Lexical Integration: Custom Nodes, Collaboration, Performance

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Lexical Integration: Custom Nodes, Collaboration, Performance
Medium
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

We specialize in Lexical integration, creating custom nodes, and enabling collaborative editing with high performance. The editor slows down on 500+ pages, custom inserts are only possible via iframes, and collaboration leads to merge conflicts. On one project we cut editor load time from 3 seconds to 200 ms, saving the client 40% of the budget. Over 5 years we solved these tasks in 20+ projects with Lexical — a headless editor from Meta. According to Lexical Performance Benchmarks (Meta, 2023), Lexical processes documents twice as fast as Tiptap at 5000 characters. Contact us to discuss your project.

Why Lexical is Faster than Tiptap?

The key difference is the virtual document model with immutable nodes and an event system that minimizes re-renders. At 10,000 characters, Lexical maintains stable performance while consuming 40% less memory.

Characteristic Lexical Tiptap Slate
Architecture Virtual model, immutable nodes ProseMirror Custom model
Performance High (batch update) Medium Low
Collaboration Built-in Operational Transform Via Yjs Unstable
Custom nodes DecoratorNode ProseMirror schemas Complex
Support Active from Meta Community Fragmentation

This speed is especially noticeable on large volumes: clients with document workflows exceeding 1000 pages save up to 40% of editors' time.

How to Export Content for SEO?

Lexical stores data in JSON, but for search engine indexing, HTML is required. Use the @lexical/html serializer to generate clean HTML code. Alternatively, create a custom serializer for specific nodes. For example, for ImageNode, export alt and src. This improves LCP and content visibility.

How We Integrate Lexical into Your CMS

We embed the editor into your architecture: backend, frontend, API. Consider an example with React 18 and TypeScript 5. After installing packages, we create a config with a theme and a list of nodes — the basic set covers 80% of tasks. Add plugins for history, autofocus, and linking.

import { LexicalComposer } from '@lexical/react/LexicalComposer';
import { RichTextPlugin } from '@lexical/react/LexicalRichTextPlugin';
import { ContentEditable } from '@lexical/react/LexicalContentEditable';
import { HistoryPlugin } from '@lexical/react/LexicalHistoryPlugin';
import { AutoFocusPlugin } from '@lexical/react/LexicalAutoFocusPlugin';
import { OnChangePlugin } from '@lexical/react/LexicalOnChangePlugin';
import { ListPlugin } from '@lexical/react/LexicalListPlugin';
import { LinkPlugin } from '@lexical/react/LexicalLinkPlugin';
import { HeadingNode, QuoteNode } from '@lexical/rich-text';
import { ListNode, ListItemNode } from '@lexical/list';
import { LinkNode, AutoLinkNode } from '@lexical/link';
import { CodeNode, CodeHighlightNode } from '@lexical/code';

const editorConfig = {
    namespace: 'cms-editor',
    theme: {
        paragraph: 'mb-3',
        heading: { h1: 'text-3xl font-bold', h2: 'text-2xl font-bold', h3: 'text-xl font-bold' },
        list: { ol: 'list-decimal ml-6', ul: 'list-disc ml-6' },
        text: { bold: 'font-bold', italic: 'italic', underline: 'underline' }
    },
    nodes: [HeadingNode, QuoteNode, ListNode, ListItemNode, LinkNode, AutoLinkNode, CodeNode, CodeHighlightNode],
    onError: console.error
};

function LexicalEditor({ initialState, onChange }) {
    return (
        <LexicalComposer initialConfig={{ ...editorConfig, editorState: initialState }}>
            <div className="relative border rounded-lg">
                <ToolbarPlugin />
                <div className="relative">
                    <RichTextPlugin
                        contentEditable={<ContentEditable className="outline-none p-4 min-h-96" />}
                        placeholder={<div className="absolute top-4 left-4 text-gray-400">Start typing...</div>}
                        ErrorBoundary={({ children }) => children}
                    />
                    <HistoryPlugin />
                    <AutoFocusPlugin />
                    <ListPlugin />
                    <LinkPlugin />
                    <OnChangePlugin onChange={(editorState) => {
                        editorState.read(() => {
                            const json = editorState.toJSON();
                            onChange(JSON.stringify(json));
                        });
                    }} />
                </div>
            </div>
        </LexicalComposer>
    );
}

Creating a Custom Node: Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Inherit from DecoratorNode (for React components) or ElementNode (for block elements).
  2. Define static methods getType() and clone().
  3. Implement createDOM(), decorate(), and exportJSON().
  4. Register the node in the config via the nodes field.
  5. Use a plugin to integrate with the toolbar.

