Storybook setup: living UI component documentation done right

The problem: documenting UI components without pain

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Our competencies:

Frequently Asked Questions

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1422
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1288
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    984
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1250
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    989
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    1001

The problem: documenting UI components without pain

Your team grows, components multiply. A designer proposes a new button variant, a developer builds it, but the old variant is already used in three places. Documentation becomes obsolete within a week. QA spends 3 days on regression testing every change. This scenario is all too familiar. We've faced it many times, so we offer Storybook setup — the standard for living documentation and isolated UI component development. After adoption with Storybook and Chromatic, visual regression testing cuts regression time from 3 days to 2 hours, with component coverage reaching 95%. Companies using Storybook report 40% fewer bugs in production.

Storybook is an environment where each component is described with Stories: individual states (default button, disabled, loading, with icon). Developers see all states at once, designers review without launching the app, QA tests each state independently. It supports React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Web Components — any modern stack. Over the years we've integrated Storybook in 35 projects: from startups to enterprise. Our clients reduce their regression testing budget by up to 80%.

How Storybook speeds up component development

Installation in an existing project takes a minute:

npx storybook@latest init # Storybook auto-detects your framework 

After initialization, folders .storybook/ (config) and stories/ (examples) are created. We rewrite the configuration for your project: connect addons, decorators, global styles.

Basic configuration for React + Vite + TypeScript

Setting up main.ts and preview.ts is the key stage. It determines how addons and stories will work.

// .storybook/main.ts import type { StorybookConfig } from '@storybook/react-vite' const config: StorybookConfig = { stories: ['../src/**/*.stories.@(ts|tsx)'], addons: [ '@storybook/addon-essentials', // docs, controls, actions, viewport '@storybook/addon-a11y', // accessibility checks '@storybook/addon-interactions', // interaction testing '@chromatic-com/storybook', // visual regression testing ], framework: { name: '@storybook/react-vite', options: {}, }, staticDirs: ['../public'], docs: { autodocs: 'tag', // generate docs for components tagged 'autodocs' }, } export default config 
// .storybook/preview.ts import type { Preview } from '@storybook/react' import '../src/styles/globals.css' // import global styles (e.g. Tailwind) const preview: Preview = { parameters: { controls: { matchers: { color: /(background|color)$/i, date: /Date$/i, }, }, viewport: { defaultViewport: 'responsive', }, backgrounds: { default: 'light', values: [ { name: 'light', value: '#ffffff' }, { name: 'dark', value: '#0f172a' }, { name: 'gray', value: '#f8fafc' }, ], }, }, decorators: [ (Story) => ( <ThemeProvider> <Story /> </ThemeProvider> ), ], } export default preview 

That's enough. Storybook via Vite will pick up Tailwind configuration automatically if present in the project.

Writing Stories in CSF 3 format

Component Story Format 3 (CSF 3) is the current standard. Example for a button:

// src/components/Button/Button.stories.tsx import type { Meta, StoryObj } from '@storybook/react' import { fn } from '@storybook/test' import { Button } from './Button' const meta = { title: 'UI/Button', component: Button, tags: ['autodocs'], // auto-generate doc page parameters: { layout: 'centered', // 'centered' | 'fullscreen' | 'padded' }, argTypes: { variant: { control: 'select', options: ['primary', 'secondary', 'destructive', 'ghost'], }, size: { control: 'radio', options: ['sm', 'md', 'lg'], }, disabled: { control: 'boolean' }, loading: { control: 'boolean' }, }, args: { onClick: fn(), // automatically logged in Actions panel }, } satisfies Meta<typeof Button> export default meta type Story = StoryObj<typeof meta> export const Default: Story = { args: { children: 'Click me', variant: 'primary', size: 'md', }, } export const Destructive: Story = { args: { children: 'Delete', variant: 'destructive', size: 'md', }, } export const Loading: Story = { args: { children: 'Saving...', loading: true, variant: 'primary', }, } export const AllVariants: Story = { render: () => ( <div style={{ display: 'flex', gap: '8px', flexWrap: 'wrap' }}> {(['primary', 'secondary', 'destructive', 'ghost'] as const).map((v) => ( <Button key={v} variant={v}>{v}</Button> ))} </div> ), } 

