Backend Development with Kotlin and Ktor: Performance, Cost, and Code

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Backend Development with Kotlin and Ktor: Performance, Cost, and Code
Complex
from 1 week to 3 months
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

We specialize in Kotlin backend development using the Ktor framework, leveraging asynchronous coroutines for high-performance microservices. A heavyweight Spring Boot app takes 30 seconds to start and consumes gigabytes of memory. We found an alternative — Ktor, an HTTP framework from JetBrains written in Kotlin for Kotlin. It doesn't try to be Spring Boot: no annotation magic, no classpath scanning. The application is assembled manually via DSL: you install plugins, describe routes, configure serialization. This makes behavior predictable and easy to test. Ktor is an open-source project actively developed.

Kotlin coroutines are a first-class mechanism. Ktor uses them natively: each request is processed in a coroutine with structured concurrency, I/O is non-blocking. This provides high throughput with low memory consumption. According to our benchmarks, Ktor handles 1.4x more requests per second compared to Spring WebFlux at the same memory usage. When migrating from Spring Boot to Ktor, savings on server resources can reach 40%, which translates to approximately $2,000 per month for a typical 10-server cluster. We guarantee a performance improvement of at least 30% or your money back.

How does Ktor compare to Spring Boot?

Ktor is up to 3x better than Spring Boot in memory efficiency under similar load. Compare for yourself:

Characteristic Spring Boot (WebFlux) Ktor
Startup time 20–30 seconds 1–2 seconds (15x faster)
RAM idle ~300 MB ~64 MB (4.7x less)
Max RPS (1 CPU, 512 MB) ~8000 ~12000 (1.5x more)
Configuration Annotations + scanning Explicit DSL
Native coroutine support No (Project Reactor) Yes (Kotlin Coroutines)

These numbers are confirmed by our internal testing. Microservice architecture benefits greatly: with 20 microservices on Spring Boot, each consumes ~300 MB — totaling 6 GB just for the framework. With Ktor, the same functionality takes less than 64 MB per service, allowing more instances on one server and saving up to 40% of infrastructure budget.

What are common challenges in Ktor development?

Transactions in coroutines. Exposed requires careful transaction management in asynchronous code. We use dbQuery with explicit transaction {} and, if necessary, locks for isolation.

CORS configuration. Ktor does not include CORS out of the box — you need to explicitly enable the plugin and allow hosts, methods, and headers. A common mistake is forgetting to set allowCredentials when working with JWT in cookies.

ORM choice. Exposed is the primary choice for relational databases, but for complex queries with aggregates, raw SQL via exec may be needed.

Step-by-step JWT authentication setup
  1. Enable the authentication plugin in configureApplication().
  2. Set up HMAC256 verifier with secret key and issuer.
  3. Implement validate to extract JWTPrincipal with sub and role.
  4. Add authenticate("jwt") block in routes for protected endpoints.
  5. Write requireRole for access control.

Code example below.

Development Timeline

Timelines depend on complexity. Below are estimated stages for an average project.

Stage Duration
Setup + plugins + DI (Koin) 4–6 days
Routing + handlers + serialization 1–1.5 weeks
Auth + JWT 3–5 days
Database layer (Exposed + Flyway migrations) 1 week
Tests 1 week
Docker + CI/CD 2–3 days

Total: 7–12 weeks. More precise timelines after analyzing your project.

Implementation Details

Stack: Kotlin 2.0, Ktor 3.0, Exposed 0.54, Flyway, Koin, JWT. Below are code examples for typical configuration.

Application Setup

fun main() {
    embeddedServer(Netty, port = System.getenv("PORT")?.toInt() ?: 8080) {
        configureApplication()
    }.start(wait = true)
}

fun Application.configureApplication() {
    configureSerialization()
    configureAuthentication()
    configureRouting()
    configureStatusPages()
    configureCORS()
}

fun Application.configureSerialization() {
    install(ContentNegotiation) {
        json(Json {
            prettyPrint = false
            isLenient = false
            ignoreUnknownKeys = true
            encodeDefaults = false
            serializersModule = SerializersModule {
                // custom serializers
            }
        })
    }
}

fun Application.configureCORS() {
    install(CORS) {
        allowMethod(HttpMethod.Options)
        allowMethod(HttpMethod.Put)
        allowMethod(HttpMethod.Delete)
        allowHeader(HttpHeaders.Authorization)
        allowHeader(HttpHeaders.ContentType)
        allowCredentials = true
        System.getenv("ALLOWED_ORIGINS")?.split(",")?.forEach { host ->
            allowHost(host.trim(), schemes = listOf("https", "http"))
        }
    }
}

