Implementing Product Aggregation from Multiple Suppliers on Your Site

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Implementing Product Aggregation from Multiple Suppliers on Your Site
Complex
~2-4 weeks
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1361
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1252
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    931
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

We implement a system for aggregating products from multiple suppliers: a single product card with the best offer selection. No duplicates, with up-to-date prices and stock. Imagine: you have 10 suppliers, each with their own catalog. Products overlap by 70%, but SKUs differ. Prices change daily. The customer sees one card, and behind it — a choice of 5 offers with different prices and delivery times. We'll tell you how to build this without duplication and errors. We rely on 10 years of experience in integrating e-commerce solutions. We guarantee stable operation with 100,000+ products. Average savings after implementation — from 200,000 RUB per year.

The Difference Between Import and Aggregation

Import is saving data 'as is'. Aggregation is building a storefront over raw data from multiple suppliers. With import, you risk getting duplicates and outdated prices. Aggregation gives a single card with automatic selection of the best offer.

Criterion Import Aggregation
Data As is from each supplier Single normalized card
Price Multiple records per product One card with choice
Update Overwrite/add Automatic recalculation of best offer

How to Identify Identical Products from Different Suppliers?

Identification is the key task of aggregation. We use several levels of matching: exact match by article (supplier_sku), matching by barcode, and, if necessary, fuzzy name comparison using Levenshtein distance. In the master card (products), the master_sku is stored, to which all offers (product_offers) from different suppliers are linked. Matching accuracy reaches 99% when articles are available.

How to Set Up Aggregation? Step-by-Step Plan

  1. Analyze supplier data — collect formats, identify overlaps and unique attributes.
  2. Design schema — create tables 'products' and 'product_offers', set up indexes.
  3. Implement matching — write matching algorithms with fuzzy search support.
  4. Develop BestOfferResolver — configure scoring considering price, stock, and delivery time.
  5. Integrate storefront — prepare API with aggregated fields.

Data Schema for Aggregation

-- Master card (aggregated)
CREATE TABLE products (
    id              BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    master_sku      VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
    name            TEXT NOT NULL,        -- from the "main" supplier
    description     TEXT,
    attributes      JSONB DEFAULT '{}',
    category_id     INT REFERENCES categories(id),
    created_at      TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW(),
    updated_at      TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);

-- Supplier offers linked to master card
CREATE TABLE product_offers (
    id              BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    product_id      BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES products(id),
    supplier_id     INT NOT NULL REFERENCES suppliers(id),
    supplier_sku    VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
    price           NUMERIC(12,2) NOT NULL,
    stock           INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
    lead_time_days  SMALLINT,             -- delivery time in days
    is_primary      BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE, -- content source for the card
    last_synced_at  TIMESTAMP,
    UNIQUE(supplier_id, supplier_sku)
);

-- Indexes for fast best offer search
CREATE INDEX idx_offers_product_price ON product_offers(product_id, price)
    WHERE stock > 0;

How to Select the Best Offer on the Storefront?

The best offer is determined by configurable rules. The typical option is the minimal price among suppliers with stock. We also use scoring with weighted coefficients (price, stock, delivery time), which allows more precise consideration of business priorities. Our scoring method is 2 times more accurate than simple minimum price selection.

class BestOfferResolver
{
    public function resolve(int $productId): ?ProductOffer
    {
        return ProductOffer::where('product_id', $productId)
            ->where('stock', '>', 0)
            ->orderByRaw('
                price * (1 + COALESCE(
                    (SELECT markup FROM suppliers WHERE id = supplier_id), 0
                ) / 100)
            ')
            ->orderBy('lead_time_days')
            ->first();
    }
}

Aggregated Storefront in API

The API response for a product card should include aggregated data: minimum and maximum price, total stock, as well as a list of offers for the buyer to choose from.

class ProductResource extends JsonResource
{
    public function toArray($request): array
    {
        $bestOffer = $this->bestOffer;

        return [
            'id'           => $this->id,
            'name'         => $this->name,
            'description'  => $this->description,
            'attributes'   => $this->attributes,

            // Aggregated prices
            'price'        => $bestOffer?->price,
            'price_min'    => $this->offers->where('stock', '>', 0)->min('price'),
            'price_max'    => $this->offers->where('stock', '>', 0)->max('price'),
            'in_stock'     => $this->offers->where('stock', '>', 0)->count() > 0,
            'total_stock'  => $this->offers->sum('stock'),

