High-Performance Backend Development with Rust (Actix Web)

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
High-Performance Backend Development with Rust (Actix Web)
Complex
from 2 weeks to 3 months
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

Your website handles 10,000 RPS, but latency jumps from 5 to 200 ms, and your monitoring graphs show GC pause spikes. Node.js or Python are choking. Time to switch to Rust and Actix Web — the framework that consistently ranks in the top 5 on TechEmpower benchmarks, ahead of Node.js and Go. We have 7+ years of Rust experience and over 20 projects on Actix Web. We build ultra-fast backends: compiled to machine code, actor model, memory safety enforced by the compiler. Here’s how it cuts latency to 1 ms and saves resources.

How Actix Web achieves performance

The framework is built on the actor model and non-blocking I/O with tokio. Each handler is an actor that processes requests in parallel without blocking. Rust compiles binaries down to 5–15 MB, no garbage collection — predictable response times. Compare with Node.js: under load, Actix Web uses half the memory (5–15 MB vs 30–80 MB) and delivers 10x lower latency (p99 < 1 ms).

Why Rust is safer for backends

Rust’s type system eliminates entire vulnerability classes: null pointers, buffer overflows, data races. All code is checked at compile time. sqlx — the PostgreSQL library — validates SQL queries at compile time. If a query doesn’t match the DB schema, you get a build error, not a runtime crash. In our projects, this has cut production bugs by 40%.

What Actix Web means for your business

In one project, we replaced a Node.js API with Actix Web: latency dropped from 50 ms to 1 ms, memory consumption fell by 5x. Fewer servers, lower infrastructure costs, and faster user response. Companies save up to 70% on hosting while maintaining performance.

Typical application structure

// main.rs
use actix_web::{middleware, web, App, HttpServer};
use sqlx::PgPool;

mod config;
mod db;
mod errors;
mod handlers;
mod models;
mod services;

#[actix_web::main]
async fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
    dotenvy::dotenv().ok();
    tracing_subscriber::fmt()
        .with_env_filter(tracing_subscriber::EnvFilter::from_default_env())
        .init();

    let cfg = config::Config::from_env().expect("invalid config");
    let pool = PgPool::connect(&cfg.database_url).await.expect("db connect failed");
    sqlx::migrate!("./migrations").run(&pool).await.expect("migration failed");

    let pool = web::Data::new(pool);

    HttpServer::new(move || {
        App::new()
            .app_data(pool.clone())
            .app_data(web::JsonConfig::default().error_handler(errors::json_error_handler))
            .wrap(middleware::Logger::default())
            .wrap(middleware::Compress::default())
            .service(
                web::scope("/api/v1")
                    .service(handlers::users::scope())
                    .service(handlers::orders::scope()),
            )
    })
    .bind(("0.0.0.0", cfg.port))?
    .workers(num_cpus::get())
    .run()
    .await
}

Models and safe database queries

// models/user.rs
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use sqlx::FromRow;
use time::OffsetDateTime;
use uuid::Uuid;

#[derive(Debug, Serialize, FromRow)]
pub struct User {
    pub id: Uuid,
    pub email: String,
    pub display_name: String,
    #[serde(skip)]
    pub password_hash: String,
    pub created_at: OffsetDateTime,
}

#[derive(Debug, Deserialize)]
pub struct CreateUserPayload {
    pub email: String,
    pub display_name: String,
    pub password: String,
}
// db/users.rs
pub async fn find_by_id(pool: &PgPool, id: Uuid) -> sqlx::Result<Option<User>> {
    sqlx::query_as!(
        User,
        r#"
        SELECT id, email, display_name, password_hash, created_at
        FROM users
        WHERE id = $1
        "#,
        id
    )
    .fetch_optional(pool)
    .await
}

pub async fn create(pool: &PgPool, payload: &CreateUserPayload) -> sqlx::Result<User> {
    let hash = bcrypt::hash(&payload.password, bcrypt::DEFAULT_COST).unwrap();
    sqlx::query_as!(
        User,
        r#"
        INSERT INTO users (id, email, display_name, password_hash)
        VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4)
        RETURNING *
        "#,
        Uuid::new_v4(),
        payload.email,
        payload.display_name,
        hash
    )
    .fetch_one(pool)
    .await
}

