Custom WYSIWYG Editor Development for CMS

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Custom WYSIWYG Editor Development for CMS
Complex
from 1 week to 3 months
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

We build a custom WYSIWYG editor when off-the-shelf tools fail to meet unique requirements: non-standard blocks, strict output HTML, deep integration with the CMS backend. With over 10 years of experience and 50+ projects, we deliver turnkey editors in 3–12 weeks. We guarantee documentation, training, and support after handover. MVP development starts from $5,000, full-featured editor from $15,000.

Ready editors like TinyMCE and CKEditor often come with excessive features or lack support for specific blocks: custom video players, interactive tables, embeds from external services. Moreover, they generate messy HTML that's tricky to parse on the backend. A custom editor gives full control over the data model and output code.

We design the editor for the specific CMS: Laravel, WordPress, Django, or a custom solution. Content is stored in JSONB database fields — flexible and indexable. The result is a fast, predictable editor with a contextual toolbar, slash commands, and drag-and-drop blocks. Performance improvements: page loads are 35% faster, and user engagement increases by an average of 50%.

When and Why Build a Custom WYSIWYG Editor?

You write your own editor when no ready solution covers all requirements. Typical scenarios:

  • Non-standard blocks: custom galleries, interactive diagrams, embedding third-party services via iframe.
  • Clean HTML: strict output code without extra wrappers, e.g., for later conversion to PDF or email.
  • Deep integration: the editor must save data directly into the CMS, work with a media library, support access rights.
  • Performance: with hundreds of blocks per page, ready editors lag — virtualization and lazy loading are needed.

Technical Core: Engine and Data Model

Engine Selection

Writing an editor on plain contenteditable is a path to endless bugs. The choice is between three mature engines:

Engine Flexibility Performance React Support Learning Curve
ProseMirror High High Via Tiptap High
Slate.js Medium Medium Native Medium
Lexical High Very high Native Medium

ProseMirror gives maximum control over the data model — it's used, for example, at New York Times. Slate.js is better for React projects where development speed is key. Lexical by Meta is the most performant — up to 2x faster than Slate.js for large documents — but the community is still small.

Data Model

The editor must work with a clear schema. Two popular approaches: Flat JSON (list of blocks) and Tree (nested structure).

Example Flat JSON (Editor.js style):

{
  "blocks": [
    { "id": "abc123", "type": "header", "data": { "text": "Heading", "level": 2 } },
    { "id": "def456", "type": "paragraph", "data": { "text": "Paragraph text" } },
    { "id": "ghi789", "type": "image", "data": { "url": "/uploads/photo.jpg", "caption": "Caption" } }
  ],
  "version": "2.28.0"
}

Example Tree (ProseMirror/Tiptap):

{
  "type": "doc",
  "content": [
    {
      "type": "heading",
      "attrs": { "level": 2 },
      "content": [{ "type": "text", "text": "Heading" }]
    },
    {
      "type": "paragraph",
      "content": [
        { "type": "text", "text": "Normal " },
        { "type": "text", "marks": [{ "type": "bold" }], "text": "bold" },
        { "type": "text", "text": " text" }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

In PostgreSQL, data is stored in jsonb with a GIN index for full-text search. Each block type is a separate React component with view and edit modes. We register blocks via a plugin system:

interface BlockPlugin<T = Record<string, unknown>> {
  type: string;
  label: string;
  icon: React.ReactNode;
  defaultData: T;
  render: (data: T, ctx: RenderContext) => React.ReactNode;
  edit: (data: T, onChange: (data: T) => void) => React.ReactNode;
  validate?: (data: T) => ValidationError[];
  toHTML?: (data: T) => string;
}

Key Features: Toolbar, Slash Commands, Drag-and-Drop, History

Toolbar appears only on text selection — it doesn't take up space and doesn't distract. We implement a floating panel via FloatingToolbar with bold, italic, link buttons.

Slash commands are the standard for block editors: typing / opens a block selection menu. Filtering by name speeds up work.

Drag-and-drop block sorting is implemented via @dnd-kit/core. Blocks are reordered without losing content.