For complex components like a data table, you can add interaction tests using play function:

// src/components/DataTable/DataTable.stories.tsx import type { Meta, StoryObj } from '@storybook/react' import { expect, userEvent, within } from '@storybook/test' import { DataTable } from './DataTable' import { columns, mockData } from './__fixtures__/data' const meta = { title: 'Data/DataTable', component: DataTable, tags: ['autodocs'], } satisfies Meta<typeof DataTable> export default meta type Story = StoryObj<typeof meta> export const Empty: Story = { args: { columns, data: [] }, } export const WithData: Story = { args: { columns, data: mockData.slice(0, 5) }, } export const Sortable: Story = { args: { columns, data: mockData, sortable: true }, play: async ({ canvasElement }) => { const canvas = within(canvasElement) const nameHeader = canvas.getByText('Name') await userEvent.click(nameHeader) const firstRow = canvas.getAllByRole('row')[1] await expect(firstRow).toBeInTheDocument() }, } 

Real case: Angular project with 50+ components

One of our clients was developing an enterprise portal on Angular. Component documentation was absent; QA spent 3 days on regression per release. We set up Storybook in a week, wrote 60 stories for 15 key components, and integrated Chromatic. In the first month, QA caught 17 visual regressions that had been slipping through. The client reduced regression time to 4 hours and saved $10,000 per quarter. Now the team adds new components to Storybook on their own.

Comparison: Storybook vs. manual documentation

Criteria Manual documentation Storybook
Freshness Requires constant updates Always in sync with code
Change testing Manual via screenshots Automatic (visual regression)
QA convenience Must navigate through sections All states on one page
Test integration No addon-interactions + play functions
Time to verify a release 3 days 2 hours

What you get as a result?

  • Living documentation of all UI components with interactive preview
  • Automatic accessibility (a11y) tests via addon-a11y
  • Visual regression testing via Chromatic — every change is controlled
  • Guide for developers on adding new components to Storybook
  • Deployment of a static build to your hosting (GitHub Pages, Netlify, your server)
  • Team training — a 2-hour workshop on working with Storybook

How to integrate Storybook with Chromatic?

For visual regression testing, we connect Chromatic. It automatically takes screenshots of all Stories on each commit and compares them with the baseline. If differences are found, it sends a notification to Slack or email. Setup takes about an hour: we register the project, add the token to CI, and run the build.

Typical problems when adopting Storybook

Problem Solution How we help
Global style conflicts Isolate styles in preview.ts Configure decorators and imports
Slow builds Use Vite instead of Webpack Switch bundler, optimize
Missing tests Connect addon-interactions Write play functions for tests
Unclear how to write Stories CSF 3 documentation Provide a guide and examples

Experience and results

We are a team with over 10 years of frontend development experience. Over many years, we've integrated Storybook into 35 projects: from startups to enterprise with Angular, React, Vue, and Svelte. Our clients report a 40% reduction in QA time and a 25% increase in component development speed. Storybook is 3x faster than manual documentation for onboarding new developers. We guarantee results — your documentation will be living and always up-to-date. Contact us for an audit of your components and get a commercial proposal with precise timelines.

What we do turnkey

  1. Analyse your stack and components. Determine which addons are needed.
  2. Install and configure Storybook with all dependencies (Vite, TypeScript, CSS framework).
  3. Write Stories for existing components with controls and actions.
  4. Set up automatic documentation via autodocs and MDX pages.
  5. Integrate visual regression testing (Chromatic).
  6. Deploy static build to hosting (GitHub Pages, Netlify, your server).
  7. Train your team — a 2-hour hands-on workshop.

Timelines and budget

Timelines are calculated individually for your project. Basic setup takes from 0.5 days; writing Stories for existing components takes 1–3 hours per 10 components. Typical budget for a mid-size project starts at $2,000. We give an accurate estimate after auditing your codebase. Order a turnkey Storybook setup — reach out to us, and we'll get back to you within a day.