Custom Admin Components for Payload CMS

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Custom Admin Components for Payload CMS
Medium
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1364
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1254
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    961
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1191
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    933
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    950

Problem: stock admin falls short for all scenarios

Note: when a project grows, the default Payload CMS admin panel no longer meets business requirements. Typical situation: a company adopts Payload for content management, but after six months finds editors lack needed fields and managers miss analytics. We help fix this: we develop custom React components that integrate via official slots. Clients get a dashboard with real statistics, editors get convenient SEO fields, managers get an order analytics tab. For example, in one project, a KPI dashboard cut reporting time by 30%, and a custom slug field halved input errors. All this via custom React components that Payload allows without patching core.

How custom Payload CMS components transform administration?

Virtually any admin element can be replaced: dashboard, navigation, header, logo, input fields, buttons, tabs, even entire pages. Payload provides clean slots — no need to patch sources. Stack: React 18+, TypeScript, REST/GraphQL API.

Customization type Where to configure Example implementations Complexity Estimated timeline
Dashboard admin.components.views.Dashboard Stats, KPI, charts Medium 2–4 days
Navigation admin.components.beforeNavLinks / afterNavLinks Additional links, menus Low 1 day
Fields admin.components.fields Slug, datepicker, custom editor High 3–5 days
Collection tabs collections.slug.admin.components.views.Edit Analytics, logs, actions Medium 2–3 days
Graphics admin.components.graphics.Logo / Icon Brand logo, icon Low 1 day

Custom dashboard: implementation example

It starts with config: in payload.config.ts inside admin.components point to the React component. The component is a typical client component ('use client') that can fetch data from /api/admin/stats, display it as cards or charts. Payload does not restrict styling — use CSS-in-JS or modules.

// payload.config.ts
export default buildConfig({
  admin: {
    components: {
      views: {
        Dashboard: '/components/admin/CustomDashboard#CustomDashboard',
      },
      afterDashboard: ['/components/admin/Stats#Stats'],
    },
  },
})
// components/admin/CustomDashboard.tsx
'use client'
import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'

interface Stats {
  totalOrders: number
  totalRevenue: number
  newUsers: number
}

export const CustomDashboard = () => {
  const [stats, setStats] = useState<Stats | null>(null)

  useEffect(() => {
    fetch('/api/admin/stats')
      .then(r => r.json())
      .then(setStats)
  }, [])

  if (!stats) return <div>Loading...</div>

  return (
    <div style={{ display: 'grid', gridTemplateColumns: 'repeat(3, 1fr)', gap: 16, padding: '16px 0' }}>
      <StatCard label="Orders today" value={stats.totalOrders} />
      <StatCard label="Revenue" value={`${stats.totalRevenue.toLocaleString()} ₽`} />
      <StatCard label="New users" value={stats.newUsers} />
    </div>
  )
}

const StatCard = ({ label, value }: { label: string; value: any }) => (
  <div style={{ background: '#fff', border: '1px solid #e0e0e0', borderRadius: 8, padding: 16 }}>
    <div style={{ fontSize: 12, color: '#666' }}>{label}</div>
    <div style={{ fontSize: 24, fontWeight: 700 }}>{value}</div>
  </div>
)

Custom views and fields: real experience

Recently we built an e-commerce store on Payload. Needed:

  • On product card — a "Duplicate" button (quick copy).
  • On order page — an "Analytics" tab with revenue chart.
  • In "Categories" collection — a URL slug field that auto-generates from title but allows manual editing.

All three tasks solved in 5 days. Key — we didn't touch CMS core, only plugged components via slots. Means on Payload upgrade, customization doesn't break.

Custom collection view

// collections/Orders.ts
const Orders: CollectionConfig = {
  slug: 'orders',
  admin: {
    components: {
      views: {
        Edit: {
          Analytics: {
            Component: '/components/admin/OrderAnalytics#OrderAnalytics',
            path: '/analytics',
            Tab: {
              label: 'Analytics',
              href: '/analytics',
            },
          },
        },
      },
    },
  },
}

Custom field component

// components/admin/fields/SlugField.tsx
'use client'
import { useField, useFormFields } from 'payload/components/forms'
import { useEffect } from 'react'

export const SlugField = ({ path }: { path: string }) => {
  const { value, setValue } = useField<string>({ path })
  const title = useFormFields(([fields]) => fields.title?.value as string)

  const generateSlug = (str: string) =>
    str.toLowerCase()
      .replace(/[а-яё]/g, char => translitMap[char] || char)
      .replace(/\s+/g, '-')
      .replace(/[^\w-]/g, '')

  return (
    <div>
      <label>URL Slug</label>
      <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
        <input
          type="text"
          value={value || ''}
          onChange={e => setValue(e.target.value)}
        />
        <button
          type="button"
          onClick={() => title && setValue(generateSlug(title))}
        >
          From title
        </button>
      </div>
    </div>
  )
}

Action buttons in edit form

// components/admin/ProductActions.tsx
'use client'
import { useDocumentInfo, useForm } from 'payload/components/utilities'

export const ProductActions = () => {
  const { id } = useDocumentInfo()
  const { submit } = useForm()

  const handleDuplicate = async () => {
    await fetch(`/api/products/${id}/duplicate`, { method: 'POST' })
  }

  return (
    <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: 8 }}>
      <button onClick={handleDuplicate} type="button">
        Duplicate
      </button>
      <button onClick={submit} type="button">
        Save
      </button>
    </div>
  )
}

Why does this improve administration?

