Apache Cassandra Setup for High-Load Web Applications

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Apache Cassandra Setup for High-Load Web Applications
Complex
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1360
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Setting up Apache Cassandra for a web application involves more than just installing a package. Without proper schema design and cluster configuration, you will face slow queries, hot partitions, and unstable operation under load. Over 5 years, we've configured Cassandra for 30+ projects: event streams, metrics, logs. The most common mistake is an incorrect primary key. Ignoring compaction and insufficient memory for memtables leads to 2–3x performance degradation. Proper Cassandra setup from the start saves weeks of rework. Here are our proven techniques.

Where Cassandra is indispensable

Time series with millions of events per second, activity feeds, logging systems, IoT telemetry — scenarios requiring fast, high-volume writes. Netflix, Discord, Apple use Cassandra precisely for this. Discord stores trillions of messages. For OLTP with complex transactions, it is not suitable. We use Cassandra for storing metrics and logs: it provides linear write scalability and fault tolerance without a single point of failure.

How to install and configure Cassandra 4.1

Installation of Cassandra 4.1:

echo "deb https://debian.cassandra.apache.org 41x main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cassandra.sources.list
curl https://downloads.apache.org/cassandra/KEYS | apt-key add -
apt update && apt install -y cassandra

After installation, edit cassandra.yaml:

cluster_name: 'MyAppCluster'

# Network
listen_address: 10.0.0.1
rpc_address: 10.0.0.1
seeds: "10.0.0.1,10.0.0.2,10.0.0.3"

# Directories
data_file_directories:
  - /var/lib/cassandra/data
commitlog_directory: /var/lib/cassandra/commitlog  # separate disk for speed
hints_directory: /var/lib/cassandra/hints
saved_caches_directory: /var/lib/cassandra/saved_caches

# Performance
concurrent_reads: 32
concurrent_writes: 32
concurrent_counter_writes: 16
memtable_heap_space: 2048
compaction_throughput_mb_per_sec: 64

# Replication and consistency
endpoint_snitch: GossipingPropertyFileSnitch

# JVM (in jvm11-server.options)
num_tokens: 256

Additionally, configure JVM to avoid long GC pauses:

# /etc/cassandra/jvm11-server.options
-Xms8G
-Xmx8G
-XX:+UseG1GC
-XX:G1RSetUpdatingPauseTimePercent=5
-XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=300
-XX:InitiatingHeapOccupancyPercent=70

Comparison of compaction strategies

Strategy Purpose When to use
SizeTieredCompactionStrategy Default Universal option, suitable for most cases
TimeWindowCompactionStrategy Time series Data with TTL, event feeds — reduces number of files
LeveledCompactionStrategy Frequent updates Systems with many writes, requires more disk space

Choosing compaction directly affects read and write performance. For example, TimeWindowCompactionStrategy reduces the number of SSTables by 2–3x compared to SizeTieredCompactionStrategy when working with time series. We recommend TimeWindowCompactionStrategy for data with TTL, and LeveledCompactionStrategy for scenarios with intense updates.

Which compaction strategy to choose?

Base your choice on the data characteristics. If data has TTL and is written at a constant rate — TimeWindowCompactionStrategy. For frequent updates and deletes — LeveledCompactionStrategy. SizeTieredCompactionStrategy is a safe choice if unsure.

Why proper partition key selection matters?

The partition key determines data distribution across nodes. If chosen incorrectly, some nodes will be overloaded while others sit idle. For example, for the user_events table we use user_id — this guarantees even distribution. For time series (table metrics), a composite key (service, bucket, metric_name) groups metrics by service and time window. Never use columns with few unique values (boolean or enum) — this leads to hot partitions.

