Custom Umbraco Package Development for Your Needs

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Custom Umbraco Package Development for Your Needs
Complex
~1-2 weeks
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1365
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1254
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    961
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1191
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    933
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    951

Custom Umbraco Package Development

Imagine you need a Property Editor that displays a color matrix for brand styles. The standard text editor falls short, and a ready-made package from NuGet either doesn't exist or hasn't been updated since the last Umbraco version. The solution is to develop your own custom Umbraco package that perfectly fits your ecosystem. We specialize in developing Umbraco packages: from simple Property Editors to full Backoffice sections with database migrations. A custom package is a NuGet assembly that extends the CMS core through the Composer pattern. It includes services, Notification Handlers, new property types, dashboards, and API controllers. With over 10 years of experience, we have built a library of standard solutions, but each new project is unique. If you have specific data input requirements, you likely need a custom editor. According to official Umbraco documentation, all packages must register via IComposer, ensuring correct integration with the core. — Umbraco CMS Documentation Order custom package development — and you'll get a solution that precisely meets your needs. We have implemented 8 custom packages for Umbraco 13+. Starting from $5,000 for a simple package, you get a tailored extension without unnecessary dependencies.

What Problems We Solve

  • Non-standard Property Editors. Visual builders, map with coordinates, Color Matrix. Standard editors (text, number, list) fail to meet content editors' needs. Based on our project statistics, every second client encounters this task.
  • Integration with external services. Catalog synchronization with CRM, data retrieval via API. Without a custom package, you have to duplicate logic in every project, increasing development time by 30–50%.
  • Data migrations. Idempotent migrations to update the database schema without data loss — when migrating content from another CMS or adding new fields.
  • Custom Backoffice sections. Isolated sections for managing specific functionality, such as publication statistics or A/B testing.

Why a Custom Package Is Better Than a Ready-Made One

Ready-made packages are often overloaded with unnecessary dependencies and require adjustments for your Umbraco version. A custom one is lightweight, built for your exact needs. For example, a Color Matrix Property Editor written from scratch processes data twice as fast as a NuGet equivalent due to the lack of overhead. Additionally, a custom package reduces licensing costs for external solutions by 40–60%, and development budget savings through service reuse reach 30%. You get full control over the code and security — critical for projects handling personal data (GDPR, 152-FZ). In one of our cases, a package for managing promotional campaigns reduced campaign publication time from 3 hours to 15 minutes. With 100% compatibility guarantee, your package works seamlessly with any Umbraco LTS release.

Parameter Ready-Made Package Custom Package
Flexibility Limited by functionality Full customization
Dependencies Many extras Only needed ones
Updates Dependent on author You control versions

How to Develop a Umbraco Package from Scratch

Standard approach: create a .NET library, register components via IComposer. Entry point — a class implementing IComposer. Typical project structure includes folders for Composers, Services, Models, Migrations, NotificationHandlers, and static assets in App_Plugins.

Composer — Entry Point

// Composers/MyPackageComposer.cs
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Composing;
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.DependencyInjection;
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Migrations;
using Umbraco.Cms.Core.Notifications;
using Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Migrations.Upgrade;

[assembly: ComposeAfter(typeof(ICoreComposer))]

public class MyPackageComposer : IComposer
{
    public void Compose(IUmbracoBuilder builder)
    {
        builder.Services.AddSingleton<IMyService, MyService>();
        builder.AddNotificationAsyncHandler<UmbracoApplicationStartingNotification,
            MyPackageStartupHandler>();
        builder.AddNotificationHandler<ContentPublishedNotification,
            ContentPublishedHandler>();
        builder.AddNotificationAsyncHandler<UmbracoApplicationStartingNotification,
            RunPackageMigrationsHandler>();
        builder.PropertyEditors().Add<MyCustomPropertyEditor>();
    }
}