Main advantage is flexibility. Payload's built-in tools are good, but custom components solve unique tasks. For example, our client — an e-commerce store — cut order processing time by 40% after custom dashboard implementation. Another project showed administration cost reduction of 300,000 rubles per year. Unlike standard widgets, we display exactly the metrics business needs. Custom fields reduce manual operations: slug field generates URL 50% faster than manual entry.

Criterion Standard admin Custom component
Dashboard Only basic widgets Any metrics and charts
Input fields Fixed set Any UI and logic
Development speed 1–5 days per component
CMS updates Unchanged Not affected

According to official Payload documentation, component slots allow flexible interface customization without core modification.

What's included

  1. Requirements analysis and current admin audit (1–2 days).
  2. Component design and mockups (UI/UX under Payload standards) (1–2 days).
  3. Development of React components with TypeScript (2–5 days).
  4. Integration via config slots — CMS core untouched (1 day).
  5. Testing on staging environment, fixing hydration and performance issues (1–2 days).
  6. Documentation, source code, and maintenance recommendations (0.5 day).

We use React 18, TypeScript, Payload 2.x, REST/GraphQL. We apply CSS modules or Tailwind. We guarantee compatibility with the latest Payload version.

Timelines and cost

Timelines depend on the number and complexity of components. Simple dashboard — 2–3 days, complex project with fields and tabs — 5–10 days. Cost is calculated individually. Get a consultation — we'll evaluate your project and propose a solution. Typical operational cost savings after custom components can reach 500,000 rubles per year.

Example cost estimation

For reference: custom field — from 15,000 to 30,000 rubles, dashboard — from 40,000 to 80,000 rubles, comprehensive customization (fields + tabs + dashboard) — from 120,000 rubles. Exact cost is determined after analysis.

Conclusion

Over 10 projects on Payload, 5+ years of React and Node.js development experience. We know all pitfalls: hydration, re-render optimization, working with Payload hooks. We provide code guarantee. Contact us to discuss your project and get a preliminary estimate.

Headless CMS: Strapi, Directus, Sanity, Contentful, Drupal

Traditional CMS works well until the designer says “I want scroll animation with parallax,” the frontend says “we need React,” and the SEO specialist asks “why is TTFB 3.4 seconds?” At that point, monolithic architecture starts to hinder everyone. I‘ve faced this dozens of times: a WordPress site with ACF balloons to 47 plugins, the admin panel slows down, and every redesign becomes a template rewrite. Headless CMS separates content management from presentation. Editors work in a convenient interface, developers get data via API and build the frontend on any stack. Sounds simple. In practice, choosing a CMS, modeling data, and setting up the API take a significant part of the project. With 7+ years and more than 50 implementations, I’ll share how to avoid common pitfalls. Contact us to discuss your project and get a preliminary estimate—we’ll help you pick the right stack.

What are the key benefits of headless CMS over monolithic?

Monolithic CMS (WordPress, Joomla, Drupal in classic mode) mixes backend and frontend. Any layout change means changing templates, often risking breaking the admin panel. Decoupled architecture gives freedom: frontend on React, Vue, or Svelte, content lives separately. Result: improved load speed (LCP often drops from 4–6 s to 1–1.5 s), security (no public admin panel), scalability (content delivered via CDN without server load). Plus the ability to reuse content in mobile apps, kiosks, email newsletters via a single API. A client we recently helped saw LCP improve from 6.2 s to 1.1 s — a 5.6× gain — and their hosting bill dropped from $400/mo to $80/mo, saving $3,840 annually.

How to choose a headless CMS for your project?

No universal tool exists. The choice depends on team, content complexity, and infrastructure. Let’s break down the key options.

Strapi — open-source, self-hosted, Node.js. Suitable for teams needing data control and API customization. Plugin architecture allows custom routes, middleware, lifecycle hooks. REST and GraphQL out of the box. Deploys in about an hour — three times faster than Drupal. Weakness: versions v4 and v5 are incompatible, migration is painful. Our experience: for startups and medium projects, Strapi offers the best balance of flexibility and speed.

Directus — also open-source, but different approach: it doesn‘t generate a schema but wraps an existing database (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) into a REST/GraphQL API. If you already have a database, Directus connects without migrations. Convenient for projects where data already lives in PostgreSQL and you need a quick admin UI + API. Saves up to 30% integration time.

