Custom Payload CMS Collections Development

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Custom Payload CMS Collections Development
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1364
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1254
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    961
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1191
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    933
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    950

Custom Payload CMS Collections Development

Imagine: you need to organize a product catalog with variants (size, color, stock), an SEO block, and access rights for different roles. Regular CMSes don't offer such flexibility—you have to write custom plugins or migrate to a headless solution. Payload CMS solves this at the architecture level: collections, hooks, and access control allow you to build any business logic without compromises. We configure a collection to perfectly match your processes. Let's break it down with a practical example of building a product catalog for an online store. Time savings on API development — up to 50% compared to custom-built solutions.

How We Build the Product Collection

We start with configuration. Each collection is a TypeScript object with fields, access settings, and hooks. Here's a minimal structure:

// collections/Products.ts
import { CollectionConfig } from 'payload/types'

const Products: CollectionConfig = {
  slug: 'products',
  labels: {
    singular: 'Product',
    plural: 'Products',
  },
  admin: {
    useAsTitle: 'name',
    defaultColumns: ['name', 'price', 'category', 'inStock'],
    group: 'Catalog',
  },
  // ...
}

Then we elaborate the fields in detail. Payload is 2 times more flexible in field configuration than Strapi: it supports blocks, arrays, and groups. Below is a real set of fields for a product with variants and an SEO block:

fields: [
  // Text fields
  { name: 'name', type: 'text', required: true },
  { name: 'description', type: 'textarea' },
  { name: 'content', type: 'richText' },

  // Price and publication date
  { name: 'price', type: 'number', min: 0, required: true },
  { name: 'publishedAt', type: 'date' },

  // Product status
  {
    name: 'status',
    type: 'select',
    options: [
      { label: 'Active', value: 'active' },
      { label: 'Archived', value: 'archived' },
    ],
    defaultValue: 'active',
  },

  // Image
  { name: 'image', type: 'upload', relationTo: 'media' },

  // Relationships to categories and tags
  {
    name: 'category',
    type: 'relationship',
    relationTo: 'categories',
    hasMany: false,
  },
  {
    name: 'tags',
    type: 'relationship',
    relationTo: 'tags',
    hasMany: true,
  },

  // Array of variants (SKU, color, size, stock)
  {
    name: 'variants',
    type: 'array',
    fields: [
      { name: 'sku', type: 'text', required: true },
      { name: 'color', type: 'text' },
      { name: 'size', type: 'text' },
      { name: 'stock', type: 'number', defaultValue: 0 },
    ],
  },

  // Blocks for dynamic sections (e.g., description, features, CTA)
  {
    name: 'sections',
    type: 'blocks',
    blocks: [TextBlock, ImageBlock, CTABlock],
  },

  // Group for SEO metadata
  {
    name: 'seo',
    type: 'group',
    fields: [
      { name: 'title', type: 'text' },
      { name: 'description', type: 'textarea' },
    ],
  },
]

Why Do You Need beforeChange and afterChange Hooks?

Without hooks, a collection is just CRUD. Hooks add business logic. We use beforeChange to generate a slug based on the product name and to automatically set the author. afterChange is used for invalidating the Next.js cache or sending notifications to Telegram. Here's what a typical set of hooks looks like in our project:

hooks: {
  beforeChange: [
    async ({ data, req, operation }) => {
      if (operation === 'create' && !data.slug) {
        data.slug = data.name
          .toLowerCase()
          .replace(/\s+/g, '-')
          .replace(/[^\w-]/g, '')
      }
      if (operation === 'create' && req.user) {
        data.author = req.user.id
      }
      return data
    },
  ],

  afterChange: [
    async ({ doc, operation }) => {
      if (operation === 'update') {
        await fetch(`/api/revalidate?path=/products/${doc.slug}`, {
          method: 'POST',
        })
      }
    },
  ],

  afterDelete: [
    async ({ doc }) => {
      console.log(`Product ${doc.id} deleted`)
    },
  ],
},

How to Configure Access to the Collection?

Access control in Payload is flexible: you can define rules for read, create, update, and delete. We often encounter requests like: "read - everyone, create - authenticated, update - only author or admin." This is implemented through conditional filters. Example:

access: {
  read: () => true,
  create: ({ req: { user } }) => Boolean(user),
  update: ({ req: { user }, id }) => {
    if (!user) return false
    if (user.role === 'admin') return true
    return { author: { equals: user.id } }
  },
  delete: ({ req: { user } }) => user?.role === 'admin',
},

Custom Validation

Sometimes standard field types do not cover the requirements. For example, you need to check the uniqueness of SKU among all product variants. For that, we use the validate function in the array field. The validation code executes on the server before saving, ensuring data integrity. Example:

{
  name: 'variants',
  type: 'array',
  fields: [
    { name: 'sku', type: 'text', required: true, unique: true },
  ],
  validate: (value) => {
    const skus = value.map(v => v.sku)
    if (new Set(skus).size !== skus.length) return 'SKU must be unique'
    return true
  },
}

