AI Face Grouping for Mobile Photo Galleries

TRUETECH is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of iOS, Android, PWA mobile applications. We have extensive experience and expertise in publishing mobile applications in popular markets like Google Play, App Store, Amazon, AppGallery and others.

Development and support of all types of mobile applications:

Information and entertainment mobile applications
News apps, games, reference guides, online catalogs, weather apps, fitness and health apps, travel apps, educational apps, social networks and messengers, quizzes, blogs and podcasts, forums, aggregators
E-commerce mobile applications
Online stores, B2B apps, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback services, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, loyalty programs, food and goods delivery, payment systems.
Business process management mobile applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, project management, sales team tools, financial management, production management, logistics and delivery management, HR management, data monitoring systems
Electronic services mobile applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, electronic service platforms, cashback platforms, video hosting, thematic portals, online booking and scheduling platforms, online trading platforms

These are just some of the types of mobile applications we work with, and each of them may have its own specific features and functionality, tailored to the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 1734 services
AI Face Grouping for Mobile Photo Galleries
Complex
~1-2 weeks
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_mobile-applications_feedme_467_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for FEEDME
    858
  • image_mobile-applications_xoomer_471_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for XOOMER
    745
  • image_mobile-applications_rhl_428_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for RHL
    1162
  • image_mobile-applications_zippy_411_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for ZIPPY
    1034
  • image_mobile-applications_affhome_429_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for Affhome
    968
  • image_mobile-applications_flavors_409_0.webp
    Development of a mobile application for the FLAVORS company
    563

AI Face Grouping for Mobile Photo Galleries

Imagine: a user has 50,000 photos in their gallery. Finding all shots with a specific person manually takes hours. A typical gallery contains tens of thousands of photos, and each shot may include several faces — AI is indispensable. Automatic grouping by face solves this, but requires careful implementation: detection accuracy, embedding extraction speed, and correct clustering. We specialize in such pipelines: 8+ years in mobile development, 20+ projects with computer vision. Our solution runs entirely on-device: face detection (Vision/ML Kit) → embedding extraction with MobileFaceNet (128-dimensional vector) → DBSCAN clustering. This approach ensures privacy, speed, and offline functionality. On-device processing saves up to 70% on cloud infrastructure costs compared to server solutions — reducing the app's TCO.

How AI Grouping Works On-Device

The pipeline consists of three stages, each optimized for mobile processors.

Face Detection

On iOS, we use VNDetectFaceRectanglesRequest from the Vision framework:

let request = VNDetectFaceRectanglesRequest { req, _ in
    guard let faces = req.results as? [VNFaceObservation], !faces.isEmpty else { return }
    for face in faces {
        let faceRect = VNImageRectForNormalizedRect(face.boundingBox, width, height)
        self.extractEmbedding(from: originalImage.cropping(to: faceRect)!)
    }
}

On Android — ML Kit FaceDetector (simple integration) or MediaPipe FaceDetector (more control). The choice depends on accuracy and model size requirements.

Embedding Extraction

Apple does not provide a built-in API for face recognition (only detection). We use MobileFaceNet — a compact model (1–3 MB) running via Core ML. After L2 normalization, the cosine distance between embeddings of the same person is <0.3, between different people >0.6. A threshold of 0.4–0.5 works well in practice.

func extractEmbedding(from faceImage: CGImage) -> [Float]? {
    guard let input = try? MobileFaceNetInput(face_image: MLMultiArray(from: resize(faceImage, to: CGSize(width: 112, height: 112)))) else { return nil }
    guard let output = try? facenetModel.prediction(input: input) else { return nil }
    let embedding = (0..<128).map { output.embedding[$0].floatValue }
    return l2Normalize(embedding)
}

func l2Normalize(_ v: [Float]) -> [Float] {
    let norm = sqrt(v.reduce(0) { $0 + $1 * $1 })
    return norm > 0 ? v.map { $0 / norm } : v
}

Clustering

For clustering without a predefined number of clusters, we use DBSCAN (density-based spatial clustering). In Swift, we implement it with Accelerate/BLAS for cosine distance computation:

func dbscan(embeddings: [[Float]], eps: Float = 0.45, minPoints: Int = 2) -> [Int] {
    var labels = Array(repeating: -1, count: embeddings.count)
    var clusterId = 0
    for i in 0..<embeddings.count {
        guard labels[i] == -1 else { continue }
        let neighbours = rangeQuery(embeddings: embeddings, idx: i, eps: eps)
        if neighbours.count < minPoints { continue }
        labels[i] = clusterId
        var seeds = neighbours
        while !seeds.isEmpty {
            let q = seeds.removeFirst()
            if labels[q] == -1 { labels[q] = clusterId }
            if labels[q] != clusterId { continue }
            labels[q] = clusterId
            let qNeighbours = rangeQuery(embeddings: embeddings, idx: q, eps: eps)
            if qNeighbours.count >= minPoints { seeds.append(contentsOf: qNeighbours) }
        }
        clusterId += 1
    }
    return labels
}

For galleries with 20,000+ embeddings, DBSCAN with O(n²) can run 10–30 seconds. Speedup is achieved via Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) using FAISS (with Swift bindings), reducing complexity to O(n log n).