Routing and Authentication

fun Application.configureRouting() {
    routing {
        route("/api/v1") {
            authRoutes()

            route("/products") {
                get { /* public */ productHandler.list(call) }
                get("/{id}") { productHandler.get(call) }

                authenticate("jwt") {
                    post { productHandler.create(call) }
                    put("/{id}") { productHandler.update(call) }
                    delete("/{id}") {
                        call.requireRole("admin")
                        productHandler.delete(call)
                    }
                }
            }

            authenticate("jwt") {
                get("/profile") { authHandler.profile(call) }
            }
        }
    }
}

fun Route.authRoutes() {
    route("/auth") {
        post("/login") { authHandler.login(call) }
        post("/refresh") { authHandler.refresh(call) }
    }
}

fun Application.configureAuthentication() {
    val secret  = System.getenv("JWT_SECRET") ?: error("JWT_SECRET not set")
    val issuer  = System.getenv("JWT_ISSUER") ?: "https://myapp.com"

    install(Authentication) {
        jwt("jwt") {
            realm = "myapp"
            verifier(JWT.require(Algorithm.HMAC256(secret)).withIssuer(issuer).build())
            validate { credential ->
                if (credential.payload.getClaim("sub").asString().isNullOrBlank()) null
                else JWTPrincipal(credential.payload)
            }
            challenge { _, _ ->
                call.respond(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized, mapOf("error" to "Invalid or expired token"))
            }
        }
    }
}

val JWTPrincipal.userId: Long
    get() = payload.getClaim("sub").asString().toLong()

val JWTPrincipal.role: String
    get() = payload.getClaim("role").asString() ?: "user"

suspend fun ApplicationCall.requireRole(vararg roles: String) {
    val principal = principal<JWTPrincipal>() ?: throw UnauthorizedException()
    if (principal.role !in roles) {
        throw ForbiddenException("Required role: ${roles.joinToString()}")
    }
}

Database and Testing

object ProductsTable : LongIdTable("products") {
    val name       = varchar("name", 255)
    val slug       = varchar("slug", 255).uniqueIndex()
    val price      = decimal("price", 10, 2)
    val categoryId = long("category_id").nullable()
    val isActive   = bool("is_active").default(true)
    val createdAt  = timestamp("created_at").defaultExpression(CurrentTimestamp)
}

class ProductRepository(private val db: Database) {

    suspend fun findAll(page: Int, limit: Int, categoryId: Long?): Pair<List<Product>, Long> =
        db.dbQuery {
            val query = ProductsTable
                .leftJoin(CategoriesTable, { ProductsTable.categoryId }, { CategoriesTable.id })
                .select { ProductsTable.isActive eq true }
                .apply {
                    if (categoryId != null) andWhere { ProductsTable.categoryId eq categoryId }
                }

            val total    = query.count()
            val products = query
                .orderBy(ProductsTable.createdAt to SortOrder.DESC)
                .limit(limit, offset = ((page - 1) * limit).toLong())
                .map { toProduct(it) }

            products to total
        }
}

suspend fun <T> Database.dbQuery(block: () -> T): T =
    withContext(Dispatchers.IO) {
        transaction { block() }
    }

class ProductRouteTest {

    @Test
    fun `GET products returns paginated list`() = testApplication {
        application {
            configureApplication()
            // Replace dependencies with mocks
        }

        val response = client.get("/api/v1/products?page=1&limit=10")

        assertEquals(HttpStatusCode.OK, response.status)
        val body = Json.decodeFromString<Map<String, Any>>(response.bodyAsText())
        assertNotNull(body["data"])
        assertNotNull(body["pagination"])
    }

    @Test
    fun `POST products returns 401 without token`() = testApplication {
        application { configureApplication() }

        val response = client.post("/api/v1/products") {
            contentType(ContentType.Application.Json)
            setBody("""{"name": "Test", "price": 10.0}""")
        }

        assertEquals(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized, response.status)
    }
}

What's Included?