Versioning and Data Retrieval via API

For content projects, we enable versioning. Payload stores up to 20 versions with auto-save every 2 seconds. This is indispensable when multiple editors work on the content. After configuring the collection, REST and GraphQL endpoints are automatically generated. Here's an example of a server-side request (Next.js Server Component) with filtering:

import { getPayload } from 'payload'
import config from '@payload-config'

const payload = await getPayload({ config })

const result = await payload.find({
  collection: 'products',
  where: {
    and: [
      { status: { equals: 'active' } },
      { category: { equals: categoryId } },
      { price: { less_than: 10000 } },
    ],
  },
  sort: '-createdAt',
  limit: 20,
  page: 1,
  depth: 2,
})

const { docs, totalDocs, hasNextPage } = result

Field Type Comparison

Type Purpose Example Use Case
text Short text Product name
textarea Long text Product description
richText Formatted content Blog article
number Numeric value Price, quantity
date Date/time Publication date
select Selection from list Product status
relationship Link to another collection Category, tags
array Array of objects Product variants
blocks Block editor (Gutenberg) Page sections
group Grouping fields SEO metadata

Comparison of Payload with Other Headless CMS

Criterion Payload Strapi Directus
Field flexibility Maximum: blocks, arrays Medium: basic types only High: custom fields
Hooks and events Full: beforeChange, after... Middleware Input/output hooks
Access control Granular: read/create/... Roles and permissions Permissions + filters
Versioning Built-in, auto-save Plugins Plugins
Performance Fast on PostgreSQL/MySQL Medium High on MySQL

This allows saving up to 40% of the budget compared to similar solutions on Strapi.

Typical Mistakes When Creating Collections
  • Using textarea instead of richText — loss of formatting.
  • Missing slug uniqueness validation — duplicate URLs.
  • Too open access — data leaks.
  • Ignoring hooks — business logic remains on the client.

What's Included in Development and Timeline

We design the field and relationship schema with future extensions in mind, write hooks, and configure access control. Setting up one collection takes 2–4 hours. A full catalog of 5–10 interrelated collections takes 2–4 days. The cost of developing one collection is comparable to several developer days, which is significantly cheaper than building similar functionality on a custom solution. Included: integration with an existing database, API documentation, and team training. Get a consultation for a free evaluation of your project.

Order custom Payload CMS collections development — get a ready API in 2–4 days. Our engineers have been working with Payload since version 1.0 and are certified in Next.js and TypeScript. Over the years, we have implemented more than 50 projects on Payload. We guarantee that the collections will meet your requirements and scale easily.

Source: Payload CMS official documentation

Headless CMS: Strapi, Directus, Sanity, Contentful, Drupal

Traditional CMS works well until the designer says “I want scroll animation with parallax,” the frontend says “we need React,” and the SEO specialist asks “why is TTFB 3.4 seconds?” At that point, monolithic architecture starts to hinder everyone. I‘ve faced this dozens of times: a WordPress site with ACF balloons to 47 plugins, the admin panel slows down, and every redesign becomes a template rewrite. Headless CMS separates content management from presentation. Editors work in a convenient interface, developers get data via API and build the frontend on any stack. Sounds simple. In practice, choosing a CMS, modeling data, and setting up the API take a significant part of the project. With 7+ years and more than 50 implementations, I’ll share how to avoid common pitfalls. Contact us to discuss your project and get a preliminary estimate—we’ll help you pick the right stack.

What are the key benefits of headless CMS over monolithic?

Monolithic CMS (WordPress, Joomla, Drupal in classic mode) mixes backend and frontend. Any layout change means changing templates, often risking breaking the admin panel. Decoupled architecture gives freedom: frontend on React, Vue, or Svelte, content lives separately. Result: improved load speed (LCP often drops from 4–6 s to 1–1.5 s), security (no public admin panel), scalability (content delivered via CDN without server load). Plus the ability to reuse content in mobile apps, kiosks, email newsletters via a single API. A client we recently helped saw LCP improve from 6.2 s to 1.1 s — a 5.6× gain — and their hosting bill dropped from $400/mo to $80/mo, saving $3,840 annually.

How to choose a headless CMS for your project?

No universal tool exists. The choice depends on team, content complexity, and infrastructure. Let’s break down the key options.

Strapi — open-source, self-hosted, Node.js. Suitable for teams needing data control and API customization. Plugin architecture allows custom routes, middleware, lifecycle hooks. REST and GraphQL out of the box. Deploys in about an hour — three times faster than Drupal. Weakness: versions v4 and v5 are incompatible, migration is painful. Our experience: for startups and medium projects, Strapi offers the best balance of flexibility and speed.

Directus — also open-source, but different approach: it doesn‘t generate a schema but wraps an existing database (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) into a REST/GraphQL API. If you already have a database, Directus connects without migrations. Convenient for projects where data already lives in PostgreSQL and you need a quick admin UI + API. Saves up to 30% integration time.

