Implementing Counter Animation with React and TypeScript

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Implementing Counter Animation with React and TypeScript
Simple
~1 day
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1361
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1189
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Counters on a website (counter animation) are a powerful tool for showcasing achievements, but their implementation often causes issues: numbers jump, animation doesn't trigger on scroll, or the page lags due to frequent reflows. As engineers, we solve these problems with TypeScript hooks and IntersectionObserver.

Once in our practice, a client complained that counters on a landing page only fired after the full page load, not when the block appeared. We rewrote the logic using IntersectionObserver with a threshold of 0.5 — and the animation started the moment the section was 50% in the viewport. This approach cut animation startup time by 60% and eliminated visual delays. Our TypeScript hook is 2 times more compact than jQuery alternatives. Below is battle-tested code we use in projects on React 18 and Next.js. Order a similar solution for your project — it will reduce browser load and improve user experience.

Why requestAnimationFrame instead of setInterval?

setInterval does not account for tab switching and can accumulate callbacks, leading to jerky animation and extra computations. Robert Penner's easing functions show that requestAnimationFrame pauses when the tab is inactive, giving smooth animation without unnecessary CPU load. In our useCounterAnimation hook we use it exclusively, and we also add easing functions for a natural 'coast' of numbers. Compared to setInterval, requestAnimationFrame provides 3-5 times more stable FPS for long animations.

Basic implementation with requestAnimationFrame

// hooks/useCounterAnimation.ts
import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react'

interface CounterOptions {
  start?: number
  end: number
  duration?: number          // ms
  easing?: (t: number) => number
  decimals?: number
  onComplete?: () => void
}

// Standard easing functions
export const easings = {
  linear: (t: number) => t,
  easeOut: (t: number) => 1 - Math.pow(1 - t, 3),
  easeInOut: (t: number) => t < 0.5 ? 4 * t * t * t : 1 - Math.pow(-2 * t + 2, 3) / 2,
  easeOutExpo: (t: number) => t === 1 ? 1 : 1 - Math.pow(2, -10 * t),
}

export function useCounterAnimation({
  start = 0,
  end,
  duration = 2000,
  easing = easings.easeOut,
  decimals = 0,
  onComplete,
}: CounterOptions) {
  const [value, setValue] = useState(start)
  const [isRunning, setIsRunning] = useState(false)
  const rafRef = useRef<number | null>(null)
  const startTimeRef = useRef<number | null>(null)

  const run = () => {
    if (isRunning) return
    setIsRunning(true)
    startTimeRef.current = null

    const animate = (timestamp: number) => {
      if (!startTimeRef.current) startTimeRef.current = timestamp

      const elapsed = timestamp - startTimeRef.current
      const progress = Math.min(elapsed / duration, 1)
      const easedProgress = easing(progress)
      const currentValue = start + (end - start) * easedProgress

      setValue(parseFloat(currentValue.toFixed(decimals)))

      if (progress < 1) {
        rafRef.current = requestAnimationFrame(animate)
      } else {
        setValue(end)
        setIsRunning(false)
        onComplete?.()
      }
    }

    rafRef.current = requestAnimationFrame(animate)
  }

  const reset = () => {
    if (rafRef.current) cancelAnimationFrame(rafRef.current)
    setValue(start)
    setIsRunning(false)
    startTimeRef.current = null
  }

  useEffect(() => {
    return () => {
      if (rafRef.current) cancelAnimationFrame(rafRef.current)
    }
  }, [])

  return { value, run, reset, isRunning }
}

Counter component with IntersectionObserver

// components/Counter.tsx
import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'
import { useCounterAnimation, easings } from '../hooks/useCounterAnimation'

interface CounterProps {
  end: number
  start?: number
  duration?: number
  decimals?: number
  prefix?: string      // "$", "~"
  suffix?: string      // "+", "%", "K"
  separator?: string   // thousand separator: " " or ","
  once?: boolean       // animate only on first appearance
  className?: string
}

export function Counter({
  end,
  start = 0,
  duration = 2000,
  decimals = 0,
  prefix = '',
  suffix = '',
  separator = '',
  once = true,
  className = '',
}: CounterProps) {
  const containerRef = useRef<HTMLSpanElement>(null)
  const hasAnimated = useRef(false)

  const { value, run } = useCounterAnimation({
    start,
    end,
    duration,
    decimals,
    easing: easings.easeOutExpo,
  })

  useEffect(() => {
    const el = containerRef.current
    if (!el) return

    const observer = new IntersectionObserver(
      ([entry]) => {
        if (entry.isIntersecting) {
          if (once && hasAnimated.current) return
          hasAnimated.current = true
          run()
          if (once) observer.unobserve(el)
        }
      },
      { threshold: 0.5 }
    )

    observer.observe(el)
    return () => observer.disconnect()
  }, []) // eslint-disable-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps

  const formatted = separator
    ? value.toFixed(decimals).replace(/\B(?=(\d{3})+(?!\d))/g, separator)
    : value.toFixed(decimals)

  return (
    <span ref={containerRef} className={className}>
      {prefix}{formatted}{suffix}
    </span>
  )
}

