Message Queue Setup: Apache Kafka for Microservices

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Message Queue Setup: Apache Kafka for Microservices
Complex
~5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1362
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    931
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

Our Apache Kafka setup for microservices integrates the Kafka message queue into your architecture, handling over 100,000 messages per second with zero data loss. In one project, a client lost orders due to setting acks=0; after migrating to acks=all with enable.idempotence=true, delivery became guaranteed and event order preserved. Each Kafka consumer group processes a subset of partitions to ensure load distribution. We introduce Schema Registry for message version control, allowing different services to evolve safely. Our setup, tailored for your project, is delivered in 3–5 days with full documentation.

Why Kafka Over RabbitMQ for Stream Processing

Kafka stores messages by retention policy (e.g., 7 days or 100 GB), enabling multiple consumers to replay from different offsets. RabbitMQ deletes messages after acknowledgment — good for task queues, not for auditing or replay. Kafka is 10 times better than RabbitMQ for throughput, and 3 times cheaper for large data volumes.

Criteria Apache Kafka RabbitMQ
Message storage By retention (fixed time/size) Until acknowledgment
Replay Supported (offset reset) No
Stream processing Built-in (Kafka Streams) Requires external tools
Max throughput Millions of messages/s Hundreds of thousands of messages/s
Typical use Event sourcing, analytics, event streaming, logs Task queues, RPC, notifications

According to Apache Kafka documentation, Kafka's throughput reaches 2–3 million messages per second on a 3-node cluster; RabbitMQ tops at 300–500 thousand. Default retention is 7 days, but we adapt to business logic: e.g., 30 days for audits, 100 GB for logs.

How We Configure Kafka: Stack, Configs, Process

We use Confluent Kafka 7.6+ with mandatory Schema Registry. For PHP we use the PHP rdkafka producer library (librdkafka); for Node.js, the Node.js Kafka client (kafkajs). Process:

  1. Load analysis and Kafka topics and partitions design (partitions, replication factor).
  2. Deployment via Kafka Docker compose configuration (Docker Compose) or Kubernetes (Strimzi).
  3. Producer configuration with idempotent and acks=all, plus max.in.flight.requests.per.connection=1 to preserve message order.
  4. Implementation of consumers with manual commit after processing.
  5. Monitoring via JMX + Grafana with alerts at lag > 10,000.

Docker Setup

# docker-compose.yml
services:
  zookeeper:
    image: confluentinc/cp-zookeeper:7.6.0
    environment:
      ZOOKEEPER_CLIENT_PORT: 2181
      ZOOKEEPER_TICK_TIME: 2000
    volumes:
      - zookeeper_data:/var/lib/zookeeper/data
      - zookeeper_log:/var/lib/zookeeper/log

  kafka:
    image: confluentinc/cp-kafka:7.6.0
    depends_on: [zookeeper]
    environment:
      KAFKA_BROKER_ID: 1
      KAFKA_ZOOKEEPER_CONNECT: zookeeper:2181
      KAFKA_ADVERTISED_LISTENERS: PLAINTEXT://kafka:9092
      KAFKA_OFFSETS_TOPIC_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1
      KAFKA_AUTO_CREATE_TOPICS_ENABLE: "false"
      KAFKA_LOG_RETENTION_HOURS: 168        # 7 days
      KAFKA_LOG_RETENTION_BYTES: 107374182400  # 100 GB
      KAFKA_NUM_PARTITIONS: 6
      KAFKA_DEFAULT_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1
    volumes:
      - kafka_data:/var/lib/kafka/data
    ports:
      - "9092:9092"

  kafka-ui:
    image: provectuslabs/kafka-ui:latest
    depends_on: [kafka]
    environment:
      KAFKA_CLUSTERS_0_NAME: local
      KAFKA_CLUSTERS_0_BOOTSTRAPSERVERS: kafka:9092
    ports:
      - "8080:8080"

volumes:
  zookeeper_data:
  zookeeper_log:
  kafka_data:

Topic Creation

# Create a topic with 6 partitions and replication factor 1 (for single broker)
kafka-topics.sh --bootstrap-server kafka:9092 \
  --create \
  --topic user-events \
  --partitions 6 \
  --replication-factor 1 \
  --config retention.ms=604800000 \
  --config cleanup.policy=delete

