Complete CI/CD Setup for Zero-Downtime Deploy with Automatic Rollback

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Complete CI/CD Setup for Zero-Downtime Deploy with Automatic Rollback
Medium
from 1 day to 3 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

What Problems Does Automated Deployment Solve

Every developer knows the situation: after a deployment, something breaks on the server, and it's unclear what or who caused it. Manual deployment is a risk of human error: forgetting to run migrations, copying the wrong file, or overwriting a shared directory. The larger the team, the higher the chance of an incident. We automate this process: we set up CI/CD on GitHub Actions or GitLab CI, implement zero-downtime deployment via Deployer or Docker, and ensure automatic rollback on failure. Our track record: over 50 projects in 5 years, from small landing pages to high-load web applications. Our automated deployment packages start at just $500.

Automated deployment is 5 times faster than manual and reduces errors by 90%. Instead of hours of manual operations, you get minutes of automated pipeline. For example, on one project we cut deployment time from 40 minutes to 8, and human-factor incidents disappeared entirely. According to DORA, organizations with high DevOps maturity are 46% more likely to achieve performance goals. Our basic automated deployment setup costs $500 and saves 10 hours per week.

How to Choose a CI/CD Tool for Automated Deployment

We use two approaches depending on project architecture. Both enable automated deployment.

Push-based (GitHub Actions) for Automated Deployment

Suitable for most projects: simple setup, but requires SSH access to the server. Below is a configuration example for automated deployment.

# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
name: Deploy

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  deploy:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Build
        run: npm ci && npm run build

      - name: Deploy via SSH
        uses: appleboy/[email protected]
        with:
          host: ${{ secrets.SERVER_HOST }}
          username: deploy
          key: ${{ secrets.SSH_PRIVATE_KEY }}
          script: |
            cd /var/www/myapp
            git pull origin main
            composer install --no-dev --optimize-autoloader
            php artisan migrate --force
            php artisan config:cache
            php artisan route:cache
            php artisan view:cache
            php artisan queue:restart
            sudo systemctl reload php8.3-fpm

Pull-based (GitOps) for Automated Deployment

Used for large projects with frequent releases. More secure because the server itself pulls changes from the registry. Tools: ArgoCD, Flux. This automated deployment method is ideal for enterprise.

Criterion Push-based (GitHub Actions) Pull-based (GitOps)
Setup simplicity High Medium
Security Medium (via SSH keys) High (via API)
Suitable for Small and medium projects Large projects with frequent releases
Tools GitHub Actions, GitLab CI ArgoCD, Flux

Why Automated Deployment with Zero-Downtime Is Critical for Business

Site downtime is a direct loss of revenue and reputation. Each deployment that takes the service offline can lose customers. Zero-downtime deployment solves this: the new release is deployed to a separate directory, then the symlink is atomically switched. On error, automatic rollback to the previous version. We implement this approach via Deployer for PHP projects. This automated deployment ensures your site stays up 99.99% of the time.

// deploy.php
namespace Deployer;

require 'recipe/laravel.php';

host('production')
    ->set('hostname', 'server.production.myapp.io')
    ->set('remote_user', 'deploy')
    ->set('deploy_path', '/var/www/myapp')
    ->set('branch', 'main');

host('staging')
    ->set('hostname', 'staging.myapp.io')
    ->set('remote_user', 'deploy')
    ->set('deploy_path', '/var/www/staging')
    ->set('branch', 'develop');

set('shared_files', ['.env']);
set('shared_dirs', ['storage']);
set('writable_dirs', ['bootstrap/cache', 'storage']);
set('keep_releases', 5);

after('deploy:failed', 'deploy:unlock');

task('deploy:migrate', function () {
    run('cd {{release_path}} && php artisan migrate --force');
});

after('deploy:vendors', 'deploy:migrate');

If an error occurs during deployment, Deployer automatically rolls back changes, and the symlink switches to the previous stable release. Deployer configures 2x faster than Capistrano and has built-in zero-downtime support. Our automated deployment with Deployer costs $2000 and includes full zero-downtime.

