AI Solution Migration from Cloud to On-Premise

We design and deploy artificial intelligence systems: from prototype to production-ready solutions. Our team combines expertise in machine learning, data engineering and MLOps to make AI work not in the lab, but in real business.
Showing 1 of 1 servicesAll 1566 services
AI Solution Migration from Cloud to On-Premise
Medium
~1-2 weeks
FAQ
AI Development Areas
AI Solution Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1212
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    852
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    822

Migrating an AI solution from the cloud to on-premise

Migrating AI from the cloud to on-premise infrastructure is an inversion of the standard approach. Reasons include security and compliance concerns (prohibiting data transfer to the cloud), economics under high, constant load (owned GPUs are cheaper than rented ones with 70%+ utilization), latency requirements (edge deployment), and corporate policy.

Economic Analysis: When is On-Premise More Profitable?

The cost of renting 8x A100 80GB on AWS (p4d.24xlarge): ~$32/hour or ~$280,000/year at 100% utilization. The cost of owning a DGX A100 80GB server: ~$200,000 + $20,000/year operational expenses. With >60% utilization, owning a server pays for itself in 18-24 months.

On-premise ML platform architecture

On-Premise Infrastructure:
├── GPU Cluster (обучение)
│   ├── Training nodes: 4x DGX A100 (32 GPU)
│   └── InfiniBand network 200Gbps
├── Inference Cluster (инференс)
│   ├── Inference nodes: 4x A100/H100
│   └── 100GbE network
├── Storage
│   ├── NVMe SSD (hot data): 200TB
│   ├── HDD NAS (warm data): 2PB
│   └── Tape (cold archive)
├── Platform (Kubernetes)
│   ├── NVIDIA GPU Operator
│   ├── Kubeflow Pipelines
│   └── MLflow Tracking Server
└── Networking
    ├── Load Balancer (HAProxy/MetalLB)
    └── Service Mesh (Istio)

Replacing cloud-managed services

Cloud Service On-Premise Alternative
S3 MinIO (S3-compatible)
SageMaker Kubeflow + MLflow
RDS PostgreSQL on bare metal
ElastiCache Redis cluster
CloudWatch Prometheus + Grafana
ECR Harbor (container registry)
Secrets Manager HashiCorp Vault
Lambda Knative / OpenFaaS

MinIO as a replacement for S3:

import boto3

# Код не меняется — MinIO S3-совместим
s3 = boto3.client(
    's3',
    endpoint_url='https://minio.internal.company.com',
    aws_access_key_id='minioadmin',
    aws_secret_access_key='minioadmin'
)

# Создание bucket и загрузка — идентично S3 API
s3.create_bucket(Bucket='ml-models')
s3.upload_file('model.pkl', 'ml-models', 'v1/model.pkl')

Security of on-premise ML infrastructure

On-premise doesn't automatically guarantee security. Required features include network segmentation (GPU cluster in an isolated VLAN), mTLS between services, data encryption at rest (LUKS for disks), role-based access control via LDAP/AD integration, and audit logging of all actions with models and data.

Hybrid approach

A complete transition to on-premise isn't always optimal. A hybrid architecture: on-premise training and data, peak inference scaling through the cloud (burst capacity), and disaster recovery in the cloud. This reduces capex while maintaining control over the data.

Timeframe and complexity

Initial hardware and base platform setup: 4-6 weeks. Migration of existing ML pipelines: 8-12 weeks. Full operational maturity (monitoring, DR, automation): 4-6 months. The key risk is underestimating the DevOps workload: on-premise requires a team to support the infrastructure provided by the cloud provider.