History management uses an undo/redo stack with a configurable limit (default 100 states). Autosave debounces changes every 2 seconds, displaying status: "Saved", "Saving...", "Unsaved changes". We use immutable structures (Immer) to save memory for large documents.

class EditorHistory {
  private undoStack: EditorState[] = [];
  private redoStack: EditorState[] = [];
  private maxSize = 100;

  push(state: EditorState) {
    this.undoStack.push(structuredClone(state));
    if (this.undoStack.length > this.maxSize) this.undoStack.shift();
    this.redoStack = [];
  }

  undo(current: EditorState): EditorState | null {
    if (this.undoStack.length === 0) return null;
    this.redoStack.push(structuredClone(current));
    return this.undoStack.pop()!;
  }

  redo(current: EditorState): EditorState | null {
    if (this.redoStack.length === 0) return null;
    this.undoStack.push(structuredClone(current));
    return this.redoStack.pop()!;
  }
}

Rendering and Performance

The editor JSON is rendered on the public part of the site. Two approaches:

  1. SSR via React — data is passed to the same block components as in the editor. Ideal for Next.js.
  2. Server-side rendering — in PHP or Node.js, parse the JSON and generate HTML directly, without React.
Approach Performance Complexity Flexibility
SSR with React Medium Medium High
Server-side rendering High High Medium

Example renderer in Laravel:

class BlockRenderer
{
    protected array $renderers = [];

    public function register(string $type, callable $renderer): void
    {
        $this->renderers[$type] = $renderer;
    }

    public function render(array $blocks): string
    {
        return collect($blocks)
            ->map(fn($block) => ($this->renderers[$block['type']] ?? fn() => '')($block['data']))
            ->implode("\n");
    }
}

Media Handling

The editor integrates with the CMS media library. Images are uploaded via drag-and-drop directly into the block — a progress bar shows the status. For large documents (hundreds of blocks and dozens of images), we enable virtualization: we render only visible blocks plus buffer, replacing the rest with placeholders. We use react-window or @tanstack/virtual. This reduces rendering time by 40%.

Deliverables and Custom WYSIWYG Editor Pricing

What's Included

  • Requirements analysis and data model design
  • Development of the editor core and plugin system
  • Implementation of standard and custom blocks
  • Integration with the CMS via REST API or direct database access
  • Configuration of autosave, history, media library
  • Testing and debugging
  • Creation of documentation and editor training
  • 12-month warranty support

Custom WYSIWYG Editor Timelines and Cost

Estimated timelines:

  • MVP: 3–4 weeks (from $5,000)
  • Full-featured editor: 8–12 weeks (from $15,000)
  • Complex projects with unique blocks: up to 16 weeks

Cost is calculated individually based on complexity. We provide a specific number after an audit of requirements. This investment pays for itself within 6 months, saving an average of $10,000 in licensing fees.

Why Choose Us for Custom WYSIWYG Editor Development?

  • 10+ years of experience in editor development for media and corporate websites
  • 50+ projects — from small blogs to large portals (e.g., a media portal with 500+ blocks per page)
  • Transparent process: we demo interim results every 2 weeks
  • 12-month warranty and free support after launch

Ready to build your custom WYSIWYG editor? Contact us for a consultation and get a tool that fully meets your business needs.

Quick Start Steps 1. Requirements gathering. 2. Data model design. 3. Core engine selection. 4. Block plugin development. 5. Integration and testing.

CMS development: solving real editorial bottlenecks, not installing plugins

A news publisher had a WordPress site with 5 editors. Every article required 15 minutes of manual formatting because the WYSIWYG mangled pasted text. After 6 months, the database had 12 different font sizes and 7 custom colors. The redesign would cost $30k just to clean up the mess — and no one would admit it.

We develop content management systems (CMS) that prevent this from day one. Instead of free-form <textarea> hell, we design structured content models, custom WYSIWYG editors using ProseMirror, and media libraries that offload to S3+CDN within two sprints. This is CMS development without shortcuts.

When is headless CMS justified and when not?

Headless CMS (Strapi, Contentful, Sanity) decouples content management from frontend rendering — the API serves content to any client: website, mobile app, smart display. You get omnichannel delivery and a React/Vue frontend that never touches the admin panel. But if your editors need “save and see” preview and you have no separate frontend team, headless costs extra: you must build a preview layer or use a service like Vercel’s preview deployments.

Sanity customises Studio down to the field level — each field is a React component you can replace. Portable Text (its rich content format) ports to any renderer via custom serializers. For complex editorial workflows with multiple authors, Sanity is the best choice. Contentful offers stable cloud infrastructure with a marketplace of extensions, but monthly bills scale with content volume — typical enterprise plans are $500–$2,000/month. Strapi is self-hosted, open source, with a TypeScript API and custom fields via plugins, but you manage the hosting and backups.

Traditional CMS (WordPress, Craft CMS) works when editors need a familiar admin UI and the frontend is rendered server-side. Craft CMS provides Matrix fields, flexible entry structures, and built-in localization — it’s a professional tool for content teams that need granular permissions and versioning.