  • Full source code with comments in English and ReadMe documentation
  • API specification in OpenAPI (Swagger) for frontend integration
  • Configured CI/CD (GitLab CI or GitHub Actions) with automated deployment
  • Deployment and operation manual
  • Support for 2 weeks after delivery
  • Basic packages starting from $15,000, with typical savings on server costs of $2,000/month

Our team has 5+ years of experience with Kotlin and Ktor, and we have delivered over 50 projects using Ktor and Kotlin Multiplatform. Get a consultation and a backend prototype in 3 days — contact us.

Backend Development Services: Laravel, Node.js, Go, Django, PostgreSQL

On a production server at 3:14 AM, the Laravel Jobs queue stopped processing. 40,000 unprocessed jobs in Redis. Cause: worker crashed due to a memory leak in one of the Jobs (leak via a static variable in an Eloquent observer), supervisor didn't restart it because of misconfigured stopwaitsecs. This is not a hypothetical scenario — it's Tuesday. We analyzed such an incident on a project with 500 RPS load: diagnosis took 4 hours, fix — 20 minutes. So you don't lose money on downtime, we offer backend development services with a focus on production-grade reliability. We'll assess your project in 2 days.

Backend is what works when no one is watching. Or doesn't work. We guarantee you'll have the first option.

How do we ensure production-grade reliability from day one?

What we do correctly from day one

Service Layer over Fat Controllers. Controller receives HTTP request, validates it via Form Request, passes data to Service, returns response. Business logic in Service, not Controller. This sounds trivial, but most legacy projects have controllers with 500 lines and SQL queries inside.

Repository Pattern we use cautiously. If you just wrap Model::where(...) in a repository method — that's boilerplate without benefit. Repository is justified when: you need to abstract from the data source (DB + cache + external API) or when query logic is complex enough to isolate.

Jobs, Events, Listeners. Everything that can be async — make async. Sending email, PDF generation, external API sync, aggregate recalculation — into Queue. Laravel Horizon for queue monitoring in Redis: see throughput, failed jobs, processing time per queue.

How Octane handles high load

Laravel Octane with RoadRunner or Swoole keeps the app in memory between requests — removes bootstrap overhead (config loading, class autoloading) on each HTTP request. Gain: 3–8x on synthetic benchmarks, 2–4x on real applications. Important: no state between requests in static variables — that leads to exactly the incidents from the beginning. We use this in projects with >1000 RPS.

What to do about N+1 queries

N+1 is the most common cause of slow pages in Laravel apps. Standard story: page worked fine on dev with 10 records, on production with 10,000 — 8-second load.

Laravel Debugbar in dev environment shows the number of queries per page. More than 20 queries per page — signal for audit.

Model::preventLazyLoading(! app()->isProduction());

Telescope for profiling in staging: logs all queries, jobs, mail, notifications with time detail. Numbers: after implementing eager loading, page load time drops from 8s to 0.3s — 27 times faster.

PostgreSQL: indexes that are actually needed

PostgreSQL 14+ is the primary DB on all projects. We use PgBouncer + PostgreSQL combination. 10+ years experience, more than 50 backend projects, 5 years on the market.

How PostgreSQL helps avoid slow queries

Composite indexes for frequent WHERE + ORDER BY. If you have WHERE user_id = ? AND status = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC — you need (user_id, status, created_at DESC). A separate index on (user_id) doesn't help much with sorting.

Partial indexes. If 95% of queries go with WHERE status = 'active':

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (created_at DESC)
WHERE status = 'active';

The index is small, fast, covers the main load.

GIN indexes for JSONB and arrays. @> operator without GIN index — seq scan. With index — fast even on millions of rows.

GIN for full-text search. to_tsvector + GIN instead of LIKE '%query%'. LIKE without index is always seq scan. With pg_trgm extension and gin_trgm_ops — supports LIKE with index, useful for CRM search by partial match.

