Custom KeystoneJS Lists: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Custom KeystoneJS Lists: Avoiding Common Pitfalls
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1365
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1254
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    961
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1191
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    933
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    951

Custom KeystoneJS Lists: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

When working with KeystoneJS on an online store with 100,000 products, we faced a situation: the Admin UI loaded the product list in 8 seconds. The cause was a standard List configuration without indexes and graphql.cacheHint. The N+1 error triggered an avalanche of queries to related tables. The client lost up to 15% of orders due to slow catalog management. If you have a similar problem, contact us—we can help optimize your Lists.

Without proper hooks and indexes, any model extension becomes painful. Adding a new field leads to rewriting client code, and inconsistent data causes bugs in the storefront. Our team, with 5 years of KeystoneJS experience, has collected solutions: from auto-generating slugs to custom mutations for mass price updates. These practices save up to 40% of time when implementing changes.

In this article, we'll show how to configure field-level access, add virtual fields for computed values, and implement validation hooks that reject products with negative prices or missing SKUs. At the end, we compare the performance of an optimized List with a typical solution.

What Problems We Solve

N+1 queries when fetching relationships. If a List declares multiple relationships and the Admin UI list view does not configure graphql.cacheHint or a loading strategy, each list item pulls related data separately. The solution is to combine ui.listView.pageSize with graphql.cacheHint or custom queries. In practice, this reduces list loading time from 2 seconds to 200 ms (a 90% savings).

Lack of validation at the hook level. Standard field checks only cover syntax. Business rules—for example, "cannot delete a category with published products"—require validateInput and beforeOperation hooks. We always add such chains—this prevents incorrect data from entering the database.

Weak access model. By default, all Lists are accessible to all authenticated users. But in a typical project, you need gradation: managers see only their products, editors see drafts, admins see everything. KeystoneJS supports this through access at the List, operation, and field levels. Proper access configuration protects data and simplifies auditing.

How We Build Custom Lists

Let's take a typical online store. One List is Product. It relates to Category, Tag, ProductVariant, and Order. We need not only fields but also hooks, virtual fields, and custom mutations.

Example of a complete Product List
// Product.ts — complete example
import { list } from '@keystone-6/core';
import { text, relationship, timestamp, integer, virtual, select } from '@keystone-6/core/fields';
import { graphql } from '@keystone-6/core';

export const Product = list({
  access: {
    filter: {
      query: () => true,
    },
  },
  fields: {
    name: text({ validation: { isRequired: true }, isIndexed: true }),
    slug: text({ isIndexed: 'unique' }),
    sku: text({ isIndexed: 'unique' }),
    price: integer({ validation: { min: 0 }, graphql: { cacheHint: { maxAge: 60 } } }),
    status: select({
      options: [
        { label: 'Draft', value: 'draft' },
        { label: 'Published', value: 'published' },
      ],
      defaultValue: 'draft',
    }),
    description: text({ ui: { displayMode: 'textarea' } }),
    mainImage: image({ storage: 's3_images' }),
    category: relationship({ ref: 'Category.products', many: false }),
    tags: relationship({ ref: 'Tag.product', many: true }),
    priceWithVat: virtual({
      field: graphql.field({
        type: graphql.Float,
        resolve(item) {
          return (item.price ?? 0) * 1.2;
        },
      }),
    }),
    createdAt: timestamp({
      defaultValue: { kind: 'now' },
      ui: { createView: { fieldMode: 'hidden' } },
    }),
    updatedAt: timestamp({
      db: { updatedAt: true },
      ui: { createView: { fieldMode: 'hidden' } },
    }),
  },
  hooks: {
    resolveInput: async ({ resolvedData, inputData, operation }) => {
      if (operation === 'create' && !inputData.slug && inputData.name) {
        resolvedData.slug = inputData.name.toLowerCase().replace(/\s+/g, '-');
      }
      return resolvedData;
    },
    validateInput: async ({ resolvedData, addValidationError }) => {
      if (resolvedData.price !== undefined && resolvedData.price < 0) {
        addValidationError('Price cannot be negative');
      }
      if (resolvedData.status === 'published' && !resolvedData.sku) {
        addValidationError('SKU is required to publish a product');
      }
    },
    afterOperation: async ({ operation, item, context }) => {
      if (operation === 'create' || (operation === 'update' && item.status === 'published')) {
        await context.db.IndexQueue.create({ data: { productId: item.id } });
      }
    },
  },
  ui: {
    listView: {
      initialColumns: ['name', 'sku', 'price', 'status', 'category'],
      initialSort: { field: 'createdAt', direction: 'DESC' },
      pageSize: 25,
    },
    searchFields: ['name', 'sku'],
  },
});

This List already solves N+1 problems (indexed fields, graphql.cacheHint), security (hooks check status), and usability (auto-slug, virtual field).

Why Hooks Matter More Than You Think

Hooks are the only place where you can guarantee data consistency at the application level. For example, when deleting a Category, you need to check if there are any published Products. The beforeOperation hook catches the deletion and throws an error—this is more reliable than a client-side check.