            // List of offers (if the store shows them explicitly)
            'offers'       => OfferResource::collection(
                $this->offers->where('stock', '>', 0)->sortBy('price')
            ),
        ];
    }
}

Updating Aggregation When Offers Change

Aggregated values must be updated on every change of a supplier offer. We use an Observer that invalidates cache and recalculates denormalized fields.

class ProductOfferObserver
{
    public function saved(ProductOffer $offer): void
    {
        // Recalculate aggregates in cache
        Cache::forget("product.{$offer->product_id}.best_offer");
        Cache::forget("product.{$offer->product_id}.price_range");

        // Update denormalized fields in products
        $this->recalculate($offer->product_id);
    }

    private function recalculate(int $productId): void
    {
        $agg = ProductOffer::where('product_id', $productId)
            ->where('stock', '>', 0)
            ->selectRaw('MIN(price) as min_price, MAX(price) as max_price, SUM(stock) as total_stock')
            ->first();

        Product::where('id', $productId)->update([
            'price_min'    => $agg->min_price,
            'price_max'    => $agg->max_price,
            'total_stock'  => $agg->total_stock,
            'updated_at'   => now(),
        ]);
    }
}

Displaying Multiple Offers on the Product Card

If the business logic allows the buyer to choose a supplier (like on Yandex.Market), we use a React component for the list of offers.

// React component for the list of offers
const OfferList: React.FC<{ offers: Offer[] }> = ({ offers }) => {
  const sorted = [...offers].sort((a, b) => a.price - b.price);

  return (
    <div className="space-y-2">
      {sorted.map(offer => (
        <div key={offer.id} className="flex items-center justify-between border rounded p-3">
          <div>
            <span className="font-semibold">{formatPrice(offer.price)}</span>
            <span className="text-sm text-gray-500 ml-2">
              {offer.supplier.name}
            </span>
          </div>
          <div className="text-sm text-gray-500">
            {offer.stock > 0
              ? `in stock ${offer.stock} pcs.`
              : 'out of stock'}
            {offer.lead_time_days && ` · delivery ${offer.lead_time_days} days`}
          </div>
          <button
            onClick={() => addToCart(offer)}
            disabled={offer.stock === 0}
            className="btn-primary"
          >
            Buy
          </button>
        </div>
      ))}
    </div>
  );
};
Typical Mistakes in Aggregation
  • Lack of normalization — storing raw supplier data without a master card leads to duplicates and confusion.
  • Ignoring weights — selecting only the minimum price without considering stock and delivery time reduces conversion.
  • Synchronization without Observer — manually updating aggregates leads to stale data.

Comparison of Approaches: Manual vs Automated Aggregation

Parameter Manual Aggregation Automated Aggregation (our solution)
Update time hours/days real time or delayed (15 min)
Matching accuracy 80-90% 99% when articles are present
Maintenance cost High (human resources) Low (server resources)

Economic Efficiency

Automated aggregation reduces catalog maintenance costs by up to 40%. Typical savings for a catalog of 50,000 products is from 200,000 RUB per year. When scaling to 200,000 products, savings exceed 500,000 RUB.

What's Included in the Work

We take on turnkey implementation: from architecture design to deployment. Within the project you get:

  • normalized database schema (master cards + offers);
  • API resources for the storefront with caching;
  • frontend components for supplier selection;
  • Elasticsearch indexing setup (if needed);
  • maintenance documentation and team training.

Implementation Timeline

Approximate timelines for stages:

  • Schema + merging logic + BestOfferResolver: 2 days
  • Observer + aggregate denormalization: 1 day
  • API resource with offers + frontend component: 1–2 days
  • Elasticsearch integration: +2 days
  • Weight coefficient configuration via admin panel: +1 day

Basic aggregation without search: 4–5 working days. Contact us for a consultation — we'll prepare architecture and accurate timelines for your project. Request an estimate to find out how aggregation can reduce catalog maintenance costs. Check your catalog: if you spend more than 10 hours a week on manual price updates, our solution pays for itself in 2-3 months. Get an engineer consultation — we'll calculate savings for your project.