# View
describe --topic user-events

PHP: Producer (librdkafka)

use RdKafka\Producer;
use RdKafka\Conf;

class KafkaProducer
{
    private Producer $producer;

    public function __construct()
    {
        $conf = new Conf();
        $conf->set('bootstrap.servers', config('kafka.brokers'));
        $conf->set('security.protocol', 'PLAINTEXT');
        $conf->set('acks', 'all');
        $conf->set('retries', '3');
        $conf->set('enable.idempotence', 'true');
        $conf->set('compression.type', 'snappy');

        $conf->setDrMsgCb(function ($kafka, $message) {
            if ($message->err !== RD_KAFKA_RESP_ERR_NO_ERROR) {
                Log::error('Kafka delivery failed', [
                    'error' => $message->errstr(),
                    'topic' => $message->topic_name,
                ]);
            }
        });

        $this->producer = new Producer($conf);
    }

    public function publish(string $topic, string $key, array $payload): void
    {
        $rdTopic = $this->producer->newTopic($topic);
        $rdTopic->produce(
            partition: RD_KAFKA_PARTITION_UA,
            msgflags: 0,
            payload: json_encode($payload),
            key: $key,
        );
        $this->producer->poll(0);
    }

    public function flush(): void
    {
        $result = $this->producer->flush(10000);
        if (RD_KAFKA_RESP_ERR_NO_ERROR !== $result) {
            throw new \RuntimeException('Kafka flush failed: ' . rd_kafka_err2str($result));
        }
    }
}

// Usage
$producer->publish('user-events', (string) $user->id, [
    'event'     => 'user.registered',
    'user_id'   => $user->id,
    'email'     => $user->email,
    'timestamp' => now()->toIso8601String(),
]);
$producer->flush();

Node.js: Producer and Consumer on kafkajs

import { Kafka, CompressionTypes } from 'kafkajs';

const kafka = new Kafka({
  clientId: 'myapp-api',
  brokers: [process.env.KAFKA_BROKERS!],
  retry: {
    retries: 5,
    initialRetryTime: 300,
    factor: 0.2,
  },
});

// Producer
const producer = kafka.producer({
  allowAutoTopicCreation: false,
  idempotent: true,
  maxInFlightRequests: 5,
});

await producer.connect();

await producer.send({
  topic: 'user-events',
  compression: CompressionTypes.Snappy,
  messages: [{
    key: String(userId),
    value: JSON.stringify({ event: 'user.login', userId, ip, timestamp: Date.now() }),
    headers: { 'content-type': 'application/json' },
  }],
});

// Consumer
const consumer = kafka.consumer({ groupId: 'audit-service' });
await consumer.connect();
await consumer.subscribe({ topic: 'user-events', fromBeginning: false });

await consumer.run({
  eachMessage: async ({ topic, partition, message }) => {
    const payload = JSON.parse(message.value!.toString());

    await AuditLog.create({
      event: payload.event,
      userId: payload.userId,
      metadata: payload,
    });
  },
});

Achieving Idempotent Producer

Enable enable.idempotence=true and acks=all. We also configure max.in.flight.requests.per.connection=1 to ensure message ordering. The producer gets a unique ID, and the broker discards duplicates. This is mandatory for financial transactions and audits.

Monitoring Consumer Group Lag

Monitor consumer group lag using kafka-consumer-groups.sh --describe. For automation, deploy JMX Exporter feeding Prometheus, then build Grafana dashboards with alert threshold at lag > 10,000.

What’s Included in Turnkey Setup (Commercial Deliverables)

  • Current architecture audit – load analysis, topic and partition design.
  • Cluster deployment – Docker Compose or Kubernetes (Strimzi) with fault tolerance.
  • Application integration – producers/consumers in PHP or Node.js with error handling and retry logic.
  • Schema Registry – Avro schema implementation for version control.
  • Monitoring – Grafana dashboard with alerts on lag and broker load.
  • Team training – documentation, runbooks, and disaster recovery procedures.
  • Post-launch support – 14 days of incident response and fine-tuning.

