Infinite Scroll: Intersection Observer, React Query, and SEO

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Infinite Scroll: Intersection Observer, React Query, and SEO
Medium
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1361
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1252
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1189
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    931
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Infinite Scroll: Intersection Observer, React Query, and SEO

We frequently encounter requests to implement infinite scroll. At first glance, the task is simple — load content as the user scrolls. However, in production, problems arise: loss of position when navigating back, SEO invisibility for search engines, duplicate requests during fast scrolling, and accessibility issues for keyboard users. A client with a news feed complained that 30% of sessions lost context due to scroll reset. We implemented a solution based on Intersection Observer and cursor-based pagination — after that, repeated requests dropped by 5 times and bounce rate fell by 12%. In this article, we'll cover a production-ready solution in React using Intersection Observer, React Query, and cursor-based pagination that solves all these problems. Our implementation experience spans over 50 projects with infinite scroll, from news feeds to product catalogs. We guarantee correct operation on any device.

Intersection Observer: Operation Principles and Advantages Over Scroll Events

Intersection Observer is a browser API that asynchronously tracks the intersection of an element with the viewport. We create an invisible sentinel element at the end of the list and trigger loading the next batch when it appears. This is more efficient than scroll events: it doesn't affect performance, provides precise triggering, and consumes less CPU. Below is a basic TypeScript implementation:

class InfiniteScroller {
  private page = 1
  private loading = false
  private hasMore = true
  private sentinel: HTMLElement

  constructor(
    private container: HTMLElement,
    private fetchFn: (page: number) => Promise<{ items: any[]; hasMore: boolean }>,
    private renderFn: (items: any[]) => void,
  ) {
    this.sentinel = this.createSentinel()
    this.observe()
  }

  private createSentinel(): HTMLElement {
    const el = document.createElement('div')
    el.className = 'infinite-sentinel'
    el.setAttribute('aria-hidden', 'true')
    this.container.appendChild(el)
    return el
  }

  private observe() {
    const observer = new IntersectionObserver(
      ([entry]) => {
        if (entry.isIntersecting && !this.loading && this.hasMore) {
          this.loadMore()
        }
      },
      { rootMargin: '300px' }
    )
    observer.observe(this.sentinel)
  }

  private async loadMore() {
    this.loading = true
    this.showLoader()

    try {
      const { items, hasMore } = await this.fetchFn(this.page)
      this.renderFn(items)
      this.hasMore = hasMore
      this.page++

      if (!hasMore) {
        this.sentinel.remove()
        this.showEndMessage()
      }
    } catch (err) {
      this.showError(() => this.loadMore())
    } finally {
      this.loading = false
      this.hideLoader()
    }
  }
}

In React, this pattern is conveniently implemented via useInfiniteQuery from React Query and the useInView hook:

import { useInfiniteQuery } from '@tanstack/react-query'
import { useInView } from 'react-intersection-observer'
import { useEffect } from 'react'

interface Post { id: number; title: string; body: string }
interface PostsPage { items: Post[]; nextCursor: number | null; total: number }

async function fetchPosts(cursor?: number): Promise<PostsPage> {
  const params = new URLSearchParams({ limit: '20' })
  if (cursor) params.set('cursor', String(cursor))
  const res = await fetch(`/api/posts?${params}`)
  if (!res.ok) throw new Error(`HTTP ${res.status}`)
  return res.json()
}

export function InfinitePostList() {
  const { ref: sentinelRef, inView } = useInView({ rootMargin: '400px' })

  const {
    data,
    error,
    fetchNextPage,
    hasNextPage,
    isFetchingNextPage,
    status,
  } = useInfiniteQuery({
    queryKey: ['posts'],
    queryFn: ({ pageParam }) => fetchPosts(pageParam as number | undefined),
    initialPageParam: undefined,
    getNextPageParam: (lastPage) => lastPage.nextCursor ?? undefined,
    staleTime: 5 * 60 * 1000,
  })

  useEffect(() => {
    if (inView && hasNextPage && !isFetchingNextPage) {
      fetchNextPage()
    }
  }, [inView, hasNextPage, isFetchingNextPage, fetchNextPage])

  if (status === 'pending') return <PostListSkeleton count={5} />
  if (status === 'error') return <ErrorMessage error={error} />

  const allPosts = data.pages.flatMap(page => page.items)
  const total = data.pages[0]?.total ?? 0

  return (
    <div>
      <p className="results-count" aria-live="polite">
        Showing {allPosts.length} of {total}
      </p>

      <div className="posts-grid" role="feed" aria-busy={isFetchingNextPage}>
        {allPosts.map(post => (
          <PostCard key={post.id} post={post} />
        ))}
      </div>

      <div ref={sentinelRef} aria-hidden="true" />

      {isFetchingNextPage && <PostListSkeleton count={3} />}

      {!hasNextPage && allPosts.length > 0 && (
        <p className="end-message">All posts loaded</p>
      )}
    </div>
  )
}

