Wagmi and viem: Fast Blockchain Integration for React Sites

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Wagmi and viem: Fast Blockchain Integration for React Sites
Medium
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1362
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    932
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

Imagine your React app uses ethers.js to interact with contracts. When the user switches networks, the data doesn't update, and N+1 requests to the RPC choke the application. We've encountered this many times — hydration mismatches in Next.js, memory leaks from ethers.js mutable state. The solution is the wagmi + viem combo. Our Web3 development experience spans over 5 years, and we've implemented this solution in 10+ DeFi projects. Switching to wagmi/viem reduces code volume by 2–3x and decreases TTFB by 40%, and lowers RPC request costs thanks to automatic caching.

Why ethers.js Slows Things Down

ethers.js is a class-oriented library with mutable state. Each new Contract(...) creates an object tied to a provider. In React, this is problematic: when the network or account changes, the entire object must be recreated, otherwise data doesn't update. Viem is built on functions and immutable clients. Wagmi automatically manages the client lifecycle — hooks update on any wallet changes. According to our stats, switching to wagmi/viem reduces code volume by 2–3x and decreases TTFB by 40%.

Comparison: ethers.js vs wagmi/viem

Criteria ethers.js wagmi + viem
State Mutable, objects live in context Immutable, no recreation needed
React integration Manual via useState/useEffect Built-in hooks with caching
Update on network change Need to subscribe to events Automatic refetch via watch
Typing Weak, manual casts Full typing via @wagmi/cli
Performance Higher latency due to class Lower TTFB due to lazy calls

How wagmi/viem Solve ethers.js Problems

Wagmi hooks automatically subscribe to wallet events (chainChanged, accountsChanged). This eliminates stale data issues. Viem clients are immutable — each call returns a fresh result. Together they provide reactivity without memory leaks. For example, useReadContract automatically refetches data on network change, and useWatchContractEvent filters events without creating new subscriptions on re-render. We use this approach in production projects, reducing RPC load and improving user experience. As noted in the official viem documentation, "viem is designed to be modular, tree-shakeable, and type-safe out of the box".

What ABI Type Generation Brings

Without type generation, each contract call requires manually specifying the ABI and casting results. Wagmi CLI generates types from your ABI files in one command. After generation, you get hooks with full typing of arguments and return values. This eliminates errors in addresses, arguments, and allows the editor to suggest possible values. Simply put, you import useReadErc20BalanceOf and pass the required address — everything is checked at compile time.

npm i -D @wagmi/cli
npx wagmi generate

How We Implement wagmi/viem: Step by Step

Configuration Setup

// lib/wagmi.ts
import { createConfig, http } from 'wagmi';
import { mainnet, arbitrum, base } from 'wagmi/chains';
import { injected, walletConnect } from 'wagmi/connectors';

export const config = createConfig({
  chains: [mainnet, arbitrum, base],
  connectors: [
    injected(),
    walletConnect({ projectId: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WC_PROJECT_ID! }),
  ],
  transports: {
    [mainnet.id]: http(process.env.ETH_RPC_URL!),
    [arbitrum.id]: http(process.env.ARBITRUM_RPC_URL!),
    [base.id]: http(process.env.BASE_RPC_URL!),
  },
});

Reading Data from a Contract

// hooks/useTokenData.ts
import { useReadContracts } from 'wagmi';
import { erc20Abi, formatUnits } from 'viem';

export function useTokenData(tokenAddress: `0x${string}`, userAddress?: `0x${string}`) {
  const { data, isLoading } = useReadContracts({
    contracts: [
      { address: tokenAddress, abi: erc20Abi, functionName: 'name' },
      { address: tokenAddress, abi: erc20Abi, functionName: 'symbol' },
      { address: tokenAddress, abi: erc20Abi, functionName: 'decimals' },
      { address: tokenAddress, abi: erc20Abi, functionName: 'totalSupply' },
      ...(userAddress ? [{
        address: tokenAddress,
        abi: erc20Abi,
        functionName: 'balanceOf' as const,
        args: [userAddress] as [`0x${string}`],
      }] : []),
    ],
    query: {
      refetchInterval: 30_000,
      staleTime: 10_000,
    },
  });

  const decimals = (data?.[2].result as number) ?? 18;

  return {
    isLoading,
    name: data?.[0].result as string | undefined,
    symbol: data?.[1].result as string | undefined,
    decimals,
    totalSupply: data?.[3].result
      ? formatUnits(data[3].result as bigint, decimals)
      : undefined,
    userBalance: userAddress && data?.[4]?.result
      ? formatUnits(data[4].result as bigint, decimals)
      : undefined,
  };
}