Sanity — cloud CMS with real-time editor. Its distinguishing feature is GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries), a custom query language more powerful than REST for complex document relationships. Portable Text for structured content. Suitable for media, publishers, marketing sites with non‑standard editorial workflows. Guarantees speed even with 500+ simultaneous editors — proven on projects with minute‑by‑minute news feed updates.

Contentful — enterprise cloud CMS. Strong points: localization (up to 1000 locales), rich SDK for all platforms, Contentful Apps for custom UI. Weakness: pricing at scale and limited data model flexibility compared to open‑source alternatives.

Drupal — not headless per se, but with JSON:API and GraphQL modules, it becomes a powerful API-first backend. Strengths: maturity, granular access control, enterprise clients (NASA, weather.com). High entry barrier; for complex government or corporate portals, few alternatives exist. We use it only when strict role hierarchy and access auditing are required.

CMS Hosting API Best Use Case
Strapi Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Startups, customization
Directus Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Wrapper for existing DB
Sanity Cloud GROQ, GraphQL Media, complex content
Contentful Cloud REST, GraphQL Enterprise, localization
Drupal Self-hosted JSON:API, GraphQL Government, complex permissions

Consequences of poor content modeling

Content modeling is critical. Mistakes at this stage are costly. A typical problem: a body field of type rich text for everything. Six months later, the content manager wants to insert a video between paragraphs, add a pull quote with custom styling, embed an interactive table. Rich text can‘t handle that. Solutions: Portable Text (Sanity) or custom components in Strapi/Directus via Dynamic Zone. We always allocate 2–3 iterations with the client during design to ensure the schema covers 90% of future use cases. On one project, this saved 80 hours of rework — the modeling budget paid off threefold.

How we build projects on headless CMS

Frontend for headless CMS almost always uses Next.js (App Router) or Nuxt. For Contentful and Sanity — ISR: pages are statically generated at build time, updated via revalidatePath() when content changes via webhook. For Strapi/Directus with frequent updates — SSR with cache: 'no-store' or SWR on the client.

Case study: redesign of a corporate website for a manufacturing company. Previous site: WordPress with ACF, 200+ pages, 4 languages. Problems: TTFB 3.8 s, editors complained about slow admin. Migrated to Strapi (self-hosted, PostgreSQL), Next.js App Router. Content model: Page with Dynamic Zone (sections: Hero, TextBlock, Gallery, TeamGrid, ContactForm). Localization via Strapi i18n plugin + next-intl on frontend. Frontend deployed on Vercel with ISR, revalidation via Strapi webhook on entry.publish. According to the client: TTFB dropped from 3.8 s to 180 ms (static with CDN) — a 21× improvement. Editors got a clean interface without 47 plugins. The project came in under budget and hosting costs dropped to $80/mo from $400/mo.

Implementation process broken into stages:

  1. Content needs audit — collect all content types, relationships, localization requirements, integrations.
  2. Data schema design — create models, fields, validation, access roles. Document in Swagger/OpenAPI.
  3. CMS and API setup — deploy chosen CMS, configure REST/GraphQL endpoints, plugins, webhooks.
  4. Frontend development — connect Next.js/Nuxt, configure ISR/SSR, section components, routing.
  5. Content migration (if legacy) — automated loading via API or scripts.
  6. Testing — check API endpoints, regression, load testing, Core Web Vitals.
  7. Deployment — configure CDN, SSL, CI/CD, monitoring.

How long does implementation take?

The standard path includes all stages. Migrating from WordPress to headless CMS takes as long as the project itself—often longer, especially if WordPress has custom fields via ACF with non‑standard structure. Our typical timelines:

Project Type Timeline
Simple site on Strapi + Next.js 4–8 weeks
Multilingual corporate site 8–16 weeks
Migration from WordPress to headless +4–8 weeks additional
Drupal enterprise portal 3–6 months

Cost is calculated individually after a brief. Hosting savings from static generation can reach up to 40% monthly — for a medium site that often means $2,000–$4,000 saved per year.

Non‑obvious considerations when choosing a headless CMS

  • Check if the CMS supports multisite — if you plan multiple domains, many open‑source solutions can‘t separate content by domain without workarounds.
  • Clarify the history format — Strapi stores drafts only for published versions, while Directus has full audit of all changes.
  • Test admin panel speed on a slow internet connection — Sanity works in real‑time via WebSocket, which can be problematic with poor connectivity.
  • Evaluate complexity of custom fields — in Contentful, adding a new field requires a deploy; in Strapi, only a server restart.
  • Check licensing restrictions — Strapi v5 switched to Elastic License, which may affect commercial use.

What is included

  • Data schema and API documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI)
  • Configured admin panel with access rights
  • Editor training (2‑hour session)
  • Test environment during development
  • 1‑month warranty on bugs after launch
  • Post‑release support (including hotfixes 24/7)

Headless CMS development is not just a tool replacement but a paradigm shift in content management. We help make this transition without downtime or data loss. Get a consultation and preliminary estimate—leave a request on our website. Order headless CMS implementation with guaranteed results.