Database Migration

// Migrations/AddMyTableMigration.cs
using Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Migrations;

public class AddMyTableMigration : MigrationBase
{
    public AddMyTableMigration(IMigrationContext context) : base(context) { }

    protected override void Migrate()
    {
        if (!TableExists("MyPackageData"))
        {
            Create.Table<MyPackageDataDto>().Do();
        }
        else
        {
            // idempotent column addition
            if (!ColumnExists("MyPackageData", "ExtraField"))
            {
                Alter.Table("MyPackageData")
                     .AddColumn("ExtraField")
                     .AsString(512)
                     .Nullable()
                     .Do();
            }
        }
    }
}

Custom Property Type

// Property Editor — server side
[DataEditor(
    alias: "MyPackage.ColorMatrix",
    name: "Color Matrix",
    view: "~/App_Plugins/MyPackage/color-matrix.html",
    Group = "Common",
    Icon = "icon-color")]
public class ColorMatrixPropertyEditor : DataEditor
{
    public ColorMatrixPropertyEditor(
        IDataValueEditorFactory dataValueEditorFactory,
        EditorType type = EditorType.PropertyValue)
        : base(dataValueEditorFactory, type) { }

    protected override IConfigurationEditor CreateConfigurationEditor()
        => new ColorMatrixConfigurationEditor();
}

NuGet Package

<!-- MyPackage.Core.csproj -->
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
  <PropertyGroup>
    <TargetFramework>net8.0</TargetFramework>
    <PackageId>MyCompany.UmbracoMyPackage</PackageId>
    <Version>1.0.0</Version>
    <Authors>MyCompany</Authors>
    <PackageRequireLicenseAcceptance>false</PackageRequireLicenseAcceptance>
    <Description>Custom package for Umbraco 13+</Description>
    <PackageTags>umbraco;cms;plugin</PackageTags>
  </PropertyGroup>
  <ItemGroup>
    <PackageReference Include="Umbraco.Cms.Core" Version="13.*" />
  </ItemGroup>
</Project>
dotnet pack -c Release
dotnet nuget push ./bin/Release/MyCompany.UmbracoMyPackage.1.0.0.nupkg \
  --source https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json \
  --api-key $NUGET_API_KEY

Typical Mistakes When Creating Custom Packages

  • Non-idempotent migrations. Forgetting to check table/column existence — the package fails on re-run. Use if (!TableExists(...)).
  • Missing Composer registration. Code is not picked up by Umbraco without calling builder.Services.Add... in the Composer.
  • Hard version binding. Use versioned aliases and conditional compilation for multiple version support.
  • Ignoring caching. Frequently querying the database on every request — apply caching with IAppCache.

Work Process

  1. Audit. You describe the task, we clarify requirements and estimate complexity. We provide a detailed project plan within 48 hours.
  2. Design. We outline the architecture: which Composers, migrations, View components are needed. You receive a structured specification.
  3. Implementation. We write code, including tests (unit + integration for migrations). Each module is independently testable.
  4. Build and testing. We build the NuGet package, install it on a clean Umbraco, and check compatibility across all targeted versions.
  5. Delivery. Source code on Git, package, documentation, and instructions. We deploy on your server upon request.
  6. Support. Bug fixes and consultations for 30 days. Extended support available.

Component Comparison

Component Type Complexity Typical Timeline
Property Editor Medium 2–4 days
Dashboard Low 1–3 days
Section High 5–7 days
Tree Medium 3–5 days
Composer Low 1–2 days

What's Included in Development

  • Source code with comments
  • Compiled NuGet package
  • Documentation: installation, configuration, API description
  • Unit tests for key components (95%+ coverage)
  • Package update instructions
  • 30-day support with guaranteed response within 24 hours

Estimated Timeline

  • Simple package (service + Composer + migration): 3–5 days.
  • Package with custom property type, dashboard, and API controller: 1–2 weeks.
  • With tests, documentation, and support for multiple Umbraco versions: 3–4 weeks.

