Rolling Update Deployment with Zero Downtime

Our company is engaged in the development, support and maintenance of sites of any complexity. From simple one-page sites to large-scale cluster systems built on micro services. Experience of developers is confirmed by certificates from vendors.

Development and maintenance of all types of websites:

Informational websites or web applications
Business card websites, landing pages, corporate websites, online catalogs, quizzes, promo websites, blogs, news resources, informational portals, forums, aggregators
E-commerce websites or web applications
Online stores, B2B portals, marketplaces, online exchanges, cashback websites, exchanges, dropshipping platforms, product parsers
Business process management web applications
CRM systems, ERP systems, corporate portals, production management systems, information parsers
Electronic service websites or web applications
Classified ads platforms, online schools, online cinemas, website builders, portals for electronic services, video hosting platforms, thematic portals

These are just some of the technical types of websites we work with, and each of them can have its own specific features and functionality, as well as be customized to meet the specific needs and goals of the client.

Showing 1 of 1All 2062 services
Rolling Update Deployment with Zero Downtime
Complex
~3-5 days
Frequently Asked Questions

Our competencies:

Development stages

Latest works

  • image_website-b2b-advance_0.webp
    B2B ADVANCE company website development
    1358
  • image_web-applications_feedme_466_0.webp
    Development of a web application for FEEDME
    1250
  • image_websites_belfingroup_462_0.webp
    Website development for BELFINGROUP
    956
  • image_ecommerce_furnoro_435_0.webp
    Development of an online store for the company FURNORO
    1188
  • image_crm_enviok_479_0.webp
    Development of a web application for Enviok
    929
  • image_bitrix-bitrix-24-1c_fixper_448_0.webp
    Website development for FIXPER company
    947

Rolling Update Deployment with Zero Downtime

When updating a web application in production, users often lose access or get 503 errors. Imagine: you roll out a new version, and half the requests fail with a timeout—the database couldn't switch over in time. The standard "stop → replace → start" approach doesn't work for services with SLA requirements of 99.9%. We configure Rolling Update—a strategy that eliminates downtime with minimal resource overhead. Our experience: 10+ years in DevOps, rolling update implementations for fintech and e-commerce platforms with millions of users.

Why Rolling Update Is the Best Choice for Zero-Downtime Deployment

Rolling Update replaces instances gradually: first 1–2 pods are updated, their health is verified, then the next. Unlike Blue-Green, it doesn't require double resources, and unlike Recreate, it doesn't stop all pods at once. This provides a balance between cost and fault tolerance. Rolling Update is 2× faster than Blue-Green in deployment time, and with proper configuration, downtime is completely eliminated.

Parameter Rolling Update Blue-Green Recreate
Additional resources 0 0
Downtime No No Yes
Deployment time Medium Fast Fast
Configuration complexity Medium High Low
Risk of incompatibility Higher Lower Lower

Rolling Update offers the best price-to-reliability ratio for most production systems. This is confirmed by Rolling release on Wikipedia, where rolling update is recommended as the default strategy.

How to Configure Rolling Update in Kubernetes

# deployment.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: myapp
spec:
  replicas: 6
  strategy:
    type: RollingUpdate
    rollingUpdate:
      maxSurge: 2
      maxUnavailable: 1
  minReadySeconds: 30
  selector:
    matchLabels: { app: myapp }
  template:
    metadata:
      labels: { app: myapp }
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: myapp
          image: registry.example.com/myapp:v1.1.0
          readinessProbe:
            httpGet:
              path: /health/ready
              port: 8080
            initialDelaySeconds: 10
            periodSeconds: 5
            failureThreshold: 3
          livenessProbe:
            httpGet:
              path: /health/live
              port: 8080
            initialDelaySeconds: 30
            periodSeconds: 10
      terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 60
kubectl set image deployment/myapp myapp=registry.example.com/myapp:v1.2.0
kubectl rollout status deployment/myapp
kubectl rollout history deployment/myapp
kubectl rollout undo deployment/myapp
kubectl rollout undo deployment/myapp --to-revision=3

What Is Graceful Shutdown and Why Is It Needed?

Proper process termination is critical for zero-downtime. On receiving SIGTERM, the application must finish active requests, close connections, and release resources. If the app doesn't finish within the termination period, Kubernetes forcibly kills it, leading to request loss.

// Node.js/Express — graceful shutdown on SIGTERM
process.on('SIGTERM', async () => {
    console.log('SIGTERM received, shutting down gracefully');
    server.close(() => {
        console.log('HTTP server closed');
    });
    await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 30_000));
    await db.destroy();
    process.exit(0);
});

How to Verify Application Readiness?

