Site pagination: offset, cursor, SEO, and prefetch

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Site pagination: offset, cursor, SEO, and prefetch
Simple
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1361
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1252
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1189
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    931
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    948

Site pagination: offset, cursor, SEO, and prefetch

Note: when a catalog exceeds 10,000 items or a log table contains 500,000 rows, pagination is essential. In our practice, there was a project with 1.5 million records in PostgreSQL — COUNT executed in 4 seconds even after indexing. Users lost their position when hitting 'Back', and search bots did not index all pages. We implemented pagination for 50+ projects, from e-commerce stores to analytical dashboards. This is especially critical for projects on Laravel and Next.js, where incorrect pagination leads to Core Web Vitals degradation and lower conversion. In this article, we'll break down pagination implementation: from algorithm selection to SEO tags and prefetch.

Choosing a pagination type for an e-commerce store

The choice between offset and cursor depends on the task. Offset pagination is simple: LIMIT 20 OFFSET 40. But on large datasets, COUNT is a bottleneck. We use approximate counting via pg_class.reltuples in PostgreSQL, speeding up the query by 100x. Cursor pagination is faster but does not provide a URL for each page — a problem for SEO.

Criteria Offset Cursor
Speed on 1M rows 2-4 s (COUNT) <10 ms
Stability under inserts Shifting No
SEO compatibility Yes No
Implementation complexity Low Medium

Why prefetch matters for mobile devices?

Prefetch allows loading the next page before a click. On mobile devices with slow connections, this reduces INP by 40%. We use react-query with staleTime: 30_000 and preload data in useEffect. Example for Next.js:

useEffect(() => {
  if (page < lastPage) {
    queryClient.prefetchQuery({
      queryKey: ['products', page + 1],
      queryFn: () => fetchProducts(page + 1),
      staleTime: 30_000,
    });
  }
}, [page]);

Performance comparison: prefetch vs no prefetch

Scenario LCP INP Transition time
No prefetch 2.8 s 200 ms 600 ms
With prefetch 2.1 s 120 ms 100 ms

When to use cursor pagination?

Cursor pagination is suitable for real-time feeds (Twitter, comment feed) or APIs with large data volumes where order without shifts is important. We use it in projects with more than 100,000 records with frequent inserts. Cursor pagination requires a unique sort key (e.g., ID or created_at) and does not support arbitrary page jumps, but ensures stability when new records are added.

Step-by-step guide to implementing pagination on Next.js

  1. Define the API contract: choose offset or cursor. For offset, return current_page, last_page, total, per_page.
  2. Implement server logic: use paginate() in Laravel or find().skip().limit() in MongoDB. Cache COUNT via Redis for 5 minutes.
  3. Develop the UI component: with ellipsis, aria-label, responsiveness.
  4. Synchronize with URL: via useSearchParams in Next.js or history.pushState in vanilla JS.
  5. Add prefetch: with React Query or useEffect with fetch.
  6. Implement SEO tags: <link rel="prev"/> and <link rel="next"/> for Yandex. Google does not use rel prev/next for ranking (Google Search Central), but they are important for Yandex.
  7. Test: check LCP < 2.5 s, INP < 200 ms.

Server side: offset vs cursor pagination

To speed up COUNT, we use approximate counting via pg_class.reltuples in PostgreSQL or caching in Redis for 5 minutes. This reduces query time from seconds to milliseconds.

// Laravel — standard paginate()
public function index(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $perPage = min($request->integer('per_page', 20), 100);

    $products = Product::where('is_active', true)
        ->orderByDesc('created_at')
        ->paginate($perPage);

    return response()->json([
        'data'         => ProductResource::collection($products->items()),
        'current_page' => $products->currentPage(),
        'last_page'    => $products->lastPage(),
        'per_page'     => $products->perPage(),
        'total'        => $products->total(),
        'from'         => $products->firstItem(),
        'to'           => $products->lastItem(),
    ]);
}

UI pagination component

The component displays page numbers with an ellipsis for many pages. Buttons have aria-label for accessibility. Active page is highlighted. Styled with Tailwind.

// components/Pagination.tsx
interface PaginationProps {
  currentPage: number
  lastPage: number
  onPageChange: (page: number) => void
}

export function Pagination({ currentPage, lastPage, onPageChange }: PaginationProps) {
  const pages = buildPageRange(currentPage, lastPage)

  return (
    <nav aria-label="Page navigation">
      <ul className="flex items-center gap-1">
        <li>
          <button
            onClick={() => onPageChange(currentPage - 1)}
            disabled={currentPage === 1}
            aria-label="Previous page"
          >
            ←
          </button>
        </li>

        {pages.map((page, i) =>
          page === '...' ? (
            <li key={`ellipsis-${i}`} aria-hidden="true">…</li>
          ) : (
            <li key={page}>
              <button
                onClick={() => onPageChange(page as number)}
                aria-current={page === currentPage ? 'page' : undefined}
                className={page === currentPage ? 'font-bold' : ''}
              >
                {page}
              </button>
            </li>
          )
        )}

        <li>
          <button
            onClick={() => onPageChange(currentPage + 1)}
            disabled={currentPage === lastPage}
            aria-label="Next page"
          >
            →
          </button>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </nav>
  )
}

function buildPageRange(current: number, last: number): (number | '...')[] {
  if (last <= 7) return Array.from({ length: last }, (_, i) => i + 1)

  const delta = 2
  const range: (number | '...')[] = []
  const left = current - delta
  const right = current + delta

  let prev: number | null = null
  for (let i = 1; i <= last; i++) {
    if (i === 1 || i === last || (i >= left && i <= right)) {
      if (prev !== null && i - prev > 1) range.push('...')
      range.push(i)
      prev = i
    }
  }
  return range
}

URL synchronization

The page number must live in the URL — otherwise the user loses position on refresh and cannot share the link. We use useSearchParams in Next.js App Router.

// Next.js App Router
'use client'
import { useRouter, useSearchParams, usePathname } from 'next/navigation'

function usePageParam() {
  const searchParams = useSearchParams()
  const router = useRouter()
  const pathname = usePathname()

  const page = Number(searchParams.get('page') ?? '1')

  const setPage = (newPage: number) => {
    const params = new URLSearchParams(searchParams.toString())
    params.set('page', String(newPage))
    router.push(`${pathname}?${params.toString()}`, { scroll: true })
  }

  return [page, setPage] as const
}

What's included in our pagination work

  • Audit of the current pagination scheme (SQL queries, response time)
  • API contract design (offset/cursor, response format)
  • Server logic implementation with COUNT caching
  • UI component development with responsiveness and accessibility
  • URL synchronization (Next.js, React Router, Vanilla)
  • Prefetch setup for instant transitions
  • SEO tag integration (rel prev/next, canonical, sitemap for pagination)
  • Documentation and training for the client's team

Deadlines and cost

A basic component with API integration — from 1 day. A full package with URL synchronization, prefetch, SEO tags, responsive design, and training — from 2 to 4 days. The cost is calculated individually after analyzing your project. Development time savings on ready-made components are up to 30% compared to writing from scratch.

Contact us for a free evaluation of your project. Our engineers with years of experience will help implement pagination considering SEO and performance. We guarantee LCP < 2.5 s and correct indexing in Yandex. Order pagination implementation with a Core Web Vitals guarantee. Get an engineer consultation and a prototype in 1 day.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.