Web Application Database Schema Design

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Web Application Database Schema Design
Complex
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1360
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Web Application Database Schema Design

A database schema is the foundation that is hardest to change after launch. Improperly normalized tables, missing FKs, or incorrect data types turn into technical debt that accumulates for years. We've encountered this dozens of times: when a project grows and the database starts cracking at the seams, redesign costs many times more. On one project, the client lost two months due to missing indexes — queries took 30 seconds. After implementing a proper schema, everything flew in 50 milliseconds. On average, schema refactoring takes 2–3 days but prevents months of rework. We guarantee that after our work, queries will be tens of times faster.

Main Principles and Common Problems

In 80% of projects, we find the same errors: N+1 queries due to missing foreign keys, index fragmentation when using random UUIDs, loss of precision in financial calculations due to FLOAT, and magic numbers instead of enums. For most applications, the third normal form (3NF) is sufficient: each field depends only on the primary key, without transitive dependencies. Normalization helps avoid redundancy and update anomalies.

Denormalization is justified for counters (comments_count, likes_count) — instead of COUNT JOIN on every query. Also for cached aggregates (monthly order totals) and flattening hierarchical data for search. It is harmful when personal data or frequently changing statuses are duplicated.

Why Choosing the Right Data Type Is a Critical Decision

Errors in data types are one of the most common causes of production issues. Here are typical antipatterns:

-- Bad
user_id   INT              -- will overflow at 2.1 billion records
price     FLOAT            -- precision loss in financial calculations
status    INT              -- magic numbers, no domain constraint
created   VARCHAR(30)      -- string sorting instead of dates
settings  TEXT             -- no structure, no index

-- Good
user_id   BIGINT           -- or UUID
price     DECIMAL(12, 2)   -- exact arithmetic
status    VARCHAR(20) CHECK (status IN ('draft', 'published', 'archived'))
created   TIMESTAMPTZ      -- with timezone
settings  JSONB            -- structured, indexable

TIMESTAMPTZ stores time in UTC and converts on read according to the session's TimeZone. TIMESTAMP stores "as-is" — when the server timezone changes, data loses meaning.

How to Choose a Primary Key: BIGSERIAL or UUID?

-- SERIAL (auto-increment): simple, compact (8 bytes), predictable
id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY

-- UUID v4: globally unique, but 16 bytes, random order = index fragmentation
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid()

-- ULID via pg_ulid or application-side generation:
-- lexicographically sortable by time, 16 bytes
id UUID PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT uuid_generate_v7()  -- PostgreSQL 17+

For most web applications, BIGSERIAL is the optimal choice. UUID is needed when IDs are generated on the client side or to hide predictability.

How to Avoid Common Schema Design Mistakes

The key to success is to think ahead about access patterns. If the application frequently reads the cart with items, use aggregate fields and avoid deep JOINs. For historical data (orders), intentionally denormalize unit_price to preserve a price snapshot. Always check whether the chosen PK supports growth — BIGSERIAL covers 9.2 quintillion records, enough for decades.

Example: E-commerce Schema

CREATE TABLE categories (
    id         BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    name       VARCHAR(200)  NOT NULL,
    slug       VARCHAR(220)  NOT NULL UNIQUE,
    parent_id  BIGINT        REFERENCES categories(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
    sort_order INT           NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
    created_at TIMESTAMPTZ   NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE TABLE products (
    id              BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    title           VARCHAR(500)   NOT NULL,
    slug            VARCHAR(520)   NOT NULL UNIQUE,
    category_id     BIGINT         NOT NULL REFERENCES categories(id) ON DELETE RESTRICT,
    price           DECIMAL(12, 2) NOT NULL CHECK (price > 0),
    status          VARCHAR(20)    NOT NULL DEFAULT 'draft'
                    CHECK (status IN ('draft', 'published', 'archived')),
    stock           INT            NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 CHECK (stock >= 0),
    specs           JSONB,
    search_vector   TSVECTOR,                -- for full-text search
    created_at      TIMESTAMPTZ    NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
    updated_at      TIMESTAMPTZ    NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE TABLE orders (
    id          BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    user_id     BIGINT       NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE RESTRICT,
    status      VARCHAR(20)  NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pending'
                CHECK (status IN ('pending', 'paid', 'shipped', 'completed', 'cancelled')),
    total       DECIMAL(12, 2) NOT NULL,
    currency    CHAR(3)      NOT NULL DEFAULT 'USD',
    meta        JSONB,                       -- delivery address etc.
    created_at  TIMESTAMPTZ  NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW(),
    updated_at  TIMESTAMPTZ  NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);

CREATE TABLE order_items (
    id          BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    order_id    BIGINT         NOT NULL REFERENCES orders(id)   ON DELETE CASCADE,
    product_id  BIGINT         NOT NULL REFERENCES products(id) ON DELETE RESTRICT,
    quantity    INT            NOT NULL CHECK (quantity > 0),
    unit_price  DECIMAL(12, 2) NOT NULL,     -- price at time of purchase
    UNIQUE (order_id, product_id)
);

unit_price is intentional denormalization: the product price will change over time, but the historical price in the order must remain unchanged.