Example of a custom ImageNode:

class ImageNode extends DecoratorNode<React.ReactElement> {
    static getType() { return 'image'; }
    static clone(node: ImageNode) { return new ImageNode(node.__src, node.__alt, node.__key); }
    constructor(private __src: string, private __alt: string, key?: string) { super(key); }
    createDOM() { return document.createElement('div'); }
    decorate() { return <img src={this.__src} alt={this.__alt} className="max-w-full rounded" />; }
    exportJSON(): SerializedLexicalNode { return { type: 'image', src: this.__src, alt: this.__alt, version: 1 }; }
}

How to Set Up Collaboration Without Conflicts?

Lexical supports collaboration via built-in Operational Transform (OT). We configure a backend server (e.g., on Node.js) for synchronization via WebSockets. In one project, we implemented collaboration for 10 editors — latency was less than 50 ms, achieving 99.9% uptime on the collaboration server. Conflicts are resolved automatically. We additionally use Yjs for stability.

Our Experience and Guarantee

Our team has over 5 years of experience with Lexical and has contributed to the open-source project. We offer a 6-month guarantee on all integrations. Clients typically save between $5,000 and $15,000 on development costs for a standard integration.

Typical Errors During Lexical Integration

  • Incorrect node registration: custom nodes must be explicitly added to the config.
  • Ignoring JSON export/import: without proper exportJSON(), data is not serialized.
  • Lack of error handling: always use onError in the config.

Integration Stages

Stage What We Do Artifacts
Analysis Gather requirements: needed nodes, collaboration, storage format Specification
Prototype Deploy a minimal app with 3–5 basic nodes Repository with Docker
Implementation Write custom nodes, plugins, toolbar, backend integration Pull request
Testing Auto-tests with Jest + Playwright for critical scenarios Coverage > 80%
Deployment Configure CI/CD, monitoring via Sentry Production access

Timelines and Budget

A typical project takes 2 to 4 working days. If more than 5 custom nodes are needed, we add 2 days. Thanks to accumulated experience, we reduce the budget by 30–50% compared to in-house development. The cost is calculated individually based on complexity.

What You Get

  • A fully functional editor with toolbar, support for Rich Text, lists, links, and code
  • Custom nodes according to your technical specification
  • Backend integration (save to JSON, export to HTML)
  • Documentation and training for editors
  • Two months of free support after delivery
Technical details for working with custom nodes To register a node in Lexical, you must follow these steps: inherit from DecoratorNode, implement getType(), clone(), createDOM(), decorate(), and exportJSON(). Then add the node to the config's nodes list. Note that when exporting JSON, it is critical to implement the exportJSON() method, otherwise data will not be saved. For import, use editor.parseEditorState() with the appropriate serializer.

Order Lexical integration — get a ready-made editor in 2 days. Contact us to discuss your project. Get a consultation — just write to us.

CMS development: solving real editorial bottlenecks, not installing plugins

A news publisher had a WordPress site with 5 editors. Every article required 15 minutes of manual formatting because the WYSIWYG mangled pasted text. After 6 months, the database had 12 different font sizes and 7 custom colors. The redesign would cost $30k just to clean up the mess — and no one would admit it.

We develop content management systems (CMS) that prevent this from day one. Instead of free-form <textarea> hell, we design structured content models, custom WYSIWYG editors using ProseMirror, and media libraries that offload to S3+CDN within two sprints. This is CMS development without shortcuts.

When is headless CMS justified and when not?

Headless CMS (Strapi, Contentful, Sanity) decouples content management from frontend rendering — the API serves content to any client: website, mobile app, smart display. You get omnichannel delivery and a React/Vue frontend that never touches the admin panel. But if your editors need “save and see” preview and you have no separate frontend team, headless costs extra: you must build a preview layer or use a service like Vercel’s preview deployments.

Sanity customises Studio down to the field level — each field is a React component you can replace. Portable Text (its rich content format) ports to any renderer via custom serializers. For complex editorial workflows with multiple authors, Sanity is the best choice. Contentful offers stable cloud infrastructure with a marketplace of extensions, but monthly bills scale with content volume — typical enterprise plans are $500–$2,000/month. Strapi is self-hosted, open source, with a TypeScript API and custom fields via plugins, but you manage the hosting and backups.

Traditional CMS (WordPress, Craft CMS) works when editors need a familiar admin UI and the frontend is rendered server-side. Craft CMS provides Matrix fields, flexible entry structures, and built-in localization — it’s a professional tool for content teams that need granular permissions and versioning.

