Implementing an Accessibility Mode on Your Website

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Implementing an Accessibility Mode on Your Website
Medium
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1368
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1255
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    963
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1199
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    942
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    956

A standard site with 4.5:1 contrast and default font sizes is a step toward accessibility but doesn't guarantee comfort for users with visual or motor impairments. An accessibility mode solves this comprehensively: it enlarges text, boosts contrast to 7:1, disables animations, and increases clickable areas. We implemented such a solution using CSS variables and a React component.

Why standard accessibility isn't enough?

WCAG 2.1 requirements are the minimum. Text smaller than 18px needs 4.5:1 contrast, but users with low vision often prefer 7:1 or higher. Additionally, standard accessibility doesn't account for individual preferences: some need only large text, others high contrast, and some suffer from animations. Our mode gives choice: users decide which improvements to enable.

How our solutions work?

The foundation is a set of CSS variables that are overridden when a data attribute is set on html. This instantly applies changes across the entire interface. Switching happens without JavaScript — only through CSS.

Option CSS Variable Effect
High contrast --color-text, --color-bg, --focus-outline Text and background contrast at least 7:1
Enlarged text --font-size-base Base font size increases by 4px
Reduced motion --transition-duration and animation-duration: 0.01ms All animations and transitions disabled
Larger touch targets --min-touch-target to 56px Buttons and links become larger, easier for motor impairments

React control component

We wrote a useAccessibilityMode hook that stores selected modes in localStorage and listens to system media queries. If the OS has reduced motion enabled, the reduced-motion mode activates automatically.

type AccessibilityMode = 'high-contrast' | 'large-text' | 'reduced-motion' | 'large-targets';

function useAccessibilityMode() {
    const [modes, setModes] = useState<Set<AccessibilityMode>>(() => {
        const stored = localStorage.getItem('a11y-modes');
        return stored ? new Set(JSON.parse(stored)) : new Set();
    });

    // Listen to system settings
    useEffect(() => {
        const mediaQuery = window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)');
        if (mediaQuery.matches) {
            setModes(prev => new Set([...prev, 'reduced-motion']));
        }
    }, []);

    const toggle = useCallback((mode: AccessibilityMode) => {
        setModes(prev => {
            const next = new Set(prev);
            next.has(mode) ? next.delete(mode) : next.add(mode);
            localStorage.setItem('a11y-modes', JSON.stringify([...next]));
            return next;
        });
    }, []);

    // Apply to document.documentElement
    useEffect(() => {
        document.documentElement.dataset.accessibilityMode = [...modes].join(' ');
    }, [modes]);

    return { modes, toggle };
}

function AccessibilityPanel() {
    const { modes, toggle } = useAccessibilityMode();
    const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false);

    const options = [
        { id: 'high-contrast' as const,  label: 'High contrast', icon: '◑' },
        { id: 'large-text' as const,     label: 'Enlarged text', icon: 'A+' },
        { id: 'reduced-motion' as const, label: 'Less animation',   icon: '⏸' },
        { id: 'large-targets' as const,  label: 'Large buttons',    icon: '⊞' },
    ];

    return (
        <div className="accessibility-widget">
            <button
                aria-expanded={isOpen}
                aria-controls="a11y-panel"
                onClick={() => setIsOpen(!isOpen)}
                aria-label="Accessibility settings"
            >
                ♿
            </button>

            {isOpen && (
                <div id="a11y-panel" role="group" aria-label="Accessibility settings">
                    {options.map(opt => (
                        <label key={opt.id} className="a11y-option">
                            <input
                                type="checkbox"
                                checked={modes.has(opt.id)}
                                onChange={() => toggle(opt.id)}
                            />
                            <span className="icon">{opt.icon}</span>
                            {opt.label}
                        </label>
                    ))}

                    <button
                        onClick={() => {
                            localStorage.removeItem('a11y-modes');
                            setModes(new Set());
                        }}
                    >
                        Reset settings
                    </button>
                </div>
            )}
        </div>
    );
}

Integration with system settings (no JS)

Some improvements apply automatically if the user has configured their OS. CSS media queries override variables for prefers-reduced-motion: reduce, prefers-contrast: more, and prefers-color-scheme: dark. This reduces browser load and saves bandwidth — no extra JS needed.