Data schema — Query-driven design

-- Keyspace with replication
CREATE KEYSPACE myapp
WITH replication = {
  'class': 'NetworkTopologyStrategy',
  'dc1': 3
} AND durable_writes = true;

USE myapp;

-- User event feed
CREATE TABLE user_events (
    user_id     uuid,
    occurred_at timestamp,
    event_id    uuid,
    event_type  text,
    payload     text,
    PRIMARY KEY ((user_id), occurred_at, event_id)
) WITH CLUSTERING ORDER BY (occurred_at DESC)
  AND compaction = {'class': 'TimeWindowCompactionStrategy',
                    'compaction_window_unit': 'DAYS',
                    'compaction_window_size': 7}
  AND default_time_to_live = 7776000;

-- User statistics
CREATE TABLE user_stats (
    user_id     uuid PRIMARY KEY,
    total_orders counter,
    total_spent  counter,
    last_active  timestamp
);

-- Time series metrics
CREATE TABLE metrics (
    service     text,
    bucket      timestamp,
    metric_name text,
    ts          timestamp,
    value       double,
    PRIMARY KEY ((service, bucket, metric_name), ts)
) WITH CLUSTERING ORDER BY (ts DESC)
  AND compaction = {'class': 'TimeWindowCompactionStrategy',
                    'compaction_window_unit': 'HOURS',
                    'compaction_window_size': 1};

Integration with Node.js backend

import cassandra from 'cassandra-driver'

const client = new cassandra.Client({
  contactPoints: ['10.0.0.1', '10.0.0.2', '10.0.0.3'],
  localDataCenter: 'dc1',
  keyspace: 'myapp',
  credentials: { username: 'cassandra', password: process.env.CASSANDRA_PASSWORD! },
  pooling: {
    coreConnectionsPerHost: {
      [cassandra.types.distance.local]: 3,
      [cassandra.types.distance.remote]: 1
    }
  },
  socketOptions: { readTimeout: 12000 }
})

await client.connect()

const insertEvent = await client.prepare(`
  INSERT INTO user_events (user_id, occurred_at, event_id, event_type, payload)
  VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
`)

const selectEvents = await client.prepare(`
  SELECT * FROM user_events
  WHERE user_id = ? AND occurred_at >= ? AND occurred_at <= ?
  ORDER BY occurred_at DESC
  LIMIT ?
`)

async function writeEvents(events: UserEvent[]) {
  const batch = events.map(e => ({
    query: insertEvent,
    params: [
      cassandra.types.Uuid.fromString(e.userId),
      new Date(e.occurredAt),
      cassandra.types.TimeUuid.now(),
      e.eventType,
      JSON.stringify(e.payload)
    ]
  }))
  await client.batch(batch, { prepare: true, logged: false })
}

async function* fetchEvents(userId: string, from: Date, to: Date) {
  const options = { prepare: true, fetchSize: 1000 }
  let pageState: Buffer | undefined
  do {
    const result = await client.execute(selectEvents,
      [cassandra.types.Uuid.fromString(userId), from, to, 1000],
      { ...options, pageState })
    yield result.rows
    pageState = result.pageState as Buffer | undefined
  } while (pageState)
}

Consistency levels

Level Speed Reliability Use case
ONE Fast Low Analytics, cache
LOCAL_QUORUM Medium High Write operations
QUORUM Slow Maximum Critical data
const { types: { consistencies } } = cassandra

await client.execute(insertEvent, params, { consistency: consistencies.localQuorum })
await client.execute(selectEvents, params, { consistency: consistencies.one })
await client.execute(criticalQuery, params, { consistency: consistencies.quorum })

Monitoring and diagnostics

nodetool status
nodetool tpstats
nodetool cfstats myapp.user_events
nodetool compactionstats
nodetool cleanup myapp

Enable slow query logging in cassandra.yaml: slow_query_log_timeout_in_ms: 500.

Typical mistakes and their solutions

  • Hot partitions due to wrong key: use composite keys with high cardinality. Avoid columns with few values.
  • High memory consumption: reduce memtable_heap_space or switch from G1GC to ParallelGC.
  • Slow writes: check the disk for commitlog — use a separate SSD. Increase concurrent_writes.

How long does a full setup take?

A typical project with three nodes and integration takes 2–3 weeks. It includes requirements audit, schema design, cluster deployment, configuration tuning, and backend adapter writing. Complex clusters with multiple data centers may take up to 5 weeks. Get an accurate estimate for your project — contact us.