The readiness probe should check dependent services: database, cache, queue. Example in Laravel:

// Laravel — health check routes
Route::get('/health/live', function () {
    return response()->json(['status' => 'ok']);
});

Route::get('/health/ready', function () {
    try {
        DB::connection()->getPdo();
        Cache::store()->get('health-check');
    } catch (\Exception $e) {
        return response()->json(['status' => 'not ready', 'error' => $e->getMessage()], 503);
    }
    return response()->json(['status' => 'ready']);
});

How to Ensure Database Compatibility During Rolling Update?

When two versions coexist, the database schema must be compatible with both. The hard rule: migrations are run before deploying new code and must be backward-compatible. Avoid renaming or deleting columns immediately, or changing data types without intermediate steps.

We recommend a three-phase deployment: first add the new column (nullable) or new table. Then populate the new fields, switch the code to use them. Only in the third iteration remove old columns or tables. This approach eliminates compatibility errors when two versions run simultaneously.

Typical Problems When Configuring Rolling Update

One common mistake is setting maxSurge or maxUnavailable too small, which prolongs the deployment. For example, if maxSurge=1 and replicas=10, the update takes 10 rounds. Choose these parameters based on the total number of replicas and acceptable deployment speed. Another issue is incorrect readiness probes: they must check actual application readiness, not just return 200. If the probe does not include a database check, a new pod may start accepting traffic before the database is initialized, causing 500 errors. Also, often forgotten is terminationGracePeriodSeconds: if the app cannot shut down before SIGKILL, active requests are lost. Set it to at least 30 seconds.

What’s Included in the Rolling Update Setup?

  • Analysis of current infrastructure and application architecture
  • Configuration of Kubernetes Deployment or Docker Swarm service
  • Writing proper readiness and liveness probes
  • Implementing graceful shutdown (SIGTERM, request draining)
  • Developing a backward-compatible migration strategy
  • Testing on a staging environment with load
  • Documentation of settings and procedures
  • Team training on working with Rolling Update

Process

  1. Analysis: review current stack, infrastructure, deployment processes
  2. Design: select Rolling Update parameters, health checks
  3. Implementation: configure orchestrator, write probes, graceful shutdown
  4. Testing: validate on staging with load testing
  5. Deployment: roll to production, monitor first 24 hours

Timeline

Stage Duration
Basic Rolling Update setup (Kubernetes + health checks) 2–3 days
Docker Swarm rolling update 1–2 days
Backward-compatible migration development 1–2 days
Full cycle with training 3–5 days

On a recent e-commerce project with 500k daily users, we reduced deployment downtime from 5 minutes to zero by implementing rolling update with proper health checks and graceful shutdown. The database schema changes were handled via three-phase migrations, ensuring zero errors during the transition.

Contact us for a consultation — we'll evaluate your project within 2 days. Order Rolling Update setup from professionals. Get a ready solution with guaranteed zero downtime and full compatibility.

We regularly encounter a situation: "The site is not opening" at 3 a.m. — and it turns out that the VPS disk is full because nginx logs haven't been rotated for six months. Or the server went down under load on the day of an advertising campaign launch because the shared hosting had a limit of 50 concurrent connections. Setting up hosting and deployment is not about "where it's cheaper" but about what happens when something goes wrong. Our team helps avoid such incidents by designing infrastructure that accounts for real load patterns.

When to choose Vercel and Netlify?

Vercel is built for Next.js — deploy in one push, preview deployments for every PR, automatic CDN, Edge Functions, ISR without configuration. For frontend projects and JAMstack, it's the optimal choice: no operational overhead, time-to-deploy measured in minutes.

Real limitations: Vercel Serverless Functions run in us-east-1 by default (latency for Europe +80–100ms), Function timeout 300 seconds on Pro, Bandwidth 1TB/month on Pro. For heavy backend, you need workers or a separate server.

Netlify is closer to static sites and Edge Functions based on Deno Deploy. Build minutes are the main limitation on the free tier.

Criterion Vercel Netlify
Main specialization Next.js, frameworks Static, JAMstack
Edge Functions V8 isolates (Node.js) Deno Deploy
Preview Deployments Built-in Built-in
Serverless Functions Yes, 300s limit Yes, 10s limit
Free bandwidth limit 100 GB 100 GB

Why is Docker the foundation of predictable deployment?

"It works on my machine" — classic. Docker solves this through environment containerization. But a bad Dockerfile creates new problems.

A typical mistake: copying everything into the image without .dockerignore, resulting in an 800MB image instead of 80MB. node_modules inside the image weighs as much. Correct approach: multi-stage build.

FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci --only=production
COPY . .
RUN npm run build

FROM node:20-alpine AS runner
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=builder /app/.next ./.next
COPY --from=builder /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY --from=builder /app/package.json ./package.json
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["npm", "start"]

Final image: 180MB instead of 1.2GB. CI build time is reduced due to layer caching — if package.json hasn't changed, the layer with npm ci is taken from cache.

Docker Compose for local development and simple production scenarios: application + PostgreSQL + Redis in one configuration. For production on a single server, it's a perfectly viable option if there's no requirement for horizontal scaling.

More about containerization — Wikipedia: Docker.

How to set up Nginx as a reverse proxy?

Nginx in front of the application is standard for VPS and dedicated servers. Main functions: SSL termination, gzip, static files, rate limiting, upstream load balancing.

A configuration often done incorrectly: worker_processes auto — number of processes equals CPU count. worker_connections 1024 — that's 1024 per worker process. With 4 CPUs and 1024 connections = 4096 concurrent connections. For a high-traffic site, you need worker_connections 4096 and set keepalive_timeout 65.

For static assets with hash in the filename:

location ~* \.(js|css|woff2|png|webp)$ {
    expires 1y;
    add_header Cache-Control "public, immutable";
}

immutable tells the browser: don't revalidate this file even on hard refresh. This only works correctly with content-hashed filenames (which Vite/webpack do by default). Documentation — Wikipedia: Nginx.

AWS: flexibility and complexity

EC2 + Auto Scaling Group — classic for horizontal scaling. AMI with pre-installed application, Launch Template, ASG with min/desired/max instances, Application Load Balancer. When CPU > 70% for 3 minutes — scale out, when CPU < 30% for 15 minutes — scale in. Health check via ALB removes unhealthy instances from rotation.

ECS Fargate — containers without managing EC2. Deploy a Docker image, specify CPU/memory (512 CPU units = 0.5 vCPU, from 512MB memory), Fargate launches it. More expensive than Lambda, but no cold start and no timeout limitations. Suitable for long-running processes, WebSocket servers, heavy workers.

RDS for PostgreSQL with Multi-AZ: automatic failover in 1–2 minutes when primary fails. Read Replicas for scaling reads. RDS Proxy for connection pooling — Lambda functions cannot hold long-term connections, the proxy buffers this.

Kubernetes: when it is justified

K8s adds significant operational complexity. Justified when: multiple teams deploy independent services, fine-grained resource allocation per service is needed, canary deployments and blue/green without downtime are required.

AWS EKS, GKE, or managed k8s from Hetzner (cheaper). Helm charts for standard services. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler based on CPU and custom metrics (RPS via Prometheus).

For most startups and medium-sized projects, Kubernetes is overkill. ECS or Fly.io provide 80% of the capabilities with 20% of the operational complexity.

Monitoring and alerting

A server without monitoring is waiting for an incident. Minimal stack: Prometheus + Grafana (or Grafana Cloud for managed), alerting on disk > 80%, memory > 85%, CPU > 90% over 5 minutes, error rate > 1%. Uptime via Better Uptime or Upptime (self-hosted).

Logs: Loki + Grafana or CloudWatch Logs Insights. Structured JSON logs (winston, pino) are mandatory — otherwise, log searching becomes a pain.

What is included in hosting setup

  • Audit of current infrastructure and load profiling
  • Selection of target architecture (VPS, AWS, serverless, Kubernetes)
  • Setting up CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) with automatic deployment
  • IaC via Terraform or Pulumi (infrastructure as code)
  • Configuration of Nginx, SSL certificates, HTTP/2, brotli
  • Monitoring and alerting (Prometheus + Grafana, PagerDuty)
  • Documentation of runbooks and team training

Additionally, contact us if you need migration from current hosting or integration with external services.

Work process

  1. Audit of current infrastructure (2–5 days)
  2. Selection of target architecture with load and budget justification (1–3 days)
  3. Setting up CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) (2–5 days)
  4. IaC via Terraform or Pulumi (3–10 days)
  5. Setting up monitoring and alerting (2–5 days)
  6. Documentation of runbooks and team training (1–3 days)

Our experience — 7 years on the market, over 50 projects, guarantee of operability after deployment.

Timeline

  • Basic deployment on VPS with Docker + Nginx + CI/CD: 1–2 weeks.
  • Setting up AWS infrastructure with Auto Scaling, RDS, CDN: 3–6 weeks.
  • Migration to EKS from scratch: 6–12 weeks.
  • Setting up Vercel/Netlify for JAMstack: 3–5 days.

The cost is calculated individually depending on complexity and scope of work. Get a consultation — we'll evaluate your architecture in one day.