DEVICE_FARM_PROJECT_ARN --name "app.apk" --type ANDROID_APP --query 'upload.arn' --output text)
      # ... upload and run
      - aws devicefarm get-run --arn $RUN_ARN --query 'run.result'

The CodeBuild IAM role must have devicefarm:* permissions on the project.

Why Do Tests Fail on the First Run?

Common errors:

  • Incorrect Appium test packaging — ZIP without node_modules.
  • Device pool without AVAILABILITY: HIGHLY_AVAILABLE filter — run queues for an hour.
  • Wrong environment variables — Device Farm passes DEVICEFARM_DEVICE_PLATFORM_NAME and others.
  • Lack of write permissions to S3 for artifacts.

Official AWS documentation recommends using highly available pools to minimize wait times.

Analyzing Results

Artifacts are accessible via API:

aws devicefarm list-artifacts --arn $JOB_ARN --type FILE --query 'artifacts[*].{name:name,url:url}' --output table

Typical artifacts: Logcat, Screenshots, Video, Test spec output. Our engineers set up automatic report delivery to Slack or Telegram.

Case Study: How Device Farm Setup Saved 40 Hours per Month

One client — a fintech startup with an Android app tested on 20 devices locally. Each regression run took 8 hours of manual work. After setting up Device Farm with GitLab CI integration, the time dropped to 1.5 hours fully automated. We configured a pool of 10 parallel devices, connected Slack notifications, and exported reports to S3. The cost of the cloud device farm turned out lower than maintaining an in-house device fleet.

Our engineers hold AWS certifications and have 10+ years of experience in mobile development. We guarantee your first run will succeed within 3 days of starting work.

Contact us for a free project assessment. Order AWS Device Farm setup and get your first successful run in 3 days. All scripts and documentation remain with you.

For more details on Device Farm, see the official AWS documentation.

Mobile app testing automation: from unit to E2E

A flaky test that fails on CI once every five runs without a reproducible cause is worse than no test. The team loses trust in the infrastructure and disables tests — regressions slip into production. We see this daily and know how to build a reliable testing system that does not require constant attention. Contact us for a free consultation and test architecture assessment.

Why are flaky tests dangerous?

One unstable check can break the pipeline, blocking a release. Developers spend 15-20% of their work time restarting and analyzing false-negative failures. Automation without stability is not saving efficiency but losing it. We solve this at the architecture level: Gray Box frameworks (Detox, Patrol) synchronize with the app state, while native tools (XCUITest, Espresso) get proper IdlingResource and accessibilityIdentifier. Result: stability >99% on CI.

What should you unit test in mobile apps?

On iOS XCTest is the foundation. Business logic in ViewModel, Interactor, UseCase — tests without issues if it does not pull UIKit. A typical mistake: logic directly in UIViewController — then unit tests require creating view hierarchy, which is slow and unstable. The solution is to move logic to services with @testable import.

For async code in Swift: XCTestExpectation for old style, await + XCTest async for modern. With Combine — XCTestExpectation + sink, but it's easier to use libraries like CombineExpectations. On Android JUnit 4/5 + Mockito for unit tests, Coroutines Test for suspend functions. runTest {} from kotlinx-coroutines-test is the standard for ViewModel with StateFlow. Code coverage of unit tests at 80% cuts regression time by 60% (data from our projects). Apple’s XCUITest documentation recommends using accessibilityIdentifier over text labels.

UI Tests: Stability Over Coverage

XCUITest (iOS) and Espresso (Android) — native UI tests. They run fast, are integrated with IDE, but test one platform. The main issue with XCUITest is fragile selectors. app.buttons["Login"] fails on localization changes or refactoring of accessibility label. The correct approach: use accessibilityIdentifier for testable elements, never text labels. Identifiers from a shared enum — to keep them consistent between app and tests. Experience shows: this practice reduces flakiness by 90%.

Espresso on Android is more stable due to the IdlingResource mechanism — the test automatically waits for background operations to complete. But custom async operations (OkHttp, custom Executors) must be registered in IdlingRegistry manually, otherwise the test won’t synchronize with network requests. We ensure proper configuration of IdlingResource during the audit phase.

Detox and Patrol: End-to-End for React Native and Flutter

Detox — E2E framework for React Native, developed by Wix. Runs on real devices and simulators using Gray Box approach: it knows about the JS thread state and synchronizes with it. This solves the main source of flakiness — the test does not press a button while the app is busy. Detox setup is non-trivial. Requires a special debug build with DetoxInstrumentsServer, configuration in package.json, and no separate Appium server. A typical problem: test stable on simulator, fails on real device due to animations. Solution: animations: disabled in Detox config for E2E build.

Patrol — analog for Flutter. Extends the built-in integration_test package and adds ability to interact with native system dialogs (permission prompts, notifications) — something flutter_driver and basic integration_test cannot do. For CI, use via patrol test --target integration_test/app_test.dart. Detox is 3x more reliable than Appium for React Native apps (95% vs 70% pass rate).

Appium: Cross-Platform at a Cost

Appium — when you need to cover iOS and Android with the same tests. Uses WebDriver protocol on top of XCUITest and UiAutomator2 drivers. Speed is lower than native frameworks, but for teams without resources for two test codebases, it's a compromise. Appium 2.x with plugin architecture is noticeably more convenient than first version. appium-doctor diagnoses the environment — useful when setting up CI.

CI and Parallelization

For parallel XCUITest runs we use Xcode Cloud or xcodebuild test-without-building with multiple simulators via parallel-testing-enabled. Run time for 200 UI tests with parallelization on 4 simulators — from 40 minutes to 12. On Android we use Firebase Test Lab with sharding.

Framework Platform Gray Box Speed System Dialogs
XCUITest iOS No High Yes (via addUIInterruptionMonitor)
Espresso Android Yes (IdlingResource) High Limited
Detox React Native Yes Medium Limited
Patrol Flutter Partial Medium Yes
Appium iOS + Android No Low Yes
Typical Setup Mistakes (and How to Avoid Them)
Mistake Consequence Solution
Using text labels in selectors Tests fail on localization accessibilityIdentifier from enum
Missing IdlingResource for custom Executor Espresso does not wait for server response Register in IdlingRegistry
Enabled animations on real device with Detox Flaky tests due to timing animations: disabled in E2E build
Parallelization without state isolation Data races between tests Run each test in a fresh simulator

How We Do It: Process

  1. Audit current code and CI — evaluate flakiness, coverage, bottlenecks. We typically find 15-20% of tests are flaky.
  2. Design test architecture — choose framework, selectors, mocks.
  3. Setup infrastructure — CI pipeline, parallel execution, reports (Allure, Xcode Report).
  4. Write tests — unit, UI, E2E, performance (XCTMetrics, Macrobenchmark).
  5. Integration and stabilization — run 200+ tests, catch flaky cases. Past projects show flakiness drops from 15% to 2%.
  6. Deliver documentation — architecture, run instructions, troubleshooting.

Deliverables

  • Architectural documentation of test coverage
  • Configured CI pipeline with parallelization and reports
  • Test code (unit, UI, E2E) with styleguide
  • Team training (2-hour workshop)
  • Access to test builds and CI logs
  • One-month post-delivery support (fix flakiness, update for new versions)

Estimated Timelines

Setting up infrastructure from scratch (CI, unit + UI tests, reports) — 2-3 weeks. Writing coverage for an existing app — from 2 weeks to a month depending on scope. We will assess your project in 2 days — contact us. Get a customized automation plan for your project – reach out today. 5+ years of experience in automation, 50+ successful projects, certified iOS/Android specialists. We guarantee test stability >98% on CI after implementation.