Our cases and guarantees

We have completed over 30 projects with Cassandra, including metric systems for an advertising platform (100 million events per day) and activity feeds for a SaaS service. In every project, we guarantee stable cluster operation for one month after delivery. Our engineers have 5+ years of experience with Cassandra and related technologies. Contact us for a consultation — we will discuss your architecture free of charge.

What is included in turnkey setup

  • Audit of current architecture and load requirements
  • Data schema design (query-driven design)
  • Cluster deployment (bare-metal / cloud / Docker)
  • Optimization of cassandra.yaml, JVM, and network settings
  • Backend integration (Node.js, Python, Go)
  • Schema documentation and operation instructions
  • Team training and operational recommendations
  • Guaranteed stable cluster operation for one month after delivery

Order Cassandra tuning for your project — get a consultation from an engineer with 5 years of experience.

Backend Development Services: Laravel, Node.js, Go, Django, PostgreSQL

On a production server at 3:14 AM, the Laravel Jobs queue stopped processing. 40,000 unprocessed jobs in Redis. Cause: worker crashed due to a memory leak in one of the Jobs (leak via a static variable in an Eloquent observer), supervisor didn't restart it because of misconfigured stopwaitsecs. This is not a hypothetical scenario — it's Tuesday. We analyzed such an incident on a project with 500 RPS load: diagnosis took 4 hours, fix — 20 minutes. So you don't lose money on downtime, we offer backend development services with a focus on production-grade reliability. We'll assess your project in 2 days.

Backend is what works when no one is watching. Or doesn't work. We guarantee you'll have the first option.

How do we ensure production-grade reliability from day one?

What we do correctly from day one

Service Layer over Fat Controllers. Controller receives HTTP request, validates it via Form Request, passes data to Service, returns response. Business logic in Service, not Controller. This sounds trivial, but most legacy projects have controllers with 500 lines and SQL queries inside.

Repository Pattern we use cautiously. If you just wrap Model::where(...) in a repository method — that's boilerplate without benefit. Repository is justified when: you need to abstract from the data source (DB + cache + external API) or when query logic is complex enough to isolate.

Jobs, Events, Listeners. Everything that can be async — make async. Sending email, PDF generation, external API sync, aggregate recalculation — into Queue. Laravel Horizon for queue monitoring in Redis: see throughput, failed jobs, processing time per queue.

How Octane handles high load

Laravel Octane with RoadRunner or Swoole keeps the app in memory between requests — removes bootstrap overhead (config loading, class autoloading) on each HTTP request. Gain: 3–8x on synthetic benchmarks, 2–4x on real applications. Important: no state between requests in static variables — that leads to exactly the incidents from the beginning. We use this in projects with >1000 RPS.

What to do about N+1 queries

N+1 is the most common cause of slow pages in Laravel apps. Standard story: page worked fine on dev with 10 records, on production with 10,000 — 8-second load.

Laravel Debugbar in dev environment shows the number of queries per page. More than 20 queries per page — signal for audit.

Model::preventLazyLoading(! app()->isProduction());

Telescope for profiling in staging: logs all queries, jobs, mail, notifications with time detail. Numbers: after implementing eager loading, page load time drops from 8s to 0.3s — 27 times faster.

PostgreSQL: indexes that are actually needed

PostgreSQL 14+ is the primary DB on all projects. We use PgBouncer + PostgreSQL combination. 10+ years experience, more than 50 backend projects, 5 years on the market.

How PostgreSQL helps avoid slow queries

Composite indexes for frequent WHERE + ORDER BY. If you have WHERE user_id = ? AND status = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC — you need (user_id, status, created_at DESC). A separate index on (user_id) doesn't help much with sorting.

Partial indexes. If 95% of queries go with WHERE status = 'active':

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (created_at DESC)
WHERE status = 'active';

The index is small, fast, covers the main load.

GIN indexes for JSONB and arrays. @> operator without GIN index — seq scan. With index — fast even on millions of rows.

GIN for full-text search. to_tsvector + GIN instead of LIKE '%query%'. LIKE without index is always seq scan. With pg_trgm extension and gin_trgm_ops — supports LIKE with index, useful for CRM search by partial match.

