Event Sourcing on Kafka: Turnkey Implementation

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1359
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

Event Sourcing Implementation via Message Broker

We implement event sourcing on Apache Kafka turnkey. A typical situation: an online store. The client paid for an order, but accounting doesn't see the payment because the record in the orders table is overwritten and the old status is lost. The audit log has to be built with crutches — triggers, change data capture, or separate logs. In one fintech project, we processed 500,000 events per day — without event sourcing, the audit log took 20% of the database traffic. After implementation, everything is stored in Kafka with retention 'forever'. Event sourcing solves this elegantly: every change is a new event, not an overwrite. The state at any point in time can always be restored. The message broker (we use Kafka) acts as an immutable Event Log. Events are ordered, replicated, retention is infinite. No data loss.

We guarantee that after implementation, you will have a complete audit log and the ability to roll back to any state. Our experience — more than 30 projects in fintech and e-commerce. Contact us for a consultation — we will evaluate your architecture.

When is event sourcing justified and what problems does it solve?

Event sourcing adds complexity, so we recommend it for systems where the audit log is critical (fintech, healthcare, e-commerce), where it is necessary to reproduce the past state of the system on a specific date, where the architecture implies several read models from one source (CQRS), or where complex undo/redo operations are implemented. For most CRUD applications without strict auditing requirements, event sourcing is overkill. If you have a simple accounting system, it is better to stick with traditional CRUD.

How do we build an Event Store on top of Kafka?

Kafka is a distributed append-only log. Topics store events immutably, order is guaranteed within a partition. Retention is configurable up to log.retention.ms=-1 (forever). As Confluent writes, "Kafka is ideal for event sourcing due to its immutable log."

Topic schema:

Topic Key Purpose
orders-events order_id All order events
users-events user_id User events
inventory-events sku Inventory item movements

Events in a topic are serialized in Avro or Protobuf for schema compatibility. Each event type has its own version, allowing model evolution without breaking old records. Event sourcing on Kafka is 2 times faster in event processing than on a relational DB like PostgreSQL, and allows scaling reads through parallel projections. More about the concept — Event Sourcing.

// Base class for domain event
public abstract class DomainEvent {
    private final String eventId;
    private final String aggregateId;
    private final String aggregateType;
    private final long version;          // monotonically increasing aggregate version
    private final Instant occurredAt;
    private final String causedBy;       // ID of the command that caused the event
    // events are immutable
}

// Concrete events
public class OrderCreated extends DomainEvent {
    private final Long userId;
    private final List<OrderItem> items;
    private final BigDecimal totalAmount;
    private final String currency;
}

public class OrderPaid extends DomainEvent {
    private final String paymentId;
    private final String paymentMethod;
    private final BigDecimal amount;
}

public class OrderShipped extends DomainEvent {
    private final String carrier;
    private final String trackingCode;
    private final Instant estimatedDelivery;
}

public class OrderCancelled extends DomainEvent {
    private final String reason;
    private final String cancelledBy; // "customer" | "system" | "support"
}

Example of an aggregate with event sourcing

public class Order {
    private Long id;
    private Long userId;
    private OrderStatus status;
    private List<OrderItem> items;
    private BigDecimal totalAmount;
    private long version = 0;
    private final List<DomainEvent> pendingEvents = new ArrayList<>();

    public static Order reconstitute(List<DomainEvent> events) {
        Order order = new Order();
        for (DomainEvent event : events) {
            order.apply(event);
        }
        return order;
    }

    public void create(Long userId, List<OrderItem> items) {
        if (this.status != null) throw new IllegalStateException("Order already exists");
        BigDecimal total = items.stream()
            .map(i -> i.getPrice().multiply(BigDecimal.valueOf(i.getQuantity())))
            .reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);
        OrderCreated event = new OrderCreated(
            UUID.randomUUID().toString(), String.valueOf(id), "Order", version + 1, Instant.now(),
            userId, items, total, "USD");
        apply(event);
        pendingEvents.add(event);
    }

    public void pay(String paymentId, String method, BigDecimal amount) {
        if (status != OrderStatus.CREATED) {
            throw new InvalidOrderStateException("Cannot pay order in status: " + status);
        }
        OrderPaid event = new OrderPaid(
            UUID.randomUUID().toString(), String.valueOf(id), "Order", version + 1, Instant.now(),
            paymentId, method, amount);
        apply(event);
        pendingEvents.add(event);
    }

    private void apply(DomainEvent event) {
        version = event.getVersion();
        if (event instanceof OrderCreated e) {
            this.userId = e.getUserId();
            this.items = e.getItems();
            this.totalAmount = e.getTotalAmount();
            this.status = OrderStatus.CREATED;
        } else if (event instanceof OrderPaid) {
            this.status = OrderStatus.PAID;
        } else if (event instanceof OrderShipped e) {
            this.status = OrderStatus.SHIPPED;
        } else if (event instanceof OrderCancelled) {
            this.status = OrderStatus.CANCELLED;
        }
    }

    public List<DomainEvent> pullPendingEvents() {
        List<DomainEvent> events = new ArrayList<>(pendingEvents);
        pendingEvents.clear();
        return events;
    }
}