/* Automatically for users who prefer reduced motion in OS */
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
    *, *::before, *::after {
        animation-duration: 0.01ms !important;
        animation-iteration-count: 1 !important;
        transition-duration: 0.01ms !important;
    }
}

/* System high contrast theme */
@media (prefers-contrast: more) {
    :root {
        --color-text: #000;
        --color-bg: #fff;
        --focus-outline: 3px solid #000;
    }
}

/* Dark theme */
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
    :root {
        --color-text: #f0f0f0;
        --color-bg: #1a1a1a;
    }
}

What's included in the accessibility mode implementation?

Deliverables:

  • A set of CSS variables tailored to your design
  • React component with a control panel
  • Automatic integration with system settings (prefers-*)
  • Documentation for maintenance and configuration
  • User guide on how to use the mode

We also train your team: we show how to add new options and test accessibility. Our team has over 5 years of experience in web accessibility and has completed more than 30 projects.

Implementation process

Step Duration Description
Audit current accessibility 1 day Check contrast, text size, focus, keyboard operation
Design CSS variables 1 day Create a system for your design
Develop component 1–2 days Write React component or adapt to your architecture
Testing 1 day Check each mode with screen readers (NVDA, VoiceOver) and keyboard
Deployment and documentation 0.5 day Deliver code and configuration instructions

Timeline and cost

Implementation takes from 3 to 5 days depending on site complexity. Cost is calculated individually — we'll evaluate your project for free. We guarantee the mode will meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Our CSS-variable approach reduces maintenance effort by 2x, making implementation cost-effective.

Common mistakes during implementation

  • Ignoring system prefers-* queries — users should see changes automatically.
  • Overriding focus only in CSS without a visible indicator — always keep a visible outline.
  • No reset option — give users the ability to revert all settings.
  • Using only JavaScript for toggling — our CSS-variable solution is 2–3 times faster and more reliable.

How to ensure the mode works in all browsers?

We test on current versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. CSS variables are supported by all modern browsers, and prefers-reduced-motion and prefers-contrast media queries are available in recent versions. For older browsers (IE11), graceful degradation is in place: the site remains accessible but without extended options.

Conclusion

An accessibility mode is not a luxury but a necessity for sites aimed at all users. Contact us for a consultation and evaluation of your project. We'll help make your site accessible and comfortable for everyone. Get a free accessibility audit and find out how to improve your site.

Website Accessibility: WCAG, Screen Readers, Keyboard Navigation

On a major bank's website, the "Submit Application" button was marked up as <div class="btn" onclick="...">. The NVDA screen reader did not announce it, Tab skipped it, Enter didn't work. For thousands of blind users, this bank simply did not exist as an online service. We see such problems every day in dozens of projects — and developing accessible websites according to WCAG 2.2 AA has become the only way to avoid discrimination and legal risks. Fines for non-accessibility for legal entities can reach substantial amounts, and lawsuits millions.

In this card — how we make web accessibility a11y work, based on real cases, with a specific tech stack and numbers. No generic phrases.

Why is Semantic Markup the Foundation of Web Accessibility (a11y)?

Most accessibility problems are solved by correct HTML, not additional ARIA attributes. <button> instead of <div onclick>, <nav> instead of <div class="navigation">, <h1><h6> in proper hierarchy, <label for="field-id"> instead of <div class="label">. This is the basic level, but in practice, every second form in Russian online stores does not have correct <label> tags.

ARIA is needed where native HTML falls short: custom components — dropdown menus, tooltips, modal windows, tabs, accordions. And here the complexity begins.

A typical mistake in custom dropdowns: the screen reader does not know it is a combobox, does not announce the number of options, does not say which one is selected, focus does not move to the list when opened. Proper implementation:

  • role="combobox" on the input
  • aria-expanded="true/false" when opened/closed
  • aria-controls="listbox-id" points to the list
  • aria-activedescendant — ID of the currently selected item
  • role="option" and aria-selected on each option

This is not theory; it is tested with a screen reader. NVDA + Chrome or VoiceOver + Safari is a mandatory part of QA.

Example implementation of custom combobox with ARIA
<div role="combobox" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="listbox-1" aria-activedescendant="" tabindex="0">
  <label for="input-1">Select city</label>
  <input id="input-1" type="text" role="combobox" aria-autocomplete="list" />
  <ul id="listbox-1" role="listbox" aria-label="Cities">
    <li role="option" aria-selected="false" id="opt-1">Moscow</li>
    <li role="option" aria-selected="false" id="opt-2">St. Petersburg</li>
  </ul>
</div>

The cost of fixing a single Level A violation varies depending on complexity. Implementing a11y from the design stage reduces the refactoring budget by 2–3 times compared to retrofitting a finished site.