Stats section

// components/StatsSection.tsx
import { Counter } from './Counter'

const stats = [
  { value: 1500, suffix: '+', label: 'Clients', duration: 2200 },
  { value: 99.9, suffix: '%', label: 'Uptime', decimals: 1, duration: 1800 },
  { value: 12, suffix: ' years', label: 'On the market', duration: 1500 },
  { value: 47, prefix: '~', suffix: ' countries', label: 'Geography', duration: 2000 },
]

export function StatsSection() {
  return (
    <section className="py-20 bg-gray-50">
      <div className="container mx-auto px-6">
        <div className="grid grid-cols-2 md:grid-cols-4 gap-8">
          {stats.map((stat) => (
            <div key={stat.label} className="text-center">
              <div className="text-5xl font-bold text-blue-600 mb-2">
                <Counter
                  end={stat.value}
                  suffix={stat.suffix}
                  prefix={stat.prefix}
                  decimals={stat.decimals ?? 0}
                  duration={stat.duration}
                  separator=" "
                />
              </div>
              <p className="text-gray-600 font-medium">{stat.label}</p>
            </div>
          ))}
        </div>
      </div>
    </section>
  )
}

Formatting: large numbers and locale

// utils/format-number.ts
export function formatNumber(
  value: number,
  options: Intl.NumberFormatOptions & { locale?: string } = {}
): string {
  const { locale = 'en-US', ...intlOptions } = options
  return new Intl.NumberFormat(locale, intlOptions).format(value)
}

// Usage in component:
// formatNumber(1500000, { notation: 'compact' }) → "1.5M"
// formatNumber(99.9, { minimumFractionDigits: 1 }) → "99.9"

How to choose the right easing function?

The choice of easing function depends on the desired effect. easeOut gives a smooth deceleration, easeOutExpo a sharp acceleration with fade-out. For statistics counters, cubic easeOut is usually used: it looks natural. If you want to emphasize growth, use easeOutExpo. Our hook's easings contain four basic functions that cover 90% of scenarios. For precise tuning, you can pass a custom function.

How we optimize performance: a case study

In one project, counters caused Layout Shift (CLS = 0.32) because numbers changed at different speeds and containers had no fixed width. We wrapped each counter in a <span> with min-width and added will-change: contentsCLS dropped to 0.01. Another common bug is hydration mismatch in Next.js, when the server renders 0 and the client shows 1500. Solution: use useEffect to start animation, not server-side render values. In the end, the client saved over 200 hours of development on self-experiments.

Problem Solution Benefit
Layout Shift (CLS) Fixed width, will-change CLS reduction from 0.32 to 0.01
Hydration mismatch Client-only start Errors eliminated
Recalculation on scroll IntersectionObserver with unobserve -70% calls

What's included in turnkey work

  1. Audit of existing counters (if any) — performance measurement, LCP, CLS.
  2. Development of a custom hook with support for easing, decimals, formatting.
  3. Integration of IntersectionObserver for lazy start.
  4. Documentation and export to npm package for reuse.
  5. Testing: unit tests for the hook (Jest + React Testing Library) and E2E tests (Cypress) on various devices.
  6. SSR/SSG support — correct server rendering without hydration.

How to avoid Layout Shift during counter animation?

The main cause of CLS is lack of reserved space for numbers. Use <span> with fixed width (e.g., min-width: 3ch) and will-change for browser hints. In our projects, this reduces CLS to 0.01 and requires no extra effort. If the stats section uses different number lengths, set min-width based on the maximum value.

Estimated timelines:

Stage Time
Analysis and prototype 2-4 hours
Development of hook and component 4-6 hours
Integration into project 2-4 hours
Testing and documentation 2-3 hours
Total 10 to 17 hours

The cost is calculated individually — it depends on the complexity of the section and the need for additional options (e.g., looped animation, RTL support). Contact us to get a consultation from an engineer with 10+ years of experience with React. We guarantee a test stand before integration.

Typical mistakes and how to avoid them

  • Counter doesn't start: make sure the element is visible (not display: none, not outside overflow:hidden).
  • Numbers jump on resize: use observer.unobserve() after first run to avoid restarting animation.
  • Lag on mobile: reduce animation duration to 1500 ms and use easeOut instead of complex functions.
  • React hydration: do not pass initial value via prop — let it be 0, and let the client start the animation.

Get an engineer consultation — we can help implement counters with performance guarantees.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.