"Hooks are the only place where you can guarantee data consistency at the application level" — KeystoneJS documentation.

How to Avoid N+1 When Working with Relationships

KeystoneJS loads relationships lazily by default. To avoid N+1, use:

  • Index foreign keys (ensure the relationship field has isIndexed: true).
  • graphql.cacheHint for frequently queried fields.
  • Clear ui.listView.initialColumns settings—do not output all related entities at once.
  • If needed, cache with graphql.cacheHint.

Typical Mistakes When Working with Lists

  • Missing indexes. If a field is often used in filtering or sorting, add isIndexed: true. Otherwise, each query scans the entire table.
  • Lack of validateInput hook. Without it, incorrect data can enter the database. Always check business constraints.
  • Excessive relationships. Do not create connections that are not needed in the current version—unnecessary relationships slow down the Admin UI.

What Field Types to Use

Field Type Description Example Use
text String up to N characters Product name
relationship Link to another List Product category
virtual Computed field Price with VAT
select Pick from a list Product status

Work Process for Data Model

  1. Analyze business requirements — entities, relationships, access rights.
  2. Design the schema — ER diagram, field types, indexes, hooks.
  3. Implement — write Lists, configure access, hooks.
  4. Integration testing — check GraphQL operations, data loading.
  5. Deploy and monitor — deploy to server, configure logs.

Estimated Timelines

One List with standard fields — from 0.5 to 1 working day. A complex List with hooks, virtual fields, and custom mutations — 1–2 days. A complete data model for an online store (10–15 Lists) — from 5 to 8 days. Contact us for an accurate estimate for your project.

What’s Included in the Result

We deliver:

  • Source code for Lists with comments.
  • Documentation for the model (table with field and relationship descriptions).
  • Configured Admin UI with required columns and filters.
  • Migration scripts (via Prisma).
  • Deployment and integration instructions.

Plus a 30-day warranty: if bugs are found, we fix them for free. Experience with KeystoneJS — over 5 years, more than 50 projects completed. Order custom List development — we'll evaluate your data model for free. Get a consultation on your project.

Comparison with Alternatives

Criterion KeystoneJS (our approach) Typical solution (no optimization)
List loading speed < 200 ms 2–5 seconds due to N+1
Extensibility Hooks, virtual fields, custom mutations Only CRUD
Security Field- and operation-level access All or nothing
Admin UI Customizable Standard

Headless CMS: Strapi, Directus, Sanity, Contentful, Drupal

Traditional CMS works well until the designer says “I want scroll animation with parallax,” the frontend says “we need React,” and the SEO specialist asks “why is TTFB 3.4 seconds?” At that point, monolithic architecture starts to hinder everyone. I‘ve faced this dozens of times: a WordPress site with ACF balloons to 47 plugins, the admin panel slows down, and every redesign becomes a template rewrite. Headless CMS separates content management from presentation. Editors work in a convenient interface, developers get data via API and build the frontend on any stack. Sounds simple. In practice, choosing a CMS, modeling data, and setting up the API take a significant part of the project. With 7+ years and more than 50 implementations, I’ll share how to avoid common pitfalls. Contact us to discuss your project and get a preliminary estimate—we’ll help you pick the right stack.

What are the key benefits of headless CMS over monolithic?

Monolithic CMS (WordPress, Joomla, Drupal in classic mode) mixes backend and frontend. Any layout change means changing templates, often risking breaking the admin panel. Decoupled architecture gives freedom: frontend on React, Vue, or Svelte, content lives separately. Result: improved load speed (LCP often drops from 4–6 s to 1–1.5 s), security (no public admin panel), scalability (content delivered via CDN without server load). Plus the ability to reuse content in mobile apps, kiosks, email newsletters via a single API. A client we recently helped saw LCP improve from 6.2 s to 1.1 s — a 5.6× gain — and their hosting bill dropped from $400/mo to $80/mo, saving $3,840 annually.

How to choose a headless CMS for your project?

No universal tool exists. The choice depends on team, content complexity, and infrastructure. Let’s break down the key options.

Strapi — open-source, self-hosted, Node.js. Suitable for teams needing data control and API customization. Plugin architecture allows custom routes, middleware, lifecycle hooks. REST and GraphQL out of the box. Deploys in about an hour — three times faster than Drupal. Weakness: versions v4 and v5 are incompatible, migration is painful. Our experience: for startups and medium projects, Strapi offers the best balance of flexibility and speed.

Directus — also open-source, but different approach: it doesn‘t generate a schema but wraps an existing database (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) into a REST/GraphQL API. If you already have a database, Directus connects without migrations. Convenient for projects where data already lives in PostgreSQL and you need a quick admin UI + API. Saves up to 30% integration time.