ON DELETE RESTRICT vs CASCADE — rule: CASCADE only when child records are meaningless without the parent (order_items without order). RESTRICT when deleting the parent should be explicitly prevented (cannot delete a category with products).

Which Indexes to Create Immediately and Soft Delete

Add these immediately when creating the schema:

-- FK columns — always, otherwise DELETE parent = seq scan on child table
CREATE INDEX idx_products_category_id  ON products (category_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_order_items_order_id  ON order_items (order_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_order_items_product_id ON order_items (product_id);

-- Frequent filters
CREATE INDEX idx_products_status_created ON products (status, created_at DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_user_created     ON orders (user_id, created_at DESC);

-- Partial index for active records
CREATE INDEX idx_products_published ON products (category_id, created_at DESC)
    WHERE status = 'published';

-- GIN for JSONB
CREATE INDEX idx_products_specs ON products USING GIN (specs);

Soft delete pattern:

-- Soft delete
ALTER TABLE products ADD COLUMN deleted_at TIMESTAMPTZ;
CREATE INDEX idx_products_deleted_at ON products (deleted_at) WHERE deleted_at IS NULL;

-- Audit table
CREATE TABLE audit_log (
    id          BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    table_name  VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
    row_id      BIGINT       NOT NULL,
    operation   CHAR(1)      NOT NULL CHECK (operation IN ('I', 'U', 'D')),
    old_data    JSONB,
    new_data    JSONB,
    changed_by  BIGINT       REFERENCES users(id),
    changed_at  TIMESTAMPTZ  NOT NULL DEFAULT NOW()
);

Partial index with WHERE deleted_at IS NULL — active records are indexed separately. Deleted records do not enter the index and do not slow down queries.

Our Process and What's Included

  1. Analysis — identify business entities, relationships, frequent queries.
  2. Design — build an ER diagram, normalize, choose data types.
  3. DDL Creation — SQL scripts with indexes, FKs, constraints.
  4. Documentation — schema description, comments, developer guide.
  5. Audit — review existing schema, identify issues, provide recommendations.

The deliverable includes: ER diagram (up to 15 tables) in PlantUML or Draw.io format, SQL DDL with indexes and constraints, schema documentation (README with table and field descriptions), migration recommendations, and one week of consultation after delivery.

Timelines

Schema design for a new project (up to 15 tables): 1–2 days. Review and refactoring of an existing schema: 1–3 days. The cost is calculated individually — contact us for an estimate. Order schema design — we'll take all nuances into account. Get a professional consultation even if you're unsure about the scope.

Backend Development Services: Laravel, Node.js, Go, Django, PostgreSQL

On a production server at 3:14 AM, the Laravel Jobs queue stopped processing. 40,000 unprocessed jobs in Redis. Cause: worker crashed due to a memory leak in one of the Jobs (leak via a static variable in an Eloquent observer), supervisor didn't restart it because of misconfigured stopwaitsecs. This is not a hypothetical scenario — it's Tuesday. We analyzed such an incident on a project with 500 RPS load: diagnosis took 4 hours, fix — 20 minutes. So you don't lose money on downtime, we offer backend development services with a focus on production-grade reliability. We'll assess your project in 2 days.

Backend is what works when no one is watching. Or doesn't work. We guarantee you'll have the first option.

How do we ensure production-grade reliability from day one?

What we do correctly from day one

Service Layer over Fat Controllers. Controller receives HTTP request, validates it via Form Request, passes data to Service, returns response. Business logic in Service, not Controller. This sounds trivial, but most legacy projects have controllers with 500 lines and SQL queries inside.

Repository Pattern we use cautiously. If you just wrap Model::where(...) in a repository method — that's boilerplate without benefit. Repository is justified when: you need to abstract from the data source (DB + cache + external API) or when query logic is complex enough to isolate.

Jobs, Events, Listeners. Everything that can be async — make async. Sending email, PDF generation, external API sync, aggregate recalculation — into Queue. Laravel Horizon for queue monitoring in Redis: see throughput, failed jobs, processing time per queue.

How Octane handles high load

Laravel Octane with RoadRunner or Swoole keeps the app in memory between requests — removes bootstrap overhead (config loading, class autoloading) on each HTTP request. Gain: 3–8x on synthetic benchmarks, 2–4x on real applications. Important: no state between requests in static variables — that leads to exactly the incidents from the beginning. We use this in projects with >1000 RPS.

What to do about N+1 queries

N+1 is the most common cause of slow pages in Laravel apps. Standard story: page worked fine on dev with 10 records, on production with 10,000 — 8-second load.

Laravel Debugbar in dev environment shows the number of queries per page. More than 20 queries per page — signal for audit.

Model::preventLazyLoading(! app()->isProduction());

Telescope for profiling in staging: logs all queries, jobs, mail, notifications with time detail. Numbers: after implementing eager loading, page load time drops from 8s to 0.3s — 27 times faster.

PostgreSQL: indexes that are actually needed

PostgreSQL 14+ is the primary DB on all projects. We use PgBouncer + PostgreSQL combination. 10+ years experience, more than 50 backend projects, 5 years on the market.