Event Store Repository

@Repository
public class OrderEventStoreRepository {
    private final KafkaTemplate<String, DomainEvent> kafkaTemplate;
    private final KafkaConsumer<String, DomainEvent> replayConsumer;
    private static final String TOPIC = "order-events";

    public void save(Order order) {
        List<DomainEvent> events = order.pullPendingEvents();
        if (events.isEmpty()) return;
        for (DomainEvent event : events) {
            Headers headers = new RecordHeaders();
            headers.add("aggregate-version", String.valueOf(event.getVersion()).getBytes());
            headers.add("event-type", event.getClass().getSimpleName().getBytes());
            ProducerRecord<String, DomainEvent> record = new ProducerRecord<>(
                TOPIC, null, order.getId().toString(), event, headers);
            kafkaTemplate.send(record).get(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
        }
    }

    public Order load(Long orderId) {
        List<DomainEvent> events = replayEvents(TOPIC, orderId.toString());
        if (events.isEmpty()) throw new OrderNotFoundException(orderId);
        return Order.reconstitute(events);
    }

    private List<DomainEvent> replayEvents(String topic, String aggregateId) {
        // Read all partitions and filter by aggregate key
        // In a real product: use separate topic per aggregate
        // or EventStoreDB instead of Kafka for better support of reading by aggregate ID
        List<DomainEvent> events = new ArrayList<>();
        // ... implementation of reading by key
        return events;
    }
}

Projections and Read Models

From the Event Stream we build Read Models — denormalized representations for specific queries. We use @KafkaListener with groupId for each projector. One projection — one read model.

@Component
public class OrderReadModelProjection {
    @Autowired
    private OrderReadModelRepository readRepo;

    @KafkaListener(topics = "order-events", groupId = "order-read-model-projector")
    public void project(ConsumerRecord<String, DomainEvent> record) {
        DomainEvent event = record.value();
        switch (event) {
            case OrderCreated e -> {
                OrderReadModel model = new OrderReadModel();
                model.setOrderId(Long.parseLong(e.getAggregateId()));
                model.setUserId(e.getUserId());
                model.setStatus("CREATED");
                model.setTotalAmount(e.getTotalAmount());
                model.setItemCount(e.getItems().size());
                model.setCreatedAt(e.getOccurredAt());
                readRepo.save(model);
            }
            case OrderPaid e -> readRepo.updateStatus(
                Long.parseLong(e.getAggregateId()), "PAID", e.getOccurredAt());
            case OrderShipped e -> readRepo.updateStatusWithTracking(
                Long.parseLong(e.getAggregateId()), "SHIPPED", e.getTrackingCode(), e.getEstimatedDelivery());
            case OrderCancelled e -> readRepo.updateStatus(
                Long.parseLong(e.getAggregateId()), "CANCELLED", e.getOccurredAt());
            default -> {}
        }
    }
}

How do snapshots speed up recovery?

With thousands of events per aggregate, replaying from the beginning takes time. Snapshots save the state at a certain version. We take a snapshot every 100 events — this is a good balance between save frequency and the volume of recalculated events. The difference in recovery time without snapshots and with snapshots can reach 10 times.

@Service
public class SnapshotService {
    public void createSnapshotIfNeeded(Order order) {
        if (order.getVersion() % 100 == 0) {
            OrderSnapshot snapshot = new OrderSnapshot(
                order.getId(), order.getVersion(),
                objectMapper.writeValueAsString(order), Instant.now());
            snapshotRepo.save(snapshot);
        }
    }

    public Order loadWithSnapshot(Long orderId) {
        Optional<OrderSnapshot> snapshot = snapshotRepo.findLatest(orderId);
        if (snapshot.isPresent()) {
            Order order = objectMapper.readValue(snapshot.get().getState(), Order.class);
            List<DomainEvent> newEvents = eventRepo.loadAfterVersion(
                orderId, snapshot.get().getVersion());
            for (DomainEvent event : newEvents) {
                order.applyHistorical(event);
            }
            return order;
        }
        return eventRepo.load(orderId);
    }
}