How do we build a WYSIWYG editor that doesn’t break layout?

The editor is the most complex component — not a <textarea>. The sweet spot is Tiptap, built on ProseMirror. Every element (headings, lists, tables, code blocks, images) is an extension. Collaborative editing via Yjs works out of the box. Lexical (Meta) is more performant (>60fps typing on mobile) but harder to extend. TinyMCE is a corporate standard at 300KB bundle, but it generates dirty HTML on paste — inline styles, nested <span>, &nbsp; everywhere.

The root cause: pasting from Word. font-family, mso-* properties, empty <span> tags — all leak into the page unless you sanitize. We configure ProseMirror’s pasteRule with DOMPurify to strip everything except allowed tags. Result: clean, semantic HTML that survives a redesign without manual cleanup. Editors save 2–4 hours per week per person.

Media library: from upload to CDN with transformation

Saving files to the server disk is the classic mistake. The disk fills, scaling fails, and CDN becomes impossible. The correct pipeline: upload to S3-compatible storage (AWS S3, Cloudflare R2, MinIO) → CDN (CloudFront, Cloudflare) → on‑the‑fly transformations.

Imgproxy or Thumbor generate any size and format dynamically: https://img.example.com/resize:800:600/format:webp/plain/s3://bucket/photo.jpg. The original lives once, derivatives never occupy disk. Cloudflare Images costs $5 per 100k images, including transformations. Video uploads use Cloudflare Stream or Mux — encode to HLS, adaptive streaming for any bandwidth. Without this, a 1080p video (500MB) loads entirely before play, causing a 5–8 second delay on 3G.

What’s included in media library development

Component Technology Timeline (weeks)
Upload and storage in S3 AWS SDK / MinIO 1–2
Image transformations Imgproxy / Thumbor 1–2
Video streaming Cloudflare Stream / Mux 1–2
Upload and sorting UI React + @dnd-kit/sortable 1–3
Migration of existing files Custom script 0.5–1

Why structured content outperforms free-form HTML

Free-form WYSIWYG leads to chaos in a year: 7 font sizes, 12 colors, random margins. Redesign requires manual cleanup of thousands of posts. Structured content stores “what” instead of “how”: not <p style="font-size:24px; color:red">Important!</p>, but a callout block with variant: warning. The CMS stores the structure; the frontend decides rendering. Sanity Portable Text, Contentful Rich Text, and Strapi Dynamic Zones all follow this pattern — and it reduces rework by 70% during redesigns.

Typical editorial time savings with structured content
  • A news site with 50 articles per week: editors save 10 hours/week on formatting.
  • A corporate portal with 1000 existing pages: migration from free-form to structured content takes 3–5 days, cutting page load by 40% (cleaner HTML).

Work process

  1. Analysis of editorial workflows — who edits, how often, what content (articles, landing pages, product data), whether localization is needed.
  2. CMS selection — based on scenarios, not trends. We compare headless vs traditional with a weighted matrix.
  3. Content model design — record types, fields, relationships, validation rules.
  4. Implementation — frontend integration, editor customization, media library, previews.
  5. Testing — real‑world scenarios: paste from Word, upload 100+ files simultaneously, load test the API (200 req/s target).
  6. Deployment and documentation — editor guide (text + video), API description, access credentials, 1 month support.

Timelines and budget

Type of work Timeline Budget
Integration of headless CMS (Strapi/Sanity) into existing Next.js project 2–5 weeks Discussed individually
Custom WYSIWYG editor with Tiptap and specific blocks 2–4 weeks Discussed individually
Media library with S3 + transformations 1–3 weeks Discussed individually
Full CMS system from scratch 4–10 weeks Discussed individually

Budget is calculated individually after an audit. Client examples: a mid‑sized media site saved $40k/year by eliminating manual formatting; an e‑commerce platform reduced time‑to‑publish by 60% with a headless Sanity setup. Contact us for a free project estimate.

What you get after delivery

  • Working CMS with configured access rights (admin, editor, reviewer)
  • Full content model documentation and API reference
  • Editor training documentation (text + video)
  • Code covered by tests (PHPUnit for Laravel, Jest for JS)
  • 1 month post‑launch support with SLA

Our experience and guarantees

Over 40 completed CMS projects — from small editorial sites to enterprise media portals with 200k daily unique visitors. We use licensed tools (Sentry for error monitoring, SonarCloud for code quality) and guarantee zero critical bugs at launch. All code is version‑controlled and deployable via CI/CD.

For your specific needs, contact us to discuss requirements. We’ll provide a technical proposal within 2 business days.