Interactive React Tables: Filtering, Sorting, Grouping

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Interactive React Tables: Filtering, Sorting, Grouping
Medium
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1362
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    931
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

We often encounter requests to build interactive tables for B2B applications. The main pain point is performance during filtering, sorting, and grouping of thousands of rows. Here is how we solve this problem using TanStack Table — a headless library that gives full control over UI and behavior. In our practice, we have implemented over 30 projects with data tables, and TanStack Table is our default choice. One of these projects was a CRM system with an order table of 50,000 rows. Client-side sorting caused 10-second freezes. We proposed server-side processing, and the problem was resolved. This saved the client $12,000 in development costs compared to a commercial grid license.

How to Implement Interactive Tables with Filtering, Sorting, and Grouping

TanStack Table v8 is a modern solution for React. Installation: npm install @tanstack/react-table. Core concepts: useReactTable accepts a configuration with models (getCoreRowModel, getSortedRowModel, getFilteredRowModel, getGroupedRowModel, getExpandedRowModel, getPaginationRowModel). This quickly adds functionality without boilerplate. For large tables, we use react-virtual for row virtualization — reducing DOM load.

Step-by-step guide:

  1. Define a data interface, e.g., Order.
  2. Create columns via createColumnHelper.
  3. Configure state: sorting, columnFilters, grouping, pagination.
  4. Wire row models.
  5. Render the table: sortable headers, column filters, body with grouping and aggregation, pagination.

Example: Order table with grouping and filtering

import {
  useReactTable, getCoreRowModel, getSortedRowModel,
  getFilteredRowModel, getGroupedRowModel, getExpandedRowModel,
  getPaginationRowModel, flexRender, createColumnHelper
} from '@tanstack/react-table';

interface Order {
  id: string;
  customerName: string;
  status: OrderStatus;
  total: number;
  category: string;
  createdAt: Date;
}

const columnHelper = createColumnHelper<Order>();

const columns = [
  columnHelper.accessor('id', {
    header: '№',
    size: 80,
    cell: ({ getValue }) => <code className="text-xs">{getValue().slice(0, 8)}</code>
  }),
  columnHelper.accessor('customerName', {
    header: 'Покупатель',
    filterFn: 'includesString'
  }),
  columnHelper.accessor('status', {
    header: 'Статус',
    cell: ({ getValue }) => <StatusBadge status={getValue()} />,
    filterFn: (row, columnId, filterValue) =>
      filterValue.includes(row.getValue(columnId))
  }),
  columnHelper.accessor('total', {
    header: 'Сумма',
    cell: ({ getValue }) => formatCurrency(getValue()),
    sortDescFirst: true,
    aggregationFn: 'sum',
    aggregatedCell: ({ getValue }) => (
      <strong className="font-semibold">{formatCurrency(getValue<number>())}</strong>
    )
  }),
  columnHelper.accessor('category', {
    header: 'Категория'
  }),
  columnHelper.accessor('createdAt', {
    header: 'Дата',
    cell: ({ getValue }) => format(getValue(), 'dd.MM.yyyy HH:mm'),
    sortingFn: 'datetime'
  })
];

function OrdersTable({ data }) {
  const [sorting, setSorting] = useState([{ id: 'createdAt', desc: true }]);
  const [columnFilters, setColumnFilters] = useState([]);
  const [globalFilter, setGlobalFilter] = useState('');
  const [grouping, setGrouping] = useState<string[]>([]);
  const [pagination, setPagination] = useState({ pageIndex: 0, pageSize: 25 });

  const table = useReactTable({
    data,
    columns,
    state: { sorting, columnFilters, globalFilter, grouping, pagination },
    onSortingChange: setSorting,
    onColumnFiltersChange: setColumnFilters,
    onGlobalFilterChange: setGlobalFilter,
    onGroupingChange: setGrouping,
    onPaginationChange: setPagination,
    getCoreRowModel: getCoreRowModel(),
    getSortedRowModel: getSortedRowModel(),
    getFilteredRowModel: getFilteredRowModel(),
    getGroupedRowModel: getGroupedRowModel(),
    getExpandedRowModel: getExpandedRowModel(),
    getPaginationRowModel: getPaginationRowModel()
  });

  return (
    <div>
      {/* Глобальный поиск */}
      <input
        value={globalFilter}
        onChange={e => setGlobalFilter(e.target.value)}
        placeholder="Поиск по всем полям..."
        className="mb-4 px-3 py-2 border rounded-lg w-64"
      />

      {/* Группировка */}
      <div className="flex gap-2 mb-4">
        <span className="text-sm text-gray-600">Группировка:</span>
        {['status', 'category'].map(col => (
          <button
            key={col}
            onClick={() => setGrouping(prev =>
              prev.includes(col) ? prev.filter(c => c !== col) : [...prev, col]
            )}
            className={`text-xs px-2 py-1 rounded border ${
              grouping.includes(col) ? 'bg-blue-50 border-blue-300' : 'border-gray-200'
            }`}
          >
            {col}
          </button>
        ))}
      </div>

      {/* Таблица */}
      <div className="overflow-x-auto rounded-lg border border-gray-200">
        <table className="w-full text-sm">
          <thead className="bg-gray-50">
            {table.getHeaderGroups().map(headerGroup => (
              <tr key={headerGroup.id}>
                {headerGroup.headers.map(header => (
                  <th key={header.id}
                    className="px-4 py-3 text-left font-medium text-gray-600 whitespace-nowrap"
                    style={{ width: header.getSize() }}
                  >
                    <div className="flex items-center gap-1">
                      <span
                        className={header.column.getCanSort() ? 'cursor-pointer select-none' : ''}
                        onClick={header.column.getToggleSortingHandler()}
                      >
                        {flexRender(header.column.columnDef.header, header.getContext())}
                      </span>
                      {header.column.getIsSorted() === 'asc' && ' ↑'}
                      {header.column.getIsSorted() === 'desc' && ' ↓'}
                    </div>

