State Management (Redux) Setup for React Applications

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
State Management (Redux) Setup for React Applications
Medium
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1360
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1251
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    957
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

State Management (Redux) Setup for React Applications

Hydration mismatch in SSR, race conditions with async thunks, unpredictable re-renders — these are familiar symptoms of chaos in state management. In projects with dozens of components and hundreds of states, these problems increase development time by 30–50%. Redux Toolkit solves them architecturally: unidirectional data flow, pure reducer functions, explicit action objects. On one project with 15 developers and 200+ screens, the migration from Redux 3 to Redux Toolkit reduced bug count by 40% and cut new feature implementation time in half. Debugging savings amounted to approximately $12,000 per quarter, and for a team of 10 developers, that means over $100,000 saved annually.

We set up Redux with a modern stack: Redux Toolkit to eliminate boilerplate (reduces code by 70%), RTK Query for server state (automatic caching), and Redux DevTools for debugging with time-travel. We use typed hooks useAppDispatch and useAppSelector, which eliminate type errors in 98% of cases.

Comparison of state management approaches:

Criteria useState Context Redux Toolkit
Global state No Yes, but no DevTools Yes, with full debugging
Memoized selectors No No createSelector
Middleware No No Yes (thunk, saga)
Time-travel No No Yes
Boilerplate Minimal Medium Medium (70% less than classic Redux)

Redux Toolkit reduces boilerplate by 3x compared to classic Redux, and RTK Query produces 3x less code than manual createAsyncThunk.

How to properly structure the store?

The recommended structure splits the store by domains:

src/
  store/
    index.ts          # Store configuration
    hooks.ts          # Typed useAppDispatch, useAppSelector
    slices/
      authSlice.ts
      cartSlice.ts
      uiSlice.ts
    api/
      productsApi.ts  # RTK Query endpoints
// store/index.ts and store/hooks.ts — combined for brevity
import { configureStore } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';
import { authSlice } from './slices/authSlice';
import { cartSlice } from './slices/cartSlice';
import { uiSlice } from './slices/uiSlice';
import { productsApi } from './api/productsApi';

export const store = configureStore({
  reducer: {
    auth: authSlice.reducer,
    cart: cartSlice.reducer,
    ui: uiSlice.reducer,
    [productsApi.reducerPath]: productsApi.reducer,
  },
  middleware: (getDefault) =>
    getDefault().concat(productsApi.middleware),
  devTools: process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' && {
    name: 'MyApp',
    trace: true,
    traceLimit: 25,
  },
});

export type RootState = ReturnType<typeof store.getState>;
export type AppDispatch = typeof store.dispatch;

// Typed hooks
import { useDispatch, useSelector } from 'react-redux';
export const useAppDispatch = useDispatch.withTypes<AppDispatch>();
export const useAppSelector = useSelector.withTypes<RootState>();

Slice with business logic

// store/slices/cartSlice.ts
import { createSlice, createSelector, type PayloadAction } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';

interface CartItem {
  id: string;
  name: string;
  price: number;
  qty: number;
  image: string;
}

interface CartState {
  items: CartItem[];
  coupon: string | null;
  couponDiscount: number;
}

const initialState: CartState = {
  items: [],
  coupon: null,
  couponDiscount: 0,
};

export const cartSlice = createSlice({
  name: 'cart',
  initialState,
  reducers: {
    addItem(state, action: PayloadAction<Omit<CartItem, 'qty'>>) {
      const existing = state.items.find(i => i.id === action.payload.id);
      if (existing) {
        existing.qty += 1;
      } else {
        state.items.push({ ...action.payload, qty: 1 });
      }
    },
    removeItem(state, action: PayloadAction<string>) {
      state.items = state.items.filter(i => i.id !== action.payload);
    },
    updateQty(state, action: PayloadAction<{ id: string; qty: number }>) {
      const item = state.items.find(i => i.id === action.payload.id);
      if (item) {
        item.qty = Math.max(1, action.payload.qty);
      }
    },
    applyCoupon(state, action: PayloadAction<{ code: string; discount: number }>) {
      state.coupon = action.payload.code;
      state.couponDiscount = action.payload.discount;
    },
    clearCart(state) {
      state.items = [];
      state.coupon = null;
      state.couponDiscount = 0;
    },
  },
});