How to Properly Build Keyboard Navigation?

Tab order should match the visual order of elements. If in HTML the "Cancel" button comes before "Confirm", but CSS swaps them — the keyboard user is confused.

Focus trap in modal windows. When a modal opens, Tab should cycle only within it. When closing, return focus to the element that opened the modal. Without this, the user ends up at the top of the page after closing.

tabindex="-1" — element does not enter Tab sequence but can receive focus programmatically. Used for elements that receive focus via JavaScript (section headings after anchor navigation).

tabindex="1" and above is almost always an error. Explicit order breaks natural order and creates unpredictable behavior. Control order via DOM, not tabindex.

Skip links — a "Skip to content" link, hidden visually, visible on Tab. Allows screen reader users to skip repetitive navigation.

Color and Contrast: Requirements and Common Violations

WCAG 2.2 AA requires contrast 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (18px+ or 14px+ bold). AAA requires 7:1 and 4.5:1.

The most common violations: gray placeholder in inputs (#999 on white = 2.9:1), light gray secondary text, white text on pastel backgrounds.

Color should not be the sole indicator: "required fields are red" without an asterisk — violation for color blind users.

Testing tools: axe DevTools, WAVE, Accessibility Inspector in Chrome DevTools. axe-core integrates into Playwright tests: automatic check of 80+ rules on every deployment. Manual testing finds about 60% more errors than automated.

What Is Important About Media Content and Dynamics?

Images without alt — a common basic failure. alt should be meaningful: not alt="image_123.jpg", but a description of content relevant to context. Decorative images — alt="" (empty, not missing attribute).

Video should have captions. YouTube auto-captions are not a standard; they make mistakes. WebVTT files with correct captions for all educational and marketing video content.

Animations — a problem for users with vestibular disorders. @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) — media query that disables or slows animations for users with that OS setting.

What Changed in WCAG 2.2?

Version 2.2 came into effect with new criteria:

Criterion Level Essence
2.5.7 Dragging Movements AA All drag operations must have a keyboard alternative
2.5.8 Target Size AA Minimum interactive element size 24×24 px
3.2.6 Consistent Help A Contact/chat location should be same on all pages
3.3.7 Redundant Entry A Do not force re-entry of same information in one session

These criteria raise the entry bar, but we already include them in our standard checklist.

Level Minimum text contrast Large text contrast
AA 4.5:1 3:1
AAA 7:1 4.5:1

Audit and Remediation

Automated tools find about 30–40% of violations. The rest is only manual testing. Minimum scenario: go through the entire critical user flow (registration, purchase, form) using only keyboard and screen reader.

Process

  1. Automated audit — axe-core, Lighthouse, WAVE — outputs 80+ rules.
  2. Manual testing — NVDA, VoiceOver, keyboard — 2–3 days for a typical site.
  3. Violation prioritization — P1 (blocks usage), P2 (creates difficulties), P3 (enhancements).
  4. Fixing — iteratively, integrate checks into CI via Playwright + axe.
  5. Re-audit — close all P1/P2 before release.
  6. Documentation and handover — report with results, maintenance recommendations, team training.

Results and Scope

  • Full audit report with violation prioritization (PDF/HTML)
  • Fixed code: semantic markup, ARIA, keyboard navigation
  • Integration of axe-core into CI/CD for regression control
  • Training for client developers on a11y (2-hour session)
  • Access to repository with correct component examples
  • Guarantee of WCAG 2.2 AA compliance at time of delivery

Timeline

Stage Duration
Site audit (up to 50 pages) 3–7 days
Remediation of A/AA violations on existing project 3–8 weeks
Development of new project adhering to WCAG 2.2 AA from 6 weeks

Budget is calculated individually after the audit. Contact us — we will evaluate your project in 1 day. Get a consultation and free checklist when ordering an audit.

Experience and Guarantees

We have been working in web accessibility a11y for over 8 years. Completed more than 50 projects for banks, retail, and government. Certified specialists (IAAP CPACC, WAS). We guarantee passing a third-party audit or will fix for free.

WCAG 2.2 Standard — official W3C recommendation defining web content accessibility requirements.

Wikipedia: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
Wikipedia: ARIA

Web accessibility levels a11y according to WCAG 2.2: A, AA, AAA — web accessibility levels a11y per version 2.2.

Order an audit now — get a checklist and preliminary estimate for free. Contact us – we will respond within an hour.