Exact timelines are calculated individually after evaluating your task. Over 95% of our projects are delivered on time. Order custom package development — contact us, describe your project. Get a preliminary estimate and consultation. We guarantee full compatibility with your Umbraco version.

Additional materials: NuGet — official .NET package repository, .NET SDK — tool for building and publishing.

Headless CMS: Strapi, Directus, Sanity, Contentful, Drupal

Traditional CMS works well until the designer says “I want scroll animation with parallax,” the frontend says “we need React,” and the SEO specialist asks “why is TTFB 3.4 seconds?” At that point, monolithic architecture starts to hinder everyone. I‘ve faced this dozens of times: a WordPress site with ACF balloons to 47 plugins, the admin panel slows down, and every redesign becomes a template rewrite. Headless CMS separates content management from presentation. Editors work in a convenient interface, developers get data via API and build the frontend on any stack. Sounds simple. In practice, choosing a CMS, modeling data, and setting up the API take a significant part of the project. With 7+ years and more than 50 implementations, I’ll share how to avoid common pitfalls. Contact us to discuss your project and get a preliminary estimate—we’ll help you pick the right stack.

What are the key benefits of headless CMS over monolithic?

Monolithic CMS (WordPress, Joomla, Drupal in classic mode) mixes backend and frontend. Any layout change means changing templates, often risking breaking the admin panel. Decoupled architecture gives freedom: frontend on React, Vue, or Svelte, content lives separately. Result: improved load speed (LCP often drops from 4–6 s to 1–1.5 s), security (no public admin panel), scalability (content delivered via CDN without server load). Plus the ability to reuse content in mobile apps, kiosks, email newsletters via a single API. A client we recently helped saw LCP improve from 6.2 s to 1.1 s — a 5.6× gain — and their hosting bill dropped from $400/mo to $80/mo, saving $3,840 annually.

How to choose a headless CMS for your project?

No universal tool exists. The choice depends on team, content complexity, and infrastructure. Let’s break down the key options.

Strapi — open-source, self-hosted, Node.js. Suitable for teams needing data control and API customization. Plugin architecture allows custom routes, middleware, lifecycle hooks. REST and GraphQL out of the box. Deploys in about an hour — three times faster than Drupal. Weakness: versions v4 and v5 are incompatible, migration is painful. Our experience: for startups and medium projects, Strapi offers the best balance of flexibility and speed.

Directus — also open-source, but different approach: it doesn‘t generate a schema but wraps an existing database (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite) into a REST/GraphQL API. If you already have a database, Directus connects without migrations. Convenient for projects where data already lives in PostgreSQL and you need a quick admin UI + API. Saves up to 30% integration time.

Sanity — cloud CMS with real-time editor. Its distinguishing feature is GROQ (Graph-Relational Object Queries), a custom query language more powerful than REST for complex document relationships. Portable Text for structured content. Suitable for media, publishers, marketing sites with non‑standard editorial workflows. Guarantees speed even with 500+ simultaneous editors — proven on projects with minute‑by‑minute news feed updates.

Contentful — enterprise cloud CMS. Strong points: localization (up to 1000 locales), rich SDK for all platforms, Contentful Apps for custom UI. Weakness: pricing at scale and limited data model flexibility compared to open‑source alternatives.

Drupal — not headless per se, but with JSON:API and GraphQL modules, it becomes a powerful API-first backend. Strengths: maturity, granular access control, enterprise clients (NASA, weather.com). High entry barrier; for complex government or corporate portals, few alternatives exist. We use it only when strict role hierarchy and access auditing are required.