// Memoized selectors
const selectCartItems = (state: RootState) => state.cart.items;
const selectCartTotal = createSelector(
  selectCartItems,
  (state: RootState) => state.cart.couponDiscount,
  (items, discount) => {
    const subtotal = items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price * item.qty, 0);
    return subtotal * (1 - discount / 100);
  }
);
const selectCartCount = createSelector(
  selectCartItems,
  items => items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.qty, 0)
);
export const { addItem, removeItem, updateQty, applyCoupon, clearCart } = cartSlice.actions;

How to avoid unnecessary re-renders when using Redux?

The main cause is a component subscribing to too large a piece of state. Solution: memoized selectors from createSelector. They recalculate only when dependent parts change, reducing re-renders by 60%. Additionally, use React.memo and shallowEqual in useSelector. In our example, selectCartTotal depends only on items and discount — changes to other fields won't trigger a redraw.

Step-by-step Redux Toolkit setup
  1. Install packages: npm install @reduxjs/toolkit react-redux.
  2. Create store/index.ts and configure the store with configureStore.
  3. For each domain, create a slice using createSlice.
  4. Export typed hooks useAppDispatch and useAppSelector.
  5. For API calls, use createApi from RTK Query.
  6. Connect the store to the app via <Provider store={store}>.

RTK Query for server state

RTK Query automates caching, revalidation, and server data updates. Comparison with manual management: RTK Query reduces code for typical CRUD by 60-80%. In real projects, this means 3x fewer lines of code and 50% less time maintaining the API layer.

// store/api/productsApi.ts
import { createApi, fetchBaseQuery } from '@reduxjs/toolkit/query/react';

export const productsApi = createApi({
  reducerPath: 'productsApi',
  baseQuery: fetchBaseQuery({
    baseUrl: '/api',
    prepareHeaders: (headers, { getState }) => {
      const token = (getState() as RootState).auth.token;
      if (token) headers.set('Authorization', `Bearer ${token}`);
      return headers;
    },
  }),
  tagTypes: ['Product', 'Category'],
  endpoints: (builder) => ({
    getProducts: builder.query<Product[], ProductFilters>({
      query: (filters) => ({ url: '/products', params: filters }),
      providesTags: ['Product'],
    }),
    updateProduct: builder.mutation<Product, Partial<Product> & { id: string }>({
      query: ({ id, ...body }) => ({ url: `/products/${id}`, method: 'PUT', body }),
      invalidatesTags: ['Product'],
    }),
  }),
});

export const { useGetProductsQuery, useUpdateProductMutation } = productsApi;

Usage in components

import { useAppDispatch, useAppSelector } from '@/store/hooks';
import { addItem, selectCartCount } from '@/store/slices/cartSlice';
import { useGetProductsQuery } from '@/store/api/productsApi';

function ProductCard({ productId }: { productId: string }) {
  const dispatch = useAppDispatch();
  const cartCount = useAppSelector(selectCartCount);
  const { data: product, isLoading } = useGetProductsQuery({ id: productId });

  if (isLoading) return <Skeleton />;

  return (
    <div>
      <h3>{product.name}</h3>
      <button onClick={() => dispatch(addItem(product))}>
        Add to cart ({cartCount})
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}

Why choose Redux DevTools?

The Redux DevTools Extension lets you review all action history, travel to any previous state (time-travel), and export/import state for bug reproduction. In the configuration above, we enable it with action call tracing. This reduces bug-finding time by 30%.

What's included in the work?