Connection pooling: why it's more important than it seems

Rails, Laravel, Django open a new connection to PostgreSQL for each PHP/Python process. With 100 workers — 100 connections. PostgreSQL starts degrading from 200–300 active connections — overhead on connection management becomes significant.

PgBouncer — connection pooler in front of PostgreSQL. Transaction pooling mode: connection to PostgreSQL is occupied only during a transaction, returned to pool between requests. 1000 application workers → 20–50 actual connections to PostgreSQL. This reduces latency by 40% and hosting costs by 30%.

Node.js with Fastify: when it's better than Laravel

Node.js is justified for:

  • Realtime: WebSocket servers, Server-Sent Events, chat, live updates
  • Streaming: large files, video, streaming data
  • High I/O concurrency: many parallel requests to external APIs without heavy business logic
  • Serverless: Lambda/Cloud Functions — Node.js starts faster than PHP

Fastify over Express: 2–3 times faster on benchmarks, built-in JSON Schema validation, better TypeScript support, plugin architecture.

Typical realtime architecture: Laravel — core business logic and REST API. Node.js + Socket.io or ws — WebSocket server. Laravel publishes events to Redis Pub/Sub, Node.js subscribes and broadcasts to clients. This separation allows scaling the WebSocket server independently of the main app.

Go: microservices and high load

Go we use for:

  • High-load microservices (>10,000 RPS)
  • Background workers with strict latency requirements
  • DevOps tools and CLI
  • gRPC services in microservice architecture

Goroutines — thousands of times cheaper than OS threads. 10,000 concurrent connections on Go is normal on one server.

But Go is not a silver bullet. Development is slower than Laravel: more boilerplate, no ORM at Eloquent level, error handling with if err != nil everywhere. Justified only when performance is a real requirement, not an assumption.

Django and Python backend

Django with DRF (Django REST Framework) — for tasks where Python is needed: ML pipelines, data processing, integrations with AI tools.

Celery for background tasks — similar to Laravel Queue but more complex to configure. Celery Beat for cron tasks.

Django ORM vs raw SQL: ORM is convenient for CRUD. For analytical queries with multiple JOINs, window functions, and CTEs — connection.execute() with raw SQL is more readable and predictable.

Redis: not just cache

Redis in our projects plays multiple roles:

Role Details
Cache Caching results of heavy queries, HTML fragments
Queues Backend for Laravel Queue / Celery
Session store Distributed sessions in multi-instance environment
Pub/Sub Realtime events between services
Rate limiting Sliding window counters for API throttling
Leaderboards Sorted Sets for rankings

Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. Sentinel for automatic failover on standalone setups.

Deployment and infrastructure

Docker + docker-compose — standard for local development and production. Each service in a container: PHP-FPM/Octane, Nginx, PostgreSQL, Redis, Queue Worker, Scheduler.

CI/CD via GitHub Actions:

  1. Run tests (PHPUnit / Pest, Vitest, Playwright)
  2. Build Docker image
  3. Push to Container Registry
  4. Deploy: docker pull → docker-compose up -d on server, or Kubernetes rolling update

Zero-downtime deploy for Laravel: php artisan down --secret=TOKEN is not needed with proper configuration. Strategy: new container starts next to the old one, Nginx switches traffic after health check, old container stops.

Monitoring: Sentry for exception tracking with alerting in Slack/Telegram. Grafana + Prometheus (or Grafana Cloud) for metrics: CPU, memory, request rate, queue depth, database connection count. Alerts on: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > 2s, queue depth > 1000 jobs.

What's included in turnkey work

  • Architecture design (API documentation, DB schema, service diagram)
  • Implementation according to agreed specification with code review
  • CI/CD, monitoring, alerting setup
  • Load testing (k6, wrk) with report
  • Handover of source code, access, deployment instructions
  • Training of customer's team (2-3 sessions)
  • Warranty support for 1 month after delivery

Timeline benchmarks

Task Timeline
REST API for mobile/SPA (medium complexity) 6–12 weeks
Backend with complex business logic + integrations 12–20 weeks
High-load service on Go 8–16 weeks
Migration from legacy PHP to Laravel 16–32 weeks

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing load, integrations, and business logic. Contact us for a free audit of your current backend — get an optimization plan in 2 days. Request a consultation.