1C-Bitrix Size Filter: Stock and Caching

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of Bitrix and Bitrix24 solutions of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to complex online stores, CRM systems with 1C and telephony integration. The experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from the vendor.
Showing 1 of 1All 1626 services
1C-Bitrix Size Filter: Stock and Caching
Medium
~1-2 weeks
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1357
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    943
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_development_of_an_online_appointment_booking_widget_for_a_medical_center_594_0.webp
    Development based on Bitrix, Bitrix24, 1C for the company Development of an Online Appointment Booking Widget for a Medical Center
    693
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_mirsanbel_458_0.webp
    Development based on 1C Enterprise for MIRSANBEL
    829
  • image_crm_dolbimby_434_0.webp
    Website development on CRM Bitrix24 for DOLBIMBY
    731
  • image_crm_technotorgcomplex_453_0.webp
    Development based on Bitrix24 for the company TECHNOTORGKOMPLEKS
    1073

1C-Bitrix Size Filter: Stock Check and Caching

The standard catalog.smart.filter component cannot filter products by the presence of a specific size among trade offers. Result: the user clicks on size 42, but the page is empty because the item is out of stock. Conversion loss in clothing and footwear categories can reach 30% — that's hundreds of thousands of rubles in lost profit monthly. We solve this problem in 2–3 working days.

We are a team of certified developers with 10 years of experience with Bitrix and Bitrix24. We implement the filter turnkey: from data structure design to deployment on a production server. We guarantee correct stock handling and high speed through tagged caching.

Problems with Standard Size Filtering

The first problem is lack of stock consideration. The standard filter shows all sizes from the trade offer infoblock, even those with zero stock. The user selects a size, sees an empty page, and leaves. The second is performance. Querying thousands of offers without caching can take up to 2 seconds, which is unacceptable for an online store. The third is incorrect size grouping (e.g., S/M/L should appear in a defined order, not alphabetically).

We solve all three problems: we filter by PROPERTY_SIZE with CATALOG_QUANTITY > 0, implement tagged caching with agent-based invalidation, and sort sizes by the order in the list property.

Data Architecture for Sizes

Product (catalog infoblock)
  └── Trade Offers (trade offer infoblock)
        ├── PROPERTY_SIZE = "S"  CATALOG_QUANTITY = 3
        ├── PROPERTY_SIZE = "M"  CATALOG_QUANTITY = 0
        └── PROPERTY_SIZE = "L"  CATALOG_QUANTITY = 7

The filter for size M with "Only in stock" enabled should not show this product — trade offer M is out of stock.

How to Store Sizes?

Three typical approaches. The choice depends on the catalog:

Storage Method Example When to Use
Text property (list) S, M, L, XL Simple catalogs, fixed size charts
Numeric property 36, 37, 38... Shoes, clothing with numeric sizes, need range filtering
Complex sizes EU 42 / US 9, 32/34 Cross-brand conversion, multiple standards

We recommend the first option: it offers convenient sorting via a list property and a simple UI. For more details on Bitrix properties, see the official documentation. General caching principles are described in the Wikipedia article.

How to Get Sizes with Stock Consideration?

The function below collects all sizes that exist in at least one active trade offer with non-zero stock, and sorts them by the order from the property setting.

function getAvailableSizes(int $offersIblockId): array
{
    $sizes = [];

    $res = CIBlockElement::GetList(
        [],
        [
            'IBLOCK_ID'         => $offersIblockId,
            'ACTIVE'            => 'Y',
            '>CATALOG_QUANTITY' => 0,
        ],
        ['PROPERTY_SIZE'],
        false,
        ['PROPERTY_SIZE']
    );

    while ($item = $res->Fetch()) {
        $sizeId = $item['PROPERTY_SIZE_ENUM_ID'];
        $sizeValue = $item['PROPERTY_SIZE_VALUE'];