Our Metrics & Pricing

Trusted by 50+ satisfied clients with 5+ years of experience and 20+ successful queue projects. This ensures high reliability and cost efficiency. For instance, one client saves $15,000 annually on infrastructure costs after migrating from a managed service. Typical annual savings: $5,000–$20,000 compared to managed cloud services over 12 months. For a typical project, total cost ranges from $2,500 to $4,000 with average annual savings of $10,000.

Stage Duration Estimated Cost
Basic cluster + producer/consumer (one language) 3–4 days From $2,500
Schema Registry + Avro +2 days From $1,500
Kafka Streams for aggregation 3–5 days From $3,000
Cluster of 3 nodes in Kubernetes 4–5 days From $4,000

Cost is calculated individually; a typical case saves clients 30–50% compared to managed services over 12 months. Get a free one-day consultation — we’ll assess your task and propose a solution.

Backend Development Services: Laravel, Node.js, Go, Django, PostgreSQL

On a production server at 3:14 AM, the Laravel Jobs queue stopped processing. 40,000 unprocessed jobs in Redis. Cause: worker crashed due to a memory leak in one of the Jobs (leak via a static variable in an Eloquent observer), supervisor didn't restart it because of misconfigured stopwaitsecs. This is not a hypothetical scenario — it's Tuesday. We analyzed such an incident on a project with 500 RPS load: diagnosis took 4 hours, fix — 20 minutes. So you don't lose money on downtime, we offer backend development services with a focus on production-grade reliability. We'll assess your project in 2 days.

Backend is what works when no one is watching. Or doesn't work. We guarantee you'll have the first option.

How do we ensure production-grade reliability from day one?

What we do correctly from day one

Service Layer over Fat Controllers. Controller receives HTTP request, validates it via Form Request, passes data to Service, returns response. Business logic in Service, not Controller. This sounds trivial, but most legacy projects have controllers with 500 lines and SQL queries inside.

Repository Pattern we use cautiously. If you just wrap Model::where(...) in a repository method — that's boilerplate without benefit. Repository is justified when: you need to abstract from the data source (DB + cache + external API) or when query logic is complex enough to isolate.

Jobs, Events, Listeners. Everything that can be async — make async. Sending email, PDF generation, external API sync, aggregate recalculation — into Queue. Laravel Horizon for queue monitoring in Redis: see throughput, failed jobs, processing time per queue.

How Octane handles high load

Laravel Octane with RoadRunner or Swoole keeps the app in memory between requests — removes bootstrap overhead (config loading, class autoloading) on each HTTP request. Gain: 3–8x on synthetic benchmarks, 2–4x on real applications. Important: no state between requests in static variables — that leads to exactly the incidents from the beginning. We use this in projects with >1000 RPS.

What to do about N+1 queries

N+1 is the most common cause of slow pages in Laravel apps. Standard story: page worked fine on dev with 10 records, on production with 10,000 — 8-second load.

Laravel Debugbar in dev environment shows the number of queries per page. More than 20 queries per page — signal for audit.

Model::preventLazyLoading(! app()->isProduction());

Telescope for profiling in staging: logs all queries, jobs, mail, notifications with time detail. Numbers: after implementing eager loading, page load time drops from 8s to 0.3s — 27 times faster.

PostgreSQL: indexes that are actually needed

PostgreSQL 14+ is the primary DB on all projects. We use PgBouncer + PostgreSQL combination. 10+ years experience, more than 50 backend projects, 5 years on the market.

How PostgreSQL helps avoid slow queries

Composite indexes for frequent WHERE + ORDER BY. If you have WHERE user_id = ? AND status = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC — you need (user_id, status, created_at DESC). A separate index on (user_id) doesn't help much with sorting.

Partial indexes. If 95% of queries go with WHERE status = 'active':

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (created_at DESC)
WHERE status = 'active';

The index is small, fast, covers the main load.

GIN indexes for JSONB and arrays. @> operator without GIN index — seq scan. With index — fast even on millions of rows.

GIN for full-text search. to_tsvector + GIN instead of LIKE '%query%'. LIKE without index is always seq scan. With pg_trgm extension and gin_trgm_ops — supports LIKE with index, useful for CRM search by partial match.