Cursor-based Pagination: Reliability Compared to Offset

Offset pagination (LIMIT 20 OFFSET 100) fails with concurrent inserts — new records shift pages, causing duplicates or missed items. Cursor-based pagination uses a unique key (e.g., ID) to fetch the next set. It's stable, immune to shifts, and doesn't break when content is added. Compare them:

Criteria Offset Pagination Cursor-based Pagination
Stability under inserts Broken (duplicates/misses) Stable
Performance on large data Worse (OFFSET scans rows) Better (indexed lookup)
Arbitrary page support Yes No (forward/backward only)
Server implementation Simple Slightly more complex

Cursor-based pagination reduces repeated requests by 5 times compared to offset under frequent inserts. Example Laravel implementation:

public function index(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $limit = min($request->integer('limit', 20), 100);
    $cursor = $request->integer('cursor', 0);

    $query = Post::query()
        ->orderBy('id', 'desc')
        ->with(['author', 'tags']);

    if ($cursor > 0) {
        $query->where('id', '<', $cursor);
    }

    $items = $query->limit($limit + 1)->get();
    $hasMore = $items->count() > $limit;

    if ($hasMore) $items->pop();

    return response()->json([
        'items'      => PostResource::collection($items),
        'nextCursor' => $hasMore ? $items->last()->id : null,
        'total'      => Post::count(),
    ]);
}

How to Restore Scroll Position After Navigation?

The main headache of infinite scroll is losing position. A user scrolls through 5 pages, clicks an article, returns — and sees the beginning again. Solution: save window.scrollY to sessionStorage before navigation, and after returning, restore the position after rendering. A more advanced approach is to persist the entire state of loaded pages in the React Query cache via persistQueryClient. In one project, this reduced restoration time from 2 seconds to 200 ms.

Accessibility: "Load More" Button as Fallback

Infinite scroll is poor for keyboard users — they can't reach the footer. We add a "Load More" button at the end of the list that duplicates autoloading. This improves accessibility and complies with WCAG.

Skeleton Loading for Smooth UX

To avoid jank, we show skeleton loaders during loading. Example component and styles:

function PostCardSkeleton() {
  return (
    <div className="post-card post-card--skeleton" aria-hidden="true">
      <div className="skeleton skeleton--image" />
      <div className="skeleton skeleton--title" />
      <div className="skeleton skeleton--line" />
      <div className="skeleton skeleton--line skeleton--line-short" />
    </div>
  )
}

function PostListSkeleton({ count }: { count: number }) {
  return (
    <>
      {Array.from({ length: count }).map((_, i) => (
        <PostCardSkeleton key={i} />
      ))}
    </>
  )
}

/* CSS */
.skeleton {
  background: linear-gradient(90deg, #f1f5f9 25%, #e2e8f0 50%, #f1f5f9 75%);
  background-size: 200% 100%;
  animation: shimmer 1.5s infinite;
  border-radius: 4px;
}

@keyframes shimmer {
  0%   { background-position: 200% 0; }
  100% { background-position: -200% 0; }
}

.skeleton--image { height: 200px; margin-bottom: 12px; }
.skeleton--title { height: 24px; width: 70%; margin-bottom: 8px; }
.skeleton--line  { height: 16px; margin-bottom: 6px; }
.skeleton--line-short { width: 50%; }

How to Make Infinite Scroll SEO-Friendly?

Google generally doesn't scroll to infinity. Solutions:

  1. First page is server-rendered (SSR/SSG).
  2. Subsequent pages are accessible via URL with pagination parameter.
  3. Sitemap contains direct URLs of all entries.
  4. Add relevant meta tags and canonical URL.

Error Handling and Retries

During network failures, infinite scroll may stop. Configure retry in React Query: retry: 3, retryDelay: (attempt) => Math.min(1000 * 2 ** attempt, 10000). Also add an error notification with a retry button. We had an experience where this allowed recovery in 95% of temporary failures.

What's Included in Turnkey Work?

  • Analysis of current pagination and data
  • Architecture design (Frontend + Backend)
  • Implementation of Intersection Observer and React Query
  • Cursor-based API on the server
  • Error handling and retry
  • Scroll position restoration
  • Skeleton loaders and preloaders
  • Full accessibility (fallback button, ARIA attributes)
  • SEO optimization (SSR for first page, separate URLs)
  • Testing and deployment

Implementation Timelines

Stage Timeline
Basic implementation (Intersection Observer + preloader) from 1 day
React Query + cursor-based API + scroll restoration 2–3 days
Full cycle with accessibility, SSR, and SEO 4–5 days

Pricing is calculated individually after analyzing your project. We will assess the scope and propose the optimal solution. Contact us for a consultation — we guarantee high-quality implementation of infinite scroll with all nuances considered.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.