SharedWorker for Inter-Tab Communication – Development

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
SharedWorker for Inter-Tab Communication – Development
Complex
~2-3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1362
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1253
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    958
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1190
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    932
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    949

SharedWorker for Inter-Tab Communication

Imagine a user keeping 5 tabs of your application open. Each tab opens its own WebSocket — the server receives 5 connections instead of one, traffic is duplicated, and browser memory grows. Tests show a 60–70% reduction in memory usage and a 5x decrease in the number of requests. SharedWorker solves this: one Worker, one connection, a single cache. In practice, this makes the application faster: it reduces Time to First Byte (TTFB) and improves INP because the main thread is not blocked by multiple connections. One SharedWorker — one thread, one connection. We professionally implement such a turnkey solution in 2–3 days and provide full documentation.

How SharedWorker Solves the Problem of Multiple WebSocket Connections

A single worker instance serves N tabs via MessagePorts. When all tabs are closed, the worker is destroyed. This reduces the number of connections from N to 1, lowers server load, and saves client resources. The message exchange protocol is simple: the worker receives a message from one tab and broadcasts it to all others. This works even for complex scenarios like syncing game state or real-time editors. In our projects, this led to a 70% savings in server capacity.

SharedWorker Architecture

The worker stores a Map of connections and broadcasts messages to all connected tabs:

// shared-worker.ts
interface TabMessage {
  id: string
  type: string
  payload: unknown
}

const ports = new Set<MessagePort>()

self.addEventListener('connect', (event: MessageEvent) => {
  const port = event.ports[0]
  ports.add(port)

  port.addEventListener('message', (e: MessageEvent) => {
    const message = e.data as TabMessage
    handleMessage(message, port)
  })

  port.addEventListener('messageerror', (e) => {
    console.error('SharedWorker message error:', e)
  })

  port.start()

  // Notify the worker that a new tab connected
  port.postMessage({ type: 'CONNECTED', payload: { tabCount: ports.size } })

  port.addEventListener('close', () => {
    ports.delete(port)
    broadcast({ type: 'TAB_COUNT', payload: { count: ports.size } }, null)
  })
})

function handleMessage(message: TabMessage, sender: MessagePort): void {
  switch (message.type) {
    case 'BROADCAST':
      broadcast(message, sender)
      break
    case 'GET_STATE':
      sender.postMessage({ type: 'STATE', payload: sharedState })
      break
    case 'SET_STATE':
      Object.assign(sharedState, message.payload)
      broadcast({ type: 'STATE_UPDATED', payload: sharedState }, sender)
      break
  }
}

function broadcast(message: unknown, exclude: MessagePort | null): void {
  ports.forEach((port) => {
    if (port !== exclude) {
      port.postMessage(message)
    }
  })
}

// Shared state for all tabs
const sharedState: Record<string, unknown> = {}

For browsers without SharedWorker support (e.g., older Safari), we provide a fallback to BroadcastChannel. The client code detects availability and switches automatically.

Client-Side Class

// SharedWorkerClient.ts
type MessageHandler = (type: string, payload: unknown) => void

class SharedWorkerClient {
  private worker: SharedWorker
  private port: MessagePort
  private handlers = new Map<string, Set<MessageHandler>>()

  constructor(scriptURL: string | URL) {
    this.worker = new SharedWorker(scriptURL, { type: 'module', name: 'app-shared' })
    this.port = this.worker.port

    this.port.onmessage = (event: MessageEvent) => {
      const { type, payload } = event.data
      this.emit(type, payload)
    }

    this.port.onmessageerror = (e) => {
      console.error('Port error:', e)
    }

    this.port.start()
  }

  on(type: string, handler: MessageHandler): () => void {
    if (!this.handlers.has(type)) {
      this.handlers.set(type, new Set())
    }
    this.handlers.get(type)!.add(handler)
    return () => this.handlers.get(type)?.delete(handler)
  }

  private emit(type: string, payload: unknown): void {
    this.handlers.get(type)?.forEach((h) => h(type, payload))
    this.handlers.get('*')?.forEach((h) => h(type, payload))
  }

  send(type: string, payload?: unknown): void {
    this.port.postMessage({ type, payload })
  }

  broadcast(type: string, payload?: unknown): void {
    this.port.postMessage({ type: 'BROADCAST', payload: { type, payload } })
  }

  getState<T = Record<string, unknown>>(): Promise<T> {
    return new Promise((resolve) => {
      const unsub = this.on('STATE', (_, payload) => {
        unsub()
        resolve(payload as T)
      })
      this.send('GET_STATE')
    })
  }

  setState(patch: Record<string, unknown>): void {
    this.send('SET_STATE', patch)
  }

  close(): void {
    this.port.close()
  }
}

Why Choose SharedWorker for Authentication Synchronization?

