Tiptap CMS Integration: Custom Extensions, Collaboration, Headless

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Tiptap CMS Integration: Custom Extensions, Collaboration, Headless
Medium
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

Integrate Tiptap Editor into Your CMS

Ever tried to fit TinyMCE into a React app with custom design? Janky UI, no proper toolbar styling, heavy bundle. We've faced this many times. The solution is Tiptap: a headless editor built on ProseMirror. No built-in UI — you build the interface yourself. Full control, minimal size (~80KB in bundle), and seamless React integration. Over the years, we've integrated Tiptap into dozens of corporate CMS — from landing pages to complex editorial systems.

Problems Tiptap Solves

Problem 1: Bulky UI and customization limitations. Built-in editors impose their own styling. Tiptap lets you create a toolbar from custom components — buttons, dropdowns, modals. You control every pixel.

Problem 2: Collaborative editing. Tiptap supports Yjs, a protocol for real-time collaboration. Merge conflicts are resolved automatically. We used this in a project for a media editorial team of 50 people.

Problem 3: Content storage. Tiptap outputs content as JSON and HTML. JSON is structured, requires no sanitization, and is easy to transform. This eliminates XSS attack headaches.

Why Tiptap Outperforms TinyMCE & CKEditor

We ran a benchmark on a project with 2000+ pages: Tiptap achieves 40% lower LCP than TinyMCE (1.2s vs 2.0s). Compared to CKEditor, Tiptap's bundle is 80KB vs 400KB — a 5x reduction. If Core Web Vitals matter, the choice is clear.

How Tiptap Handles Collaboration

Tiptap uses CRDT via Yjs. Multiple editors can edit the same document simultaneously, with automatic conflict resolution. Server synchronization uses y-websocket or y-webrtc. In one project, we ensured stable operation for 50+ editors with minimal latency.

Steps to Add Collaborative Editing to Tiptap

  1. Install dependencies: npm install @tiptap/extension-collaboration @tiptap/extension-collaboration-cursor yjs y-websocket.
  2. Set up a Yjs document on the server (e.g., with y-websocket).
  3. Add the Collaboration extension to the editor: new Tiptap({ extensions: [Collaboration.configure({ document: ydoc })] }).
  4. Add cursors: CollaborationCursor.configure({ provider, user: { name, color } }).
  5. Run the WebSocket server and connect clients.

What Is Tiptap and Why Headless?

Tiptap is a wrapper around ProseMirror, providing a convenient API for creating extensions. Headless means the editor does not impose a UI — you build the toolbar and menus yourself. This gives flexibility for integration with any design and framework. For example, use React components for custom nodes.

Our Integration Process & Pricing

Stage What We Do Timeline
Analysis Determine extension set, custom nodes, backend integration 1 day
Design Toolbar prototype, data schema (JSON/HTML), API 1 day
Implementation Install and configure Tiptap, custom extensions, image upload 2-3 days
Testing Mobile device checks, collaboration tests 1 day
Deploy Staging deployment, documentation handover, access 1 day

Total: 5 to 7 business days. Typical cost: $3,000 to $8,000. We'll estimate your project in one day — contact us.

Tiptap vs TinyMCE & CKEditor

Criteria Tiptap TinyMCE CKEditor
Bundle size ~80KB ~400KB ~500KB
UI control Full (headless) Limited Limited
React support Native Via wrappers Via wrappers
Custom nodes Any via ProseMirror Limited Limited
Collaboration Built-in (Yjs) No No
Tree-shaking Yes No No

What's Included in Turnkey Work

  • Documentation: instructions for all custom nodes and extensions.
  • Access: source code, npm packages (if private), CI/CD configs.
  • Training: mini-workshop for editors (1 hour) and for developers (2 hours) on maintenance.
  • Support: 2 weeks after deployment — bug fixes, Q&A.

Custom Nodes (Content Blocks)

Tiptap allows creating custom blocks — e.g., a "Quote with author" block:

import { Node, mergeAttributes } from '@tiptap/core';
import { ReactNodeViewRenderer } from '@tiptap/react';

const QuoteBlock = Node.create({
    name: 'quoteBlock',
    group: 'block',
    content: 'inline*',
    addAttributes() {
        return {
            author: { default: null },
            position: { default: null }
        };
    },
    parseHTML() {
        return [{ tag: 'blockquote[data-type="quote-block"]' }];
    },
    renderHTML({ HTMLAttributes }) {
        return ['blockquote', mergeAttributes(HTMLAttributes, { 'data-type': 'quote-block' }), 0];
    },
    addNodeView() {
        return ReactNodeViewRenderer(QuoteBlockComponent);
    }
});

JSON vs HTML Storage

Tiptap can save content in JSON (native ProseMirror format) or HTML. JSON is preferred: it's structured, needs no sanitization, and is easy to transform. Use @tiptap/html for server-side conversion.

const jsonContent = editor.getJSON();
// On server
import { generateHTML } from '@tiptap/html';
const html = generateHTML(jsonContent, [StarterKit, Image, Link]);

Get a Consultation on Tiptap Integration

Contact us — we'll evaluate your project within a day, propose architecture and timeline. Guaranteed quality: 5 years on market, 30+ Tiptap implementations, experience with React and Next.js. Order integration today and get a lag-free editor.

Official Tiptap documentation: https://tiptap.dev/

CMS development: solving real editorial bottlenecks, not installing plugins

A news publisher had a WordPress site with 5 editors. Every article required 15 minutes of manual formatting because the WYSIWYG mangled pasted text. After 6 months, the database had 12 different font sizes and 7 custom colors. The redesign would cost $30k just to clean up the mess — and no one would admit it.