        if ($sizeId && !isset($sizes[$sizeId])) {
            $sizes[$sizeId] = [
                'id'    => $sizeId,
                'xmlId' => $item['PROPERTY_SIZE_ENUM_XML_ID'],
                'value' => $sizeValue,
                'sort'  => 0,
            ];
        }
    }

    if (!empty($sizes)) {
        $enumRes = CIBlockPropertyEnum::GetList(
            ['SORT' => 'ASC'],
            ['IBLOCK_ID' => $offersIblockId, 'CODE' => 'SIZE']
        );
        $sortMap = [];
        while ($enum = $enumRes->Fetch()) {
            $sortMap[$enum['ID']] = intval($enum['SORT']);
        }
        foreach ($sizes as &$size) {
            $size['sort'] = $sortMap[$size['id']] ?? 999;
        }
        usort($sizes, fn($a, $b) => $a['sort'] <=> $b['sort']);
    }

    return array_values($sizes);
}

Catalog Filtering by Size with Stock Consideration

function getProductIdsBySize(
    int $catalogIblockId,
    int $offersIblockId,
    array $sizeXmlIds,
    bool $onlyInStock = true
): array {
    if (empty($sizeXmlIds)) return [];

    $offerFilter = [
        'IBLOCK_ID'   => $offersIblockId,
        'ACTIVE'      => 'Y',
        'PROPERTY_SIZE' => $sizeXmlIds,
    ];

    if ($onlyInStock) {
        $offerFilter['>CATALOG_QUANTITY'] = 0;
    }

    $productIds = [];
    $res = CIBlockElement::GetList(
        [],
        $offerFilter,
        false,
        false,
        ['PROPERTY_CML2_LINK']
    );

    while ($row = $res->GetNext()) {
        if ($pid = intval($row['PROPERTY_CML2_LINK_VALUE'])) {
            $productIds[$pid] = true;
        }
    }

    return array_keys($productIds);
}

UI: Size Grid

We display sizes as checkboxes in a grid layout. Active sizes are highlighted, others have a gray border.

$availableSizes = getAvailableSizes(OFFERS_IBLOCK_ID);
$selectedSizes = array_map('htmlspecialchars', (array)($_GET['SIZE'] ?? []));
?>
<div class="filter-block filter-block--sizes">
    <h3 class="filter-block__title">Size</h3>
    <div class="size-grid">
        <?php foreach ($availableSizes as $size): ?>
        <?php $isSelected = in_array($size['xmlId'], $selectedSizes); ?>
        <label class="size-option <?= $isSelected ? 'is-selected' : '' ?>">
            <input type="checkbox"
                   name="SIZE[]"
                   value="<?= htmlspecialchars($size['xmlId']) ?>"
                   <?= $isSelected ? 'checked' : '' ?>>
            <span class="size-label"><?= htmlspecialchars($size['value']) ?></span>
        </label>
        <?php endforeach; ?>
    </div>
</div>

Why Caching Dimensions Matters

The list of available sizes rarely changes — only when goods arrive or are written off. Without caching, each catalog request queries thousands of offers. Our tagged caching approach speeds up filter loading by 3 times compared to no cache. Filter response time drops from 0.9 to 0.3 seconds for a catalog with 50,000 products. This saves up to 15% of user bounce rate, increasing profit.

$cacheId = 'available_sizes_' . OFFERS_IBLOCK_ID;
$cache = \Bitrix\Main\Data\Cache::createInstance();

if ($cache->initCache(600, $cacheId, '/catalog/filter/')) {
    $availableSizes = $cache->getVars();
} else {
    $availableSizes = getAvailableSizes(OFFERS_IBLOCK_ID);
    $cache->startDataCache();
    $cache->endDataCache($availableSizes);
}

For invalidation, we set an agent that updates stock every 10 minutes — the cache is cleared automatically.