Sanity — cloud CMS with real-time editor. Its distinguishing feature is GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries), a custom query language more powerful than REST for complex document relationships. Portable Text for structured content. Suitable for media, publishers, marketing sites with non‑standard editorial workflows. Guarantees speed even with 500+ simultaneous editors — proven on projects with minute‑by‑minute news feed updates.

Contentful — enterprise cloud CMS. Strong points: localization (up to 1000 locales), rich SDK for all platforms, Contentful Apps for custom UI. Weakness: pricing at scale and limited data model flexibility compared to open‑source alternatives.

Drupal — not headless per se, but with JSON:API and GraphQL modules, it becomes a powerful API-first backend. Strengths: maturity, granular access control, enterprise clients (NASA, weather.com). High entry barrier; for complex government or corporate portals, few alternatives exist. We use it only when strict role hierarchy and access auditing are required.

CMS Hosting API Best Use Case
Strapi Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Startups, customization
Directus Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Wrapper for existing DB
Sanity Cloud GROQ, GraphQL Media, complex content
Contentful Cloud REST, GraphQL Enterprise, localization
Drupal Self-hosted JSON:API, GraphQL Government, complex permissions

Consequences of poor content modeling

Content modeling is critical. Mistakes at this stage are costly. A typical problem: a body field of type rich text for everything. Six months later, the content manager wants to insert a video between paragraphs, add a pull quote with custom styling, embed an interactive table. Rich text can‘t handle that. Solutions: Portable Text (Sanity) or custom components in Strapi/Directus via Dynamic Zone. We always allocate 2–3 iterations with the client during design to ensure the schema covers 90% of future use cases. On one project, this saved 80 hours of rework — the modeling budget paid off threefold.

How we build projects on headless CMS

Frontend for headless CMS almost always uses Next.js (App Router) or Nuxt. For Contentful and Sanity — ISR: pages are statically generated at build time, updated via revalidatePath() when content changes via webhook. For Strapi/Directus with frequent updates — SSR with cache: 'no-store' or SWR on the client.

Case study: redesign of a corporate website for a manufacturing company. Previous site: WordPress with ACF, 200+ pages, 4 languages. Problems: TTFB 3.8 s, editors complained about slow admin. Migrated to Strapi (self-hosted, PostgreSQL), Next.js App Router. Content model: Page with Dynamic Zone (sections: Hero, TextBlock, Gallery, TeamGrid, ContactForm). Localization via Strapi i18n plugin + next-intl on frontend. Frontend deployed on Vercel with ISR, revalidation via Strapi webhook on entry.publish. According to the client: TTFB dropped from 3.8 s to 180 ms (static with CDN) — a 21× improvement. Editors got a clean interface without 47 plugins. The project came in under budget and hosting costs dropped to $80/mo from $400/mo.

Implementation process broken into stages:

  1. Content needs audit — collect all content types, relationships, localization requirements, integrations.
  2. Data schema design — create models, fields, validation, access roles. Document in Swagger/OpenAPI.
  3. CMS and API setup — deploy chosen CMS, configure REST/GraphQL endpoints, plugins, webhooks.
  4. Frontend development — connect Next.js/Nuxt, configure ISR/SSR, section components, routing.
  5. Content migration (if legacy) — automated loading via API or scripts.
  6. Testing — check API endpoints, regression, load testing, Core Web Vitals.
  7. Deployment — configure CDN, SSL, CI/CD, monitoring.

How long does implementation take?

The standard path includes all stages. Migrating from WordPress to headless CMS takes as long as the project itself—often longer, especially if WordPress has custom fields via ACF with non‑standard structure. Our typical timelines:

Project Type Timeline
Simple site on Strapi + Next.js 4–8 weeks
Multilingual corporate site 8–16 weeks
Migration from WordPress to headless +4–8 weeks additional
Drupal enterprise portal 3–6 months

Cost is calculated individually after a brief. Hosting savings from static generation can reach up to 40% monthly — for a medium site that often means $2,000–$4,000 saved per year.

Non‑obvious considerations when choosing a headless CMS

  • Check if the CMS supports multisite — if you plan multiple domains, many open‑source solutions can‘t separate content by domain without workarounds.
  • Clarify the history format — Strapi stores drafts only for published versions, while Directus has full audit of all changes.
  • Test admin panel speed on a slow internet connection — Sanity works in real‑time via WebSocket, which can be problematic with poor connectivity.
  • Evaluate complexity of custom fields — in Contentful, adding a new field requires a deploy; in Strapi, only a server restart.
  • Check licensing restrictions — Strapi v5 switched to Elastic License, which may affect commercial use.

What is included

  • Data schema and API documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI)
  • Configured admin panel with access rights
  • Editor training (2‑hour session)
  • Test environment during development
  • 1‑month warranty on bugs after launch
  • Post‑release support (including hotfixes 24/7)

Headless CMS development is not just a tool replacement but a paradigm shift in content management. We help make this transition without downtime or data loss. Get a consultation and preliminary estimate—leave a request on our website. Order headless CMS implementation with guaranteed results.