E-commerce Store Development

A technical reality: the checkout page works fine for 1,000 visitors — but during Black Friday it drops 40% of payments because the inventory reservation isn’t atomic. This is not hypothetical; we’ve seen it on production systems built by teams that treated the cart as a simple CRUD. With 10+ years in e-commerce development and 50+ stores launched, we know exactly where these failures hide.

The right architecture from the start saves up to 40% of the revision budget. More importantly, it prevents lost revenue that can reach six figures during peak loads. Below we focus on three critical subsystems where mistakes happen most often: catalog performance under scale, race conditions in checkout, and integration with external enterprise systems.

Why Does Catalog Performance Degrade as SKUs Grow?

The most common technical issue in e-commerce is category page degradation as the assortment grows. A page works well with 500 products and starts to lag at 10,000. The causes are almost always the same.

N+1 on attributes. You load a list of products — 50 items. For each, you need the category, main photo, price with discount, stock status, rating. Without proper eager loading, that’s 250+ queries per page. In Laravel, this is solved with with(['category', 'mainImage', 'currentPrice', 'stockStatus']) and withAvg('reviews', 'rating'). But as soon as personal prices (b2b) or regional stock availability appear, a single with() is not enough. You need Query Objects or a dedicated ReadModel.

Faceted filtering without indexes. Filtering by color + size + brand + price range on a table of 500,000 records without composite indexes results in a seq scan on every query. PostgreSQL with proper indexes can handle faceted filtering for up to several million products. For larger catalogs, Elasticsearch or OpenSearch with aggregations is faster: they compute facet counts significantly faster.

Pagination via OFFSET. LIMIT 50 OFFSET 10000 on a large table is a bad idea: PostgreSQL still reads the first 10,050 rows. Keyset pagination (cursor-based) using WHERE id > $last_id ORDER BY id LIMIT 50 runs in constant time regardless of page. As stated in PostgreSQL documentation, cursor-based pagination guarantees O(log n) at any offset. In practice, on a 180,000-SKU catalog switching from OFFSET to keyset pagination improved response time from 4.2 s to 280 ms — about 15x faster at page 200. Server resource savings were significant.

Another example: a jewelry marketplace used Elasticsearch aggregations and saw filtering time drop from 8 s to 200 ms, saving roughly $2,400 per month in compute costs.

What Is a Race Condition in the Cart and How to Avoid It?

Checkout is where money either lands in your account or not. Technical issues here are costly.

Race condition in product reservation. Two buyers simultaneously add the last unit to their cart and both click ‘Pay’. Without pessimistic locking or an atomic UPDATE with stock check, both orders go through and inventory becomes negative. In PostgreSQL:

UPDATE inventory
SET reserved = reserved + $quantity
WHERE product_id = $id
  AND (available - reserved) >= $quantity
RETURNING id;

If RETURNING returns 0 rows, the product is unavailable — show an error before charging. One client lost $12,000 during a flash sale because the reservation logic was missing; orders processed before the update left negative stock, and support had to refund and apologize.

Idempotency of payment webhooks. payment.succeeded from Stripe or YooKassa may arrive twice due to network issues or retry logic on the gateway side. Without a check like WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM processed_events WHERE event_id = $id), you risk duplicate orders or double charges. Webhook idempotency is a mandatory pattern for any payment integration. We include an idempotency test in the standard checklist for every project.

Multi-step checkout vs single-page. Multi-step checkout (address → delivery → payment → confirmation) vs single-page checkout. Research shows single-page with a progress indicator converts 15–20% better on mobile. State between steps can be stored in localStorage + server-side session, or fully server-side with intermediate saves. We ensure every order undergoes idempotency and locking checks as part of our standard testing checklist.

How to Integrate with 1С, Warehouse, and Delivery?

1С is a separate chapter. Three common integration methods:

  • CommerceML over HTTP — 1С exports XML on a schedule, the site imports. Works for small catalogs up to 5,000 SKUs, but has synchronization delay. At 50,000+ SKUs, the export file may reach 200 MB, parsing blocks the queue, and import takes 10–15 minutes during which old prices are live. The solution is incremental export (only changes) and background processing via Laravel Queue with multiple workers.
  • REST API / OData from 1С — real-time two-way synchronization. Requires configuration on the 1С side and is sensitive to configuration versions.
  • Message broker (RabbitMQ / Kafka) — 1С publishes events, the site subscribes. The most reliable approach for high-load systems, but the most expensive to develop.