What's Included

Stage Content
Analysis Study catalog, size charts, filter requirements
Design Choose storage method, design cache
Development PHP logic, component template, CSS/JS
Testing Verification on real data, load testing
Documentation Architecture, data schema, deployment guide
Training Knowledge transfer to your team (1–2 hours online)
Support 30 days of warranty support after launch

Process

  1. Analysis — study the catalog, size charts, filter requirements.
  2. Design — choose storage method, design the cache.
  3. Development — write functions for size retrieval, filtering, UI.
  4. Testing — verify on real data.
  5. Deployment — deploy to production server, configure cache invalidation.

Implementation Timeline

Basic implementation (without stock check): from 4 hours. Full version with stock, caching, and custom UI: 2–3 working days. Complex scenarios (multiple size charts, cross-brand conversion): up to 5 days. Cost is calculated individually: we evaluate complexity, catalog volume, number of size charts. Contact us — we'll prepare a quote within one day.

Our experience: over 50 filter projects in Bitrix, certified specialists. Request a consultation — we'll discuss your task without obligation.

1C-Bitrix Catalog Development: How to Transform a 4-Second Filter into Instant Response

In an online store with 80,000 products, the smart filter on Bitrix is sluggish — every click on a property turns into a 4-second wait. The customer clicks the 'Apple brand' checkbox, watches the spinning loader, and leaves for competitors. Conversion drops by 20%. This is a familiar pain. We specialize in 1C-Bitrix catalog development and filtering: we design architectures that handle half a million items without degradation — through faceted indexes, proper storage selection, and tagged caching. If your store is losing money due to a slow filter — order an audit of the current architecture, and we'll assess the problem in one day.

How Do Information Blocks Affect Catalog Performance?

Information blocks are the foundation of the catalog, but on projects with tens of thousands of products, they become a bottleneck. The standard bitrix:catalog.smart.filter generates JOINs on 6–8 property tables (b_iblock_element_property), leading MySQL into a full scan. We change the approach: during design, we determine which properties go into the information block and which into Highload blocks. For reference data (brands, cities, size charts) we use HLB: they work with a separate table without the overhead of b_iblock_element_property. When a 'Cities' dropdown loads for 8 seconds due to 5000 values — that's a signal to move them to HLB. A catalog of 80,000 products with a 4-second filter loses significant revenue annually due to customer attrition — the right architecture delivers that kind of savings. Contact us to estimate the benefit for your project.

What Is the Faceted Index and Why Is It Important?

The core performance lies here. Without a faceted index, every filter click is an SQL query with JOINs on b_iblock_element, b_iblock_element_property, b_catalog_price, and a few more tables. On 100,000 products, such a query takes 2–4 seconds. With a faceted index — 30–80 ms. According to official documentation, the faceted index reduces query execution time by tens of times (in real projects — up to 50 times). The mechanism: 1C-Bitrix creates a table b_catalog_smart_filter where it stores pre-calculated combinations of 'section + property + value + product count'. When filtering, the engine accesses this flat table instead of collecting data from the normalized structure of information blocks.

Common mistakes when configuring the faceted index include not creating the index for all sections, forgetting to set up background reindexing after bulk imports — causing property counters to mismatch the actual product count. Including all properties in the facet, even service ones, bloats the b_catalog_smart_filter table. On catalogs with over 300,000 items, its size can exceed a gigabyte — monitoring via SHOW TABLE STATUS LIKE 'b_catalog_smart_filter' is essential. Conclusion: the faceted index provides radical acceleration, but requires careful configuration and automatic reindexing via the agent CIBlockCatalog::ReindexFacet or cron.

Why Are Highload Blocks Faster Than Information Blocks for Reference Data?

Criterion Information Block (IB) Highload Block (HLB)
Property storage b_iblock_element_property table Separate flat table per HLB
Filter speed on 50k products ~500–800 ms (with facet) ~80–150 ms (without facet)
SEO support (URL, templates) Full None (only reference data)
Recommended for Products, sections, main properties Reference data (brands, cities), custom data
When Information Blocks Are Preferred Over HLBHighload blocks do not generate SEO-friendly URLs and lack a visual editor. If the reference data requires separate pages (e.g., brands with unique H1s), use information blocks. HLB is strictly for service data that does not need indexing.

