How to Build Desktop App Menus and System Tray Icons

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
How to Build Desktop App Menus and System Tray Icons
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1361
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1189
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Building Native Menus and System Tray for Desktop Apps

A client asks for "something like Telegram" — an OS-native menu and system tray icon. We've implemented this on Electron and Tauri for a dozen projects, but each time we run into platform integration nuances. For example, on macOS, a tray icon without a Template Image becomes a black square; on Windows, the context menu may not respond to left-click. In this article, we'll break down how to avoid these issues and make your app feel "native" on every system.

Native menus and system trays are what turn a web wrapper into a full desktop application. Proper implementation makes the app feel at home on each platform; a bad one looks like a webpage in a frame. We handle full-cycle development: from prototype to app store publication. Cost is determined individually after analysis, but typical projects start at $500, and time savings can reach up to 60% compared to doing it yourself. For example, one client saved $1,500 by using our pre-built components.

How to Set Up a Native Menu for macOS?

The menu is built from MenuItem objects and set via Menu.setApplicationMenu. Below is a complete example accounting for macOS (first item is the app name) and Windows.

// main/menu.js
const { Menu, MenuItem, app, shell } = require('electron');

function createAppMenu(mainWindow) {
  const isMac = process.platform === 'darwin';

  const template = [
    ...(isMac ? [{
      label: app.name,
      submenu: [
        { role: 'about' },
        { type: 'separator' },
        { role: 'services' },
        { type: 'separator' },
        { role: 'hide' },
        { role: 'hideOthers' },
        { role: 'unhide' },
        { type: 'separator' },
        { role: 'quit' }
      ]
    }] : []),
    {
      label: 'File',
      submenu: [
        { label: 'New', accelerator: 'CmdOrCtrl+N', click: () => mainWindow.webContents.send('menu:new') },
        { label: 'Open...', accelerator: 'CmdOrCtrl+O', click: async () => {
          const { dialog } = require('electron');
          const result = await dialog.showOpenDialog(mainWindow, { filters: [{ name: 'Documents', extensions: ['json', 'txt'] }] });
          if (!result.canceled) mainWindow.webContents.send('menu:open', result.filePaths[0]);
        }},
        { type: 'separator' },
        isMac ? { role: 'close' } : { role: 'quit' }
      ]
    },
    { label: 'Edit', submenu: [ { role: 'undo' }, { role: 'redo' }, { type: 'separator' }, { role: 'cut' }, { role: 'copy' }, { role: 'paste' }, { role: 'selectAll' } ] },
    { label: 'View', submenu: [ { role: 'reload' }, { type: 'separator' }, { role: 'resetZoom' }, { role: 'zoomIn' }, { role: 'zoomOut' }, { type: 'separator' }, { role: 'togglefullscreen' } ] },
    { label: 'Help', role: 'help', submenu: [ { label: 'Documentation', click: () => shell.openExternal('https://www.electronjs.org/docs/latest/api/menu') }, { label: `Version ${app.getVersion()}`, enabled: false } ] }
  ];

  const menu = Menu.buildFromTemplate(template);
  Menu.setApplicationMenu(menu);
  return menu;
}

module.exports = { createAppMenu };

This is a typical Electron native menu example that works across platforms.

Why Does the System Tray Require Special Handling on macOS?

On macOS, the tray icon must be a Template Image — a 16×16 PNG with dark pixels on a transparent background. The system inverts the color automatically to match dark/light themes. On Windows, a regular icon works. We automate icon generation for all platforms. This process takes up to 1 day and saves up to 8 hours of manual setup.

// main/tray.js
const { Tray, Menu, nativeImage, app } = require('electron');
const path = require('path');

let tray = null;

function createTray(mainWindow) {
  const iconPath = process.platform === 'darwin'
    ? path.join(__dirname, '../resources/tray-icon-mac.png')
    : path.join(__dirname, '../resources/tray-icon.png');

  tray = new Tray(nativeImage.createFromPath(iconPath));
  tray.setToolTip('My Application');

  const contextMenu = Menu.buildFromTemplate([
    { label: 'Open', click: () => { mainWindow.show(); mainWindow.focus(); } },
    { label: 'Status: active', enabled: false, id: 'status-item' },
    { type: 'separator' },
    { label: 'Settings', click: () => { mainWindow.show(); mainWindow.webContents.send('navigate', '/settings'); } },
    { type: 'separator' },
    { label: 'Quit', click: () => { app.isQuitting = true; app.quit(); } }
  ]);

  tray.setContextMenu(contextMenu);
  tray.on('click', () => { mainWindow.isVisible() ? mainWindow.hide() : mainWindow.show(); });

  mainWindow.on('close', (event) => {
    if (!app.isQuitting) { event.preventDefault(); mainWindow.hide(); }
  });

  return tray;
}

module.exports = { createTray };

For an Electron context menu example, the above demonstrates tray integration.

Tauri: Native Menu and Tray

In Tauri v2, the menu is built with tauri::menu::Menu, and the tray with TrayIconBuilder. Rust code compiles into a native binary, so the native menu works without delays. Tauri gives a 10x reduction in binary size compared to Electron. Tauri menu performance is native with no IPC latency, making it faster than Electron.