CMS Hosting API Best Use Case
Strapi Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Startups, customization
Directus Self-hosted / Cloud REST, GraphQL Wrapper for existing DB
Sanity Cloud GROQ, GraphQL Media, complex content
Contentful Cloud REST, GraphQL Enterprise, localization
Drupal Self-hosted JSON:API, GraphQL Government, complex permissions

Consequences of poor content modeling

Content modeling is critical. Mistakes at this stage are costly. A typical problem: a body field of type rich text for everything. Six months later, the content manager wants to insert a video between paragraphs, add a pull quote with custom styling, embed an interactive table. Rich text can‘t handle that. Solutions: Portable Text (Sanity) or custom components in Strapi/Directus via Dynamic Zone. We always allocate 2–3 iterations with the client during design to ensure the schema covers 90% of future use cases. On one project, this saved 80 hours of rework — the modeling budget paid off threefold.

How we build projects on headless CMS

Frontend for headless CMS almost always uses Next.js (App Router) or Nuxt. For Contentful and Sanity — ISR: pages are statically generated at build time, updated via revalidatePath() when content changes via webhook. For Strapi/Directus with frequent updates — SSR with cache: 'no-store' or SWR on the client.

Case study: redesign of a corporate website for a manufacturing company. Previous site: WordPress with ACF, 200+ pages, 4 languages. Problems: TTFB 3.8 s, editors complained about slow admin. Migrated to Strapi (self-hosted, PostgreSQL), Next.js App Router. Content model: Page with Dynamic Zone (sections: Hero, TextBlock, Gallery, TeamGrid, ContactForm). Localization via Strapi i18n plugin + next-intl on frontend. Frontend deployed on Vercel with ISR, revalidation via Strapi webhook on entry.publish. According to the client: TTFB dropped from 3.8 s to 180 ms (static with CDN) — a 21× improvement. Editors got a clean interface without 47 plugins. The project came in under budget and hosting costs dropped to $80/mo from $400/mo.

Implementation process broken into stages:

  1. Content needs audit — collect all content types, relationships, localization requirements, integrations.
  2. Data schema design — create models, fields, validation, access roles. Document in Swagger/OpenAPI.
  3. CMS and API setup — deploy chosen CMS, configure REST/GraphQL endpoints, plugins, webhooks.
  4. Frontend development — connect Next.js/Nuxt, configure ISR/SSR, section components, routing.
  5. Content migration (if legacy) — automated loading via API or scripts.
  6. Testing — check API endpoints, regression, load testing, Core Web Vitals.
  7. Deployment — configure CDN, SSL, CI/CD, monitoring.

How long does implementation take?

The standard path includes all stages. Migrating from WordPress to headless CMS takes as long as the project itself—often longer, especially if WordPress has custom fields via ACF with non‑standard structure. Our typical timelines:

Project Type Timeline
Simple site on Strapi + Next.js 4–8 weeks
Multilingual corporate site 8–16 weeks
Migration from WordPress to headless +4–8 weeks additional
Drupal enterprise portal 3–6 months

Cost is calculated individually after a brief. Hosting savings from static generation can reach up to 40% monthly — for a medium site that often means $2,000–$4,000 saved per year.

Non‑obvious considerations when choosing a headless CMS

  • Check if the CMS supports multisite — if you plan multiple domains, many open‑source solutions can‘t separate content by domain without workarounds.
  • Clarify the history format — Strapi stores drafts only for published versions, while Directus has full audit of all changes.
  • Test admin panel speed on a slow internet connection — Sanity works in real‑time via WebSocket, which can be problematic with poor connectivity.
  • Evaluate complexity of custom fields — in Contentful, adding a new field requires a deploy; in Strapi, only a server restart.
  • Check licensing restrictions — Strapi v5 switched to Elastic License, which may affect commercial use.

What is included

  • Data schema and API documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI)
  • Configured admin panel with access rights
  • Editor training (2‑hour session)
  • Test environment during development
  • 1‑month warranty on bugs after launch
  • Post‑release support (including hotfixes 24/7)

Headless CMS development is not just a tool replacement but a paradigm shift in content management. We help make this transition without downtime or data loss. Get a consultation and preliminary estimate—leave a request on our website. Order headless CMS implementation with guaranteed results.