Handlers and routing

// handlers/users.rs
use actix_web::{get, post, web, HttpResponse, Scope};
use sqlx::PgPool;
use uuid::Uuid;

use crate::{db, errors::AppError, models::user::CreateUserPayload};

pub fn scope() -> Scope {
    web::scope("/users")
        .service(get_user)
        .service(create_user)
}

#[get("/{id}")]
async fn get_user(
    pool: web::Data<PgPool>,
    id: web::Path<Uuid>,
) -> Result<HttpResponse, AppError> {
    let user = db::users::find_by_id(&pool, *id)
        .await?
        .ok_or(AppError::NotFound("user not found".into()))?;
    Ok(HttpResponse::Ok().json(user))
}

#[post("")]
async fn create_user(
    pool: web::Data<PgPool>,
    payload: web::Json<CreateUserPayload>,
) -> Result<HttpResponse, AppError> {
    let user = db::users::create(&pool, &payload).await?;
    Ok(HttpResponse::Created().json(user))
}

Error handling

// errors.rs
use actix_web::{HttpResponse, ResponseError};
use serde_json::json;

#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
pub enum AppError {
    #[error("not found: {0}")]
    NotFound(String),
    #[error("validation error: {0}")]
    Validation(String),
    #[error("database error")]
    Database(#[from] sqlx::Error),
    #[error("unauthorized")]
    Unauthorized,
}

impl ResponseError for AppError {
    fn error_response(&self) -> HttpResponse {
        match self {
            AppError::NotFound(msg) => HttpResponse::NotFound().json(json!({ "error": msg })),
            AppError::Validation(msg) => HttpResponse::UnprocessableEntity().json(json!({ "error": msg })),
            AppError::Unauthorized => HttpResponse::Unauthorized().json(json!({ "error": "unauthorized" })),
            AppError::Database(e) => {
                tracing::error!("db error: {:?}", e);
                HttpResponse::InternalServerError().json(json!({ "error": "internal error" }))
            }
        }
    }
}

Authentication with JWT

We add a middleware that validates a JWT token from the Authorization header. The middleware is implemented as an actor, intercepting requests before the handler. Invalid tokens return 401. The framework provides convenient traits, and we often package JWT validation into a separate service for reusability.

Comparing Actix Web with alternatives

Parameter Actix Web (Rust) Express (Node.js) Django (Python)
RPS (basic CRUD) ~500 000 ~50 000 ~10 000
Memory usage 5–15 MB 30–80 MB 50–200 MB
Type checking Compile time Runtime Runtime
GC pauses None Yes Yes
Binary size 5–15 MB ≥20 MB (includes node_modules) ≥100 MB (includes interpreter)
Criterion Actix Web Express Django
Speed of writing CRUD Medium High High
Maintenance complexity Low (types catch errors) Medium Medium
Library ecosystem Smaller, but key ones exist Huge Huge

Deployment and infrastructure

The final binary is a self-contained file with no external dependencies. A Docker image can be built from scratch: just copy the binary. This simplifies deployment in Kubernetes and CI/CD. One Actix instance can replace 5–10 Node.js services under load, saving significantly on server costs. Get an engineer consultation — we'll assess your project and show how much you can save on infrastructure.

Process

  1. Analysis — refine requirements, profile load, select infrastructure.
  2. Design — architecture, DB schema, API contracts.
  3. Implementation — write code with code review and testing.
  4. Load testing — verify claimed RPS and latency.
  5. Deployment — deploy to chosen hosting, monitoring.

Timelines: simple CRUD API (5–8 resources) — 2 to 3 weeks, high-load service — 4 to 7 weeks. Cost is calculated individually. Order a prototype in 2 weeks — we'll show results.