In practice, the best architecture is hybrid. Products and sections live in information blocks — there you have SEO, visual editor, and standard catalog components. Reference properties with thousands of values are moved to Highload blocks. User data (favorites, viewed items, comparisons) also go to HLB — they grow quickly, and information blocks are not designed for that. Want to know which architecture to choose for your catalog? Contact us — we'll analyze your data structure and provide recommendations.

SEO Filters: How to Get SEO-Friendly URLs and Not Get Penalized by Yandex?

The standard filter generates ?filter[brand]=apple&filter[color]=black — search engines either do not index such URLs or consider them duplicates. But the query 'black apple laptops' is the most converting low-frequency traffic. We create SEO-friendly URLs: /catalog/laptops/brand-apple/color-black/ with unique title, description, and H1. Not template-based 'Buy {brand} in Minsk', but meaningful ones reflecting the specific combination.

  • Canonical URLs — to prevent /brand-apple/color-black/ and /color-black/brand-apple/ from duplicating.
  • Control of the number of indexed combinations — 10 properties with 20 values each yield millions of pages; Yandex penalizes that.
  • Automatic sitemap for SEO filter pages.
  • Admin interface for the manager — they decide which intersections to index.

Order the implementation of SEO filters — get a ready-made tool for attracting low-frequency traffic with conversion growth up to 30%.

What Methods Provide a Significant Performance Boost?

  • Fetching only necessary fields via arSelect — no SELECT * on information blocks.
  • Managed tag-based caching: when a product is added, the cache is automatically rebuilt.
  • Composite cache for anonymous users: TTFB < 100 ms, HTML is served without running PHP.
  • Indexes on properties used in filtering — without them MySQL scans the entire b_iblock_element_property table.
  • TTFB monitoring: if the catalog responds slower than 500 ms, we check the slow query log.

What Is Included in Comprehensive Catalog Development on 1C-Bitrix

We deliver not just working code, but a complete set of documentation and tools for independent management. Deliverables include:

  • Audit of current catalog and filtering architecture.
  • Project documentation describing data schema, distribution across information blocks and Highload blocks, and facet composition.
  • Ready smart filter with AJAX mode, grouping, and state persistence.
  • Configured faceted index with cron reindexing.
  • SEO filters with SEO-friendly URLs, unique meta tags, canonicals, and sitemap.
  • Integration of quick view and sorting (AJAX, mobile adaptation).
  • Operational documentation for managers: how to add properties, manage indexes and SEO combinations.
  • 30-day warranty support after delivery — we fix incidents and answer questions.

How We Develop a Catalog: Step-by-Step Plan

We don't just install components. The process includes:

  1. Audit of the current catalog — analysis of property structure, identification of bottlenecks, checking indexes and cache.
  2. Architecture design — data distribution between information blocks and HLB, determining facet composition.
  3. Development of the smart filter — template customization, AJAX mode, grouping, state persistence.
  4. Faceted index configuration — creation, cron reindexing, monitoring.
  5. SEO filters — SEO-friendly URLs, meta tags, canonicals, sitemap.
  6. Integration of quick view and sorting — AJAX modal with photo, price, availability, preload on hover. On mobile — bottom sheet instead of popup.
  7. Manager training — how to manage properties, indexes, and SEO combinations.
  8. Warranty support — 30 days after delivery.

Implementation Timeline

Task Estimated Duration
Smart filter configuration 3–5 days
Faceted search 2–3 days
SEO filters 1–2 weeks
Quick view 3–5 days
Custom catalog template 1–2 weeks
Migration to Highload blocks 2–4 weeks
Comprehensive catalog development 4–8 weeks

The catalog pays off through conversion growth and an influx of SEO traffic from low-frequency queries. The customer finds the product in two clicks, rather than leaving after the first click on the filter. Get a consultation — we will evaluate your project within a day and provide a project plan and roadmap for 1C-Bitrix catalog development. Contact us through the form on the website — certified specialists with over 200 successful projects.