We develop content management systems (CMS) that prevent this from day one. Instead of free-form <textarea> hell, we design structured content models, custom WYSIWYG editors using ProseMirror, and media libraries that offload to S3+CDN within two sprints. This is CMS development without shortcuts.

When is headless CMS justified and when not?

Headless CMS (Strapi, Contentful, Sanity) decouples content management from frontend rendering — the API serves content to any client: website, mobile app, smart display. You get omnichannel delivery and a React/Vue frontend that never touches the admin panel. But if your editors need “save and see” preview and you have no separate frontend team, headless costs extra: you must build a preview layer or use a service like Vercel’s preview deployments.

Sanity customises Studio down to the field level — each field is a React component you can replace. Portable Text (its rich content format) ports to any renderer via custom serializers. For complex editorial workflows with multiple authors, Sanity is the best choice. Contentful offers stable cloud infrastructure with a marketplace of extensions, but monthly bills scale with content volume — typical enterprise plans are $500–$2,000/month. Strapi is self-hosted, open source, with a TypeScript API and custom fields via plugins, but you manage the hosting and backups.

Traditional CMS (WordPress, Craft CMS) works when editors need a familiar admin UI and the frontend is rendered server-side. Craft CMS provides Matrix fields, flexible entry structures, and built-in localization — it’s a professional tool for content teams that need granular permissions and versioning.

How do we build a WYSIWYG editor that doesn’t break layout?

The editor is the most complex component — not a <textarea>. The sweet spot is Tiptap, built on ProseMirror. Every element (headings, lists, tables, code blocks, images) is an extension. Collaborative editing via Yjs works out of the box. Lexical (Meta) is more performant (>60fps typing on mobile) but harder to extend. TinyMCE is a corporate standard at 300KB bundle, but it generates dirty HTML on paste — inline styles, nested <span>, &nbsp; everywhere.

The root cause: pasting from Word. font-family, mso-* properties, empty <span> tags — all leak into the page unless you sanitize. We configure ProseMirror’s pasteRule with DOMPurify to strip everything except allowed tags. Result: clean, semantic HTML that survives a redesign without manual cleanup. Editors save 2–4 hours per week per person.

Media library: from upload to CDN with transformation

Saving files to the server disk is the classic mistake. The disk fills, scaling fails, and CDN becomes impossible. The correct pipeline: upload to S3-compatible storage (AWS S3, Cloudflare R2, MinIO) → CDN (CloudFront, Cloudflare) → on‑the‑fly transformations.

Imgproxy or Thumbor generate any size and format dynamically: https://img.example.com/resize:800:600/format:webp/plain/s3://bucket/photo.jpg. The original lives once, derivatives never occupy disk. Cloudflare Images costs $5 per 100k images, including transformations. Video uploads use Cloudflare Stream or Mux — encode to HLS, adaptive streaming for any bandwidth. Without this, a 1080p video (500MB) loads entirely before play, causing a 5–8 second delay on 3G.

What’s included in media library development

Component Technology Timeline (weeks)
Upload and storage in S3 AWS SDK / MinIO 1–2
Image transformations Imgproxy / Thumbor 1–2
Video streaming Cloudflare Stream / Mux 1–2
Upload and sorting UI React + @dnd-kit/sortable 1–3
Migration of existing files Custom script 0.5–1

Why structured content outperforms free-form HTML

Free-form WYSIWYG leads to chaos in a year: 7 font sizes, 12 colors, random margins. Redesign requires manual cleanup of thousands of posts. Structured content stores “what” instead of “how”: not <p style="font-size:24px; color:red">Important!</p>, but a callout block with variant: warning. The CMS stores the structure; the frontend decides rendering. Sanity Portable Text, Contentful Rich Text, and Strapi Dynamic Zones all follow this pattern — and it reduces rework by 70% during redesigns.

Typical editorial time savings with structured content
  • A news site with 50 articles per week: editors save 10 hours/week on formatting.
  • A corporate portal with 1000 existing pages: migration from free-form to structured content takes 3–5 days, cutting page load by 40% (cleaner HTML).

Work process

  1. Analysis of editorial workflows — who edits, how often, what content (articles, landing pages, product data), whether localization is needed.
  2. CMS selection — based on scenarios, not trends. We compare headless vs traditional with a weighted matrix.
  3. Content model design — record types, fields, relationships, validation rules.
  4. Implementation — frontend integration, editor customization, media library, previews.
  5. Testing — real‑world scenarios: paste from Word, upload 100+ files simultaneously, load test the API (200 req/s target).
  6. Deployment and documentation — editor guide (text + video), API description, access credentials, 1 month support.

Timelines and budget

Type of work Timeline Budget
Integration of headless CMS (Strapi/Sanity) into existing Next.js project 2–5 weeks Discussed individually
Custom WYSIWYG editor with Tiptap and specific blocks 2–4 weeks Discussed individually
Media library with S3 + transformations 1–3 weeks Discussed individually
Full CMS system from scratch 4–10 weeks Discussed individually

Budget is calculated individually after an audit. Client examples: a mid‑sized media site saved $40k/year by eliminating manual formatting; an e‑commerce platform reduced time‑to‑publish by 60% with a headless Sanity setup. Contact us for a free project estimate.

What you get after delivery

  • Working CMS with configured access rights (admin, editor, reviewer)
  • Full content model documentation and API reference
  • Editor training documentation (text + video)
  • Code covered by tests (PHPUnit for Laravel, Jest for JS)
  • 1 month post‑launch support with SLA

Our experience and guarantees

Over 40 completed CMS projects — from small editorial sites to enterprise media portals with 200k daily unique visitors. We use licensed tools (Sentry for error monitoring, SonarCloud for code quality) and guarantee zero critical bugs at launch. All code is version‑controlled and deployable via CI/CD.

For your specific needs, contact us to discuss requirements. We’ll provide a technical proposal within 2 business days.