What's included

  • API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger)
  • Complete test suite (unit + integration)
  • Database migrations and seed data
  • CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions)
  • Training your team to work with the code
  • Performance guarantee (SLA on latency and throughput)

Contact us for a project audit — we'll propose the optimal Rust solution.

Backend Development Services: Laravel, Node.js, Go, Django, PostgreSQL

On a production server at 3:14 AM, the Laravel Jobs queue stopped processing. 40,000 unprocessed jobs in Redis. Cause: worker crashed due to a memory leak in one of the Jobs (leak via a static variable in an Eloquent observer), supervisor didn't restart it because of misconfigured stopwaitsecs. This is not a hypothetical scenario — it's Tuesday. We analyzed such an incident on a project with 500 RPS load: diagnosis took 4 hours, fix — 20 minutes. So you don't lose money on downtime, we offer backend development services with a focus on production-grade reliability. We'll assess your project in 2 days.

Backend is what works when no one is watching. Or doesn't work. We guarantee you'll have the first option.

How do we ensure production-grade reliability from day one?

What we do correctly from day one

Service Layer over Fat Controllers. Controller receives HTTP request, validates it via Form Request, passes data to Service, returns response. Business logic in Service, not Controller. This sounds trivial, but most legacy projects have controllers with 500 lines and SQL queries inside.

Repository Pattern we use cautiously. If you just wrap Model::where(...) in a repository method — that's boilerplate without benefit. Repository is justified when: you need to abstract from the data source (DB + cache + external API) or when query logic is complex enough to isolate.

Jobs, Events, Listeners. Everything that can be async — make async. Sending email, PDF generation, external API sync, aggregate recalculation — into Queue. Laravel Horizon for queue monitoring in Redis: see throughput, failed jobs, processing time per queue.

How Octane handles high load

Laravel Octane with RoadRunner or Swoole keeps the app in memory between requests — removes bootstrap overhead (config loading, class autoloading) on each HTTP request. Gain: 3–8x on synthetic benchmarks, 2–4x on real applications. Important: no state between requests in static variables — that leads to exactly the incidents from the beginning. We use this in projects with >1000 RPS.

What to do about N+1 queries

N+1 is the most common cause of slow pages in Laravel apps. Standard story: page worked fine on dev with 10 records, on production with 10,000 — 8-second load.

Laravel Debugbar in dev environment shows the number of queries per page. More than 20 queries per page — signal for audit.

Model::preventLazyLoading(! app()->isProduction());

Telescope for profiling in staging: logs all queries, jobs, mail, notifications with time detail. Numbers: after implementing eager loading, page load time drops from 8s to 0.3s — 27 times faster.

PostgreSQL: indexes that are actually needed

PostgreSQL 14+ is the primary DB on all projects. We use PgBouncer + PostgreSQL combination. 10+ years experience, more than 50 backend projects, 5 years on the market.

How PostgreSQL helps avoid slow queries

Composite indexes for frequent WHERE + ORDER BY. If you have WHERE user_id = ? AND status = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC — you need (user_id, status, created_at DESC). A separate index on (user_id) doesn't help much with sorting.

Partial indexes. If 95% of queries go with WHERE status = 'active':

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (created_at DESC)
WHERE status = 'active';

The index is small, fast, covers the main load.

GIN indexes for JSONB and arrays. @> operator without GIN index — seq scan. With index — fast even on millions of rows.

GIN for full-text search. to_tsvector + GIN instead of LIKE '%query%'. LIKE without index is always seq scan. With pg_trgm extension and gin_trgm_ops — supports LIKE with index, useful for CRM search by partial match.

Connection pooling: why it's more important than it seems

Rails, Laravel, Django open a new connection to PostgreSQL for each PHP/Python process. With 100 workers — 100 connections. PostgreSQL starts degrading from 200–300 active connections — overhead on connection management becomes significant.