More about the MobileFaceNet model MobileFaceNet is a 4-layer convolutional network that extracts 128-dimensional embeddings. The model size is only 1–3 MB, ideal for mobile devices. It was trained on the MS-Celeb-1M dataset.

Why On-Device is Better than Server-Side

Criteria On-Device Server-Side
Privacy Embeddings never leave the device Requires consent to transmit biometrics
Speed Instant, no network latency Depends on connection and load
Offline Mode Full functionality without internet Requires constant connection
Infrastructure Cost No server costs High GPU and storage expenses

On-device processing is 3–5 times faster for typical galleries (up to 10,000 photos) and fully complies with GDPR, CCPA, and other regulations. Cloud computing costs drop to zero, which is especially important for startups with limited budgets.

Embedding Model Comparison

Model Size Dimensionality Accuracy (LFW)
MobileFaceNet 1-3 MB 128 99.2%
FaceNet 10-30 MB 512 99.6%
ArcFace 20-50 MB 512 99.8%

For mobile applications, MobileFaceNet is optimal — a balance of accuracy and performance.

Performance on Large Galleries

A real gallery has 5,000–50,000 photos. Faces appear in about 30–40% of them. For example, 10,000 photos with faces, 2 faces on average = 20,000 embeddings. DBSCAN processes them in 10–30 seconds on an iPhone 14. With FAISS — 2–3 seconds. We register the background task via BGProcessingTask (iOS 13+):

BGTaskScheduler.shared.register(forTaskWithIdentifier: "com.app.faceGrouping") { task in
    let bgTask = task as! BGProcessingTask
    self.runFaceGrouping(completion: { bgTask.setTaskCompleted(success: true) })
    bgTask.expirationHandler = { /* save progress */ }
}

Storing Results

Embeddings are biometric data, so we store them locally in Core Data with Data Protection encryption (.complete). The mapping identifier is PHAsset.localIdentifier, not the photo itself. Embeddings are not synced to iCloud without explicit user consent.

What's Included in the Work

  1. Analysis — assessment of gallery size, selection of detection and clustering models.
  2. Design — pipeline architecture, integration with Core Data / Room.
  3. Implementation — coding in Swift/Kotlin, training/calibrating thresholds.
  4. Testing — A/B tests on real galleries, clustering accuracy verification.
  5. Documentation — API description, integration guide, configuration manual.
  6. Support — 3-month warranty, maintenance during OS updates.

Our team with 8 years of experience and Apple/Google certifications guarantees timely delivery. Order development of on-device AI grouping for your app. Get a consultation — we'll find the optimal solution for your gallery.

Timelines

A basic on-device pipeline (detection, embeddings, clustering) for medium galleries takes 2–3 weeks. A scalable version with FAISS, background processing, incremental updates, and UI takes 4–5 weeks. Contact us — we'll calculate cost and timelines individually.

FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering, Schroff et al.

Machine Learning in Mobile Apps: CoreML, TFLite, and On-Device Models

We distinguish two fundamentally different approaches: an app with on-device AI and an app that simply calls a cloud API. The former works without internet, does not send user data to third-party servers, and responds within 50 milliseconds. The latter depends on network latency and pricing plans. Choosing the architecture is a key step that directly affects cost, privacy, and user experience in machine learning in mobile apps. Our experience shows that in 70% of projects, on-device inference is cheaper in the long run due to eliminating server costs.

How to Choose Between CoreML and TFLite for On-Device Inference?

CoreML — Apple's native framework for running ML models on device. Supports Neural Engine (starting with A11 Bionic), GPU, and CPU as fallback. Models are converted to .mlmodel format via coremltools from PyTorch, ONNX, or TensorFlow. Conversion is not always trivial: custom layers require implementing MLCustomLayer, and INT8 quantization can sometimes noticeably reduce accuracy on specific data. We ensure the final model passes validation on real data before and after conversion.

TensorFlow Lite — cross-platform alternative for Android and Flutter. On Android it uses NNAPI (Neural Networks API) for hardware acceleration — since Android 10 NNAPI is more stable; before that it's better to explicitly use GPU delegate via GpuDelegate. A typical mistake: the model is trained on normalized data in range [0,1], but the app feeds [0,255] — inference runs but produces meaningless results without any error. We include an automatic input data validation module in the SDK.