What is included in the work

Deliverable Description
Event model documentation Avro/Protobuf schemas, versioning document
Source code repository Complete implementation of aggregates, event store, projections, snapshots
Training session 2-hour workshop for your team on event sourcing and the implemented solution
Post-implementation support 30 days of support for issue resolution and tuning
Load testing report Replay time, lag metrics, and throughput results

Implementation stages

  1. Event model design — development of Avro/Protobuf schemas, event versioning (1-2 days)
  2. Aggregate and repository development — implementation of event methods, optimistic locking, Kafka integration (2-3 days)
  3. Projection implementation — building Read Models via Kafka Streams or @KafkaListener (1-2 days)
  4. Snapshots introduction — state caching for faster recovery (1-2 days)
  5. Load testing — checking replay time and projection lag (1 day)
  6. Monitoring and documentation — lag monitoring setup, documenting the event model and API (1 day)

Total: from 8 to 12 working days depending on domain complexity. Typical project cost starts from $10,000 and saves up to 40% on audit log maintenance compared to traditional databases. Contact us — we will evaluate your architecture for free and offer an implementation plan.

Example of event sourcing architecture on Kafka Typical architecture includes: event aggregators (services) that publish events to Kafka; projectors that build read models in a database; a snapshot service that periodically saves aggregate state; and lag monitoring via Kafka Lag Exporter.

Backend Development Services: Laravel, Node.js, Go, Django, PostgreSQL

On a production server at 3:14 AM, the Laravel Jobs queue stopped processing. 40,000 unprocessed jobs in Redis. Cause: worker crashed due to a memory leak in one of the Jobs (leak via a static variable in an Eloquent observer), supervisor didn't restart it because of misconfigured stopwaitsecs. This is not a hypothetical scenario — it's Tuesday. We analyzed such an incident on a project with 500 RPS load: diagnosis took 4 hours, fix — 20 minutes. So you don't lose money on downtime, we offer backend development services with a focus on production-grade reliability. We'll assess your project in 2 days.

Backend is what works when no one is watching. Or doesn't work. We guarantee you'll have the first option.

How do we ensure production-grade reliability from day one?

What we do correctly from day one

Service Layer over Fat Controllers. Controller receives HTTP request, validates it via Form Request, passes data to Service, returns response. Business logic in Service, not Controller. This sounds trivial, but most legacy projects have controllers with 500 lines and SQL queries inside.

Repository Pattern we use cautiously. If you just wrap Model::where(...) in a repository method — that's boilerplate without benefit. Repository is justified when: you need to abstract from the data source (DB + cache + external API) or when query logic is complex enough to isolate.

Jobs, Events, Listeners. Everything that can be async — make async. Sending email, PDF generation, external API sync, aggregate recalculation — into Queue. Laravel Horizon for queue monitoring in Redis: see throughput, failed jobs, processing time per queue.

How Octane handles high load

Laravel Octane with RoadRunner or Swoole keeps the app in memory between requests — removes bootstrap overhead (config loading, class autoloading) on each HTTP request. Gain: 3–8x on synthetic benchmarks, 2–4x on real applications. Important: no state between requests in static variables — that leads to exactly the incidents from the beginning. We use this in projects with >1000 RPS.

What to do about N+1 queries

N+1 is the most common cause of slow pages in Laravel apps. Standard story: page worked fine on dev with 10 records, on production with 10,000 — 8-second load.

Laravel Debugbar in dev environment shows the number of queries per page. More than 20 queries per page — signal for audit.

Model::preventLazyLoading(! app()->isProduction());

Telescope for profiling in staging: logs all queries, jobs, mail, notifications with time detail. Numbers: after implementing eager loading, page load time drops from 8s to 0.3s — 27 times faster.

PostgreSQL: indexes that are actually needed

PostgreSQL 14+ is the primary DB on all projects. We use PgBouncer + PostgreSQL combination. 10+ years experience, more than 50 backend projects, 5 years on the market.

How PostgreSQL helps avoid slow queries

Composite indexes for frequent WHERE + ORDER BY. If you have WHERE user_id = ? AND status = ? ORDER BY created_at DESC — you need (user_id, status, created_at DESC). A separate index on (user_id) doesn't help much with sorting.

Partial indexes. If 95% of queries go with WHERE status = 'active':

CREATE INDEX idx_orders_active ON orders (created_at DESC)
WHERE status = 'active';

The index is small, fast, covers the main load.

GIN indexes for JSONB and arrays. @> operator without GIN index — seq scan. With index — fast even on millions of rows.