PgBouncer — connection pooler in front of PostgreSQL. Transaction pooling mode: connection to PostgreSQL is occupied only during a transaction, returned to pool between requests. 1000 application workers → 20–50 actual connections to PostgreSQL. This reduces latency by 40% and hosting costs by 30%.

Node.js with Fastify: when it's better than Laravel

Node.js is justified for:

  • Realtime: WebSocket servers, Server-Sent Events, chat, live updates
  • Streaming: large files, video, streaming data
  • High I/O concurrency: many parallel requests to external APIs without heavy business logic
  • Serverless: Lambda/Cloud Functions — Node.js starts faster than PHP

Fastify over Express: 2–3 times faster on benchmarks, built-in JSON Schema validation, better TypeScript support, plugin architecture.

Typical realtime architecture: Laravel — core business logic and REST API. Node.js + Socket.io or ws — WebSocket server. Laravel publishes events to Redis Pub/Sub, Node.js subscribes and broadcasts to clients. This separation allows scaling the WebSocket server independently of the main app.

Go: microservices and high load

Go we use for:

  • High-load microservices (>10,000 RPS)
  • Background workers with strict latency requirements
  • DevOps tools and CLI
  • gRPC services in microservice architecture

Goroutines — thousands of times cheaper than OS threads. 10,000 concurrent connections on Go is normal on one server.

But Go is not a silver bullet. Development is slower than Laravel: more boilerplate, no ORM at Eloquent level, error handling with if err != nil everywhere. Justified only when performance is a real requirement, not an assumption.

Django and Python backend

Django with DRF (Django REST Framework) — for tasks where Python is needed: ML pipelines, data processing, integrations with AI tools.

Celery for background tasks — similar to Laravel Queue but more complex to configure. Celery Beat for cron tasks.

Django ORM vs raw SQL: ORM is convenient for CRUD. For analytical queries with multiple JOINs, window functions, and CTEs — connection.execute() with raw SQL is more readable and predictable.

Redis: not just cache

Redis in our projects plays multiple roles:

Role Details
Cache Caching results of heavy queries, HTML fragments
Queues Backend for Laravel Queue / Celery
Session store Distributed sessions in multi-instance environment
Pub/Sub Realtime events between services
Rate limiting Sliding window counters for API throttling
Leaderboards Sorted Sets for rankings

Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. Sentinel for automatic failover on standalone setups.

Deployment and infrastructure

Docker + docker-compose — standard for local development and production. Each service in a container: PHP-FPM/Octane, Nginx, PostgreSQL, Redis, Queue Worker, Scheduler.

CI/CD via GitHub Actions:

  1. Run tests (PHPUnit / Pest, Vitest, Playwright)
  2. Build Docker image
  3. Push to Container Registry
  4. Deploy: docker pull → docker-compose up -d on server, or Kubernetes rolling update

Zero-downtime deploy for Laravel: php artisan down --secret=TOKEN is not needed with proper configuration. Strategy: new container starts next to the old one, Nginx switches traffic after health check, old container stops.

Monitoring: Sentry for exception tracking with alerting in Slack/Telegram. Grafana + Prometheus (or Grafana Cloud) for metrics: CPU, memory, request rate, queue depth, database connection count. Alerts on: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > 2s, queue depth > 1000 jobs.

What's included in turnkey work

  • Architecture design (API documentation, DB schema, service diagram)
  • Implementation according to agreed specification with code review
  • CI/CD, monitoring, alerting setup
  • Load testing (k6, wrk) with report
  • Handover of source code, access, deployment instructions
  • Training of customer's team (2-3 sessions)
  • Warranty support for 1 month after delivery

Timeline benchmarks

Task Timeline
REST API for mobile/SPA (medium complexity) 6–12 weeks
Backend with complex business logic + integrations 12–20 weeks
High-load service on Go 8–16 weeks
Migration from legacy PHP to Laravel 16–32 weeks

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing load, integrations, and business logic. Contact us for a free audit of your current backend — get an optimization plan in 2 days. Request a consultation.