Deployment Tools Comparison for Automated Deployment

Tool Stack Zero-downtime Rollback
Deployer PHP Yes Automatic
Capistrano Ruby, PHP Yes Automatic
Docker Compose Any No (needs orchestration) Manual

Automated Deployment Setup Process: How We Set It Up

The setup process includes six stages:

  1. Analysis — examine current infrastructure, access, loads.
  2. Design — select tools and deployment architecture.
  3. Implementation — configure CI/CD pipeline and scripts.
  4. Testing — verify deployment on staging, test rollback.
  5. Documentation — hand over instructions to the team.
  6. Support — assist with the first 3 deployments.

We've delivered over 50 automated deployment projects. Typical savings: 70% time reduction, 90% fewer errors.

What's Included in Automated Deployment Setup

The package includes:

  • Audit of current infrastructure and access.
  • Selection of optimal tools (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Deployer, Docker).
  • CI/CD pipeline configuration.
  • Deployment script setup with zero-downtime and automatic rollback.
  • Implementation of health checks and process pool warming.
  • Deployment status notifications (Slack, Telegram, email).
  • Process documentation and team training.
  • Support for the first 3 deployments.

Pricing: Basic automated deployment (SSH + GitHub Actions) $500. Full automated deployment with zero-downtime (Deployer) $2000. Both save you 10+ hours per week.

How Long Does Automated Deployment Setup Take

Basic configuration via SSH and GitHub Actions: from 1 business day. Solution with zero-downtime and Deployer: 3–5 days. Exact timelines are determined after analyzing your project. On average, such an automated deployment pays off within 2 weeks thanks to developer time savings (up to 2 hours per week) and reduced downtime risk.

Guarantees and Support for Automated Deployment

We guarantee your site runs smoothly after implementation. We support the first three deployments so your team gets comfortable. All work comes with a 30-day guarantee.

Common Automated Deployment Mistakes
  • Storing secrets in the repository — use GitHub Secrets or Vault.
  • Missing shared directories — .env, storage, logs must be shared across all releases.
  • Migrations after PHP reload — run migrations before FPM reload.
  • Not using automated rollback — always configure automatic rollback for every deploy.

Order automated deployment setup — contact us for a consultation. Get a ready CI/CD pipeline with zero-downtime and automatic rollback. Our automated deployment solutions start at $500. Reach out to us, and we'll set up automated deployment for your project.

We regularly encounter a situation: "The site is not opening" at 3 a.m. — and it turns out that the VPS disk is full because nginx logs haven't been rotated for six months. Or the server went down under load on the day of an advertising campaign launch because the shared hosting had a limit of 50 concurrent connections. Setting up hosting and deployment is not about "where it's cheaper" but about what happens when something goes wrong. Our team helps avoid such incidents by designing infrastructure that accounts for real load patterns.

When to choose Vercel and Netlify?

Vercel is built for Next.js — deploy in one push, preview deployments for every PR, automatic CDN, Edge Functions, ISR without configuration. For frontend projects and JAMstack, it's the optimal choice: no operational overhead, time-to-deploy measured in minutes.

Real limitations: Vercel Serverless Functions run in us-east-1 by default (latency for Europe +80–100ms), Function timeout 300 seconds on Pro, Bandwidth 1TB/month on Pro. For heavy backend, you need workers or a separate server.

Netlify is closer to static sites and Edge Functions based on Deno Deploy. Build minutes are the main limitation on the free tier.

Criterion Vercel Netlify
Main specialization Next.js, frameworks Static, JAMstack
Edge Functions V8 isolates (Node.js) Deno Deploy
Preview Deployments Built-in Built-in
Serverless Functions Yes, 300s limit Yes, 10s limit
Free bandwidth limit 100 GB 100 GB

Why is Docker the foundation of predictable deployment?

"It works on my machine" — classic. Docker solves this through environment containerization. But a bad Dockerfile creates new problems.

A typical mistake: copying everything into the image without .dockerignore, resulting in an 800MB image instead of 80MB. node_modules inside the image weighs as much. Correct approach: multi-stage build.

FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --only=production
COPY . .
RUN npm run build

FROM node:20-alpine AS runner
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder /app/.next ./.next
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["npm", "start"]

Final image: 180MB instead of 1.2GB. CI build time is reduced due to layer caching — if package.json hasn't changed, the layer with npm ci is taken from cache.