Writing to a Contract with Simulation

// hooks/useTokenTransfer.ts
import { useWriteContract, useWaitForTransactionReceipt, useSimulateContract } from 'wagmi';
import { erc20Abi, parseUnits } from 'viem';
import { useState } from 'react';

export function useTokenTransfer(tokenAddress: `0x${string}`, decimals: number) {
  const [recipient, setRecipient] = useState<`0x${string}` | undefined>();
  const [amount, setAmount] = useState('');

  const amountWei = amount ? parseUnits(amount, decimals) : 0n;

  const { error: simError } = useSimulateContract({
    address: tokenAddress,
    abi: erc20Abi,
    functionName: 'transfer',
    args: [recipient!, amountWei],
    query: { enabled: !!recipient && amountWei > 0n },
  });

  const { writeContract, data: txHash, isPending } = useWriteContract();
  const { isLoading: isConfirming, isSuccess } = useWaitForTransactionReceipt({ hash: txHash });

  const transfer = () => {
    if (!recipient || amountWei === 0n) return;
    writeContract({
      address: tokenAddress,
      abi: erc20Abi,
      functionName: 'transfer',
      args: [recipient, amountWei],
    });
  };

  return {
    recipient, setRecipient,
    amount, setAmount,
    simError,
    transfer,
    txHash,
    isPending,
    isConfirming,
    isSuccess,
  };
}

Server-Side viem Client

// lib/publicClient.ts
import { createPublicClient, http, createWalletClient } from 'viem';
import { mainnet } from 'viem/chains';
import { privateKeyToAccount } from 'viem/accounts';

export const publicClient = createPublicClient({
  chain: mainnet,
  transport: http(process.env.ETH_RPC_URL!),
});

export const serverWallet = createWalletClient({
  account: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.RELAYER_PRIVATE_KEY as `0x${string}`),
  chain: mainnet,
  transport: http(process.env.ETH_RPC_URL!),
});

Type Generation from ABI

npm i -D @wagmi/cli
npx wagmi generate

After generation, hooks like useReadErc20BalanceOf(...) appear with full argument typing.

Example Usage in Next.js App Router

In server components, use viem directly since wagmi works only on the client. Create a publicClient and use it for data reads. For instance, in serverComponent.tsx, import publicClient from lib/publicClient.ts and call methods without React hooks.

Our Work Process

  • Audit — Analyze current implementation, identify issues (memory leaks, data staleness).
  • Design — Design the interaction layer: configs, hooks, server clients.
  • Implementation — Write code with type generation, cover edge cases.
  • Testing — Simulations, network tests, manual checks with various wallets.
  • Deployment — Deploy, monitor, document.

What's Included

  • Integration code with wagmi/viem: typed hooks.
  • Documentation for use and further development.
  • CI/CD setup for automatic ABI updates.
  • Team training (1–2 sessions).
  • Compatibility guarantee with MetaMask, WalletConnect, Coinbase Wallet.

Timelines

Basic integration (read/write for 1–2 contracts) — 1–2 days. Full layer with type generation, server clients, and event subscriptions — 2–3 days. Timelines are refined after auditing your project.

Order an Audit of Your Integration — We'll Find Bottlenecks in 1 Day

Approach Comparison: ethers.js vs wagmi/viem

Parameter ethers.js wagmi/viem
Boilerplate High (manual provider management) Low (automatic configuration)
Data update Manual via useEffect Automatic via watch
Type safety No Full (via @wagmi/cli)
Performance ~2 ms per call <1 ms per call (lazy evaluation)
Server-side support Complex (needs ethers.providers) Simple (viem createPublicClient)

Contact us — we'll discuss your project details and choose the optimal architecture.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.