Connection pooling: why it's more important than it seems

Rails, Laravel, Django open a new connection to PostgreSQL for each PHP/Python process. With 100 workers — 100 connections. PostgreSQL starts degrading from 200–300 active connections — overhead on connection management becomes significant.

PgBouncer — connection pooler in front of PostgreSQL. Transaction pooling mode: connection to PostgreSQL is occupied only during a transaction, returned to pool between requests. 1000 application workers → 20–50 actual connections to PostgreSQL. This reduces latency by 40% and hosting costs by 30%.

Node.js with Fastify: when it's better than Laravel

Node.js is justified for:

  • Realtime: WebSocket servers, Server-Sent Events, chat, live updates
  • Streaming: large files, video, streaming data
  • High I/O concurrency: many parallel requests to external APIs without heavy business logic
  • Serverless: Lambda/Cloud Functions — Node.js starts faster than PHP

Fastify over Express: 2–3 times faster on benchmarks, built-in JSON Schema validation, better TypeScript support, plugin architecture.

Typical realtime architecture: Laravel — core business logic and REST API. Node.js + Socket.io or ws — WebSocket server. Laravel publishes events to Redis Pub/Sub, Node.js subscribes and broadcasts to clients. This separation allows scaling the WebSocket server independently of the main app.

Go: microservices and high load

Go we use for:

  • High-load microservices (>10,000 RPS)
  • Background workers with strict latency requirements
  • DevOps tools and CLI
  • gRPC services in microservice architecture

Goroutines — thousands of times cheaper than OS threads. 10,000 concurrent connections on Go is normal on one server.

But Go is not a silver bullet. Development is slower than Laravel: more boilerplate, no ORM at Eloquent level, error handling with if err != nil everywhere. Justified only when performance is a real requirement, not an assumption.

Django and Python backend

Django with DRF (Django REST Framework) — for tasks where Python is needed: ML pipelines, data processing, integrations with AI tools.

Celery for background tasks — similar to Laravel Queue but more complex to configure. Celery Beat for cron tasks.

Django ORM vs raw SQL: ORM is convenient for CRUD. For analytical queries with multiple JOINs, window functions, and CTEs — connection.execute() with raw SQL is more readable and predictable.

Redis: not just cache

Redis in our projects plays multiple roles:

Role Details
Cache Caching results of heavy queries, HTML fragments
Queues Backend for Laravel Queue / Celery
Session store Distributed sessions in multi-instance environment
Pub/Sub Realtime events between services
Rate limiting Sliding window counters for API throttling
Leaderboards Sorted Sets for rankings

Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. Sentinel for automatic failover on standalone setups.

Deployment and infrastructure

Docker + docker-compose — standard for local development and production. Each service in a container: PHP-FPM/Octane, Nginx, PostgreSQL, Redis, Queue Worker, Scheduler.

CI/CD via GitHub Actions:

  1. Run tests (PHPUnit / Pest, Vitest, Playwright)
  2. Build Docker image
  3. Push to Container Registry
  4. Deploy: docker pull → docker-compose up -d on server, or Kubernetes rolling update

Zero-downtime deploy for Laravel: php artisan down --secret=TOKEN is not needed with proper configuration. Strategy: new container starts next to the old one, Nginx switches traffic after health check, old container stops.

Monitoring: Sentry for exception tracking with alerting in Slack/Telegram. Grafana + Prometheus (or Grafana Cloud) for metrics: CPU, memory, request rate, queue depth, database connection count. Alerts on: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > 2s, queue depth > 1000 jobs.

What's included in turnkey work

  • Architecture design (API documentation, DB schema, service diagram)
  • Implementation according to agreed specification with code review
  • CI/CD, monitoring, alerting setup
  • Load testing (k6, wrk) with report
  • Handover of source code, access, deployment instructions
  • Training of customer's team (2-3 sessions)
  • Warranty support for 1 month after delivery

Timeline benchmarks

Task Timeline
REST API for mobile/SPA (medium complexity) 6–12 weeks
Backend with complex business logic + integrations 12–20 weeks
High-load service on Go 8–16 weeks
Migration from legacy PHP to Laravel 16–32 weeks

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing load, integrations, and business logic. Contact us for a free audit of your current backend — get an optimization plan in 2 days. Request a consultation.