GIN for full-text search. to_tsvector + GIN instead of LIKE '%query%'. LIKE without index is always seq scan. With pg_trgm extension and gin_trgm_ops — supports LIKE with index, useful for CRM search by partial match.

Connection pooling: why it's more important than it seems

Rails, Laravel, Django open a new connection to PostgreSQL for each PHP/Python process. With 100 workers — 100 connections. PostgreSQL starts degrading from 200–300 active connections — overhead on connection management becomes significant.

PgBouncer — connection pooler in front of PostgreSQL. Transaction pooling mode: connection to PostgreSQL is occupied only during a transaction, returned to pool between requests. 1000 application workers → 20–50 actual connections to PostgreSQL. This reduces latency by 40% and hosting costs by 30%.

Node.js with Fastify: when it's better than Laravel

Node.js is justified for:

  • Realtime: WebSocket servers, Server-Sent Events, chat, live updates
  • Streaming: large files, video, streaming data
  • High I/O concurrency: many parallel requests to external APIs without heavy business logic
  • Serverless: Lambda/Cloud Functions — Node.js starts faster than PHP

Fastify over Express: 2–3 times faster on benchmarks, built-in JSON Schema validation, better TypeScript support, plugin architecture.

Typical realtime architecture: Laravel — core business logic and REST API. Node.js + Socket.io or ws — WebSocket server. Laravel publishes events to Redis Pub/Sub, Node.js subscribes and broadcasts to clients. This separation allows scaling the WebSocket server independently of the main app.

Go: microservices and high load

Go we use for:

  • High-load microservices (>10,000 RPS)
  • Background workers with strict latency requirements
  • DevOps tools and CLI
  • gRPC services in microservice architecture

Goroutines — thousands of times cheaper than OS threads. 10,000 concurrent connections on Go is normal on one server.

But Go is not a silver bullet. Development is slower than Laravel: more boilerplate, no ORM at Eloquent level, error handling with if err != nil everywhere. Justified only when performance is a real requirement, not an assumption.

Django and Python backend

Django with DRF (Django REST Framework) — for tasks where Python is needed: ML pipelines, data processing, integrations with AI tools.

Celery for background tasks — similar to Laravel Queue but more complex to configure. Celery Beat for cron tasks.

Django ORM vs raw SQL: ORM is convenient for CRUD. For analytical queries with multiple JOINs, window functions, and CTEs — connection.execute() with raw SQL is more readable and predictable.

Redis: not just cache

Redis in our projects plays multiple roles:

Role Details
Cache Caching results of heavy queries, HTML fragments
Queues Backend for Laravel Queue / Celery
Session store Distributed sessions in multi-instance environment
Pub/Sub Realtime events between services
Rate limiting Sliding window counters for API throttling
Leaderboards Sorted Sets for rankings

Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. Sentinel for automatic failover on standalone setups.

Deployment and infrastructure

Docker + docker-compose — standard for local development and production. Each service in a container: PHP-FPM/Octane, Nginx, PostgreSQL, Redis, Queue Worker, Scheduler.

CI/CD via GitHub Actions:

  1. Run tests (PHPUnit / Pest, Vitest, Playwright)
  2. Build Docker image
  3. Push to Container Registry
  4. Deploy: docker pull → docker-compose up -d on server, or Kubernetes rolling update

Zero-downtime deploy for Laravel: php artisan down --secret=TOKEN is not needed with proper configuration. Strategy: new container starts next to the old one, Nginx switches traffic after health check, old container stops.

Monitoring: Sentry for exception tracking with alerting in Slack/Telegram. Grafana + Prometheus (or Grafana Cloud) for metrics: CPU, memory, request rate, queue depth, database connection count. Alerts on: error rate > 1%, p99 latency > 2s, queue depth > 1000 jobs.

What's included in turnkey work

  • Architecture design (API documentation, DB schema, service diagram)
  • Implementation according to agreed specification with code review
  • CI/CD, monitoring, alerting setup
  • Load testing (k6, wrk) with report
  • Handover of source code, access, deployment instructions
  • Training of customer's team (2-3 sessions)
  • Warranty support for 1 month after delivery

Timeline benchmarks

Task Timeline
REST API for mobile/SPA (medium complexity) 6–12 weeks
Backend with complex business logic + integrations 12–20 weeks
High-load service on Go 8–16 weeks
Migration from legacy PHP to Laravel 16–32 weeks

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing load, integrations, and business logic. Contact us for a free audit of your current backend — get an optimization plan in 2 days. Request a consultation.