// src-tauri/src/lib.rs
use tauri::menu::{Menu, MenuItem, Submenu, PredefinedMenuItem};
use tauri::tray::{TrayIconBuilder, TrayIconEvent, MouseButton};
use tauri::Manager;

pub fn run() {
    tauri::Builder::default()
        .setup(|app| {
            let handle = app.handle();

            // Menu
            let file_menu = Submenu::with_items(handle, "File", true, &[
                &MenuItem::with_id(handle, "new", "New", true, Some("CmdOrCtrl+N"))?,
                &MenuItem::with_id(handle, "open", "Open...", true, Some("CmdOrCtrl+O"))?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::separator(handle)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::quit(handle, Some("Quit"))?,
            ])?;
            let edit_menu = Submenu::with_items(handle, "Edit", true, &[
                &PredefinedMenuItem::undo(handle, None)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::redo(handle, None)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::separator(handle)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::cut(handle, None)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::copy(handle, None)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::paste(handle, None)?,
                &PredefinedMenuItem::select_all(handle, None)?,
            ])?;
            let menu = Menu::with_items(handle, &[&file_menu, &edit_menu])?;
            app.set_menu(menu)?;

            // Tray
            let quit = MenuItem::with_id(handle, "quit", "Quit", true, None::<&str>)?;
            let show = MenuItem::with_id(handle, "show", "Show", true, None::<&str>)?;
            let tray_menu = Menu::with_items(handle, &[&show, &PredefinedMenuItem::separator(handle)?, &quit])?;

            TrayIconBuilder::with_id("main-tray")
                .tooltip("My Application")
                .icon(app.default_window_icon().unwrap().clone())
                .menu(&tray_menu)
                .on_menu_event(|app, event| match event.id().as_ref() {
                    "quit" => app.exit(0),
                    "show" => {
                        if let Some(window) = app.get_webview_window("main") {
                            let _ = window.show();
                            let _ = window.set_focus();
                        }
                    }
                    _ => {}
                })
                .on_tray_icon_event(|tray, event| {
                    if let TrayIconEvent::Click { button: MouseButton::Left, .. } = event {
                        let app = tray.app_handle();
                        if let Some(window) = app.get_webview_window("main") {
                            if window.is_visible().unwrap_or(false) { let _ = window.hide(); }
                            else { let _ = window.show(); let _ = window.set_focus(); }
                        }
                    }
                })
                .build(app)?;

            Ok(())
        })
        .run(tauri::generate_context!())
        .expect("error while running app");
}

This serves as a solid Tauri tray implementation reference.

Comparison of Electron and Tauri for Native Elements

Parameter Electron Tauri (v2)
Binary size 150 MB+ (Chromium) 5–15 MB (WebKit on macOS/Linux, Edge on Windows)
Menu performance Native but with IPC latency Native, direct Rust call
Tray implementation complexity Moderate (Node.js events) Moderate (Rust callbacks)
Cross-platform support Excellent (unified API) Good (some nuances on Linux)
macOS Template icon support Yes, requires template Yes, similar

Common Implementation Mistakes and Their Solutions

Frequent issues we've seen in projects
Issue Solution
Tray icon without Template on macOS Prepare a 16×16 PNG with transparency; name the file with a Template prefix (e.g., iconTemplate.png).
Mixing IPC and UI threads Always check if the window exists before calling show(); use mainWindow.isDestroyed().
Missing window close handler Set a flag app.isQuitting and handle close event with event.preventDefault().
Ignoring macOS roles Insert app.name as the first menu item and use role for standard OS commands.

How Native Menus Improve User Experience

Native menus provide familiar keyboard shortcuts, support system services (e.g., macOS Services), and integrate with VoiceOver/Narrator for accessibility. In one project for a medical application, we implemented a menu with over 20 items and a tray with notifications — this reduced typical operation time by 30% compared to a custom menu. In another case, migrating from Electron to Tauri cut the binary size from 180 MB to 12 MB and sped up app launch by 40%. Client feedback indicated a 95% satisfaction rate with the tray implementation.

What's Included in the Work

  • Documentation — description of the menu structure, event handlers, icon build instructions.
  • Access — repository with code, CI/CD for multi-platform builds.
  • Knowledge transfer — code walkthrough, consultation on future modifications.
  • Support — 1-month warranty on bug fixes discovered after delivery.
  • Audit of current state — when migrating from Electron to Tauri or another framework.

Project Workflow

  1. Analysis — gather requirements for the menu and tray, hotkey list, behavior on different OS.
  2. Design — prepare the menu structure, icon mockups, event handlers.
  3. Implementation — write code in JavaScript (Electron) or Rust (Tauri), integrate with the backend.
  4. Testing — verify on macOS, Windows, Linux; unit tests for IPC and tray events.
  5. Deployment — build for all platforms, publish to stores if needed.

The typical development time for a native menu and tray is 2 to 5 days depending on complexity. Final cost is determined individually after project analysis. Get a consultation for your project — we'll help you choose a stack and prepare a prototype within 1 day. We have over 5 years of experience and have completed over 30 projects with native desktop elements. Contact us to discuss your project.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.