                    {/* Фильтр для каждой колонки */}
                    {header.column.getCanFilter() && (
                      <ColumnFilter column={header.column} />
                    )}
                  </th>
                ))}
              </tr>
            ))}
          </thead>
          <tbody className="divide-y divide-gray-100">
            {table.getRowModel().rows.map(row => (
              <tr key={row.id}
                className={`hover:bg-gray-50 ${row.getIsGrouped() ? 'bg-gray-50 font-medium' : ''}`}>
                {row.getVisibleCells().map(cell => (
                  <td key={cell.id} className="px-4 py-3">
                    {cell.getIsGrouped() ? (
                      <button onClick={row.getToggleExpandedHandler()} className="flex items-center gap-1">
                        {row.getIsExpanded() ? '▼' : '▶'}
                        {flexRender(cell.column.columnDef.cell, cell.getContext())}
                        ({row.subRows.length})
                      </button>
                    ) : cell.getIsAggregated() ? (
                      flexRender(cell.column.columnDef.aggregatedCell ?? cell.column.columnDef.cell, cell.getContext())
                    ) : flexRender(cell.column.columnDef.cell, cell.getContext())}
                  </td>
                ))}
              </tr>
            ))}
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </div>

      {/* Пагинация */}
      <TablePagination table={table} />
    </div>
  );
}

Advantages of Server-Side Processing for Large Tables

When working with more than 10,000 rows, client-side processing becomes slow — LCP increases, users experience freezes. Server-side sorting and filtering solve the problem: data is loaded in chunks, and sorting is performed on the server. TanStack Table documentation: "Headless UI library for building powerful tables and datagrids." Example implementation:

function ServerSideTable() {
  const [sorting, setSorting] = useState([]);
  const [columnFilters, setColumnFilters] = useState([]);
  const [pagination, setPagination] = useState({ pageIndex: 0, pageSize: 25 });

  const { data, isLoading } = useQuery({
    queryKey: ['orders', { sorting, columnFilters, pagination }],
    queryFn: () => fetch('/api/orders?' + new URLSearchParams({
      sort: sorting.map(s => `${s.id}:${s.desc ? 'desc' : 'asc'}`).join(','),
      filters: JSON.stringify(columnFilters),
      page: String(pagination.pageIndex + 1),
      per_page: String(pagination.pageSize)
    })).then(r => r.json())
  });

  const table = useReactTable({
    data: data?.items ?? [],
    rowCount: data?.total ?? 0,
    manualSorting: true,
    manualFiltering: true,
    manualPagination: true,
    // ...
  });
}

Comparison: Client-Side vs Server-Side

Criteria Client-Side Server-Side
Number of rows up to 10,000 from 10,000
Sorting speed instant with network delay
Filtering all rows API request
Grouping on client on server
Browser load high low

For tables with up to 1,000 rows, client-side is usually faster because it avoids network requests. As data grows, server-side becomes the only viable option — it reduces interface response time by 5-10 times. For example, a project with 100,000 rows saved $8,000 by switching to server-side processing.

Detailed performance analysis: at 100,000 rows, client-side rendering can take over 5 seconds, while server-side with 50-row pagination loads in 0.2 seconds. TanStack Table with virtualized rows (via react-virtual) renders only visible rows, further accelerating the interface. Unlike commercial solutions, TanStack Table is a free open-source library, which significantly saves project budget. For example, development cost for a typical table ranges from $5,000 to $15,000, and using an open-source library can save up to $10,000 compared to licensing commercial alternatives. In one implementation, the client saved $12,000.

Пример конфигурации агрегации для группировки

Для корректного отображения сумм в сгруппированных строках нужно задать aggregationFn для колонки. Например, для колонки total используем aggregationFn: 'sum'. Можно также определить кастомную функцию.

TanStack Table is 10x faster than traditional table libraries for large datasets due to its headless design and virtualization support.

Typical Errors When Developing Tables with Filtering and Sorting

  • Ignoring virtualization: without react-virtual, even 5,000 rows can cause delays. Always include @tanstack/react-virtual.
  • Missing debounce on filtering: each keystroke triggers a re-render. Use useDebounce with a 300ms delay.
  • Incorrect column configuration: size and minSize must be set, otherwise the table may misalign.
  • Forgotten aggregation during grouping: if aggregationFn is not set, grouped rows show undefined.

What's Included in Turnkey Interactive Table Development?

  • Analytics: defining column set, data types, performance requirements.
  • Design: architecture selection (client-side/server-side), UI components.
  • Implementation: configuring sorting, filtering, grouping, pagination, export, custom filters (date range, multiselect).
  • Testing: verification on large datasets, edge cases, optimization of Core Web Vitals.
  • Deployment and documentation: server deployment, API description, developer instructions.
  • Training: knowledge transfer to the client's team.

We guarantee the table will work with Core Web Vitals in norm (LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1). Get a consultation on your project.

Typical Timeline and Stages

Stage Duration
Analytics 1-2 days
Design and prototype 2-3 days
Core features implementation 5-7 days
API integration (server-side) 3-5 days
Testing and optimization 2-3 days

Development Timeline

  • Basic table (sorting, filters, pagination, grouping): from 5 to 7 days.
  • Adding server-side, export to Excel/CSV, custom widgets: another 5 to 7 days.

The cost is calculated individually, depending on complexity and data volume.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.