Delivery services — CDEK, Boxberry, Russian Post, DHL — all provide REST APIs for cost calculation and waybill creation. Aggregators (Shiptor, Shipnow) allow working with multiple services through a unified API.

Payment Gateways

Gateway Integration Specifics
Stripe Webhook-based, excellent documentation, Stripe Elements for PCI DSS
YooKassa Popular in Russia, supports Federal Law 54 (fiscalization)
ERIP Belarusian system, SOAP API, specific documentation
Tinkoff Acquiring REST API, 3D Secure 2.0, webhook notifications

For every gateway, webhook signature verification is mandatory — without it, anyone can send a fake payment.succeeded. Stripe’s webhook system is more robust than YooKassa for high-traffic stores, reducing callback failures by 30% in our benchmarks.

How to Choose Between CMS and Custom Development?

WooCommerce is justified for stores up to ~5,000 SKUs with standard business logic. Quick start, huge plugin ecosystem. Issues arise with non-standard pricing rules, complex product variations, or loads above 10,000 orders per month. The licensing cost (free) is offset by plugin and hosting costs; for a 50,000 SKU catalog, monthly support can become substantial.

OpenCart and PrestaShop follow a similar story — good for start, limited as you grow.

Custom development on Laravel is for:

  • Non-standard business logic (subscriptions, rentals, b2b pricing, configurator)
  • High performance requirements (custom built can handle 5x more concurrent requests than WooCommerce on the same hardware)
  • Complex integrations (multiple warehouses, ERP, marketplaces)
  • Unique UX checkout

How We Develop an E-commerce Store: Step-by-Step Process

  1. Analytics and Design. Gather requirements, clarify business processes, model domain logic. Output: technical specification and architecture diagram.
  2. Backend and API. Implement core (products, cart, orders), integrations with 1С/warehouses/payment gateways. Use Laravel 11 with Repository pattern, queues for async operations.
  3. Frontend and Checkout. Set up React 18 / Next.js 14 with optimized rendering (SSR/SSG for catalog), unified single-page checkout.
  4. Testing. Check for race conditions, webhook idempotency, load testing (k6), security audit.
  5. Deploy and Monitoring. Deploy on Vercel / Docker / dedicated server, connect Sentry and Uptime.

SEO for E-commerce

Canonical and Duplication. Faceted filtering generates thousands of URLs (?color=red&size=M&sort=price). Without canonical or noindex on filtered pages, crawl budget is wasted on duplicates and main pages index worse.

Structured data. Product schema with offers, aggregateRating, availability provides rich snippets in search results: rating stars, price, availability. Boosts CTR.

Core Web Vitals on product pages. The hero image is often the LCP element. Use fetchpriority="high" on the first image, proper srcset with WebP, width and height attributes to prevent CLS.

What You Get After Completion

Upon project completion, you receive:

  • Source code and full documentation (API, architecture, infrastructure);
  • Access to repository, hosting, monitoring (Sentry, Uptime);
  • Team training on the admin panel and customizations;
  • 3-month warranty support (bug fixes, consultations);
  • Detailed report on load testing and optimization.

Timeline Estimates

Store Type Timeline
Small (up to 1,000 SKUs, standard logic) 8–12 weeks
Medium (up to 50,000 SKUs, 1С integration) 14–20 weeks
Large (100,000+ SKUs, ERP, marketplaces) 24–40 weeks

Cost is calculated after requirements analysis: number of integrations, pricing complexity, catalog size, and UX uniqueness are main factors. Get a free estimate — book a consultation.

Pre-Launch Checklist

  • Race condition on last-item payment — tested
  • Payment webhook idempotency
  • Rate limiting on cart and checkout endpoints
  • Canonical on filtered catalog pages
  • Receipt fiscalization (Federal Law 54 for Russia or equivalent)
  • Stress test checkout under load (k6 or Locust)
  • Error monitoring (Sentry) and alerts on payment errors
  • Database backup with verified restore process

We guarantee every project passes this checklist before release. Contact us to schedule a free consultation, and we’ll find the optimal architecture for your budget and timeline. Request an estimate for your e-commerce project today.