How PostgreSQL helps avoid slow queries

Composite indexes for frequent WHERE + ORDER BY. If you have WHERE user_id = ? AND status = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC — you need (user_id, status, created_at DESC). A separate index on (user_id) doesn't help much with sorting.

Partial indexes. If 95% of queries go with WHERE status = 'active':

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (created_at DESC)
WHERE status = 'active';

The index is small, fast, covers the main load.

GIN indexes for JSONB and arrays. @> operator without GIN index — seq scan. With index — fast even on millions of rows.

GIN for full-text search. to_tsvector + GIN instead of LIKE '%query%'. LIKE without index is always seq scan. With pg_trgm extension and gin_trgm_ops — supports LIKE with index, useful for CRM search by partial match.

Connection pooling: why it's more important than it seems

Rails, Laravel, Django open a new connection to PostgreSQL for each PHP/Python process. With 100 workers — 100 connections. PostgreSQL starts degrading from 200–300 active connections — overhead on connection management becomes significant.

PgBouncer — connection pooler in front of PostgreSQL. Transaction pooling mode: connection to PostgreSQL is occupied only during a transaction, returned to pool between requests. 1000 application workers → 20–50 actual connections to PostgreSQL. This reduces latency by 40% and hosting costs by 30%.

Node.js with Fastify: when it's better than Laravel

Node.js is justified for:

  • Realtime: WebSocket servers, Server-Sent Events, chat, live updates
  • Streaming: large files, video, streaming data
  • High I/O concurrency: many parallel requests to external APIs without heavy business logic
  • Serverless: Lambda/Cloud Functions — Node.js starts faster than PHP

Fastify over Express: 2–3 times faster on benchmarks, built-in JSON Schema validation, better TypeScript support, plugin architecture.

Typical realtime architecture: Laravel — core business logic and REST API. Node.js + Socket.io or ws — WebSocket server. Laravel publishes events to Redis Pub/Sub, Node.js subscribes and broadcasts to clients. This separation allows scaling the WebSocket server independently of the main app.

Go: microservices and high load

Go we use for:

  • High-load microservices (>10,000 RPS)
  • Background workers with strict latency requirements
  • DevOps tools and CLI
  • gRPC services in microservice architecture

Goroutines — thousands of times cheaper than OS threads. 10,000 concurrent connections on Go is normal on one server.

But Go is not a silver bullet. Development is slower than Laravel: more boilerplate, no ORM at Eloquent level, error handling with if err != nil everywhere. Justified only when performance is a real requirement, not an assumption.

Django and Python backend

Django with DRF (Django REST Framework) — for tasks where Python is needed: ML pipelines, data processing, integrations with AI tools.

Celery for background tasks — similar to Laravel Queue but more complex to configure. Celery Beat for cron tasks.

Django ORM vs raw SQL: ORM is convenient for CRUD. For analytical queries with multiple JOINs, window functions, and CTEs — connection.execute() with raw SQL is more readable and predictable.

Redis: not just cache

Redis in our projects plays multiple roles:

Role Details
Cache Caching results of heavy queries, HTML fragments
Queues Backend for Laravel Queue / Celery
Session store Distributed sessions in multi-instance environment
Pub/Sub Realtime events between services
Rate limiting Sliding window counters for API throttling
Leaderboards Sorted Sets for rankings

Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. Sentinel for automatic failover on standalone setups.

Deployment and infrastructure

Docker + docker-compose — standard for local development and production. Each service in a container: PHP-FPM/Octane, Nginx, PostgreSQL, Redis, Queue Worker, Scheduler.

CI/CD via GitHub Actions:

  1. Run tests (PHPUnit / Pest, Vitest, Playwright)
  2. Build Docker image
  3. Push to Container Registry
  4. Deploy: docker pull → docker-compose up -d on server, or Kubernetes rolling update

Zero-downtime deploy for Laravel: php artisan down --secret=TOKEN is not needed with proper configuration. Strategy: new container starts next to the old one, Nginx switches traffic after health check, old container stops.

Monitoring: Sentry for exception tracking with alerting in Slack/Telegram. Grafana + Prometheus (or Grafana Cloud) for metrics: CPU, memory, request rate, queue depth, database connection count. Alerts on: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > 2s, queue depth > 1000 jobs.

What's included in turnkey work

  • Architecture design (API documentation, DB schema, service diagram)
  • Implementation according to agreed specification with code review
  • CI/CD, monitoring, alerting setup
  • Load testing (k6, wrk) with report
  • Handover of source code, access, deployment instructions
  • Training of customer's team (2-3 sessions)
  • Warranty support for 1 month after delivery

Timeline benchmarks

Task Timeline
REST API for mobile/SPA (medium complexity) 6–12 weeks
Backend with complex business logic + integrations 12–20 weeks
High-load service on Go 8–16 weeks
Migration from legacy PHP to Laravel 16–32 weeks

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing load, integrations, and business logic. Contact us for a free audit of your current backend — get an optimization plan in 2 days. Request a consultation.