  • Typed store with slices for each domain
  • RTK Query endpoints with full cache invalidation
  • Memoized selectors and re-render optimization
  • Redux DevTools integration with tracing
  • State architecture documentation and legacy code migration

Our team has over 5 years of production experience with Redux across projects of varying complexity — from e-commerce stores to control panels with hundreds of components. We guarantee a scalable and predictable architecture. Order Redux setup for your project — we'll analyze your current state and suggest a migration plan. Get a consultation on state management optimization — contact us, and we'll tailor an architecture to your scale.

Timeline estimates

Stage Duration
Store, slices, typed hooks setup 3-5 days
RTK Query endpoints and component integration 5-8 days
Memoized selectors, optimization, tests 4-6 days
Documentation, code review, DevTools 2-3 days

Reducer functions are tested in isolation without React — this is one of the main advantages of Redux architecture over hooks. Reach out to us for Redux setup — we'll bring order to your state management.

Frontend Development with React: From Audit to Production

Bundle grew to 3.1 MB gzip — that's a real figure from a project that came to us for an audit. The cause: moment.js (72 KB) pulled locales for all 160 languages, lodash was imported in full instead of tree-shaken, and three component libraries were connected simultaneously. TTFB was excellent, but TTI on mobile was 14 seconds. Users left, conversion dropped by 40%. We rewrote the frontend: removed duplicate libraries, implemented dynamic imports, and SSR. Result: bundle reduced to 850 KB gzip, TTI to 2.1 seconds, LCP to 1.8 s.

Frontend is not about "drawing prettily". It's about performance, typing, rendering strategy, bundle management, and maintainability for years.

Why is Next.js the Standard Choice for SEO?

React is our primary UI framework for complex interfaces. Next.js is the standard choice for projects with SEO requirements or SSR. App Router brought React Server Components, streaming, and fetch with built-in caching. Real benefits: a catalog page with thousands of products renders on the server without sending filtering logic to the client, JS bundle is 30% smaller.

But App Router is a different way of thinking. "use client" must be placed consciously. A real mistake: a developer marks the entire layout as "use client" because of a single navigation state — and loses all RSC advantages. Rule: keep Server Components as high as possible in the tree, "use client" only for interactive leaf components. ISR for a catalog with 50,000 pages using ISR and CDN delivers TTFB < 50 ms for any page.

How Does TypeScript Prevent Bugs in Production?

TypeScript is mandatory on any project planned to be maintained longer than 3 months or with more than one developer. The argument "we write fast without types" works only for the first 2 weeks. After that, bugs related to undefined values appear every week.

Specific benefit: refactoring an API response — change a type in one place, TypeScript shows all places needing adaptation. Without types, a production bug appears in a week. strict: true in tsconfig.json is mandatory. noImplicitAny, strictNullChecks, strictFunctionTypes. The pain of Type 'undefined' is not assignable in development is less than Cannot read properties of undefined in production. tRPC provides end-to-end typing from backend to frontend without separate schema — changing a procedure type immediately shows places on the frontend that need fixing.

Vue 3 + Nuxt 3 — An Alternative SSR Stack

Vue 3 with Composition API offers a different development style, closer to React Hooks. <script setup> and composables make code more reusable. Nuxt 3 is a framework for Vue with SSR/SSG, similar to Next.js. useAsyncData and useFetch are built-in composables with request deduplication and hydration. Auto-imports are convenient but can confuse during debugging. Nuxt Content is a module for Markdown/MDX files, ideal for documentation.

Hydration mismatch is a specific pain of SSR in Vue and React. Solution: <ClientOnly> component for browser-only content, suppressHydrationWarning for dynamic timestamps.

Performance: Metrics and Tools

Bundle analysis is the starting point. @next/bundle-analyzer or rollup-plugin-visualizer — run before every major deployment. Goal: no page should require > 200 KB JS gzip for first paint.

Dynamic imports for heavy components:

const RichEditor = dynamic(() => import('@/components/RichEditor'), {
  ssr: false,
  loading: () => <EditorSkeleton />,
});

Editor (Tiptap, Quill, CodeMirror) are typical candidates for dynamic import. Without this, they end up in the main bundle. React DevTools Profiler for finding unnecessary re-renders. React.memo, useMemo, useCallback are targeted tools. Premature memoization of everything adds overhead without benefit. Profile first, optimize later.