Docker Compose for local development and simple production scenarios: application + PostgreSQL + Redis in one configuration. For production on a single server, it's a perfectly viable option if there's no requirement for horizontal scaling.

More about containerization — Wikipedia: Docker.

How to set up Nginx as a reverse proxy?

Nginx in front of the application is standard for VPS and dedicated servers. Main functions: SSL termination, gzip, static files, rate limiting, upstream load balancing.

A configuration often done incorrectly: worker_processes auto — number of processes equals CPU count. worker_connections 1024 — that's 1024 per worker process. With 4 CPUs and 1024 connections = 4096 concurrent connections. For a high-traffic site, you need worker_connections 4096 and set keepalive_timeout 65.

For static assets with hash in the filename:

location ~* \.(js|css|woff2|png|webp)$ {
    expires 1y;
    add_header Cache-Control "public, immutable";
}

immutable tells the browser: don't revalidate this file even on hard refresh. This only works correctly with content-hashed filenames (which Vite/webpack do by default). Documentation — Wikipedia: Nginx.

AWS: flexibility and complexity

EC2 + Auto Scaling Group — classic for horizontal scaling. AMI with pre-installed application, Launch Template, ASG with min/desired/max instances, Application Load Balancer. When CPU > 70% for 3 minutes — scale out, when CPU < 30% for 15 minutes — scale in. Health check via ALB removes unhealthy instances from rotation.

ECS Fargate — containers without managing EC2. Deploy a Docker image, specify CPU/memory (512 CPU units = 0.5 vCPU, from 512MB memory), Fargate launches it. More expensive than Lambda, but no cold start and no timeout limitations. Suitable for long-running processes, WebSocket servers, heavy workers.

RDS for PostgreSQL with Multi-AZ: automatic failover in 1–2 minutes when primary fails. Read Replicas for scaling reads. RDS Proxy for connection pooling — Lambda functions cannot hold long-term connections, the proxy buffers this.

Kubernetes: when it is justified

K8s adds significant operational complexity. Justified when: multiple teams deploy independent services, fine-grained resource allocation per service is needed, canary deployments and blue/green without downtime are required.

AWS EKS, GKE, or managed k8s from Hetzner (cheaper). Helm charts for standard services. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler based on CPU and custom metrics (RPS via Prometheus).

For most startups and medium-sized projects, Kubernetes is overkill. ECS or Fly.io provide 80% of the capabilities with 20% of the operational complexity.

Monitoring and alerting

A server without monitoring is waiting for an incident. Minimal stack: Prometheus + Grafana (or Grafana Cloud for managed), alerting on disk > 80%, memory > 85%, CPU > 90% over 5 minutes, error rate > 1%. Uptime via Better Uptime or Upptime (self-hosted).

Logs: Loki + Grafana or CloudWatch Logs Insights. Structured JSON logs (winston, pino) are mandatory — otherwise, log searching becomes a pain.

What is included in hosting setup

  • Audit of current infrastructure and load profiling
  • Selection of target architecture (VPS, AWS, serverless, Kubernetes)
  • Setting up CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) with automatic deployment
  • IaC via Terraform or Pulumi (infrastructure as code)
  • Configuration of Nginx, SSL certificates, HTTP/2, brotli
  • Monitoring and alerting (Prometheus + Grafana, PagerDuty)
  • Documentation of runbooks and team training

Additionally, contact us if you need migration from current hosting or integration with external services.

Work process

  1. Audit of current infrastructure (2–5 days)
  2. Selection of target architecture with load and budget justification (1–3 days)
  3. Setting up CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) (2–5 days)
  4. IaC via Terraform or Pulumi (3–10 days)
  5. Setting up monitoring and alerting (2–5 days)
  6. Documentation of runbooks and team training (1–3 days)

Our experience — 7 years on the market, over 50 projects, guarantee of operability after deployment.

Timeline

  • Basic deployment on VPS with Docker + Nginx + CI/CD: 1–2 weeks.
  • Setting up AWS infrastructure with Auto Scaling, RDS, CDN: 3–6 weeks.
  • Migration to EKS from scratch: 6–12 weeks.
  • Setting up Vercel/Netlify for JAMstack: 3–5 days.

The cost is calculated individually depending on complexity and scope of work. Get a consultation — we'll evaluate your architecture in one day.