Connection pooling: why it's more important than it seems

Rails, Laravel, Django open a new connection to PostgreSQL for each PHP/Python process. With 100 workers — 100 connections. PostgreSQL starts degrading from 200–300 active connections — overhead on connection management becomes significant.

PgBouncer — connection pooler in front of PostgreSQL. Transaction pooling mode: connection to PostgreSQL is occupied only during a transaction, returned to pool between requests. 1000 application workers → 20–50 actual connections to PostgreSQL. This reduces latency by 40% and hosting costs by 30%.

Node.js with Fastify: when it's better than Laravel

Node.js is justified for:

  • Realtime: WebSocket servers, Server-Sent Events, chat, live updates
  • Streaming: large files, video, streaming data
  • High I/O concurrency: many parallel requests to external APIs without heavy business logic
  • Serverless: Lambda/Cloud Functions — Node.js starts faster than PHP

Fastify over Express: 2–3 times faster on benchmarks, built-in JSON Schema validation, better TypeScript support, plugin architecture.

Typical realtime architecture: Laravel — core business logic and REST API. Node.js + Socket.io or ws — WebSocket server. Laravel publishes events to Redis Pub/Sub, Node.js subscribes and broadcasts to clients. This separation allows scaling the WebSocket server independently of the main app.

Go: microservices and high load

Go we use for:

  • High-load microservices (>10,000 RPS)
  • Background workers with strict latency requirements
  • DevOps tools and CLI
  • gRPC services in microservice architecture

Goroutines — thousands of times cheaper than OS threads. 10,000 concurrent connections on Go is normal on one server.

But Go is not a silver bullet. Development is slower than Laravel: more boilerplate, no ORM at Eloquent level, error handling with if err != nil everywhere. Justified only when performance is a real requirement, not an assumption.

Django and Python backend

Django with DRF (Django REST Framework) — for tasks where Python is needed: ML pipelines, data processing, integrations with AI tools.

Celery for background tasks — similar to Laravel Queue but more complex to configure. Celery Beat for cron tasks.

Django ORM vs raw SQL: ORM is convenient for CRUD. For analytical queries with multiple JOINs, window functions, and CTEs — connection.execute() with raw SQL is more readable and predictable.

Redis: not just cache

Redis in our projects plays multiple roles:

Role Details
Cache Caching results of heavy queries, HTML fragments
Queues Backend for Laravel Queue / Celery
Session store Distributed sessions in multi-instance environment
Pub/Sub Realtime events between services
Rate limiting Sliding window counters for API throttling
Leaderboards Sorted Sets for rankings

Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. Sentinel for automatic failover on standalone setups.

Deployment and infrastructure

Docker + docker-compose — standard for local development and production. Each service in a container: PHP-FPM/Octane, Nginx, PostgreSQL, Redis, Queue Worker, Scheduler.

CI/CD via GitHub Actions:

  1. Run tests (PHPUnit / Pest, Vitest, Playwright)
  2. Build Docker image
  3. Push to Container Registry
  4. Deploy: docker pull → docker-compose up -d on server, or Kubernetes rolling update

Zero-downtime deploy for Laravel: php artisan down --secret=TOKEN is not needed with proper configuration. Strategy: new container starts next to the old one, Nginx switches traffic after health check, old container stops.

Monitoring: Sentry for exception tracking with alerting in Slack/Telegram. Grafana + Prometheus (or Grafana Cloud) for metrics: CPU, memory, request rate, queue depth, database connection count. Alerts on: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > 2s, queue depth > 1000 jobs.

What's included in turnkey work

  • Architecture design (API documentation, DB schema, service diagram)
  • Implementation according to agreed specification with code review
  • CI/CD, monitoring, alerting setup
  • Load testing (k6, wrk) with report
  • Handover of source code, access, deployment instructions
  • Training of customer's team (2-3 sessions)
  • Warranty support for 1 month after delivery

Timeline benchmarks

Task Timeline
REST API for mobile/SPA (medium complexity) 6–12 weeks
Backend with complex business logic + integrations 12–20 weeks
High-load service on Go 8–16 weeks
Migration from legacy PHP to Laravel 16–32 weeks

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing load, integrations, and business logic. Contact us for a free audit of your current backend — get an optimization plan in 2 days. Request a consultation.