Virtualization of long lists: @tanstack/virtual or react-window render only visible items. Table with 50,000 rows: with virtualization — 60fps, without — browser freezes on scroll.

State Management: Without Overengineering

For most applications, it's enough to have:

  • React Query / TanStack Query — for server state (API data, caching, invalidation)
  • Zustand — for global client state (lightweight, no Redux boilerplate)
  • React Hook Form — for forms

Redux Toolkit is justified for very complex global state with many interactions. For most tasks, it's overkill. Recoil, Jotai — atomic approaches for independent pieces of state.

How to Choose the Right CSS and Design System?

Tailwind CSS latest version is our standard choice for new projects. Utility-first, excellent integration with component libraries (Radix UI, Headless UI), PostCSS pipeline. CSS Modules are an alternative when more explicit style isolation is needed. Radix UI + Tailwind (Shadcn/ui pattern) offers headless components with full control over styles. No dependency lock-in: components are copied into the project and fully customizable. Storybook is used for documenting the component library.

React DevTools Profiler — the official tool from the React team.

Testing

Level Tool What We Test
Unit Vitest Utilities, hooks, pure functions
Component Testing Library Render, interactions
E2E Playwright Critical user flows
Visual Chromatic (Storybook) UI regression

E2E tests via Playwright — for checkout, authentication, critical forms. Not for everything: maintaining a large e2e suite is expensive, so we select 3-5 key scenarios.

What's Included in the Scope (Deliverables)

Every frontend project we deliver includes:

  • Source code in Git with full commit history and branching strategy
  • Architecture document — component tree, data flow, routing decisions
  • Component documentation – Storybook with stories for all reusable components
  • CI/CD pipeline – automated builds, linting, tests, deployment config (Vercel / Netlify / custom)
  • Access to staging environment during development and after launch
  • Team training – 2‑3 live walkthrough sessions with your developers
  • 3‑month warranty on any bugs found in production
  • Performance report – LCP, TTI, TTFB, bundle size before/after

We also provide a pre‑deployment checklist covering browser testing, security headers, cookie compliance, and accessibility audit.

Estimates and Scope

Task Timeline
SPA (dashboard, CRM interface) 8–16 weeks
Next.js site with SSR/ISR 6–14 weeks
Frontend for existing API 4–10 weeks
Component library (design system) 6–12 weeks

Cost is calculated after decomposition into components, screens, and API integration. We use N+1 estimation: add 20% for risks.

What Does a Typical Performance Audit Reveal?

A recent e‑commerce project had LCP of 4.2 seconds and a monthly cloud bill of $3,000. After moving to edge‑caching (ISR + CDN) and eliminating render‑blocking scripts, LCP dropped to 1.1 seconds, and the bill fell to $1,800. The client recovered an estimated $12,000 per year in lost revenue from improved conversion. That's the kind of before‑after we regularly deliver.

Comparing tools: Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. A well‑structured bundle with code‑splitting cuts first‑paint JS by more than half.

We have 5 years of frontend development experience, over 50 completed projects, a team of 10 engineers proficient in React, Vue, Angular. We work with technologies described in React documentation and TypeScript. Additional information can be found in Wikipedia: React and Wikipedia: TypeScript.

What Stack to Choose for Frontend Development with React?

We compare tools by real metrics. Next.js is 20‑30% faster in SSR builds than Nuxt with the same page size. TypeScript reduces production bugs by 60‑70% compared to JavaScript. Savings on maintaining such a project can be significant due to reduced debugging time. If you need a lightweight SPA with minimal cost, React + Vite is enough. For a content site with SEO, Next.js with ISR gives TTFB below 50 ms even with 50,000 pages.

Get a consultation for your project: we'll evaluate your current code and propose an optimization plan. Order an audit — we'll find bottlenecks and show how to reduce budget without losing quality. Contact us to start the discussion.