For image classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks, ready-to-use optimized models are available. YOLOv8 in CoreML format runs detection on a 640×640 frame in 15–20 ms on iPhone 14 Neural Engine. MobileNetV3 on TFLite with GPU delegate runs around 8 ms on Pixel 7 for classification.

Parameter CoreML TFLite
Platforms iOS, macOS, watchOS Android, iOS, Linux, embedded
Hardware acceleration Neural Engine, GPU, CPU NNAPI, GPU (OpenCL/OpenGL), CPU
Quantization support FP16, INT8 (with coremltools) FP16, INT8, dynamic range
Custom operations Via MLCustomLayer (Swift) Via delegates (Java/Kotlin)
Model bundle size ~3–5 MB (MobileNetV2 quantized) ~2–4 MB

What If You Need Text Generation On-Device?

Running small language models on device has become a reality in the last few years. Apple Intelligence uses its own models via Private Cloud Compute, but for third-party developers other paths are available.

llama.cpp with Metal backend on iOS is a working approach for phi-3-mini (3.8B parameters, 4-bit quantization, ~2.3 GB). Inference: 15–25 tokens/second on iPhone 15 Pro. For integration in Swift, use the Swift Package llama.swift or a wrapper via C interface llama.h. The binary is not bundled with the app — the model is downloaded on first launch and stored in Application Support. Our certified developers configure incremental download to avoid blocking the first launch.

On Android, the analog is Google AI Edge (formerly MediaPipe LLM Inference API) supporting Gemma-2B. It works via GPU delegate, on Tensor G3 chip Pixel 8 Pro — about 20 tokens/second.

Limitations are real: models larger than 4B parameters are still slow on mobile devices. For complex reasoning tasks, on-device LLM falls behind GPT-4o in quality. A hybrid approach — on-device for short tasks and private data, cloud for complex queries — is often optimal. We will evaluate your case and propose a balance of performance and privacy — contact us.

How Does On-Device Inference Compare to Cloud in Terms of Cost and Performance?

On-device inference is typically 10x cheaper per request than cloud APIs for image recognition tasks, while also eliminating latency variability and privacy risks. The table below summarizes the trade-offs.

Criteria On-Device Inference Cloud API
Latency <50ms 200–500ms (including network)
Cost per 1M requests $0 (no server) $10–50 (AWS Rekognition, Google Vision)
Privacy Data stays on device Data sent to server
Offline Yes No
Scalability No server scaling issues Need to provision API capacity

For an app with 100k MAU running 10 image recognitions per user per month, on-device inference can save up to $5,000 monthly compared to cloud API. Get a free consultation on your ML architecture today.

Integrating OpenAI API and Other Cloud Models

For scenarios where cloud inference is acceptable, integrating OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google Gemini is an HTTP client + streaming SSE. In Swift, AsyncThrowingStream is convenient for streaming responses. In Kotlin, use Flow.

Critically: API keys must never be stored in the app bundle. Even an obfuscated key can be extracted from the IPA in 10 minutes using strings or frida. Correct architecture: mobile app → your own backend → OpenAI API. The backend controls rate limiting, logs requests, and protects the key.

What Is Included in the Work (Deliverables)

  • Trained and quantized model for the target device (documentation with metrics)
  • SDK for integration (Swift/Kotlin/Flutter) with call examples
  • Performance tests on 3–5 real devices
  • Instructions for OTA model updates
  • Support during App Store / Google Play moderation (compliance with Guidelines 4.2, 5.1)
  • 2 weeks of technical support after release

Typical Project Pipeline

  1. Task analysis — measure latency, privacy, size, supported devices.
  2. Model prototyping — in Python, evaluate accuracy on target data.
  3. Conversion and quantization — for CoreML/TFLite with validation.
  4. Integration into the app — model wrapped in a service layer (easy to swap CoreML ↔ TFLite ↔ cloud).
  5. Testing — on real devices, measure FPS, RAM, battery.
  6. Deployment — via TestFlight / Firebase App Distribution, monitor metrics.

Timelines: integration of a ready CoreML/TFLite model — 1–2 weeks, development of a custom model with mobile optimization — from 6 weeks, on-device LLM chat with personalization — 4–8 weeks.

Why We Take on Complex Cases?

10+ years of experience in mobile development, 50+ implemented AI/ML solutions, guarantee of compatibility with current iOS and Android versions. All projects undergo code review and load testing. The cost includes preparation of moderation documentation and training of your team.

Contact us — we will help you choose the architecture and implement ML in your app turnkey. Order an audit of your existing solution — we will assess the potential for server cost savings free of charge. In some projects, savings can reach significant amounts per month.