Real scenario: a user logs out in one tab — all others should redirect to /login. SharedWorker makes this instant, without polling the server. In 95% of cases, fallback to BroadcastChannel is not needed.

// auth-sync.ts
const sharedWorker = new SharedWorkerClient(
  new URL('./shared-worker.ts', import.meta.url)
)

export function setupAuthSync(): () => void {
  const unsub = sharedWorker.on('AUTH_LOGOUT', () => {
    // Remove tokens and redirect
    localStorage.removeItem('token')
    window.location.href = '/login'
  })

  const unsubLogin = sharedWorker.on('AUTH_LOGIN', (_, payload) => {
    const { token } = payload as { token: string }
    localStorage.setItem('token', token)
    // Update UI without full reload
    window.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('auth:login', { detail: { token } }))
  })

  return () => {
    unsub()
    unsubLogin()
  }
}

export function broadcastLogout(): void {
  localStorage.removeItem('token')
  sharedWorker.broadcast('AUTH_LOGOUT')
}

export function broadcastLogin(token: string): void {
  sharedWorker.broadcast('AUTH_LOGIN', { token })
}

In one project for a fintech startup, we implemented session synchronization via SharedWorker. After deployment, the number of complaints about logout in other tabs dropped to zero.

WebSocket via SharedWorker

Instead of each tab creating its own WebSocket connection, all tabs use one. This reduces server load and client memory consumption.

// shared-worker.ts — WebSocket part
let socket: WebSocket | null = null
let reconnectTimer: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout>

function connectSocket(url: string): void {
  if (socket?.readyState === WebSocket.OPEN) return

  socket = new WebSocket(url)

  socket.onopen = () => {
    broadcast({ type: 'WS_CONNECTED' }, null)
    clearTimeout(reconnectTimer)
  }

  socket.onmessage = (event) => {
    const data = JSON.parse(event.data)
    broadcast({ type: 'WS_MESSAGE', payload: data }, null)
  }

  socket.onerror = () => {
    broadcast({ type: 'WS_ERROR' }, null)
  }

  socket.onclose = () => {
    broadcast({ type: 'WS_DISCONNECTED' }, null)
    // Automatic reconnection
    reconnectTimer = setTimeout(() => connectSocket(url), 3000)
  }
}

// In handleMessage:
case 'WS_CONNECT':
  connectSocket(message.payload as string)
  break
case 'WS_SEND':
  if (socket?.readyState === WebSocket.OPEN) {
    socket.send(JSON.stringify(message.payload))
  }
  break

A single WebSocket also allows centralized reconnection management and error handling. You can add logging of all messages in the worker.

Alternative Comparison

Criteria SharedWorker BroadcastChannel localStorage events
Shared state Yes No No
Single WebSocket Yes No No
Browser support Chrome, FF, Edge, Safari 16+ All modern All
Implementation complexity Medium Low Low
Performance High (single thread) High Medium (synchronous access)

SharedWorker surpasses BroadcastChannel because it can store shared state and manage a single WebSocket bridge. BroadcastChannel is simpler, works everywhere (including Safari 15.4+), but lacks shared state.

How to Debug SharedWorker in a Browser?

SharedWorker is visible in Chrome DevTools: about:inspect → Shared workers or via chrome://inspect/#workers. In Firefox — about:debugging → Workers. The worker is not restarted on page reload — you need to explicitly close the tab or use DevTools. More details in the MDN documentation.

How to Implement SharedWorker: Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Create a shared-worker.ts file with the worker logic.
  2. Initialize SharedWorker on the client with this file.
  3. Define message types and handlers.
  4. Implement broadcast and shared state via a port Map.
  5. Add fallback to BroadcastChannel for unsupported browsers.
  6. Test inter-tab interaction by opening several tabs.

What's Included in the Work

  • Implementation of SharedWorker with broadcast and shared state support
  • Typed client class
  • Handling of tab connection/disconnection
  • Optionally: WebSocket bridge or authentication synchronization
  • Fallback to BroadcastChannel for incompatible browsers
  • Full documentation and deployment instructions
  • Connection monitoring and logging

Timeline: 2–3 days depending on scenarios (auth sync, WebSocket bridge, shared cache). Cost is calculated individually — savings on server resources usually pay off the investment in 2–3 months.

Our company (over 10 years on the market) has completed over 50 inter-tab communication projects for clients in Europe and the USA. We guarantee quality and post-delivery support.

Request a free consultation — we will evaluate your scenario and propose the optimal solution. Order a turnkey SharedWorker implementation with a guaranteed result.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.