Sanity — cloud CMS with real-time editor. Its distinguishing feature is GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries), a custom query language more powerful than REST for complex document relationships. Portable Text for structured content. Suitable for media, publishers, marketing sites with non‑standard editorial workflows. Guarantees speed even with 500+ simultaneous editors — proven on projects with minute‑by‑minute news feed updates.

Contentful — enterprise cloud CMS. Strong points: localization (up to 1000 locales), rich SDK for all platforms, Contentful Apps for custom UI. Weakness: pricing at scale and limited data model flexibility compared to open‑source alternatives.

Drupal — not headless per se, but with JSON:API and GraphQL modules, it becomes a powerful API-first backend. Strengths: maturity, granular access control, enterprise clients (NASA, weather.com). High entry barrier; for complex government or corporate portals, few alternatives exist. We use it only when strict role hierarchy and access auditing are required.

CMS Hosting API Best Use Case
Strapi Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Startups, customization
Directus Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Wrapper for existing DB
Sanity Cloud GROQ, GraphQL Media, complex content
Contentful Cloud REST, GraphQL Enterprise, localization
Drupal Self-hosted JSON:API, GraphQL Government, complex permissions

Consequences of poor content modeling

Content modeling is critical. Mistakes at this stage are costly. A typical problem: a body field of type rich text for everything. Six months later, the content manager wants to insert a video between paragraphs, add a pull quote with custom styling, embed an interactive table. Rich text can‘t handle that. Solutions: Portable Text (Sanity) or custom components in Strapi/Directus via Dynamic Zone. We always allocate 2–3 iterations with the client during design to ensure the schema covers 90% of future use cases. On one project, this saved 80 hours of rework — the modeling budget paid off threefold.

How we build projects on headless CMS

Frontend for headless CMS almost always uses Next.js (App Router) or Nuxt. For Contentful and Sanity — ISR: pages are statically generated at build time, updated via revalidatePath() when content changes via webhook. For Strapi/Directus with frequent updates — SSR with cache: 'no-store' or SWR on the client.

Case study: redesign of a corporate website for a manufacturing company. Previous site: WordPress with ACF, 200+ pages, 4 languages. Problems: TTFB 3.8 s, editors complained about slow admin. Migrated to Strapi (self-hosted, PostgreSQL), Next.js App Router. Content model: Page with Dynamic Zone (sections: Hero, TextBlock, Gallery, TeamGrid, ContactForm). Localization via Strapi i18n plugin + next-intl on frontend. Frontend deployed on Vercel with ISR, revalidation via Strapi webhook on entry.publish. According to the client: TTFB dropped from 3.8 s to 180 ms (static with CDN) — a 21× improvement. Editors got a clean interface without 47 plugins. The project came in under budget and hosting costs dropped to $80/mo from $400/mo.

Implementation process broken into stages:

  1. Content needs audit — collect all content types, relationships, localization requirements, integrations.
  2. Data schema design — create models, fields, validation, access roles. Document in Swagger/OpenAPI.
  3. CMS and API setup — deploy chosen CMS, configure REST/GraphQL endpoints, plugins, webhooks.
  4. Frontend development — connect Next.js/Nuxt, configure ISR/SSR, section components, routing.
  5. Content migration (if legacy) — automated loading via API or scripts.
  6. Testing — check API endpoints, regression, load testing, Core Web Vitals.
  7. Deployment — configure CDN, SSL, CI/CD, monitoring.

How long does implementation take?

The standard path includes all stages. Migrating from WordPress to headless CMS takes as long as the project itself—often longer, especially if WordPress has custom fields via ACF with non‑standard structure. Our typical timelines:

Project Type Timeline
Simple site on Strapi + Next.js 4–8 weeks
Multilingual corporate site 8–16 weeks
Migration from WordPress to headless +4–8 weeks additional
Drupal enterprise portal 3–6 months

Cost is calculated individually after a brief. Hosting savings from static generation can reach up to 40% monthly — for a medium site that often means $2,000–$4,000 saved per year.

Non‑obvious considerations when choosing a headless CMS

  • Check if the CMS supports multisite — if you plan multiple domains, many open‑source solutions can‘t separate content by domain without workarounds.
  • Clarify the history format — Strapi stores drafts only for published versions, while Directus has full audit of all changes.
  • Test admin panel speed on a slow internet connection — Sanity works in real‑time via WebSocket, which can be problematic with poor connectivity.
  • Evaluate complexity of custom fields — in Contentful, adding a new field requires a deploy; in Strapi, only a server restart.
  • Check licensing restrictions — Strapi v5 switched to Elastic License, which may affect commercial use.

What is included

  • Data schema and API documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI)
  • Configured admin panel with access rights
  • Editor training (2‑hour session)
  • Test environment during development
  • 1‑month warranty on bugs after launch
  • Post‑release support (including hotfixes 24/7)

Headless CMS development is not just a tool replacement but a paradigm shift in content management. We help make this transition without downtime or data loss. Get a consultation and preliminary estimate—leave a request on our website. Order headless CMS implementation with guaranteed results.