Smart Contract Security Audit Services

We design and develop full-cycle blockchain solutions: from smart contract architecture to launching DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces and crypto exchanges. Security audits, tokenomics, integration with existing infrastructure.
Showing 35 of 35 servicesAll 1306 services
FAQ
Blockchain Development Services
Blockchain Development Stages
Latest works
  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.png
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1214
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1161
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    852
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1041
  • image_logo-advance_0.png
    B2B Advance company logo design
    561
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    823

Smart Contract Audits: Finding What Compiler Misses

Euler Finance March 2023: $197M lost via flash loan on donateToReserves. Contract passed multiple audits. Vulnerability existed over a year. Auditors checked the function, missed it violated health factor invariant when combined with liquidate. Normal for complex DeFi: vulnerability isn't function bug, but invariant violation across call chains.

What Static Analysis Misses

Slither finds reentrancy, overflow, tx.origin misuse, variable shadowing. Real projects: dozens of warnings, 0-2 critical. Rest is noise. Won't find logical vulnerabilities.

Mythril uses symbolic execution. On 20-contract protocol with cross-contract calls — path explosion, hangs or false positives.

Both mandatory first pass. Don't replace manual analysis.

Fuzzing: Where Echidna and Foundry Find Real Bugs

Echidna — property-based fuzzer. Define invariants as Solidity functions, Echidna generates random sequences trying to break them.

Real: lending protocol, Echidna found deposit → borrow → liquidate → repay sequence violating totalAssets() >= totalLiabilities(). Humans wouldn't construct this.

Foundry fuzzing simpler to integrate. Stateful via invariant tests. Real project: vault contract, Foundry fuzz found maxWithdraw returning > actual balance at specific ratio. Hardhat unit tests missed it.

Medusa (Trail of Bits) supports corpus-guided fuzzing, faster on large contracts.

Formal Verification: When Needed

Formal verification proves contract satisfies spec for ALL inputs — not N random, but mathematically all. Certora Prover, K Framework, Halmos.

MakerDAO, Aave, Uniswap use Certora in CI/CD — each PR auto-verified.

Limitations: unbounded loops, hash functions, signature verification. For simple math (AMM, lending) works great.

Makes sense for contracts managing > $50M, updated rarely, with clearly formalizable invariants.

Attack Vectors Junior Auditors Miss

Storage collision in proxy. If implementation declares variable in slot 0 overlapping proxy storage — silent override.

Read-only reentrancy. External contract reads state via view during reentrancy-vulnerable moment — guard doesn't help. Curve pools 2023.

Oracle manipulation via TWAP. Harder than spot, but possible on low-liquidity pairs.

Gas griefing on loops. Attacker adds thousands of zero-balance addresses — function inaccessible.

Front-running on MEV. Use minAmountOut / deadline and checks.

Complete Audit Structure

Phase 1 — automated (1-2 days): Slither, Mythril, Aderyn. Triage.

Phase 2 — manual (5-15 days): line-by-line. Focus: external/public functions, all transfer/call/delegatecall, state changes before checks.

Phase 3 — fuzzing (2-5 days): Echidna/Foundry invariant tests. Fork mainnet.

Phase 4 — report: severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low/Info) with PoC for Critical/High. Re-audit fixes.

Audit in CI/CD

Slither and Aderyn on every PR. Certora Prover on merge. Not replacement for full audit, but catches regressions.

Timelines

Simple token/NFT: 3-5 days. DeFi: 2-4 weeks. Full: 4-8 weeks. Re-audit: 3-7 days.

Save audit budget exactly once: before first hack.