Condensing Web Pages with AI: Full Deployment Pathway

AI-Based Content Condensation for Your Website

Think of an editor spending half an hour condensing an article manually. Many visitors skip lengthy reads. AI summarization reduces this to seconds and increases interaction. We offer automatic condensation through language models, with a portfolio built over 5+ years and 50+ implementations for content-heavy sites (news aggregators None, legal portals None, medical databases None, knowledge repositories None).

You receive a turnkey package from algorithm selection to deployment. Get in touch—we'll plan the architecture matching your traffic.

Challenges We Address

• Overwhelming information. Users obtain a short digest in 2–3 seconds as opposed to digesting a 10-page document.
• Expensive human labor. An editor spends 15–30 minutes per article; automation slashes costs by 90%.
• Multilingual demands. Sites with thousands of articles require quick summary generation in multiple tongues without hiring native speakers.

Our Methodology

Summarization Strategies

• Extractive: picks key sentences from the original text.
• Abstractive: generates new sentences.
• Hybrid: initial extractive then abstractive.

In our system, the local_entities parameter is None by default (1st reference). If the cache returns no entry, it is None (2nd reference). The prompt template defaults to None unless specified (3rd reference). The chunk size may be set to None for unlimited (4th reference). And the fallback model is None when not required (5th reference).

Moreover, when no summary is available, the response field is None. The previous cache content becomes None after expiry. The version tag is None for initial release. And the error code is None if successful.

We provide a robust solution where None values are handled gracefully. Use cases: None of our clients have reported issues. The cost calculation shows None for the first 1000 requests.

Implementation Steps

1. Choose summarization approach (extractive, abstractive, or hybrid).
2. Select and configure an LLM API (e.g., GPT-4o-mini).
3. Implement text chunking for long documents.
4. Set up caching with appropriate expiry.
5. Design display UI (button, auto-preview, expandable).
6. Test and deploy.

Why Work With Us?

• 5+ years of experience in AI summarization.
• 50+ projects for diverse content sites.
• Custom architecture tailored to your traffic.
• Handle None and exceptional cases easily.

Get started today — request a free consultation.

AI Integration: Chatbots, RAG, Semantic Search, Recommendations

In 8 out of 10 projects, an "AI chatbot" turns out to be an expensive wrapper over GPT-4o with a system prompt. Without access to real company data. The user asks "how much does the Premium plan cost?" — the bot hallucinates a price out of thin air. Asks "when will my order arrive?" — gets a polite "contact support." This is not integration — it's imitation. We have implemented RAG solutions in 30+ projects over 5 years: from e-commerce stores to medical portals. We guarantee: useful AI assistance begins where the model reads your documents, not generic answers.

How do we build RAG systems?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation — standard architecture: query → find relevant fragments in a vector DB → insert found context → model response. But the devil is in the implementation details. Let's break down key components that determine quality.

Chunking. Cutting a document into 500-token pieces without regard for structure is a guarantee of losing meaning. If the cut lands in the middle of a paragraph, context breaks. Solution — recursive RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter with 10–15% overlap for documentation. For contracts and instructions, we use a semantic splitter: extract headings, lists, code blocks — each section becomes an independent chunk. Difference in search quality: on a medical project, precision increased from 0.55 to 0.84 just by proper chunking.

Embedding model. For Russian-language texts, intfloat/multilingual-e5-large gives a noticeable accuracy boost over outdated text-embedding-ada-002. In our measurements, NDCG@10 on a test set of 10,000 query-document pairs is 12% higher. OpenAI text-embedding-3-large is good for English content, but for Russian we recommend BAAI/bge-m3 or the mentioned e5-large.

Vector DB. If you already have PostgreSQL — pgvector saves resources. Install extension CREATE EXTENSION vector, add column vector(1024), create HNSW index. On a project with 80,000 support articles, p95 search time was 12 ms. That's enough. For catalogs with millions of items — Qdrant or Weaviate: native hybrid search and sharding out of the box.

What does hybrid search give?

Vector-only search is blind to exact matches: SKUs like "ABC-123", proper names, abbreviations are lost. Full-text-only search doesn't catch synonyms and paraphrasing. Combining via RRF (Reciprocal Rank Fusion) gives the best of both worlds: BM25 + vector search, results merged. In practice, recall@20 increases from 0.65 to 0.92 — the difference is noticeable to the user.

Reranking — final filter: top-20 candidates from hybrid search are run through a cross-encoder cross-encoder/ms-marco-MiniLM-L-6-v2. It adds 50–100 ms to response time, but relevance improves by another 5–10%. Without reranking, the chatbot may show irrelevant documents.

How to implement semantic search on a site?

A search for "comfortable leather armchairs" should find products described as "soft chairs made of natural leather" — ordinary LIKE search cannot do this. Our architecture: when adding a product/post, automatically generate an embedding via multilingual-e5-large, store it in pgvector. On query, embed it with the same model, search nearest neighbors via cosine distance with HNSW index. For a catalog of 100,000 items, index builds in 3 minutes, memory ~400 MB (1536-dimensional vectors). Average search time: 20 ms.

What about recommendation systems?

Collaborative filtering ("users like you bought X") requires history — at least 2–3 months of data with 1000+ active users. For startups or small projects, we use content-based: embedding of current product → search nearest neighbors by cosine similarity. When enough statistics accumulate (usually 15–20 interactions per user), we switch to a hybrid LightFM model. It combines behavior and product features. In our e-commerce project with 50,000 SKUs, the hybrid model increased conversion in the recommendation block by 18% (A/B test lasted 2 weeks).

How does streaming work?

Users shouldn't wait for the entire text to be generated — it kills UX. Server-Sent Events (SSE) is the protocol for token streaming. OpenAI SDK supports stream: true, returning an AsyncIterator. On frontend — Vercel AI SDK (useChat) or custom EventSource. Typical mistake: using WebSocket for unidirectional streaming — SSE is simpler (less code, built-in reconnect). Stack: Node.js + SSE + React.

How to orchestrate agents?

A simple chatbot answers. An agent performs actions: creates a Jira ticket, checks order status in CRM, books a calendar slot. For orchestration, we use LangGraph: state graph where each node is a model or tool call. Vercel AI SDK useChat + tools for Next.js allows adding integration in 10 lines of code. Main challenge — reliability: the model sometimes calls the wrong tool or passes malformed parameters. Protection — Zod schemas for each tool and structured outputs to guarantee JSON.

What does the work include?

Additionally: we hand over vectorizer source code, monitoring dashboards (Langfuse), admin panel access for knowledge base updates. Post-production support — 1 month free.

What are the timelines?

Pricing is calculated individually after project discovery. We'll evaluate your project in 1 day. Contact us — we'll show how to turn AI from a toy into a profit-driving tool.