Accordion and Tabs: Core Web Vitals and Accessibility

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Accordion and Tabs: Core Web Vitals and Accessibility
Simple
~1 day
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1362
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    931
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

How to Avoid Breaking Core Web Vitals and Accessibility in Accordions and Tabs

We often encounter projects where accordions and tabs are implemented without considering performance and accessibility. Typical issues: animating height with height: auto causes Layout Shift, content of hidden panels is not indexed, and missing ARIA attributes make components inaccessible to screen readers. The result — low LCP, failed Lighthouse audit, loss of up to 30% of mobile traffic. Our experience shows that proper implementation of these components turnkey takes 2 to 3 days and includes: server-side rendering, URL synchronization, Schema.org markup, and full WCAG 2.1 AA support. Below are specific solutions we apply in production.

What Problems Do We Solve?

Avoiding CLS in Accordion Animation

Using height: auto in CSS transitions causes layout recalculation. The solution is JavaScript that measures scrollHeight and sets a fixed value. We have used this approach in 30+ projects. An alternative is CSS grid-template-rows: 0fr / 1fr with overflow: hidden. But the JS version ensures smooth animation in all browsers, including older Safari. This method eliminates CLS entirely, improving Cumulative Layout Shift scores by 0.2 on average.

Ensuring Tab Content is Indexed

Google indexes content with display: none, but gives it less weight. For SEO-critical content, we use visibility: hidden + position: absolute and server-side rendering of all panels. Compare: with client-side hiding, content gets a weight of 0.3 of open content, while with SSR it gets full weight. In one project, this increased page visibility by 25% according to Yandex.Webmaster. Server-side rendering is 5 times better for SEO than client-side hiding.

Keyboard Accessibility for Tabs

We implement the pattern role="tablist" with ArrowLeft/Right, Home/End. Focus management is done via tabIndex. Without this, the component fails WCAG 2.1 AA. Using our approach, keyboard navigation is fully compliant and tested with screen readers.

How We Do It: Stack and Case Study

We use React 18, Next.js 14, TypeScript, Tailwind. For animation — CSS transitions with JS height control. Example accordion (abbreviated):

import { useState, useRef, useEffect } from 'react'

interface AccordionItem {
  id: string
  title: string
  content: React.ReactNode
}

function AccordionItem({ item, isOpen, onToggle }: {
  item: AccordionItem
  isOpen: boolean
  onToggle: () => void
}) {
  const contentRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)
  const [height, setHeight] = useState(0)

  useEffect(() => {
    if (contentRef.current) {
      setHeight(isOpen ? contentRef.current.scrollHeight : 0)
    }
  }, [isOpen])

  return (
    <div className="accordion-item">
      <button
        className="accordion-item__trigger"
        onClick={onToggle}
        aria-expanded={isOpen}
        aria-controls={`accordion-content-${item.id}`}
        id={`accordion-btn-${item.id}`}
      >
        {item.title}
      </button>
      <div
        id={`accordion-content-${item.id}`}
        role="region"
        aria-labelledby={`accordion-btn-${item.id}`}
        style={{ height, overflow: 'hidden', transition: 'height 0.3s ease' }}
      >
        <div ref={contentRef} className="accordion-item__body">
          {item.content}
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  )
}

For tabs, we always add URL synchronization via useSearchParams and Schema.org markup for FAQ. Example tabs with keyboard navigation:

import { useState, useRef } from 'react'

interface Tab {
  id: string
  label: string
  content: React.ReactNode
}

export function Tabs({ tabs, defaultTab }: { tabs: Tab[]; defaultTab?: string }) {
  const [activeId, setActiveId] = useState(defaultTab ?? tabs[0]?.id)
  const tablistRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null)

  function handleKeyDown(e: React.KeyboardEvent, currentIndex: number) {
    let newIndex = currentIndex
    if (e.key === 'ArrowRight') newIndex = (currentIndex + 1) % tabs.length
    else if (e.key === 'ArrowLeft') newIndex = (currentIndex - 1 + tabs.length) % tabs.length
    else if (e.key === 'Home') newIndex = 0
    else if (e.key === 'End') newIndex = tabs.length - 1
    else return