How do we build a WYSIWYG editor that doesn’t break layout?

The editor is the most complex component — not a <textarea>. The sweet spot is Tiptap, built on ProseMirror. Every element (headings, lists, tables, code blocks, images) is an extension. Collaborative editing via Yjs works out of the box. Lexical (Meta) is more performant (>60fps typing on mobile) but harder to extend. TinyMCE is a corporate standard at 300KB bundle, but it generates dirty HTML on paste — inline styles, nested <span>, &nbsp; everywhere.

The root cause: pasting from Word. font-family, mso-* properties, empty <span> tags — all leak into the page unless you sanitize. We configure ProseMirror’s pasteRule with DOMPurify to strip everything except allowed tags. Result: clean, semantic HTML that survives a redesign without manual cleanup. Editors save 2–4 hours per week per person.

Media library: from upload to CDN with transformation

Saving files to the server disk is the classic mistake. The disk fills, scaling fails, and CDN becomes impossible. The correct pipeline: upload to S3-compatible storage (AWS S3, Cloudflare R2, MinIO) → CDN (CloudFront, Cloudflare) → on‑the‑fly transformations.

Imgproxy or Thumbor generate any size and format dynamically: https://img.example.com/resize:800:600/format:webp/plain/s3://bucket/photo.jpg. The original lives once, derivatives never occupy disk. Cloudflare Images costs $5 per 100k images, including transformations. Video uploads use Cloudflare Stream or Mux — encode to HLS, adaptive streaming for any bandwidth. Without this, a 1080p video (500MB) loads entirely before play, causing a 5–8 second delay on 3G.

What’s included in media library development

Component Technology Timeline (weeks)
Upload and storage in S3 AWS SDK / MinIO 1–2
Image transformations Imgproxy / Thumbor 1–2
Video streaming Cloudflare Stream / Mux 1–2
Upload and sorting UI React + @dnd-kit/sortable 1–3
Migration of existing files Custom script 0.5–1

Why structured content outperforms free-form HTML

Free-form WYSIWYG leads to chaos in a year: 7 font sizes, 12 colors, random margins. Redesign requires manual cleanup of thousands of posts. Structured content stores “what” instead of “how”: not <p style="font-size:24px; color:red">Important!</p>, but a callout block with variant: warning. The CMS stores the structure; the frontend decides rendering. Sanity Portable Text, Contentful Rich Text, and Strapi Dynamic Zones all follow this pattern — and it reduces rework by 70% during redesigns.

Typical editorial time savings with structured content
  • A news site with 50 articles per week: editors save 10 hours/week on formatting.
  • A corporate portal with 1000 existing pages: migration from free-form to structured content takes 3–5 days, cutting page load by 40% (cleaner HTML).

Work process

  1. Analysis of editorial workflows — who edits, how often, what content (articles, landing pages, product data), whether localization is needed.
  2. CMS selection — based on scenarios, not trends. We compare headless vs traditional with a weighted matrix.
  3. Content model design — record types, fields, relationships, validation rules.
  4. Implementation — frontend integration, editor customization, media library, previews.
  5. Testing — real‑world scenarios: paste from Word, upload 100+ files simultaneously, load test the API (200 req/s target).
  6. Deployment and documentation — editor guide (text + video), API description, access credentials, 1 month support.

Timelines and budget

Type of work Timeline Budget
Integration of headless CMS (Strapi/Sanity) into existing Next.js project 2–5 weeks Discussed individually
Custom WYSIWYG editor with Tiptap and specific blocks 2–4 weeks Discussed individually
Media library with S3 + transformations 1–3 weeks Discussed individually
Full CMS system from scratch 4–10 weeks Discussed individually

Budget is calculated individually after an audit. Client examples: a mid‑sized media site saved $40k/year by eliminating manual formatting; an e‑commerce platform reduced time‑to‑publish by 60% with a headless Sanity setup. Contact us for a free project estimate.

What you get after delivery

  • Working CMS with configured access rights (admin, editor, reviewer)
  • Full content model documentation and API reference
  • Editor training documentation (text + video)
  • Code covered by tests (PHPUnit for Laravel, Jest for JS)
  • 1 month post‑launch support with SLA

Our experience and guarantees

Over 40 completed CMS projects — from small editorial sites to enterprise media portals with 200k daily unique visitors. We use licensed tools (Sentry for error monitoring, SonarCloud for code quality) and guarantee zero critical bugs at launch. All code is version‑controlled and deployable via CI/CD.

For your specific needs, contact us to discuss requirements. We’ll provide a technical proposal within 2 business days.