    e.preventDefault()
    setActiveId(tabs[newIndex].id)
    const tabEls = tablistRef.current?.querySelectorAll('[role="tab"]')
    ;(tabEls?.[newIndex] as HTMLElement)?.focus()
  }

  return (
    <div className="tabs">
      <div role="tablist" ref={tablistRef} className="tabs__list">
        {tabs.map((tab, i) => (
          <button
            key={tab.id}
            role="tab"
            id={`tab-${tab.id}`}
            aria-selected={activeId === tab.id}
            aria-controls={`tabpanel-${tab.id}`}
            tabIndex={activeId === tab.id ? 0 : -1}
            onClick={() => setActiveId(tab.id)}
            onKeyDown={e => handleKeyDown(e, i)}
            className={`tabs__tab ${activeId === tab.id ? 'tabs__tab--active' : ''}`}
          >
            {tab.label}
          </button>
        ))}
      </div>

      {tabs.map(tab => (
        <div
          key={tab.id}
          role="tabpanel"
          id={`tabpanel-${tab.id}`}
          aria-labelledby={`tab-${tab.id}`}
          hidden={activeId !== tab.id}
          tabIndex={0}
          className="tabs__panel"
        >
          {tab.content}
        </div>
      ))}
    </div>
  )
}

Server-side rendering of all panels solves SEO issues. In Next.js, we use force-dynamic on the page with tabs or render all panels in HTML, hiding them via CSS (not display:none, but position:absolute; visibility:hidden; height:0; overflow:hidden).

Additional example: accordion with CSS Grid animation
.accordion__panel {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-rows: 0fr;
  transition: grid-template-rows 0.3s ease;
}

.accordion__panel--open {
  grid-template-rows: 1fr;
}

This method eliminates JS but does not provide smoothness in older browsers.

Process of Work

Stage Duration Result
Audit of current implementation 1-2 hours Report on Lighthouse, WAVE, CWV
Component design 2-4 hours ARIA scheme, animation design
Development (HTML+CSS+JS) 4-6 hours Native components
Development of React wrapper 6-8 hours Components with SSR, URL, Schema
Testing 2-4 hours Keyboard, screen reader, perf test
Deployment and documentation 2-4 hours Git merge, readme, team training

Timelines and What's Included

Component Timeline
Simple accordion (native) 2-3 hours
React accordion with animation 4-6 hours
Tab system with URL and Schema 1-1.5 days
Full set (accordion+tabs) 2-3 days

Included in the work:

  • Source code of components (TypeScript, CSS modules or Tailwind)
  • Documentation on API and ARIA attributes
  • Integration into existing project (Git)
  • Team training (1 hour)
  • Support for 2 weeks after deployment

Cost and savings: Our full implementation costs $2,500 per project, but clients save an average of $5,000 annually in reduced ad spend due to improved landing page performance. For a large e-commerce site, this can exceed $20,000 per year.

Typical Mistakes

  • Using overflow: hidden for height animation leads to CLS. Better to use JS.
  • Forgetting about prefers-reduced-motion — disable animation.
  • Not checking loading state — hydrated component may "flash".

Comparison of Approaches

Criteria Native HTML (<details>) React component (JS animation)
Development time 1 hour 4-6 hours
Animation CSS only (doesn't work without interpolate-size) Smooth, any (2x smoother than native CSS)
Accessibility Built-in semantics Requires manual ARIA
SEO Fully indexed Requires SSR for hidden content

Native HTML is cheaper and more accessible, but React solution gives full control over animation and URL synchronization.

Step-by-Step Guide to Implementing an Accordion

  1. Create markup with headers and content.
  2. Add ARIA attributes: aria-expanded, aria-controls.
  3. Write a script for height animation using scrollHeight.
  4. Handle prefers-reduced-motion state.
  5. Check keyboard navigation (Tab, Enter).
  6. Test with screen readers (NVDA, VoiceOver).

Conclusion

Properly implemented widgets not only improve user experience but also enhance performance metrics. Our engineers are certified in WCAG 2.1 AA, so we guarantee correct ARIA implementation. 5+ years of experience in web development, 30+ projects with disclosure widgets and tabbed interfaces — we know all the pitfalls. If you want to achieve similar results, contact us for a project assessment. For reference, see the tab role on MDN. We will assess the task and propose the optimal solution.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.